![]() |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Somebody has switched them on again:Yikes: back to slow browsing
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.2.1 2 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms 10.23.48.1 3 14 ms <10 ms <10 ms oldh-t2cam1-a-ge910.inet.ntl.com [80.5.164.61] 4 302 ms 13 ms 14 ms mant-t2core-a-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [213.104.24 41] 5 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms man-bb-a-so-230-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.57] 6 14 ms 13 ms 14 ms man-bb-b-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.178] 7 28 ms 14 ms 27 ms win-bb-a-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.138] 8 14 ms 27 ms 14 ms win-dc-a-v900.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.162] 9 14 ms 28 ms 13 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30] |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
[16:33] * theng (~theng@spcx-roch1-6-0-custx.manc.broadband.ntl.com) has joined #nthellworld [16:34] <theng> look at the p9ings BBK in the thread I'll jump in for BBKing here and say this again as I did in previous page... Pings are not affected by caches That looks like a bit of activity on the line - note 1st hop and last hop are equal latency... I wouldn't mind pings like those to be honest: 1 1 ms <1 ms 1 ms gatelock-corporate.inside.net [192.168.253.1] 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms x-modem.inside.net [10.0.0.2] 3 17 ms 16 ms 17 ms 81-86-224-1.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.224.1] 4 16 ms 17 ms 15 ms sms10k2-2.cr1.uk5.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.45] 5 18 ms 23 ms 17 ms ge-1-2-0.cr1.gs1.systems.pipex.net [62.241.161.97] 6 28 ms 17 ms 17 ms tmp.xchangepoint.net [217.79.160.89] 7 17 ms 18 ms 17 ms bre-bb-a-so-310-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.105] 8 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms win-bb-b-so-600-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.198] 9 20 ms 18 ms 19 ms win-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.172.161] 10 19 ms 19 ms 17 ms win-dc-a-v902.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.222] 11 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms www.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.30] |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
I used Allnet Tools or Samspade always gave these results. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
The only traffic redirected to the proxies is traffic on port 80, TCP. (Some cases DNS as well but let's not complicate). Standard pings won't be affected, they don't go on port 80 and they don't use TCP. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quite right - it should theoretically be possible for a dodgy proxy to be detected if a lot of people in an area complain about access to a certain site, as you just examine which proxy would cache that site and take a good look at it. Sites subject to poor browsing are thus better to report than traceroutes, which, in th'eng's case, will make people jealous, as it goes to show that his UBR is extremely undersubscribed :)
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
:Yikes: OMG a undersubscibed UBR we cannot have this. Quick do something :PP: :LOL: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
The proxies seem more trouble that what they are worth.... I will start to report the websites I am trying to visit.. Thanks for replying BBKing and JustAnotherNoob, wonder why they never told us on tech support that its the websites they needed to check the proxies. One more question how will they know which proxy if we go through them all? Is there anything we can download that will tell us our proxy when pages fail to load so we will know which and can report it? Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
i can confirm that the baguley caches are working, if you have problems with the manc the baguley are ok.
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Yep...
I'm having great trouble accessing the website I'm working on for my job. www.hhonline.co.uk If i manually specifiy a manchester proxy, I can get to it. But when I dont specify one, I cant :( How can I find out which proxy is stopping me? |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Please don't do that, you end up with overload somewhere else. If people are going to find the addresses for Baguley they'll need to consult the list anyway and it's a lot better if people pick them kinda randomly (without any being suggested).
Anyone who has any kind of trouble even totally unrelated to proxies may read that post and pile onto Baguley and pretty soon Baguley is far from ok - it's a relatively small site for number of caches (4 of them) and a majority will pile onto cache1, then those in Baguley will start to play musical caches. The fact is the majority of caches are ok the majority of the time, even specifying one of the Manchester caches will improve service if only one of them is having strife. Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Even that advice comes from swansea to specify one that works. I realise its going to change the load calcuations but all i want is a working service |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Why not specify a local one first? It's closer/faster and doesn't overload someone else's area (just adds extra content on the one you specify and slows it down, but still).
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Would it not be better to find out why this happens in the North West only, are there any other parts of the NW east region infrastructure that cause this. Is it because the majority of people are STB as opposed to SACM. Please take the above as suggestions for improvement of the service not criticism of the service, it was right before the proxies have been introduced. To add to the above my lads pings have gone through the roof on gaming since introduction i know not related but are you sure it can not be an effect of the introduction |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Steve, is it any specifics sites, I don't seem to have any problems at all.
BTW, AllNettools is now detecting my proxy once more. seem to be going through cache 10 according to them, yet when I use the link in Pem's post it still comes up as cache 9. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Autotrader Ebay Nthellworld.co.uk Ntlworld.com Numion.com Any other that is used without specifying at proxy |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also last time you posted a trace your pings looked fine to me, and I've checked your UBR and as usual it's top-notch. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
BBK,
1. when using non specified proxy browsing slow, page does not refresh or load properley 2. When specifying Man proxy browsing slow page does not refresh or load properley. 3. When specifying othe non manc such as baguley or winnerish browsing is better. but have to keep changing proxy when it gets slow. 4. When proxies not working browsing good page does refresh and load properley List of sites available in previous posts |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Thanks for that Steve.
When specifying one of the Manchester proxies, do you go right through the card from 1 to 10 and try all those sites on all of them? If certain of them are playing up that would spot it. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
I have not had to specify a proxy since they came back on. IP/DNS both set to "automatically obtain" PS, AllNettools is now reporting "No proxy" again, very unreliable ATM. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Things have been bad here in Stockport for over a week with Saturday being particularly bad. Sunday was even worse, I gave up Sunday evening.
This evening I have spent almost 3 hours trying the access the web. With no settings in IE no web access at all. Try a random MAN cache I might connect for about 2 minutes then no connection. I have even tried 2 INKTOMI proxies suggested on Saturday evening without any joy. Last evening I even lost lost the default gateway twice. This evening I've had to reboot the STB twice to get any connection (renew didn't work), been through at least 12 proxies and ended up on a Middlesbrough which seems to be working OK, touch wood. I thought things had been going well for too long for it to last :mad: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I think you will find that a lot of people are doing the proxy dance going round the country trying to find a working proxy or two.
Please report your problems to NTL at local and swansea level. If enough people report it we might get something done |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Hi
I too have been troubled since the proxy servers were turned back on. During peak times they are very sluggish for me, and to be honest not that great during off peak times :( As a user of yahoo messenger and chat I have noticed that when trying to profile another user the page fails to display when being transparently cached. I decided to investigate this further, and found that by explicitly specifying my browser to use each of the manchester proxy servers using port 8080, I could then access profiles on everyone EXCEPT cache3-mant.server.ntli.net It's therefore safe to assume that when being transparently cached, ntl are directing me through cache3 and hence why I'm not able to bring up the profiles page. I've also had some of the problems other people have been having with other sites (ebay and nthellworld) loading very slowly, or in the case of ebay, timing out. Could cache3 be the problem there also ? I've not had the time to test as yet. Regards |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
yep ive been having probs with sites aswell. quite a few 400 bad request errors and im having real problems getting on www.ebay.co.uk could someone else try ebay for us??
Cheer |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
:cry: just missed out on a couple of DVD's i was after :cry:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Edit. do you get the same cache as me when viewing this site, 62.252.192.12 cache 9 ? |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
1 Attachment(s)
yep my proxy comin to this site is 62.252.192.12 i have tried a number of browsers as well and firfox shows something intersting:: look at the bottom left
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
bizarr it seems to work in IE now but not in fire fox, it didnt work in IE a bit a go. Somthin fishy's goin on lol
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
It's a proxy problem, changing browsers won't help because you're still routed the same way regardless of browser. Regards |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Regards |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Was just about to see if anyone was having problems getting on ebay
Who do we complain to? anyone at ntl now? Why did they mess with something that was working perfectly Assholes :mad: Its cache10 62.252.193.13 thats a bag of crap. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
ebay doesnt work for me in firefox or IE |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Regards |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I think we should all jump on one proxy server and slow some other areas right down until they turn off the machester proxies. They'll have to listen if we start causing them problems
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Definatly Manchester cache10, just changed to leeds inktomi1-lee.server.ntl.com and ebay is fine
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I think we need to call the North West the proxy dance area.
Keeps us busy at least we can change our proxies, think of all the poor customers that can not. That have not found this site and are having to re config their computers with the help of TS |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
lol dammit I need some fellow leics users so we can get our proxies turned of again.
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
You would be the first to complain of it was done to the proxy you are on ! |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
ntl should be investigating even if 1 user proves the fault is not at their end.
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
As if the frustration level is not high enough here in Gt Manchester I now keep losing the default gateway connection.
NTL Stop putting on more users and provide the service existing user pay for, that's 24/7 connectivity not something that stops working after about 6pm :afire: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Odd you say that... My monitoring software alerted me to the default gateway going down 3 times today !!!
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Just phoned tech support as I was unable to surf the web. MiRC and MSN was still working just all HTTP traffic had stopped. The message said an " error had occured while connecting to my HTTP proxy with the proxy ip number.
After talking to Keith :tu: for the help when I was stuck. He managed to get Martyn (Scott from Chetnet) to help.. When I got back online I went to nettools and it says no proxy found.... Please if they have been turned off leave them off find another use for them... Thanks to Martyn and Keith :) EDITED to add On nettools it says no proxy detected yet on UK broadband-help it detects a proxy on I have never been on before so looks like I have been jumped to another proxy... :Yikes: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
in the other half of the NW they look ok at the moment not as fast as our normal none proxied but reasonable. Wonder if they have swapped the manc ones for baguleys :D
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I'm still going through cache 9 to here and , (when it manages to spot it) through cache 10 to allnettools. still finding no real delays,
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
with this change of proxy I am going through Oldham still.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Please read my posts on proxy servers and TCP/ICMP. ;) Tracerts have no connection at all to what proxy server you may or may not be using - and you don't just use one proxy server - you use a group. :)
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
ON the last one I was on cache1 and no matter where I went if I traced to that website it was cache 1 that was there. I am on cache 4 now I am also getting cache for for ISPr where I was always cache1.
I just wishe they would switch the bu****rs off. I was also told that they had no knowledge of problems in my area..... They had been watching a while back but it was supposed to be resolved so who isn't letting them know..... |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
:banghead:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Just sometimes you have to sit back and let it happen. Have a :beer: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Unable to access ebay on my proxies yet other websites work. Also ebay is working on other networks asked some who are in the ISPr chatroom those not on NTL could access ebay.
This is getting daily now either sort them to perfection or kill them.. this is what its like using these proxies :banghead: they are up and down quicker than a yoyo :mad: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I did sometime back post a link of lots of alternative Non NTL proxys wont they do until NTL sort themselfs out?
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I'm gonna complain tommorow morning
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
(eng struggling avec french keyboard) |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Couldn't be bothered the next day, dont have enough spare time to listen the bull they'd give me for a excuse
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
We have people on this site that are honest and work for NTL |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Serves me right for saying I have had no problems,:)
Connection was fine before 11.00, now I have had to use my Zen dial up to gain access. Don't think it is proxy related, cannot get any net access or e-mails either, can't see anything on the server status page at ntlworld.com:confused: Edit can tracert so connection must be OK at this end. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
You are invited to join the NW proxy formation dance team:D
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
The STB event log reports 173 CM Periodic rangeing fail. at the time of fault. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I'm in the Manchester area and on their pathetic attempts at providing a proxy service - this morning I could do all the usual collect mail, talk over yahoo etc, but come to surfing the net - 10 mins to load google.co.uk on a 1meg connection? not on! - I couldn't even surf the net to find Robin Walkers page to switch proxies - I ended up calling the faults centre in Wales, after dialing every number possible at NTL only to discover they are all closed - marvellous idea that is! - My connection is now kind of working, but I would'nt say I was getting the speeds I got while the proxies were switched off - I have to use the proxy given to me on the phone for a week then call back after trying the Manchester ones again, if they are not working next week, its bye bye NTL.
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Well NTL have now lost my business. BT will be getting a call in the morning and I'll go to ADSL. Just lost a bargain on Ebay due to the god awful response times on the NTL Proxies. Half the time I can't even get ebay to load. What ********. I emailed Broadband support last week about the issue and got some unrelated bull**** response about bandwidth from them. ENOUGH'S ENOUGH.
Bye Bye NTL.. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
To add to the above comments to NTL staff on this board your proxies are playing up again
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Langley SACM- 0845 650 0121 Bromley SACM- 0845 650 0925 STB- 0845 650 0125 Customer services- weekdays 8-8pm and saturdays 9am- 6pm (i think!) 151 from an ntl phone, or 0800 052 2000 hope that helps. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Just remember my number is not tech support. You must report to Faults not me ?. It will not be fixed if you dont report it. There is no point winging on here if you dont report it to tech support. How many times must i say this is not monitored by tech support. :rolleyes: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
None of the techs and ntl can sort this out, but we log each call, and it is report to the fault management team, so i am sure they will recognise the problem, and will do something about it when they want to (and no i don't know anything about when that will be). The most tech support can do about it at the moment is give you proxies outside the area to specify, and that is the same advice that i will give on this site. It is not a solution, but merely a work around i know, but at the moment it is the best that i can do for you. Sorry if this is not enough, but technical support do not deal with network management, we are doing our best for you given the circumstances, and believe me we don't particularly enjoy the situation either, but I am doing my best with that i have to work with! |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Surely this has being going on long enough for people top realise that ntl appear to be doing little or nothing about it.
I would suggest you contact Alan Grant, he is the MD for that region. He is a top guy, very hands on, & is very customer focused. :tu: Info here: http://www.ntli.info/index.php?page=index_v2&id=19&c=18 |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Right-listen up people....
I happen to know that almost no one has reported this issue to ntl. :rolleyes: I have spoken to someone who has seen the reported issues, & hardly anyone has phoned up about this proxy issue. I would suggest you get your ar$e$ in gear, & get on the phone to ntl & report this issue. Make a note of the person you speak to's name & number, then follow it up. If you don't report it, they won't fix it-guaranteed. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
if you spent more time reporting the problems, and less time complain about it, then it might be resolved. I can't stand people who complain about things, and don't even help themselves!! :rolleyes: :mad: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
:Yikes: 20 pages of bitching, and no-one's reported it???? :rolleyes: FFS.... |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
As other people have said, users should not assume another user has reported a problem, and even if another user has, report it anyway as if two people report a problem, NTL are more likely to deal with it (I think the reasoning goes that if one user reports a problem, it is probably their PC, if two or more report a problem it is probably something on the network). |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Well said Neil.. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
Swansea said they can not do anything about it specify another proxy:mad: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
To Who ? |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
:erm: :rolleyes: |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
There usually closed when its not working and the next day everything fine again and i've lost my temper so never ring up
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
you have to tell them how else will they know something is wrong.Network monitoring (no silly idea):D
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum