![]() |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
If he had paid a complete stranger there would be less suspicion of collusion. It would't mean any collusion wasn't there just that it appears less likely. You stress that the committee were unable to prove things against him. I stress that he was unable to prove his complete innocence and as an MP I would have expected that he would have appreciated the need for scrupulous transparency and good business organisation. If he had got away with this there would be no change and indeed this sloppiness would continue. Now MPs have had another warning shot fired across their bows with the message that they need to get their affairs in order. I doubt if we will agree on this as I am fed up with sleaze in government particularly as MPs are paid 2 or 3 times the average national salary and many honest people exist on a lot less. I seriously question if we have any MPs with sufficient integrity to do what's best for the country but's that another story. |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Sorry? Again, this is Britain, the burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused!
Is there a legal or parlimental requirement to keep timesheets or evidence of work? No, there wasn't, and that's why he's not been punished for that. Should there be? Yes, it makes sense, but you can't make the introduction of such a requirement retroactive can you? |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Just before going to bed last night, I spent half an hour reading through the report from the Standards and Privileges Committee (http://www.publications.parliament.u.../280/28002.htm)
The main findings were: Quote:
He broke a rule, was found out, and was punished. OK, now can we move on? |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Arent all mp's thieving liars :)
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Stephen Pound MP has been banging on again about how well scrutinised our MP's are, well if that's true why is it that these issues have taken so long to surface?
He points out that it's tough being an MP (my heart bleeds) and the public can always vote them out if/when they do wrong. Given that could be up to 5 years distant, though, it's hardly the most immediate of sanctions is it? Furthermore for all those who vote on party lines, it's really no sanction since amongst other things the alternative of voting for another party would likely be unthinkable. |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
There are more important things going on in politics, so I think we should move on, but please don't try to play down what he did. Drawing comparisons between how the Labour party and the Tories handle unworthy MPs is to close to comparing rotten and rancid. |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Freezin, company execs waste millions each year, just look at NTL, and do you think they get punished with their massive bonuses and pensions?
No, in the real world of course they don't get punished. It doesn't appear he's actually broken any rules as there weren't any written, but the comittee disagreed with how he used the money, so are making him pay it back and suspended him for 10 days. Compare that with Hain, or those involved with other dodgy funding schemes of the government. |
Re: Another MP in trouble?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:39. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum