![]() |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
:erm:
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Quote:
hang on a minute , has electrolyte turned into scott here , the signature is the same :disturbd: :disturbd: :disturbd: |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Yes I have, Richard kindly changed it for me (got sick and tired of that nickname :) )
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
There is not alot of difference between the mx420 and the 440, the latter has a slightly faster core speed, and 128bit memory bus whilst the former has a 64bit bus (going back a fair bit in technolgy there) the 420 has 2.7GB/s of mem b/w compared to the 440 which has either 6.4 or 8 GB/s (depending on if its agp4x or 8x) High end cards these days are in the region of 30+GB/s
http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce4mx.html has all the specs on the 4mx, note no pixel or vertex shaders, as quite rightly said its a modern (aka cheap) geforce 2 gts. Solid performer really on older games, nothing fancy but will be 'eck of alot faster than the sis card. Technology comparison with the rest of the '4 series http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce4.html nfiniteFX (II) is there name for pixel and vertex shaders, ie dx8+ compatibility |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
OK I am really confused now, and I mean VERY confused (I hope bifta can help with this :( )
Just looking at the specs of the MX420, and accordingly the GPU runs at 250mhz, which mine does, but the memory of a MX420 is 166mhz, when mine is 333mhz? Is this a OEM card since it was from my mates Dell Dimension 8200 or is it mixed with a 440 and 420? Or would looking at the GPU find what it is? :erm: |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Quote:
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
But I thought MX's had SDR memory, not DDR :erm:
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Quote:
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Ahh right, do you know any good cooling products that would fit it so I could overclock it? :)
Thanks :D |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
The phrase "you can't polish a turd" springs to mind, but if you're really set on shortening it's life then
http://www.overclock.co.uk/customer/...=16752&cat=413 will cool the GPU, but the memory will probably also need cooling if you're going to overclock it http://www.overclock.co.uk/customer/...=17622&cat=413 Hardly worth it, you may as well put the money towards eventually buying a decent video card. |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Quote:
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Most 420s do have SDRAM but a few might have DDR.
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
From a couple of overclocker sites & forums.
280/366 (or 183, if it reports actual, rather than DDR clock) 275/365 So the overclock achievable is a little less than 10% on the RAM - not surprsing, since it's 6nS RAM which is right on it's 166 (333) clock rating - and no ramsinks, and about 10% on the core, passive heatsinked. Maybe there might be a little more in the tank, if heroically cooled, but I wouldn't expect much. Unless you're aiming for records for this particular card, I'd say take an easy overclock, and come inside of those figures, maybe 265 / 350, or don't bother - there isn't enough overclocking reserve to make much difference - unplayable frame rates would still be unplayable, and some of the tests show 0-2% gain from a 10% overclock, others show pretty well the full 10%. |
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
When doing a test a few days ago, I got it to 300/393.
|
Re: GeForce 4 MX440 showing as an MX 420?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum