Cable Forum - Is NAV 2004 Worth it?

Page 3 of 3

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Security & Virus Discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=38)

- - Is NAV 2004 Worth it? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=12993)

Russ	12-07-2004 00:02

Re: Is NAV 2004 Worth it?

Famous last words methinks.... :D

Paul K

12-07-2004 21:24

Re: Is NAV 2004 Worth it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ D

Famous last words methinks.... :D

Please don't toy with our emotions like that :p:
Some people will have no problems with NAV and then there is the rest of the planet ..... ;)

Ramrod

12-07-2004 21:28

Re: Is NAV 2004 Worth it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank

Tried NAV2004, bloody awful. Now using mcafee av 8.

Me too....

gooner4life

12-07-2004 21:29

Re: Is NAV 2004 Worth it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuartbe

Fair enough m8 :D

Have a look at the running tasks and see how much memmory it is munching !!!

My copy of e-trust is currently using 1.8mb of ram !

I concur Id never let a Norton product anywhere near my PC

gooner4life

12-07-2004 21:32

Re: Is NAV 2004 Worth it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electrolyte

I used to use NAV 2004, took forever to load up and used loads of disk activity up. Got my update CD from Microsoft, included a free 1 year trial of EZ Anti-Virus and EZ Fire Wall, installed the Anti-Virus and left the fire wall, unistalled NAV 2004 and got a huge performance increase :) . Even though EZ AV only uses about 2mb of my memory, it's fast as hell. Faster than NAV, and faster at scanning when requested. Updates are much smaller aswell, about 1.3mb for a virus definition update. So I wouldn't bother with NAV 2004 ;)

I also swear by EZ Antivirus

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:02.

Page 3 of 3

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page