![]() |
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
But it would appear to consist mostly, if not entirely, of an allowance at a fixed rate - not expenses claimed as incurred. So to be fair to the Iron Lady, she doesn't need to prove she's done £500k of work. It's just a payment she's entitled to.
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
From Hugh's quote: Quote:
As a side note: Is there any reason why these expenses (reasonable or not) could not be met by the party involved? I'm quite willing to accept that an outgoing PM still has job-related expenses, but it would seem just that the party decides the level and duration. Let them pay what they feel appropriate given the standing of the person involved. Oh, and seeing the're expenses, and not an allowance: no tax is due (presumably) |
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
"They" don't - "some of them" do.....
If it is in line with the guidelines above, they should get paid - or do you think that, when you retire, and you are asked to do something on behalf of your previous employer, you should do it for free? |
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
The atttending occasional dinner or meeting is, IMHO, speculation.
As posted above, it is paid in respect of office and secretarial expenses incurred by former Prime Ministers in connection with their public duties. |
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Ahh the Iron Lady, she still really upsets people even after all this time.
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
When they have retired, then it is up to them if they do public speaking or not. They aren't obliged to do it, they choose to do it either for money, for the love of it, or for their ego. But either way, why should the tax payer foot the bill for someone who is no longer in office to talk to a group of people? We have to remember that they are no longer in office because the country didn't want them there. ---------- Post added at 13:13 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ---------- Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:16 ---------- Previous post was at 13:13 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Thatcher doesn't, because she can't, do public speaking, and hasn't since 2002 (hence the "some of them" qualifier).
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
This totally disgraceful, when you leave public office such as these politicians, it should not be up to the tax payer to keep paying them money.
They have earn't enough through us, that they should pay there own way, its like us, when we leave a job, its up to us to pay our own way. These politicians earn a get deal through 'after dinner speeches' and with that old lady, she probably speaks at old peoples homes on how to save money on the old age pension. |
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
Re: Margaret Thatcher claims £535,000 for ex-PM duties
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum