Re: Channel renumbering
 

No no no no no no no no no no no

NO RED BUTTON

It is what makes NTL better than sky

We do need renumbering and (shock) I think all platforms should adopt the sky numbering

Then we would not have this rubbish of channel such and such on sky, something else on ntl, different on telewest etc

Re: Channel renumbering
 

nah i like the idea of having Telwest and ntl: the same channel numbers....and sky's the way it is, cus sky's sucks and is only based on who pays the most money for a number...so for example all cable having one number....all satallite having another

Re: Channel renumbering
 

Whichever way we look at this subject, the fact still remains that at some point in time ntl: are going to have to bite the bullet and start the process of reorganising the channels, and realistically the longer the DTV people put off the job, then the worse it will get for them and the CS teams as more channels are added on the existing "mix and match" EPG numbering system.

Indeed, the last batch of channels added filled up gaps iin the already existing 400 series on both platforms, and with channel M going onto 26 in the manchester area it perpetutates the hotch potch numbering of channels.:td:

To add to the discussion here's my take on how a "joint" EPG lineup could work out:

• 0 - PPV Films/Events/Sports/VOD
• 1 - 99 Terrestrials and FTA channels
• 100 - 199 Entertainment/Lifestyle/Documentary channels
• 200 - 299 Music Channels
• 300 - 399 Sky Movies/Sports Channels/Eurosport etc.
• 400 - 499 News/Business channels
• 500 - 599 Shopping channels
• 600 - 699 International channels
• 700 - 799 Local/Community and "charity" channels
• 800 - 899 Radio Channels
• 900 - 930 Adult Channels
• 990 - 999 ntl information/promotional channels

:D I have a feeling though that what's above is a bit too big to do in one go, so it would be spaced out over a 12 to 18 month period to create less confusion as one section of the current EPG transfers to new numbers!