Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710520)

TheDaddy 10-11-2021 22:55

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36100747)
It’s a failure that being a member of Parliament is not considered worthy enough of being a full time job.

Let’s face it the quality of MPs is extremely variable. If Angela Rayner qualifies, then anyone qualifies.

I don’t think it is unreasonable to set a minimum criteria for what is required for a person to stand as an MP, and have prospective candidates assessed before an independent panel before they are allowed to stand for election.

That's the thing that always makes me laugh, "we need to be paid more to attract the best people", that must mean we're making do with less than the best now then and don't it show

Sephiroth 10-11-2021 23:00

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Pierre, human psychology defeats the ideals that you have put forward.

Those who want to be MPs, whether Labour or Conservative or any other party for that matter, are interested in their slice of power and their effect on society and the country. But many are also highly qualified and naturally want to tap in to their non-political skills.

If there are to be rules, then, I suggest, they can only be tied to their parliamentary performance. For example, if an MP is not present in the chamber on 3 sitting days per week (unless absent on parliamentary business) then their constituency will have the opportunity for a recall petition each anniversary of election. Something like that.

jfman 10-11-2021 23:05

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36100747)
I don’t think it is unreasonable to set a minimum criteria for what is required for a person to stand as an MP, and have prospective candidates assessed before an independent panel before they are allowed to stand for election.

Yes I agree. If I’m certain of anything decision making by the average Brit isn’t worthy of representation at the ballot box.

Russ 11-11-2021 04:45

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36100748)
That's the thing that always makes me laugh, "we need to be paid more to attract the best people", that must mean we're making do with less than the best now then and don't it show

Thank God we don’t need the best nurses eh?

Maggy 11-11-2021 07:59

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36100721)
I think that's his point no? That people shouldn't need a second job and that some people do is a failure of our economy.

:tu:

Damien 11-11-2021 08:45

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36100746)
Oooh. That simplification cannot be right. I've done it in the past to save up for a far-away holiday. Nothing to do with the economy.

The implication of what you've said is that the economy needs to be level so that nobody needs two jobs. That's impossible owing to human nature.

This would go off topic but whilst it is a bit simplistic it's not totally unreachable. We as a society continue to produce more and more wealth so having people who work full time (a couple of part-time jobs I accept isn't the same) should have enough to have a decent standard of living.

Part of the problem is not just low-paying, insecure, work but the cost of housing as well though which is growing faster than average wage growth causing more and more of someone's income to taken up by it year on year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36100747)
I don’t think it is unreasonable to set a minimum criteria for what is required for a person to stand as an MP, and have prospective candidates assessed before an independent panel before they are allowed to stand for election.

You can't have an unelected, 'independent' panel, sanction who can stand for Parliament. It would completely subvert our democracy.

Although the nature of Parliament means it would in the end be accountable to Parliament the fact the panel gets to select who can stand for it would give huge power to that panel.

tweetiepooh 11-11-2021 11:02

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36100764)

You can't have an unelected, 'independent' panel, sanction who can stand for Parliament. It would completely subvert our democracy.

Although the nature of Parliament means it would in the end be accountable to Parliament the fact the panel gets to select who can stand for it would give huge power to that panel.


Absolutely, the nice thing in the UK is that nearly anyone can stand and nearly anyone could win.


Voters need to pay better attention to those standing and not just vote on party lines (or tactically). If each constituency sent a "good" MP maybe the overall standard would go up.

Hugh 11-11-2021 11:42

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36100768)
Absolutely, the nice thing in the UK is that nearly anyone can stand and nearly anyone could win.


Voters need to pay better attention to those standing and not just vote on party lines (or tactically). If each constituency sent a "good" MP maybe the overall standard would go up.

Unfortunately, not true (for the Major parties).

First you have to get selected to get on the (Party) Candidates List, then you have to be short-listed (and approved by Central Office and the Constituency), then you have to be selected by the Constituency, then, and only then, do the voters get a choice.

TheDaddy 11-11-2021 11:57

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36100758)
Thank God we don’t need the best nurses eh?

Seems like we don't need the best of anything, except MPs

In other news a former tory advisor who is married to a sitting Conservative MP is is going to help choose the next chairman of ofcom and bozo has the brass neck to go on live TV and announce to the world that we are not a corrupt country, well the country might not be but the government certainly is

Pierre 11-11-2021 12:02

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36100764)
You can't have an unelected, 'independent' panel, sanction who can stand for Parliament. It would completely subvert our democracy.

Doesn't seem to worry the second chamber?

Quote:

Although the nature of Parliament means it would in the end be accountable to Parliament the fact the panel gets to select who can stand for it would give huge power to that panel.
OK, in absence of a "panel" a set of basic rules.

i.e.

Minimum Age.
Must have worked for at least 10 years in a non-governmental role.
Must either live or have lived in the constituency they represent of a minimum period.
Definitely no second jobs.

just anything to improve the status quo.

---------- Post added at 12:02 ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36100768)
Absolutely, the nice thing in the UK is that nearly anyone can stand

Yes
Quote:

and nearly anyone could win.
not so much.

daveeb 11-11-2021 13:36

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36100773)
Seems like we don't need the best of anything, except MPs

In other news a former tory advisor who is married to a sitting Conservative MP is is going to help choose the next chairman of ofcom and bozo has the brass neck to go on live TV and announce to the world that we are not a corrupt country, well the country might not be but the government certainly is

I thought exactly the same, they're attempting to rig absolutely everything and they move at such a speed there isn't any opportunity for proper scrutiny or accountability.

Russ 11-11-2021 13:46

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
The MP for my mother’s area is Stephen Kinnock and this morning I had to drop off some documents from her to his office.

He wasnt there obviously so I handed them over to one of his assistants. I mentioned all this business about MPs having second/third jobs especially from companies that could benefit directly from that MP’s involvement, she just shrugged her shoulders and said “that’s politics for you”.

I’m not suggesting for one moment that Kinnock has an extra income or is up to anything improper but the impression I had from the assistant is that it’s virtually expected for MPs to be on the take.

1andrew1 11-11-2021 13:49

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36100780)
The MP for my mother’s area is Stephen Kinnock and this morning I had to drop off some documents from her to his office.

He wasnt there obviously so I handed them over to one of his assistants. I mentioned all this business about MPs having second/third jobs especially from companies that could benefit directly from that MP’s involvement, she just shrugged her shoulders and said “that’s politics for you”.

I’m not suggesting for one moment that Kinnock has an extra income or is up to anything improper but the impression I had from the assistant is that it’s virtually expected for MPs to be on the take.

I think I read it's something like 1 in 4 Conservative MPs have a second job and just a handful amongst the other parties. So not a majority of MPs by any stretch of the imagination nor even a majority of Conservative MPs either.

papa smurf 11-11-2021 13:58

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36100781)
I think I read it's something like 1 in 4 Conservative MPs have a second job and just a handful amongst the other parties. So not a majority of MPs by any stretch of the imagination nor even a majority of Conservative MPs either.

Maybe they aren't educated to a high enough standard to offer them a second high earning job, take Angela Rayner what could she do, toilet cleaner:shrug:

jfman 11-11-2021 14:42

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36100775)
Doesn't seem to worry the second chamber?



OK, in absence of a "panel" a set of basic rules.

i.e.

Minimum Age.
Must have worked for at least 10 years in a non-governmental role.
Must either live or have lived in the constituency they represent of a minimum period.
Definitely no second jobs.

just anything to improve the status quo.

---------- Post added at 12:02 ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 ----------

Yes not so much.

Maximum age to get rid of the career politicians.

Chris 11-11-2021 14:49

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36100781)
I think I read it's something like 1 in 4 Conservative MPs have a second job and just a handful amongst the other parties. So not a majority of MPs by any stretch of the imagination nor even a majority of Conservative MPs either.

Most likely because in general, Tory MPs are likely to have had private sector careers before entering the Commons whereas Labourites are more likely to have worked for a trade union or a role connected with the political process in some way. Consultancy type jobs are easier to keep going part time. Certain professional qualifications require continuing practice for the professional accreditation to continue.

papa smurf 11-11-2021 14:52

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36100783)
Maximum age to get rid of the career politicians.

What age do you send them to the scrap heap?

jfman 11-11-2021 14:55

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36100787)
What age do you send them to the scrap heap?

50. Same as the Department for Work and Pensions.

TheDaddy 11-11-2021 14:57

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36100787)
What age do you send them to the scrap heap?

You mean the house of Lords

I think something needs doing about that to, there's now 800 unelected lords making decisions on our behalf, all with their hand out, thought we voted against this sort of thing

1andrew1 11-11-2021 15:08

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36100786)
Most likely because in general, Tory MPs are likely to have had private sector careers before entering the Commons whereas Labourites are more likely to have worked for a trade union or a role connected with the political process in some way. Consultancy type jobs are easier to keep going part time. Certain professional qualifications require continuing practice for the professional accreditation to continue.

I actually found it an encouraging statistic. I don't think MPs should have a second job but happy for them to do CPD or if necessary, pro bono work, to retain their qualifications and institutional memberships.

papa smurf 11-11-2021 15:19

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36100789)
You mean the house of Lords

I think something needs doing about that to, there's now 800 unelected lords making decisions on our behalf, all with their hand out, thought we voted against this sort of thing

It costs £3,000,000 to get in , I'd have my hand out if i coughed up all that money to get in.

Chris 11-11-2021 15:40

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36100790)
I actually found it an encouraging statistic. I don't think MPs should have a second job but happy for them to do CPD or if necessary, pro bono work, to retain their qualifications and institutional memberships.

Yes, it is a slippery slope, and a very tempting one. I spent a while as a consultant (not simultaneously as an MP mind you!) and the way pay is calculated as a day rate in which it is assumed you are your own employer and will be paying all your NI, sick pay, holiday pay, pension etc out of it makes it an extremely attractive way to work that few people in their right minds would give up easily or willingly. I didn’t; the financial crash of 2008 pulled the rug right out from under me. You can see why someone who possibly expects to serve only a couple of terms in Parliament (as many do) would want to keep their hand in, even if there isn’t a professional accreditation to maintain, but you can also see how that sort of money can prompt questions about conflicts of interest.

The idea about doing pro bono or CPD only is an intriguing one, but doesn’t entirely eliminate the whiff of corruption if that work gives a third party unfair access to or influence over government.

Damien 11-11-2021 17:26

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 36100780)
The MP for my mother’s area is Stephen Kinnock and this morning I had to drop off some documents from her to his office.

He wasnt there obviously so I handed them over to one of his assistants. I mentioned all this business about MPs having second/third jobs especially from companies that could benefit directly from that MP’s involvement, she just shrugged her shoulders and said “that’s politics for you”.

I’m not suggesting for one moment that Kinnock has an extra income or is up to anything improper but the impression I had from the assistant is that it’s virtually expected for MPs to be on the take.

Here are Kinnock's other sources of income as of 1st November: https://publications.parliament.uk/p...ck_stephen.htm

Quote:

Kinnock, Stephen (Aberavon)

2. (b) Any other support not included in Category 2(a)

Name of donor: Community Union
Address of donor: 465c Caledonian Road, London N7 9GX
Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: £7,000
Date received: 19 May 2021
Date accepted: 19 May 2021
Donor status: trade union
(Registered 21 May 2021)

5. Gifts and benefits from sources outside the UK

Name of donor: The Danish Football Association
Address of donor: Brøndbyvester, Denmark
Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: Ticket to Euro 2020 semi-final, transport to Wembley, pre-match dinner; approx. value £600
Date received: 7 July 2021
Date accepted: 7 July 2021
Donor status: company
(Registered 30 July 2021)

6. Land and property portfolio: (i) value over £100,000 and/or (ii) giving rental income of over £10,000 a year

From 15 June 2016, a house in Neath Port Talbot: (i). (Registered 27 January 2017)

8. Miscellaneous

From 16 September 2021, Trustee of the Big Tent Foundation, a not-for-profit non-party foundation for the renewal of mainstream political engagement. (Registered 01 October 2021)

Paul 11-11-2021 17:38

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
The Danish Football Association ? How weird.

Sephiroth 11-11-2021 17:41

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36100805)
The Danish Football Association ? How weird.

The tickets may have been for his dad - who is weird.

Chris 11-11-2021 17:54

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36100805)
The Danish Football Association ? How weird.

Kinnock Jr. is married to the former prime minister of Denmark.

Sephiroth 11-11-2021 18:01

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36100807)
Kinnock Jr. is married to the former prime minister of Denmark.

So not a million miles away!

OLD BOY 11-11-2021 18:52

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36100786)
Most likely because in general, Tory MPs are likely to have had private sector careers before entering the Commons whereas Labourites are more likely to have worked for a trade union or a role connected with the political process in some way. Consultancy type jobs are easier to keep going part time. Certain professional qualifications require continuing practice for the professional accreditation to continue.

Or to put it another way, Conservative politicians tend to be more employable.

It’s just the way it is! :scratch:

---------- Post added at 18:52 ---------- Previous post was at 18:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36100764)
This would go off topic but whilst it is a bit simplistic it's not totally unreachable.

.

I wouldn’t worry too much about that, Damien - this thread went off topic a way back now!

Hugh 11-11-2021 19:41

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100816)
Or to put it another way, Conservative politicians tend to be more employable.

It’s just the way it is! :scratch:

---------- Post added at 18:52 ---------- Previous post was at 18:46 ----------



I wouldn’t worry too much about that, Damien - this thread went off topic a way back now!

Usually by family/old school/ University chums, or family of old school/University chums…

From Wiki about Johnson
Quote:

In late 1987, through family connections, he began work as a graduate trainee at The Times.[81] Scandal erupted when Johnson wrote an article on the archaeological discovery of King Edward II's palace for the newspaper, having invented a quote for the article which he falsely attributed to the historian Colin Lucas, his godfather. After the editor Charles Wilson learnt of the matter, he dismissed Johnson.[82]

Johnson secured employment on the leader-writing desk of The Daily Telegraph, having met its editor, Max Hastings, during his Oxford University Union presidency.
And as for the person whom the thread’s about (before you moan about "off topic" again).

Quote:

He joined his family business, British Leather Company, in 1979, becoming Sales Director in 1983 and managing director from 1993 to 1999.
Joins the company at 23, Sales Director by 27 - no nepotism there, I’m sure…

;)

Maggy 11-11-2021 22:37

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
If we are going off topic I've been wondering where Boris was today because he didn't seem to appear at any Remembrance service.

Also I suspect that we are going to hear far more about other MPs poor choices around jobs and finances for some time to come.

Paul 11-11-2021 22:37

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36100807)
Kinnock Jr. is married to the former prime minister of Denmark.

Oh, right, so an actual connection then. Makes more sense now. :tu:

Hugh 11-11-2021 23:01

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36100832)
If we are going off topic I've been wondering where Boris was today because he didn't seem to appear at any Remembrance service.

Also I suspect that we are going to hear far more about other MPs poor choices around jobs and finances for some time to come.

Looks like he was at Downing Street, according the 10 Downing Street Twitter account.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1636671560

The Cenotaph is a two minute walk from Downing Street.

Sephiroth 11-11-2021 23:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Boris doesn't care about anything other than himself.

Maggy 12-11-2021 00:03

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36100834)
Looks like he was at Downing Street, according the 10 Downing Street Twitter account.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1636671560

The Cenotaph is a two minute walk from Downing Street.


I checked his Twitter account but never saw that entry.Perhaps I wasn’t the only one asking the question

OLD BOY 12-11-2021 00:04

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36100835)
Boris doesn't care about :confused:anything other than himself.

H’mm. Still anti-Boris nonsense and still off-topic. And where are the mods?

I still want to know what CF members have got against giving MPs facing disciplinary action a right of appeal, as in just about any other walk of life.

I guess dredging up all this irrelevant stuff really does show this dramatic outrage for what it is - nothing but bumfluff.

Interestingly, MPs on both sides have been muttering about the inadequacies of the present system for some time, and now the Opposition is happily discussing with the government ways of dealing with this problem, including the right of appeal!

Still, they’ve claimed a Tory scalp and made the government squirm, so who cares, eh? :rolleyes:

That’s politics for you!

Sephiroth 12-11-2021 00:34

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100837)
H’mm. Still anti-Boris nonsense and still off-topic. And where are the mods?

I still want to know what CF members have got against giving MPs facing disciplinary action a right of appeal, as in just about any other walk of life.

I guess dredging up all this irrelevant stuff really does show this dramatic outrage for what it is - nothing but bumfluff.

Interestingly, MPs on both sides have been muttering about the inadequacies of the present system for some time, and now the Opposition is happily discussing with the government ways of dealing with this problem, including the right of appeal!

Still, they’ve claimed a Tory scalp and made the government squirm, so who cares, eh? :rolleyes:

That’s politics for you!

OB, when you put it like that, then sure - a good idea to have a fair disciplinary system.

But if you want to keep a Tory government, and if you don't want it tainted by sleaze accusations, you don't go and score an own goal like they did last week.


Paul 12-11-2021 02:42

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100837)
And where are the mods?

Watching people make fools of themselves :)

Pierre 12-11-2021 06:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36100834)
Looks like he was at Downing Street, according the 10 Downing Street Twitter account.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1636671560

The Cenotaph is a two minute walk from Downing Street.

He’ll be there on Sunday - don’t panic

Russ 12-11-2021 07:15

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100816)
Or to put it another way, Conservative politicians tend to be more corruptible.

It’s just the way it is! :scratch:

Fixed that for you.

OLD BOY 12-11-2021 07:44

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36100836)
I checked his Twitter account but never saw that entry.Perhaps I wasn’t the only one asking the question

Perhaps he figured that if he turned up on this occasion, all the media attention would be on him instead of the fallen.

jfman 12-11-2021 08:21

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100837)
H’mm. Still anti-Boris nonsense and still off-topic. And where are the mods?

The absolute state of this.

A thread about corruption in the Conservative Party and OB is appealing to the mods that the party leader and Prime Minister are off topic.

---------- Post added at 08:21 ---------- Previous post was at 08:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100844)
Perhaps he figured that if he turned up on this occasion, all the media attention would be on him instead of the fallen.

Presumably off topic?

Sephiroth 12-11-2021 08:55

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36100848)
The absolute state of this.

A thread about corruption in the Conservative Party and OB is appealing to the mods that the party leader and Prime Minister are off topic.

---------- Post added at 08:21 ---------- Previous post was at 08:20 ----------



Presumably off topic?

Don't I hate it when a fellow Conservative, and from Wokingham at that, gets got by the man from Scotland!

Chris 12-11-2021 09:40

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100837)
H’mm. Still anti-Boris nonsense and still off-topic. And where are the mods?

Not in Wokingham. ;)

If we think the thread is off topic we will step in. In the meantime perhaps reflect on how the Paterson affair might quite legitimately lead to a broader discussion of Johnson’s judgment skills.

Hugh 12-11-2021 09:52

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100837)
H’mm. Still anti-Boris nonsense and still off-topic. And where are the mods?

I still want to know what CF members have got against giving MPs facing disciplinary action a right of appeal, as in just about any other walk of life.

I guess dredging up all this irrelevant stuff really does show this dramatic outrage for what it is - nothing but bumfluff.

Interestingly, MPs on both sides have been muttering about the inadequacies of the present system for some time, and now the Opposition is happily discussing with the government ways of dealing with this problem, including the right of appeal!

Still, they’ve claimed a Tory scalp and made the government squirm, so who cares, eh? :rolleyes:

That’s politics for you!

Interestingly, this has never been mentioned before they tried to put together a Conservative controlled Committee, just before another Standards investigation into Johnson’s conduct may be launched…

Probably pure coincidence (and if you believe that, ‘I’ve got a bridge you might be interested in buying…).

But seriously, can you provide any links showing there were these "mutterings" before the Patterson farrago took off?

Maggy 12-11-2021 09:58

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36100860)
Not in Wokingham. ;)

If we think the thread is off topic we will step in. In the meantime perhaps reflect on how the Paterson affair might quite legitimately lead to a broader discussion of Johnson’s judgment skills.

:tu:

1andrew1 12-11-2021 18:07

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36100837)
H’mm. Still anti-Boris nonsense and still off-topic.

I'm starting to wonder if Starmer is paying you to defend lame duck Johnson, so that he limps on for as long as possible and increases Labour's chances of being elected. :confused:

TheDaddy 12-11-2021 19:47

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36100932)
I'm starting to wonder if Starmer is paying you to defend lame duck Johnson, so that he limps on for as long as possible and increases Labour's chances of being elected. :confused:

Why would Keir pay him, no one listens to him and that'll be Sir Starmer who Jezza blocked from taking a second job

Heard Geoff Cox is being investigated in a Neil Hamilton type probe, interesting times

pip08456 12-11-2021 20:32

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36100836)
I checked his Twitter account but never saw that entry.Perhaps I wasn’t the only one asking the question

He also went to his constuency to lay a wreath.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1636749080

Hugh 12-11-2021 20:36

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
It was on his FB page today as well - one assumes it took place today.

Mad Max 12-11-2021 20:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36100932)
I'm starting to wonder if Starmer is paying you to defend lame duck Johnson, so that he limps on for as long as possible and increases Labour's chances of being elected. :confused:

Dream on , Andrew....:D:D:D

Sephiroth 12-11-2021 20:57

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36100951)
It was on his FB page today as well - one assumes it took place today.

You can sure that the absence of specifics (such as 11-Nov) and nothing on his Twitter account makes it a dead cert that it was today and he is covering up for his selfishness.

Someone please prove me wrong.

P.S: Friday is often the day MPs spend in their constituency.

https://polandin.com/56895897/britis...olish-veterans

Hugh 12-11-2021 22:32

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
1 Attachment(s)
Obviously having some effect on the polls…

https://www.britainelects.com/the-latest-polls/

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1636756304

Paul 13-11-2021 00:23

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36100954)
You can sure that the absence of specifics (such as 11-Nov) and nothing on his Twitter account makes it a dead cert that it was today and he is covering up for his selfishness.

You're starting to sound like a broken record.
... and why are you always posting in blue :confused:

TheDaddy 13-11-2021 06:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Remember when Marcus Rashford had the temerity to try and help hungry children and that classless piece of crap told him to stick to the day job, well guess who didn't heed her own advice, that's right, Natalie hypocrite Elphick

1andrew1 13-11-2021 08:07

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36100971)
Remember when Marcus Rashford had the temerity to try and help hungry children and that classless piece of crap told him to stick to the day job, well guess who didn't heed her own advice, that's right, Natalie hypocrite Elphick

Yes, she needs to stick to her main job and give up her side hustle of being an MP.

nomadking 13-11-2021 10:23

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36100790)
I actually found it an encouraging statistic. I don't think MPs should have a second job but happy for them to do CPD or if necessary, pro bono work, to retain their qualifications and institutional memberships.

So what's the actual difference?:rolleyes: The main complaint is that they shouldn't have the time to do other things, paid or UNPAID. Just because something is unpaid, doesn't mean they haven't gained from it(eg getting selecting as an MP in the first place).

So nobody had a problem with Labour's "cash for ANSWERS", with 6 or 7 figure sums handed over to buy laws and polices, and that's before you include Trade Union donations. How many prosecutions were there over the £650,000+ of ILLEGAL 3rd party donations? Take a wild guess. The list goes on and on.

Sephiroth 13-11-2021 13:49

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
I can post in blue if I want to. It’s distinctive.

Hugh 13-11-2021 13:59

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36100963)
You're starting to sound like a broken record.
... and why are you always posting in blue :confused:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36101001)
I can post in blue if I want to. It’s distinctive.

https://media.giphy.com/media/giQyIr...nHKa/giphy.gif

TheDaddy 13-11-2021 14:54

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Douglas Ross is in trouble now for undeclared income, although to be fair he was probably just embarrassed he "only" trousered 28k, bozo calls 250k chicken feed, once he'd stopped laughing at Ross he'd probably call 28k loose change

Chris 13-11-2021 14:58

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36101006)
Douglas Ross is in trouble now for undeclared income, although to be fair he was probably just embarrassed he "only" trousered 28k, bozo calls 250k chicken feed, once he'd stopped laughing at Ross he'd probably call 28k loose change

I can’t get my head round this one at all, seeing as the stuff he didn’t declare, everyone knew about anyway. Did he think that meant he didn’t need to? It’s not as if he can have thought it could be hidden. Very odd.

Hugh 13-11-2021 15:50

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
1 Attachment(s)
Why does Johnson nearly always look like he’s been dressed in the dark by someone who is unsure how clothes work, and has just picked the clothes up from a pile on the floor?

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1636818606

Paul 13-11-2021 15:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36101001)
I can post in blue if I want to. It’s distinctive.

Much like you can be an ass if you want to.

I asked you why, nothing about if you could or could not.

TheDaddy 13-11-2021 15:55

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36101012)
Why does Johnson nearly always look like he’s been dressed in the dark by someone who is unsure how clothes work, and has just picked the clothes up from a pile on the floor?

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1636818606

It's part of his act, it's helped him get away with it for years, same as the scruffy hair except these days it's dual purpose is to hide his baldness

Carth 13-11-2021 17:07

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Maybe he's just not a vainglorious type of person :devsmoke:

TheDaddy 13-11-2021 17:14

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36101021)
Maybe he's just not a vainglorious type of person :devsmoke:

Really, his ambition at school was to be king of the world, doesn't reek of vanity at all, reminds me of the James Cagney film, screaming look at me I'm king of the world as the building (country) burns around him

Hugh 13-11-2021 17:22

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36101021)
Maybe he's just not a vainglorious type of person :devsmoke:

Good point - he’s renowned for his humility, modesty, empathy, trustworthiness, and lack of arrogance…

:erm:

Carth 13-11-2021 17:23

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36101025)
Really, his ambition at school was to be king of the world, doesn't reek of vanity at all, reminds me of the James Cagney film, screaming look at me I'm king of the world as the building (country) burns around him

I don't think the country is burning around him, but if you're one of those people that spends all day sniffing for smoke you'll obviously find something smoldering somewhere down a dark alley :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36101026)
Good point - he’s renowned for his humility, modesty, empathy, trustworthiness, and lack of arrogance…

:erm:

. . known for his bad dressing and hair style too, so why is it news now? ;)

TheDaddy 13-11-2021 17:35

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36101027)
I don't think the country is burning around him, but if you're one of those people that spends all day sniffing for smoke you'll obviously find something smoldering somewhere down a dark alley :D



. . known for his bad dressing and hair style too, so why is it news now? ;)

If you think he's doing a good job or even an average one then you're the one who has been smoking and or sniffing something

Lalya Moran been found "at it" now, admittedly for a sum Geoff Cox wouldn't get out of bed for, I mean it's not like she rents her house out, has the tax payer pay the rent on another for him to live in and then not actually live in it coz he's off in the Virginia Islands trousering hundreds of thousands for telling them how to avoid tax

nomadking 13-11-2021 17:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Why should MPs be penalised because they bought a London home under previous rules. Are they expected to pay for both homes(constituency and London)?
They could just as easily have sold the London property, pocketing the profits, and end up having to rent somewhere anyway. So what's the difference? Remember MPs can end up having to be heavily based in London for decades, not for just a few months.

1andrew1 13-11-2021 18:04

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36100983)
So what's the actual difference?:rolleyes: The main complaint is that they shouldn't have the time to do other things, paid or UNPAID. Just because something is unpaid, doesn't mean they haven't gained from it(eg getting selecting as an MP in the first place).

So nobody had a problem with Labour's "cash for ANSWERS", with 6 or 7 figure sums handed over to buy laws and polices, and that's before you include Trade Union donations. How many prosecutions were there over the £650,000+ of ILLEGAL 3rd party donations? Take a wild guess. The list goes on and on.

Any solution won't be perfect but it's delusional to pretend the current situation can't be significantly improved.

Issues with the current situation do indeed include time and energy available to spend on their full time MP roles but importantly also include treason (working against the interests of the British government), lobbying and conflicts of interest.

nomadking 13-11-2021 18:06

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101039)
Any solution won't be perfect but it's delusional to pretend the current situation can't be significantly improved.

Issues with the current situation do indeed include time available to spend on their full time roles but importantly also include treason (working against the interests of the British government), lobbying and conflicts of interest.

So how does that not effectively wipe out all Labour Party members?

1andrew1 13-11-2021 18:11

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36101041)
So how does that not effectively wipe out all Labour Party members?

I don't really understand what you're saying. I'm not an expert on party membership as I've never been a member of any party but can't see how my suggestions wipe out Labour, Conservative or any other party members,

The current situation of MPs' second jobs is clearly flawed. How would you improve it?

nomadking 13-11-2021 18:25

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101042)
I don't really understand what you're saying. I'm not an expert on party membership as I've never been a member of any party but can't see how my suggestions wipe out Labour, Conservative or any other party members,

The current situation is clearly not working. How would you improve it?

Trade Union donations pay for policies and for Labour MPs to lobby for them. IIRC They also pay the office expenses for some MPs and in at least one case for a particular person to be selected as a candidate.
At the very least there should be acknowledgement that being an MP is an unusual situation and environment that doesn't have any real comparisons.

Sephiroth 13-11-2021 18:47

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101039)
Any solution won't be perfect but it's delusional to pretend the current situation can't be significantly improved.

Issues with the current situation do indeed include time and energy available to spend on their full time MP roles but importantly also include treason (working against the interests of the British government), lobbying and conflicts of interest.

Treason: the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government.

ianch99 13-11-2021 18:59

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Anyone keeping count?

Tory MP with financial interests in a company that sells insurance to pay for care tried to change the law to help companies that sell insurance to pay for care.

MP with stake in giant health insurer lobbied for ‘Australian-style’ care insurance

---------- Post added at 18:59 ---------- Previous post was at 18:53 ----------

Move along now, plenty more room:

Quote:

SOUTH Somerset’s MP has been forced to stand up in parliament and apologise after an investigation into his businesses.

As well as finding Marcus Fysh had broken parliamentary rules, the committee on standards slammed him for being ‘patronising’ towards the commissioner.

The investigation was launched after a Private Eye article in September 2018, claimed that Mr Fysh’s register of financial interests entry was incorrect.

Mr Fysh did not register changes to three companies - London Wessex Ltd, Wessex Investments Proprietary Ltd and London Wessex Brands Ltd - within 28 days.

But the committee also discovered Mr Fysh held unpaid directorships at five companies within the Wessex Investments Group.

None of these five positions were in his declared interests.
MP Marcus Fysh in hot water over FIVE undeclared businesses

1andrew1 14-11-2021 11:01

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
And another case of a conflict of interest today.
Quote:

Grant Shapps, the minister for private jets, is ‘lobbying against his own government’

The aeroplane-owning transport secretary is spending public money on lobbyists opposing the government’s own plans to build on private runways, including one he has personally used.
I don't have a subsription, but for those that do, see https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/m...ment-l6cmgtkfg
For the rest of us, see the Sky News photo here:
https://news.sky.com/story/wednesday...pages-12427754

papa smurf 14-11-2021 11:06

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Keir Starmer faces sleaze row over 'using his Commons office for party political campaigning'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...mpaigning.html

Sleaze just keeps piling up upon sleaze

Maggy 14-11-2021 11:58

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
I knew there were untrustworthy MPs in the House of Commons but not as many as this. So depressing. Maybe Peter Viggers was more than the tip of the iceberg.

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 13:30

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
If the Opposition is so concerned about second jobs, when are they going to put forward proposals to stop the practice? Why did they not do it when in office?

This is all politicking designed to wrong-foot the Conservatives, but actually most of the public don’t care. At the election booths, most people make their decisions on the basis of which party is most likely to benefit them and which party is going to achieve the best solutions for the problems in the country and for the economy.

Labour would do well to start shaping its own proposals for levelling up the country to win back the red wall seats they lost last time. Fat chance. Labour MPs come out with stuff like ‘What does levelling up even mean?”

Well the red wall constituents know. Labour would do well to read up on it and to understand what those people want.

The current Westminster hysteria about second jobs is nothing but hot air and it’s totally irrelevant to most people. If the Opposition really wanted to tackle it and stop the practice, they should cease ‘outing’ Conservative MPs and come up with a solution, before MPs on their own side are caught out. The MP with the largest number of outside commitments was Labour’s David Lammy, with 24 entries. What goes around comes around.

1andrew1 14-11-2021 14:02

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101145)
If the Opposition is so concerned about second jobs, when are they going to put forward proposals to stop the practice? Why did they not do it when in office?

This is all politicking designed to wrong-foot the Conservatives, but actually most of the public don’t care. At the election booths, most people make their decisions on the basis of which party is most likely to benefit them and which party is going to achieve the best solutions for the problems in the country and for the economy.

Labour would do well to start shaping its own proposals for levelling up the country to win back the red wall seats they lost last time. Fat chance. Labour MPs come out with stuff like ‘What does levelling up even mean?”

Well the red wall constituents know. Labour would do well to read up on it and to understand what those people want.

The current Westminster hysteria about second jobs is nothing but hot air and it’s totally irrelevant to most people. If the Opposition really wanted to tackle it and stop the practice, they should cease ‘outing’ Conservative MPs and come up with a solution, before MPs on their own side are caught out. The MP with the largest number of outside commitments was Labour’s David Lammy, with 24 entries. What goes around comes around.

Hugh posted some opinion polls showing support increasing for Labour and decreasing for the Conservatives so it looks like it's starting to cut through. It's the Gvernment's place to enact legislation, not the Opposition's and no Opposition is going to do the government's work for them.

I must admit, I would quite like to know what levelling-up means too but don't want to go off-topic. Conservative MPs would like to know too. I suspect it's probably akin to Theresa May's definition of Brexit at the moment.

jfman 14-11-2021 15:03

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101145)
If the Opposition is so concerned about second jobs, when are they going to put forward proposals to stop the practice? Why did they not do it when in office?

Classic whataboutery.

Quote:

This is all politicking designed to wrong-foot the Conservatives, but actually most of the public don’t care. At the election booths, most people make their decisions on the basis of which party is most likely to benefit them and which party is going to achieve the best solutions for the problems in the country and for the economy.
A sizeable proportion of the public do care, and as you well know elections are won in lost in the marginal constituencies. If enough people care about Tory corruption that’s could be enough for many Tory MPs to get their P45.

Quote:

Labour would do well to start shaping its own proposals for levelling up the country to win back the red wall seats they lost last time. Fat chance. Labour MPs come out with stuff like ‘What does levelling up even mean?”

Well the red wall constituents know. Labour would do well to read up on it and to understand what those people want.
From the man who called Boris Johnson off topic. :D

Quote:

The current Westminster hysteria about second jobs is nothing but hot air and it’s totally irrelevant to most people. If the Opposition really wanted to tackle it and stop the practice, they should cease ‘outing’ Conservative MPs and come up with a solution, before MPs on their own side are caught out. The MP with the largest number of outside commitments was Labour’s David Lammy, with 24 entries. What goes around comes around.
I’m not sure the Daily Mail or Daily Express count as the Opposition. Often it’s a matter of public record who is trousering thousands to represent corporate interests against the interests of the electorate at large. It needs no input from the Labour Party or anyone else.

Carth 14-11-2021 15:07

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101147)
Hugh posted some opinion polls showing support increasing for Labour and decreasing for the Conservatives so it looks like it's starting to cut through. It's the Gvernment's place to enact legislation, not the Opposition's and no Opposition is going to do the government's work for them.

You don't want to be putting too much faith in those polls Andrew . . . most of them said that Brexit wouldn't happen ;)

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 15:23

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101147)
Hugh posted some opinion polls showing support increasing for Labour and decreasing for the Conservatives so it looks like it's starting to cut through. It's the Gvernment's place to enact legislation, not the Opposition's and no Opposition is going to do the government's work for them.

I must admit, I would quite like to know what levelling-up means too but don't want to go off-topic. Conservative MPs would like to know too. I suspect it's probably akin to Theresa May's definition of Brexit at the moment.

The opinion polls are up and down all the time, but elections make people think more about what they are doing. This current Westminster episode will be as good as forgotten by then anyway.

The Opposition has the opportunity of putting forward legislation for consideration in the Commons if they wanted to, Andrew, so they don’t simply have a passive role.

As for ‘levelling up’, I am surprised that anyone should not know what that means on either side of the House.

---------- Post added at 15:23 ---------- Previous post was at 15:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36101149)
From the man who called Boris Johnson off topic. :D

What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, jfman.

jfman 14-11-2021 15:43

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101152)
The opinion polls are up and down all the time, but elections make people think more about what they are doing. This current Westminster episode will be as good as forgotten by then anyway.

The Opposition has the opportunity of putting forward legislation for consideration in the Commons if they wanted to, Andrew, so they don’t simply have a passive role.

As for ‘levelling up’, I am surprised that anyone should not know what that means on either side of the House.

---------- Post added at 15:23 ---------- Previous post was at 15:20 ----------



What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, jfman.

Proof if ever it were required that you’ve no sincere intention of engaging with the debate other than to defend the Conservatives at all costs to your waning credibility.

1andrew1 14-11-2021 15:48

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101152)
The opinion polls are up and down all the time, but elections make people think more about what they are doing. This current Westminster episode will be as good as forgotten by then anyway.

The Opposition has the opportunity of putting forward legislation for consideration in the Commons if they wanted to, Andrew, so they don’t simply have a passive role.

Why would an Opposition Party spend their energy doing the Government's work for them? Labour is not in coalition with the Conservatives.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101152)
The opinion polls are up and down all the time, but elections make people think more about what they are doing. This current Westminster episode will be as good as forgotten by then anyway.

I'm afraid wishing these case studies of corruption away won't do it for the electorate and a lot of the press. Something needs to change and Johnson needs to swiftly make sure it's the legislation and not the occupier of No. 10 that changes.

TheDaddy 14-11-2021 16:18

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36101157)
Proof if ever it were required that you’ve no sincere intention of engaging with the debate other than to defend the Conservatives at all costs to your waning credibility.

Waning is generous, of course that's further evidenced by claiming it's hysteria about second jobs, conveniently ignoring that the real issue is second jobs that go against the direct interests of their constituents

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 16:47

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36101157)
Proof if ever it were required that you’ve no sincere intention of engaging with the debate other than to defend the Conservatives at all costs to your waning credibility.

Behave, jfman, for goodness sake. I have engaged with the debate, but that doesn’t mean that I have to give succour to the left wing point of view being expressed on this forum.

You pay attention to your own credibility (you need to) and let me worry about mine.

---------- Post added at 16:47 ---------- Previous post was at 16:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101161)
Why would an Opposition Party spend their energy doing the Government's work for them? Labour is not in coalition with the Conservatives.


I'm afraid wishing these case studies of corruption away won't do it for the electorate and a lot of the press. Something needs to change and Johnson needs to swiftly make sure it's the legislation and not the occupier of No. 10 that changes.

If Labour felt that strongly about second jobs, that is exactly what they would do, if nothing else, to embarrass the government. They won’t do it, of course, because second jobs are also performed by their own MPs.

I cannot see people agonising about this is three months’ time, let alone three years.

Maggy 14-11-2021 17:22

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Whataboutism will not get the current crop of Tory MPs off the hook if they have been found guilty of having their hands on the proverbial cookie jar.

1andrew1 14-11-2021 17:36

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101166)
If Labour felt that strongly about second jobs, that is exactly what they would do, if nothing else, to embarrass the government. They won’t do it, of course, because second jobs are also performed by their own MPs.

I cannot see people agonising about this is three months’ time, let alone three years.

As I said, wishful thinking won't make this go away, Old Boy. If you were the leader of the opposition, your number one aim is to get into power. Doing the Government's homework for it is not top of your to-do list.

You need to grab a coffee with Seph at Waitrose and he'll get you up to speed. ;)

TheDaddy 14-11-2021 17:43

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36101007)
I can’t get my head round this one at all, seeing as the stuff he didn’t declare, everyone knew about anyway. Did he think that meant he didn’t need to? It’s not as if he can have thought it could be hidden. Very odd.

I've been thinking about him to and would love to see the next person caught fiddling the dole just say they forgot to declare like the MPs and see what happens to them, still at least they can appeal their prison sentence

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36101171)
Whataboutism will not get the current crop of Tory MPs off the hook if they have been found guilty of having their hands on the proverbial cookie jar.

The latest being Rees Smug for not declaring his Cayman Islands loans

---------- Post added at 17:43 ---------- Previous post was at 17:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101173)
As I said, wishful thinking won't make this go away, Old Boy. If you were the leader of the opposition, your number one aim is to get into power. Doing the Government's homework for it is not top of your to-do list.

You need to grab a coffee with Seph at Waitrose and he'll get you up to speed. ;)

What's the old military saying, when your enemy is making a mistake, don't stop them

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 18:14

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy (Post 36101171)
Whataboutism will not get the current crop of Tory MPs off the hook if they have been found guilty of having their hands on the proverbial cookie jar.

If they have done wrong, they must be punished. Boris Johnson said so very clearly this evening.

The problem with the current dialogue being pushed is that no-one apart from Owen Paterson has been found to have done anything wrong.

As to whether the rules should be changed, I guess this depends on the will of parliamentarians to change the arrangements.

---------- Post added at 18:14 ---------- Previous post was at 18:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36101173)
As I said, wishful thinking won't make this go away, Old Boy. If you were the leader of the opposition, your number one aim is to get into power. Doing the Government's homework for it is not top of your to-do list.

You need to grab a coffee with Seph at Waitrose and he'll get you up to speed. ;)

If they put forward a proposal to ban second jobs, they would get more respect from the public that they actually tried to change it instead of simply whingeing about the practice to score political points.

Hugh 14-11-2021 18:23

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36101174)
I've been thinking about him to and would love to see the next person caught fiddling the dole just say they forgot to declare like the MPs and see what happens to them, still at least they can appeal their prison sentence



The latest being Rees Smug for not declaring his Cayman Islands loans

---------- Post added at 17:43 ---------- Previous post was at 17:41 ----------



What's the old military saying, when your enemy is making a mistake, don't stop them

Rees Mogg doesn’t own a company that doesn’t own a company that does own a company that makes money in Cayman. He doesn’t get paid by the company he doesn’t own but his wife who doesn‘t own the company works for it and gets wages. He doesn’t get paid by this company but owns 100% of the shares, and gets directors loans of £6,000,000, which he paid total interest of 0.8% (£48k in total) over 3 years, but this isn’t any form of remuneration, just "Directors Loans"…

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 18:31

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36101185)
Rees Mogg doesn’t own a company that doesn’t own a company that does own a company that makes money in Cayman. He doesn’t get paid by the company he doesn’t own but his wife who doesn‘t own the company works for it and gets wages. He doesn’t get paid by this company but owns 100% of the shares, and gets directors loans of £6,000,000, which he paid total interest of 0.8% (£48k in total) over 3 years, but this isn’t any form of remuneration, just "Directors Loans"…

So are you excusing Rees Mogg for not breaking any rules?

jfman 14-11-2021 19:16

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101166)
Behave, jfman, for goodness sake. I have engaged with the debate, but that doesn’t mean that I have to give succour to the left wing point of view being expressed on this forum.

Your posts on this matter are ever increasingly delusional if you sincerely believe it’s only “left wing” members of despairing at the Conservatives handling of this grubby affair.

Quote:

If Labour felt that strongly about second jobs, that is exactly what they would do, if nothing else, to embarrass the government. They won’t do it, of course, because second jobs are also performed by their own MPs.

I cannot see people agonising about this is three months’ time, let alone three years.
The faulty crystal ball is back out I see.

Johnson’s Premiership is now fatally wounded. There will need to be a line drawn under it before the next election campaign.

spiderplant 14-11-2021 19:19

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101152)
As for ‘levelling up’, I am surprised that anyone should not know what that means on either side of the House

Please can you provide a summary, for the benefit of those of us not in The House?

Hugh 14-11-2021 19:34

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101187)
So are you excusing Rees Mogg for not breaking any rules?

Your Conservative-tinted spectacles also appear to include a <sarcasm> bypass filter…

He doesn’t get ‘renumerated’, but gets very very low interest loans for seven figure sums, and his wife gets paid for being the Secretary of a Holding Company, which I am sure doesn’t go into a joint account*

*you might wish to remove your specs for this one… ;)

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 19:51

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36101193)
Your posts on this matter are ever increasingly delusional if you sincerely believe it’s only “left wing” members of despairing at the Conservatives handling of this grubby affair.

.

I am fully aware that some anti-Boris Conservatives are on the same side as Labour on this subject. They, too, tend to be on the left of the Conservative Party. They’ll get over it.

---------- Post added at 19:49 ---------- Previous post was at 19:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36101193)
The faulty crystal ball is back out I see.

Johnson’s Premiership is now fatally wounded. There will need to be a line drawn under it before the next election campaign.

You wish!

---------- Post added at 19:51 ---------- Previous post was at 19:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36101197)
Your Conservative-tinted spectacles also appear to include a <sarcasm> bypass filter…

He doesn’t get ‘renumerated’, but gets very very low interest loans for seven figure sums, and his wife gets paid for being the Secretary of a Holding Company, which I am sure doesn’t go into a joint account*

*you might wish to remove your specs for this one… ;)

I asked you a question (hence the question mark). Has he broken any rules?

Feel free to ignore this question with the usual diversionary tactics if you can’t possibly comment. I’ll understand.

jfman 14-11-2021 20:01

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Anti-Boris Conservatives. :D

The divisive rhetoric of modern politics has gone for the Old Boy here.

I would wager that Johnson won’t lead the party into the next election in 2024.

OLD BOY 14-11-2021 20:06

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36101203)
Anti-Boris Conservatives. :D

The divisive rhetoric of modern politics has gone for the Old Boy here.

I would wager that Johnson won’t lead the party into the next election in 2024.

Can we quote you on that?

jfman 14-11-2021 20:17

Re: Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36101204)
Can we quote you on that?

Of course, OB. Unlike others I don’t move the goalposts with increasing regularity nor shirk from being held against the statements I make.

He’s toast.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum