Originally Posted by telfordcable (Post 35193336)

just downgrade back to XL 30 meg now as I don't like 100 meg at all. speed is all over the place, 25, 42, 52, 61, 77, 83 and 96 meg and very poor upload speed with poor ping.

Much better now:

http://www.speedtest.net/result/1203327478.png

Originally Posted by telfordcable (Post 35193342)

I now realise myself that both L 10 Meg and XL 30 Meg is more solid and far better than rubbish XXL 50 Meg and 100 Meg (very poor indeed and not worth the money!) I shall not go ahead with 200 Meg in a few years time. I am now staying with XL 30 Meg forever! :)

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

---------- Post added at 18:18 ---------- Previous post was at 18:06 ----------

Virgin Media love me cos I am the ugly telfordcable ->
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/at...4&d=1300213540

Originally Posted by mikegreen (Post 35193369)

Originally Posted by telfordcable (Post 35193342)

I now realise myself that both L 10 Meg and XL 30 Meg is more solid and far better than rubbish XXL 50 Meg and 100 Meg (very poor indeed and not worth the money!) I shall not go ahead with 200 Meg in a few years time. I am now staying with XL 30 Meg forever! :)

http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedt...6860228414.png

---------- Post added at 18:18 ---------- Previous post was at 18:06 ----------

Originally Posted by Masque (Post 35193446)

Originally Posted by weesteev (Post 35193511)

If you are running wireless then that's an acceptable ping, if that is connected by Ethernet then I would be more concerned.

Edit - Wait a minute... you had 100Mb installed today and the downgraded on the same day ??? Is your fluctuating speed not more down to your wireless connection or the speedtest site?