![]() |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
(Missed the Virgins tho..) Personally I pay for my software and services. The guys that produce this stuff need to eat too. This was for information only, with no intention to justify OR condemn. |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
Coincidences do happen, but sometimes things are not just down to fortunate timing. Perhaps I'm cynnical, but had nobody made such a song and dance about thie situation, I find it a little far fetched to think VM would be implementing any counter measures at this time. Regardless, it is happening, and that is the main thing. May it succeed!:) |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
To the credit of the director he got onto the people that needed to be contacted and he jumped all over them. Told them that this needed to be pushed through as a high priority, and hence we started to see some action taken. If the work VM are doing gets rid of all the cloned modems that are bought off Ebay or the guy down the pub then that's a small victory. The over-all end user benefits and a decrease in UBR saturation is what they are aiming for. I hope that they keep on top of what's started, and I do know that other processes are going to be implemented to cut down on these things happening again in the future. |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
This is a good cop-out for VM, did we not have cloners when we were on a perfect 10Meg, VM fouled up with the switch to 20Meg after a simplistic trial, the infrastructure in many parts of the country just cannot cope with the load at peak time, hell, the speed is all over the place at any time of day.
Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:09:48 GMT Test 1: 1024K took 9123 ms = 112.2 KB/sec, approx 925 Kbps, 0.9 Mbps Test 2: 1024K took 12820 ms = 79.9 KB/sec, approx 658 Kbps, 0.64 Mbps Test 3: 1024K took 10923 ms = 93.7 KB/sec, approx 772 Kbps, 0.75 Mbps Test 4: 2048K took 19890 ms = 103 KB/sec, approx 849 Kbps, 0.83 Mbps Overall Average Speed = approx 801 Kbps, 0.78 Mbps Thankfully all the cloners switch their modems off come midnight. :dunce: |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
Gordon Brown? |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
I had the worst experience from this! My MAC was blacklisted because of these counter-measures, VM finally admitted it and are sending out a new modem!
I hope this war is not about defeating the Cloners 'AT ALL COSTS'! |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
|
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
|
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
|
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
I would not complain too much had I been able to re-activate the modem by giving VM a call, but this is not the case! :( |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
Not wishing to detract from your version of events I think it's worthwhile pointing out that a full 24 hrs before the implementation of the current measures I, a certain television production company, a certain Channel 4 "social commentator", and two top flight legal firms were made aware in advance of the tests, the demographics and the duration. You can consider this unusual sharing of information at the behest of your mysterious "director" to be coincidence should you elect to do so - or, alternatively, you can seek confirmation from those moderators on the forum who are in a position to substantiate what I have said above. As for me, I'm just glad it happened and is happening but it was nothing short of a disgrace that it was allowed to go on for so long and, as Rob has pointed out, that VM still refuse to admit that the problem exists. Hooray! for more "chance encounters" of the kind you describe - especially if they bring about tangible results in the face of national exposure. |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
I thought that a previous Attack ON The Clones, Cable Modem Config file stopped this happening?
When I was working at VM, just about all the Cloning stopped dead! I suppose the Cloners found another way eh? If your Cable Modem is identified as a (possible) clone, it's Zapped and will "Run down the curtain and join the bleedin' Chior Invisible" hence you have to get a new one. I hope you asked for (and got some) compensation Lemta? Merry Christmas I used to work for Virgin Media but I'm Alright Nowoooo! |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
There is more to this than you claim. The trials happened a week after the chance meeting, not 24 hours later. To be honest I don't really care when it happened, as long as it improves the service to customers. I could go into more details, but I don't feel they would add to this discussion |
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
|
Re: Zapping the Cloners - how good is this?
Quote:
Hi again Saneboy, I'm not suggesting that there isn't more to this than I claim, quite the opposite actually, there's more to this than I'm prepared to divulge. With regards to the 24hrs claim let me elaborate. Myself and those professionals referenced above were advised / assured 24hrs in advance of the tests that they would be happening. I'm sure the bulk of people reading this will draw their own conclusions as to why VM may have thought it prudent to do so. Suffice to say that the prospect of an expose not confined to the normal platitudes and almost instantly forgettable moaning of say, "Angry from Surrey" on Watchdog was enough to provoke some action on their part. Like yourself I'm glad it happened and hope that more robust measures are rolled out in the very near future (what is the lifespan of broadcast media?). Many thanks for the PM and the insight from your perspective - I'll try to respond later. Cheers. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 00:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum