Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Election 2019 - Week 3 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708416)

richard s 25-11-2019 19:20

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Public School Idiots running the country... God help us all. What a crap mandate the Cons have. 20,000 more police (which they got rid of in the first place), 40 new hospitals to be built (we have no staff to man the ones we have got).. and what else was it O yes 50,000 more nurses!?!?!?!?


We have just had ten years of crap... more to come me thinks.

OLD BOY 25-11-2019 19:35

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 36018274)
Public School Idiots running the country... God help us all. What a crap mandate the Cons have. 20,000 more police (which they got rid of in the first place), 40 new hospitals to be built (we have no staff to man the ones we have got).. and what else was it O yes 50,000 more nurses!?!?!?!?


We have just had ten years of crap... more to come me thinks.

Some of us want to see the country prosper rather than sink into debt. Your characterisation of Conservative politicians is just naive and frankly, completely wrong. You need to start seeing the world as it really is. Corbyn’s promises may sound good to you, but it’s worth nothing more than a six year old’s Christmas list. It simply cannot be delivered because it costs too much and the money would run out long before they reached half way through it.

jfman 25-11-2019 19:41

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 36018274)
Public School Idiots running the country... God help us all. What a crap mandate the Cons have. 20,000 more police (which they got rid of in the first place), 40 new hospitals to be built (we have no staff to man the ones we have got).. and what else was it O yes 50,000 more nurses!?!?!?!?

We have just had ten years of crap... more to come me thinks.

I think you’re doing the lads a disservice here Richard. I mean they aren’t actually running the country that’s the offshore corporate interests that are funding them, Russian oligarchs or possibly even the FSB. I mean Boris did meet with them without his security detail when he was foreign secretary.

---------- Post added at 19:41 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018276)
Some of us want to see the country prosper rather than sink into debt. Your characterisation of Conservative politicians is just naive and frankly, completely wrong. You need to start seeing the world as it really is. Corbyn’s promises may sound good to you, but it’s worth nothing more than a six year old’s Christmas list. It simply cannot be delivered because it costs too much and the money would run out long before they reached half way through it.

More absolute nonsense. The country is already 2 trillion in debt, a figure that has doubled under the Tories in nominal terms. Despite selling off almost everything worth selling in the last forty years we are still 2 trillion in debt because of failed neo-liberal economic policies. The Tory bribe of selling people their council houses and deregulating lending to push up prices is a one off windfall.

Future generations have no such windfall. Only the debt from previous generations extravagance and poor decision making.

Pray, tell, Old Boy, how and when should we pay the 2 trillion back? How do we fund it so we can stop squandering billions on interest payments?

Mr K 25-11-2019 19:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 36018274)
Public School Idiots running the country... God help us all. What a crap mandate the Cons have. 20,000 more police (which they got rid of in the first place), 40 new hospitals to be built (we have no staff to man the ones we have got).. and what else was it O yes 50,000 more nurses!?!?!?!?


We have just had ten years of crap... more to come me thinks.

Nah, they're working hard for you, honestly...

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2019/11/1.jpg

Hugh 25-11-2019 20:41

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
https://www.icmunlimited.com/our-wor...n-2019-poll-4/
Quote:

ICM’s fourth published voting intention poll of the general election campaign shows a narrower Conservative lead than last week. In this week’s poll, the Conservative lead over Labour stands at seven points, compared to a 10-point lead last week.

Headline voting intention figures:

Con: 41% (-1)
Lab: 34% (+2)
Lib Dem: 13% (-)
Brexit Party: 4% (-1)
Green: 3% (-)
SNP: 3% (-)
Plaid: 1% (+1)
UKIP: 0% (-)
Another party: 1% (-1)
Quote:

Summary

The Conservatives drop one point to 41%, while Labour climb by two points compared to last week, taking them to 34%.

Elsewhere, the Liberal Democrats remain on 13%, while the Brexit Party fall a point to 4%. In constituencies in which the Brexit Party is standing, the party is polling at 9%.

Mick 25-11-2019 20:43

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018282)
Nah, they're working hard for you, honestly...

And I counter that with this gem...



Give up Mr K, you're not winning this argument or any one you've laid here yet, judging by each poll result thus far, and yes I'm still voting for the Conservatives to stop a Marxist and Commie prick for leader like Corbyn getting in.

nomadking 25-11-2019 20:48

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018277)
I think you’re doing the lads a disservice here Richard. I mean they aren’t actually running the country that’s the offshore corporate interests that are funding them, Russian oligarchs or possibly even the FSB. I mean Boris did meet with them without his security detail when he was foreign secretary.

---------- Post added at 19:41 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------



More absolute nonsense. The country is already 2 trillion in debt, a figure that has doubled under the Tories in nominal terms. Despite selling off almost everything worth selling in the last forty years we are still 2 trillion in debt because of failed neo-liberal economic policies. The Tory bribe of selling people their council houses and deregulating lending to push up prices is a one off windfall.

Future generations have no such windfall. Only the debt from previous generations extravagance and poor decision making.

Pray, tell, Old Boy, how and when should we pay the 2 trillion back? How do we fund it so we can stop squandering billions on interest payments?

As usual :confused::confused::confused:
You complain about austerity, but also complain about adding to the public debt. Are you suggesting that in 2010 the spending taps should have been turned off by such a huge amount? That really would have been austerity. If the deficit levels inherited in 2010, had been continued, that would have added yet another £600bn to the debt.


The crash happened around 10 years into a Labour government.

jfman 25-11-2019 20:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018289)
As usual :confused::confused::confused:
You complain about austerity, but also complain about adding to the public debt. Are you suggesting that in 2010 the spending taps should have been turned off by such a huge amount? That really would have been austerity. If the deficit levels inherited in 2010, had been continued, that would have added yet another £600bn to the debt.

The crash happened around 10 years into a Labour government.

And ten years later the Tories are still running a deficit, doubling total debt in nominal terms. The Tories ran deficits in the vast majority of the Thatcher and Major years.

Totally flawed economics.

40 years of failure. I note you haven’t addressed any of my points simply misinterpreted them for the purpose of deflection. So I will repeat my point:

Future generations have no such windfall. Only the debt from previous generations extravagance and poor decision making.

If it’s about balancing the books then when should we pay the 2 trillion back? How do we fund it so we can stop squandering billions on interest payments?

Mick 25-11-2019 21:03

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018290)
And ten years later the Tories are still running a deficit, doubling total debt in nominal terms. The Tories ran deficits in the vast majority of the Thatcher and Major years.

Totally flawed economics.

40 years of failure. I note you haven’t addressed any of my points simply misinterpreted them for the purpose of deflection. So I will repeat my point:

Future generations have no such windfall. Only the debt from previous generations extravagance and poor decision making.

If it’s about balancing the books then when should we pay the 2 trillion back? How do we fund it so we can stop squandering billions on interest payments?

We cannot pay it back because we have people like you, moaning about Austerity all the time. :dozey:

jfman 25-11-2019 21:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018291)
We cannot pay it back because we have people like you, moaning about Austerity all the time. :dozey:

Austerity hasn’t reduced it though, has it? :rolleyes:

There is absolutely no plan. The state has no assets, no growth and people don’t want to pay tax. It simply doesn’t work. The older generations just hope this pozni scheme holds up til they die.

40 years of failure. Barely ran a surplus in that time with debt through the roof.

Mick 25-11-2019 21:16

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018292)
Austerity hasn’t reduced it though, has it? :rolleyes:

There is absolutely no plan. The state has no assets, no growth and people don’t want to pay tax. It simply doesn’t work. The older generations just hope this pozni scheme holds up til they die.

40 years of failure. Barely ran a surplus in that time with debt through the roof.

Austerity has reduced the need to keep dipping in it under the Tories, they didn't dip in it as much as the prior Labour Government did for 13 years, so don't try that one with me.

In other news I love to see the SNP get an absolute pasting when they fail to meet their targets, they are no better, Mr Jfman!

https://twitter.com/jackgIendinning/...56353161043969

Andrew Neil: "you've called for legislation to protect the NHS from Donald Trump but maybe we need to legislate to protect the NHS from Nicola Sturgeon."

Utterly priceless. :rofl:

jfman 25-11-2019 21:20

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018293)
Austerity has reduced the need to keep dipping in it under the Tories, they didn't dip in it as much as the prior Labour Government did for 13 years, so don't try that one with me.

In other news I love to see the SNP get an absolute pasting when they fail to meet their targets, they are no better, Mr Jfman!

https://twitter.com/jackgIendinning/...56353161043969

Andrew Neil: "you've called for legislation to protect the NHS from Donald Trump but maybe we need to legislate to protect the NHS from Nicola Sturgeon."

Utterly priceless. :rofl:

“In other news”. Another absolute deflection because you are devoid of ideas. At least you didn’t try to hide it.

No plans to pay back the debt, no plans at all. It’s an ideologically driven attack on the poor to keep tax low for the rich and multinational companies. It’s disingenuous to claim otherwise. Or outright lies.

Mick 25-11-2019 21:33

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018294)
“In other news”. Another absolute deflection because you are devoid of ideas. At least you didn’t try to hide it.

No plans to pay back the debt, no plans at all. It’s an ideologically driven attack on the poor to keep tax low for the rich and multinational companies. It’s disingenuous to claim otherwise. Or outright lies.

Or to be realistically fair, it is none of those things and you're the one, who is totally lying as usual! :dozey::rolleyes:

I see you've completely skipped on the failings of the SNP pointed out by Andrew Neil! Why is that?

jfman 25-11-2019 21:40

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018295)
Or to be realistically fair, it is none of those things and you're the one, who is totally lying as usual! :dozey::rolleyes:

I see you've completely skipped on the failings of the SNP pointed out by Andrew Neil! Why is that?

Because you haven't addressed what the plan is to pay back 2 trillion pounds of national debt? That's an awful lot of austerity.

I don't remember the big push to balance the books in the "good times" by taxing people a little more. Nope.

A big pozni scheme as I said. Although the windfalls have run out.

The failings or otherwise or the SNP are you simply derailng the conversation - a skill quite a few on here have when the obvious failings of Conservative/New Labour neo-liberal free market capitalism are exposed.

40 years. 2 trillion of debt. No assets. No growth. Ends only one way. Might not be tomorrow, but it crashes eventually.

Mick 25-11-2019 21:52

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018296)

The failings or otherwise or the SNP are you simply derailng the conversation - a skill quite a few on here have when the obvious failings of Conservative/New Labour neo-liberal free market capitalism are exposed.

I wasn't aware this was the jfman show?

Here's the thing, we're not having a conversation, you started bleating on about Austerity with Nomadking, I simply joined in and told you, you're wrong on many fronts, mainly about the whinging about austerity and for the record, no I am not derailing the conversation, this topic is not just about one party, so wind your neck in. If I want to bring up the SNP's failings I can do, I don't need your consent and you would do well to remember this.

Arthurgray50@blu 25-11-2019 22:05

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Please look at it this way.
Again today, Joker Boris has come out again with the rubbish of putting more money into nursing.
Doesn't he realise it will take FIVE years to train a nurse. And there is over 30.000 vacancies for nursing staff.
If the money was good. There wouldn't be any vacancies.

He also states that they will employ 20.000 more police officers - Is this across the UK.
Doesn't he realise that officers are leaving EACH MONTH through stress, and the workload they get each day - and remember, l work in law enforcement and know the pressure that officers are on a daily routine.

Boris, is trying to con the public. And find out how many times , on daily basis, he will talk about Brexit.

Boris is conning the public in the hope of voting Tory, then when he gets in. He will start making cuts again. Watch the space

jfman 25-11-2019 22:09

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018297)
I wasn't aware this was the jfman show?

Here's the thing, we're not having a conversation, you started bleating on about Austerity with Nomadking, I simply joined in and told you, you're wrong on many fronts, mainly about the whinging about austerity and for the record, no I am not derailing the conversation, this topic is not just about one party, so wind your neck in. If I want to bring up the SNP's failings I can do, I don't need your consent and you would do well to remember this.

I simply pointed out that you have deflected from my point. Which is a statement of fact. Hence I chose not to respond to your point.

It's a discussion forum. I thought the point was to have conversations not read moderated right wing propaganda.

I don't think you've evidenced that I'm wrong at all, simply obediently observed your own flawed ideology. Which is fine, but to call it proving me wrong is somewhat a leap.

---------- Post added at 22:09 ---------- Previous post was at 22:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 36018298)
Please look at it this way.
Again today, Joker Boris has come out again with the rubbish of putting more money into nursing.
Doesn't he realise it will take FIVE years to train a nurse. And there is over 30.000 vacancies for nursing staff.
If the money was good. There wouldn't be any vacancies.

He also states that they will employ 20.000 more police officers - Is this across the UK.
Doesn't he realise that officers are leaving EACH MONTH through stress, and the workload they get each day - and remember, l work in law enforcement and know the pressure that officers are on a daily routine.

Boris, is trying to con the public. And find out how many times , on daily basis, he will talk about Brexit.

Boris is conning the public in the hope of voting Tory, then when he gets in. He will start making cuts again. Watch the space

Nobody holds the Tories to account. In five years time we will just get more misinformation as to why the alternative is worse.

Mick 25-11-2019 22:34

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018299)
I simply pointed out that you have deflected from my point. Which is a statement of fact. Hence I chose not to respond to your point.

I have nothing to deflect from so no it is not a statement of fact at all. I simply moved on because I am bored of your whinging of austerity all the time, that I have already said, multiple times, was needed.

I was actually pointing out the hypocrisy from yourself of you whinging about Tory failings in your eyes yet you have nothing to say at all on SNP failings.

One word for that, pathetic!

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman
It's a discussion forum. I thought the point was to have conversations not read moderated right wing propaganda.

I just told you we were not having a conversation, you was whinging and I butted in to say why your whinging was unwarranted and so I moved on.

As I said, this not your topic.

muppetman11 25-11-2019 23:30

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36018210)
tory propaganda just like the 50,000 extra nurses that piers and susanna debunked this morning

It must be to work in the 40 new hospitals they are building.;)

Mick 25-11-2019 23:34

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Wow and more wow.

BREAKING:
Jeremy Corbyn and Labour have been rocked by an explosive attack over antisemitism by the UK’s most senior Jewish leader, the Chief Rabbi. In a coruscating article in The Times, Ephraim Mirvis says the Labour leader’s claims to be tackling antisemitism in is party are a "mendacious fiction".

He writes: "A new poison - sanctioned from the very top - has taken root in the Labour Party.”

https://news.sky.com/story/chief-rab...ponse-11870412

A damning indictment of the Racist party that is now Labour.

jfman 26-11-2019 08:28

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
A sign of sheer panic among the establishment as the polls get tighter. Not unexpected, and fairly transparent.

---------- Post added at 08:28 ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018301)

As I said, this not your topic.

I'm quite sure it isn't yours either.

With no plans to pay off the 2 trillion of debt, and no answer of how austerity solves it, the older generations are admitting what we already know.

They've mortgaged off future revenue from public utilities for a one off windfall, and squandered state assets balancing the books with huge borrowing and leaving it all for future generations to pay back.

mrmistoffelees 26-11-2019 08:34

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018305)
Wow and more wow.

BREAKING:
Jeremy Corbyn and Labour have been rocked by an explosive attack over antisemitism by the UK’s most senior Jewish leader, the Chief Rabbi. In a coruscating article in The Times, Ephraim Mirvis says the Labour leader’s claims to be tackling antisemitism in is party are a "mendacious fiction".

He writes: "A new poison - sanctioned from the very top - has taken root in the Labour Party.”

https://news.sky.com/story/chief-rab...ponse-11870412

A damning indictment of the Racist party that is now Labour.

And the Tory party and their deep rooted Islamophobia issues?

jfman 26-11-2019 08:39

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018312)
And the Tory party and their deep rooted Islamophobia issues?

Watch out, we can't have that kind of objectivity in our election thread.

jonbxx 26-11-2019 09:01

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
But antisemitism does not justify islamophobia or vice versa. The whole election campaign seems to have sunk to the levels of 'I know you are but what am I'. The Brexit and to a lesser extent Scottish referendum set a new playing field of what is acceptable in political campaigning where any old nonsense can be rolled out and, as long as the message is impactful, honesty is secondary.

It seems like supporting a political party is like supporting a football team these days. If you don't support a Conservative policy, you're a marxist and if you don't support a Labour policy, you're Hitler (good bit of Godwins law there)

Politicians on the whole aren't stupid but I am getting more and more convinced that they think we, the public, are and that's pretty insulting!

I will definitely vote as I think that taking part in the democratic process is part of what being part of society is but I am struggling to decide who to vote for. We have 5 candidates and I am working more on who I wouldn't vote for than who I would. I have narrowed it down to 4 so far!

I think I need to read some manifestos...

nomadking 26-11-2019 09:11

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018310)
A sign of sheer panic among the establishment as the polls get tighter. Not unexpected, and fairly transparent.

---------- Post added at 08:28 ---------- Previous post was at 08:27 ----------



I'm quite sure it isn't yours either.

With no plans to pay off the 2 trillion of debt, and no answer of how austerity solves it, the older generations are admitting what we already know.

They've mortgaged off future revenue from public utilities for a one off windfall, and squandered state assets balancing the books with huge borrowing and leaving it all for future generations to pay back.

The only time the previous Labour government was paying off the national debt was in the few years that they followed the 5 year economic plan of the previous Conservative government. Afterwards they went on a spending splurge, which at first reduced the surplus, but by 2002(ie before the crash) led to borrowing being required.
Link

Quote:

What the Manifesto said:
Quote:

"For the next two years Labour will work within the departmental ceilings for spending already announced."
Conclusion: Pledge met.
In 1997-99, Labour stuck rigidly to the spending plans it inherited from the Conservatives, even though this sparked opposition on its own backbenches.
It might easier to cut back on single spending plans like road building, but spending on things like benefit levels, tax credits are almost impossible to cut back on. Gordon Brown purposely made tax credits more generous which led to an entrenched public spending requirement.
Link
Quote:

Full details of what is on offer will not be made public until the spring, but the chancellor will use tomorrow's pre-budget report to signal the government's determination to widen the use of tax credits and make them more generous, despite rumblings in the party over whether the money would be better used on higher public spending.
Not sure how not having austerity in any shape or form would lead to paying off the national debt.:confused:


From 2008
Quote:

How did it come to this? As trauma continues to course through the global financial system in the wake of the Lehman Brothers crash, the PM and his colleagues reassure us constantly that Britain is ‘well-prepared’ to withstand the shock of economic crisis. In fact, the opposite is true. It is a basic principle that most governments, even socialist ones, pay off debts in times of prosperity. Mr Brown’s innovation was to reject this tradition. Since Labour came to power, the national debt has risen 25 per cent to £581 billion. During the second it took you to read that last sentence, it rose by £1,520 — and that’s by the government’s more optimistic measure.
Labour's use of PFI locked in future spending for the next 30 years. Whatever government was in power would have to continue to pay those commitments.
Quote:

Unofficially — and this is what Mr Brown grasped from the off, and what Mr Robinson was hinting at — PFI was an incredibly convenient way of concealing the true extent of public debt. Rather than pay upfront, the government promised to make fixed payments in each project over a period of about 30 years — keeping the whole thing off the books. PFI was a wizard’s cloak of invisibility which could be thrown around expensive new projects.

One myth is that Labour were good on social sector house building, and the Tories bad.
Just look at the graph in the link.
The yellow section of the graph which refers to housing association(ie social sector) building is much thinner under Labour than it was pre 1997 and post 2010. I got to admit, even I was surprised by that graph, because the impression that is given is that it was the reverse, ie Labour built more. The fact is they didn't, even in the good times.

jfman 26-11-2019 09:18

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018316)
The only time the previous Labour government was paying off the national debt was in the few years that they followed the 5 year economic plan of the previous Conservative government. Afterwards they went on a spending splurge, which at first reduced the surplus, but by 2002(ie before the crash) led to borrowing being required.
Link

[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=2]
It might easier to cut back on single spending plans like road building, but spending on things like benefit levels, tax credits are almost impossible to cut back on. Gordon Brown purposely made tax credits more generous which led to an entrenched public spending requirement.
Link

Not sure how not having austerity in any shape or form would lead to paying off the national debt.:confused:


From 2008
Labour's use of PFI locked in future spending for the next 30 years. Whatever government was in power would have to continue to pay those commitments.



One myth is that Labour were good on social sector house building, and the Tories bad.
Just look at the graph in the link.
The yellow section of the graph which refers to housing association(ie social sector) building is much thinner under Labour than it was pre 1997 and post 2010. I got to admit, even I was surprised by that graph, because the impression that is given is that it was the reverse, ie Labour built more. The fact is they didn't, even in the good times.

I agree.

New Labour are part of the 40 years of failure that has accumulated 2 trillion pounds of debt with no plans to pay it back. Older generations are leaving younger generations with this burden round their necks.

We need a genuine alternative to the neo-liberal capitalist status quo which has no answers for the genuine problems this country faces.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 09:48

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018277)
I think you’re doing the lads a disservice here Richard. I mean they aren’t actually running the country that’s the offshore corporate interests that are funding them, Russian oligarchs or possibly even the FSB. I mean Boris did meet with them without his security detail when he was foreign secretary.

---------- Post added at 19:41 ---------- Previous post was at 19:37 ----------



More absolute nonsense. The country is already 2 trillion in debt, a figure that has doubled under the Tories in nominal terms. Despite selling off almost everything worth selling in the last forty years we are still 2 trillion in debt because of failed neo-liberal economic policies. The Tory bribe of selling people their council houses and deregulating lending to push up prices is a one off windfall.

Future generations have no such windfall. Only the debt from previous generations extravagance and poor decision making.

Pray, tell, Old Boy, how and when should we pay the 2 trillion back? How do we fund it so we can stop squandering billions on interest payments?

How many times to we have to respond to these tired old arguments, jfman? Please give it a rest.

We've already written on here countless times that Labour spent all the balances and put no money away for a rainy day during the 'golden years'. That meant we had no reserves to deal with the global financial crash. That meant we had to come up with a good plan to put the UK back on its feet and deal with the unsustainable deficit. The Conservatives have brought that down substantially, but in the meantime, debt has continued to rise as a result. This would have not happened if Labour had not spent all the reserves in its period of office and that's where the blame lies for this mess.

Do you really believe that we would be saddled with less debt had Labour been in power throught the last decade? If so, you must be the only one who does.

For someone who professes to know about economics, I am astounded that you should trot out this nonsense. The answer to paying off all that debt is certainly not to be found in the Labour camp, where hundreds of billions of pounds would be spent to satisfy their agenda. The real question is how they would pay back the debt.

jfman 26-11-2019 10:00

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018325)
How many times to we have to respond to these tired old arguments, jfman? Please give it a rest.

We've already written on here countless times that Labour spent all the balances and put no money away for a rainy day during the 'golden years'. That meant we had no reserves to deal with the global financial crash. That meant we had to come up with a good plan to put the UK back on its feet and deal with the unsustainable deficit. The Conservatives have brought that down substantially, but in the meantime, debt has continued to rise as a result. This would have not happened if Labour had not spent all the reserves in its period of office and that's where the blame lies for this mess.

Do you really believe that we would be saddled with less debt had Labour been in power throught the last decade? If so, you must be the only one who does.

For someone who professes to know about economics, I am astounded that you should trot out this nonsense. The answer to paying off all that debt is certainly not to be found in the Labour camp, where hundreds of billions of pounds would be spent to satisfy their agenda. The real question is how they would pay back the debt.

Laughable from you Old Boy, there's no evidence at all that Conservative governments are more fiscally responsible than Labour. It was Conservative Government who squandered the windfalls of privatisation.

So how does the country pay back 2 trillion of accumulated debt from 40 years of failure?

My economic credentials are far stronger than yours here Old Boy, as you well know. Take your rose tinted glasses off and open your eyes.

Mick 26-11-2019 10:58

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018312)
And the Tory party and their deep rooted Islamophobia issues?

Non-existent-That is Fake News.

---------- Post added at 10:58 ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018326)
Laughable from you Old Boy, there's no evidence at all that Conservative governments are more fiscally responsible than Labour. It was Conservative Government who squandered the windfalls of privatisation.

So how does the country pay back 2 trillion of accumulated debt from 40 years of failure?

My economic credentials are far stronger than yours here Old Boy, as you well know. Take your rose tinted glasses off and open your eyes.

I told you to watch your tone. :nono:

jfman 26-11-2019 11:40

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Tory islamophobia, a subject highlighted by a former chair of the Party is "fake news"?

Uncomfortable news maybe, but it's very real.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 12:03

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018326)
Laughable from you Old Boy, there's no evidence at all that Conservative governments are more fiscally responsible than Labour. It was Conservative Government who squandered the windfalls of privatisation.

So how does the country pay back 2 trillion of accumulated debt from 40 years of failure?

My economic credentials are far stronger than yours here Old Boy, as you well know. Take your rose tinted glasses off and open your eyes.

:D:D:D

I have no words....

Dave42 26-11-2019 12:12

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Paul Brand

@PaulBrandITV


BREAKING: Muslim Council of Britain stands by Chief Rabbi but also tells people to vote with their conscience on Islamophobia in Tory party:

“This an issue that is particularly acute in the Conservative Party who have approached Islamophobia with denial, dismissal and deceit.”

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKS5gVoX...jpg&name=small


both parties have big issues with racism both toxic and disastrous and I repeat I never have never will be supporter of Corbyn before people say that

mrmistoffelees 26-11-2019 12:19

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36018340)
Paul Brand

@PaulBrandITV


BREAKING: Muslim Council of Britain stands by Chief Rabbi but also tells people to vote with their conscience on Islamophobia in Tory party:

“This an issue that is particularly acute in the Conservative Party who have approached Islamophobia with denial, dismissal and deceit.”

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKS5gVoX...jpg&name=small

Because it's directed at the Tory party it's 'fake news'

If it was directed at the Labour party however....

Mick 26-11-2019 12:41

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018335)
Tory islamophobia, a subject highlighted by a former chair of the Party is "fake news"?

Uncomfortable news maybe, but it's very real.

Will still vote Tory over the Terrorist loving commie, Marxist Labour Party !!!

Mr K 26-11-2019 12:42

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018327)
Non-existent-That is Fake News.

That's strange all the Conservative leadership candidates (including Bozzo) agreed Islamophobia was an an issue, in their little TV chat, and agreed to have an independent inquiry. We're still waiting....

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 12:51

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018341)
Because it's directed at the Tory party it's 'fake news'

If it was directed at the Labour party however....

The problem in the Labour Party is that anti-Semitism comes from the top and doesn't appear to be addressed.

The difference is that the Conservative Party is addressing the issue of Islamaphobia wherever it occurs and it is reported. The trouble is that some people take remarks such as those made by Boris when he talked about 'letterbox' women, ignoring the fact that he said those things to pour scorn on those men who forced their wives and daughters to dress in that way. That is more to do with men bullying women into doing their bidding than it is with religion. If you doubt that, then read the whole article instead of relying on sound bites.

Dave42 26-11-2019 12:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018346)
The problem in the Labour Party is that anti-Semitism comes from the top and doesn't appear to be addressed.

The difference is that the Conservative Party is addressing the issue of Islamaphobia wherever it occurs and it is reported. The trouble is that some people take remarks such as those made by Boris when he talked about 'letterbox' women, ignoring the fact that he said those things to pour scorn on those men who forced their wives and daughters to dress in that way. That is more to do with men bullying women into doing their bidding than it is with religion. If you doubt that, then read the whole article instead of relying on sound bites.

ahem take you forgot on purpose the islamophobia from Boris and he went back on enquiry promise he made live on tv both parties have very big issues with racism

jfman 26-11-2019 12:56

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018343)
Will still vote Tory over the Terrorist loving commie, Marxist Labour Party !!!

We get that those are your political opinions. However that doesn't make the claim of Tory Islamophobia fake news.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 12:57

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018344)
That's strange all the Conservative leadership candidates (including Bozzo) agreed Islamophobia was an an issue, in their little TV chat, and agreed to have an independent inquiry. We're still waiting....

Whereas Labour continue to ignore anti-Semitism, which is a far bigger problem. The inquiry is being set up, I understand.

jfman 26-11-2019 12:57

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018346)
The problem in the Labour Party is that anti-Semitism comes from the top and doesn't appear to be addressed.

The difference is that the Conservative Party is addressing the issue of Islamaphobia wherever it occurs and it is reported. The trouble is that some people take remarks such as those made by Boris when he talked about 'letterbox' women, ignoring the fact that he said those things to pour scorn on those men who forced their wives and daughters to dress in that way. That is more to do with men bullying women into doing their bidding than it is with religion. If you doubt that, then read the whole article instead of relying on sound bites.

The actual Prime Minister has made islamophic statements. How much closer to the top do you want?

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 12:59

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36018347)
ahem take you forgot on purpose the islamophobia from Boris and he went back on enquiry promise he made live on tv both parties have very big issues with racism

I addressed that in my post. Boris does not suffer with Islamaphobia and will not tolerate that in others. I've addressed the 'letterbox women' issue. That was not Islamaphobia. You need to read the article.

jfman 26-11-2019 13:00

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018349)
Whereas Labour continue to ignore anti-Semitism, which is a far bigger problem. The inquiry is being set up, I understand.

It's actually a lesser problem by any quantitative measure. It's on the news less though, mainly because anti-Semitism is a stick conveniently used to beat the Labour party.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 13:00

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018350)
The actual Prime Minister has made islamophic statements. How much closer to the top do you want?

Which statements are you referring to?

jfman 26-11-2019 13:01

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018353)
Which statements are you referring to?

The letterboxes one. For a start.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 13:01

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018354)
The letterboxes one. For a start.

Which I have addressed. Next...?

jfman 26-11-2019 13:02

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018355)
Which I have addressed. Next...?

It's islamophic. The fact you made an excuse for it is irrelevant.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 13:05

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018356)
It's islamophic. The fact you made an excuse for it is irrelevant.

So that is the best you can do? Read the article and get this in context. This was not an issue of being against Islam (which does not require women to wear burkas), it was against the practice by which some men try to control their women.

jfman 26-11-2019 13:17

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018357)
So that is the best you can do? Read the article and get this in context. This was not an issue of being against Islam (which does not require women to wear burkas), it was against the practice by which some men try to control their women.

A man of his expensive education would have been able to articulate himself better if that was actually true.

I don't need to see it through your rose tinted spectacles to know that, at all costs, you will defend the Conservative party.

mrmistoffelees 26-11-2019 13:48

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018346)
The problem in the Labour Party is that anti-Semitism comes from the top and doesn't appear to be addressed.

The difference is that the Conservative Party is addressing the issue of Islamaphobia wherever it occurs and it is reported. The trouble is that some people take remarks such as those made by Boris when he talked about 'letterbox' women, ignoring the fact that he said those things to pour scorn on those men who forced their wives and daughters to dress in that way. That is more to do with men bullying women into doing their bidding than it is with religion. If you doubt that, then read the whole article instead of relying on sound bites.

Not really as members of the conservative party have expressed that islamophobia is also prevalent at the top.

Both parties have declared that the respective issues in their parties will not be tolerated and yet both parties seem to be doing little to nothing to sort out the issues.

I'm not here to profess that the Tories are dealing with it better than Labour or vice versa. They're both as bad as each other

nomadking 26-11-2019 14:34

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018354)
The letterboxes one. For a start.

How is that Islamophobic? It was just making the obvious visual comparison. People make comments on different clothing and appearances all the time.

Carth 26-11-2019 14:51

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018318)

New Labour are part of the 40 years of failure that has accumulated 2 trillion pounds of debt with no plans to pay it back. Older generations are leaving younger generations with this burden round their necks.

We need a genuine alternative to the neo-liberal capitalist status quo which has no answers for the genuine problems this country faces.

OK, for starters can you stop blaming me (as part of the older generation) for something I haven't done.

Secondly, what do you (with a self confessed greater understanding of economics) suggest as a 'genuine alternative' to what is currently on offer from both Lab & Cons . . or even Lib Dems?

Paul 26-11-2019 16:03

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36018362)
Both parties have declared that the respective issues in their parties will not be tolerated and yet both parties seem to be doing little to nothing to sort out the issues.

I'm not here to profess that the Tories are dealing with it better than Labour or vice versa. They're both as bad as each other

Probably about the most sensible thing Ive read in the last four pages of drivel.

Move on people, this constant digging at each other has been done to death now, no more needed.

Carth 26-11-2019 16:11

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
So hopefully we can all agree that:

* They all tell porkies, always have done.
* They're all promising to spend money they haven't got, and probably never will have unless they decimate the UK.
* There are 'racist' undertones of one description or another in the main parties, and possibly underlying in the others too.


Right, glad that's out of the way then :D

jfman 26-11-2019 16:16

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36018365)
OK, for starters can you stop blaming me (as part of the older generation) for something I haven't done.

Individuals no, but collectively yes. Maybe not consciously, but politicians took one off windfalls from privatisation and squandered it leaving us where we are today. 2 trillion in debt.

I'm interested in how 2 trillion is sustainable but 2.2 trillion and holding state assets - like broadband networks - isn't.

Quote:

Secondly, what do you (with a self confessed greater understanding of economics) suggest as a 'genuine alternative' to what is currently on offer from both Lab & Cons . . or even Lib Dems?
The starting point is for politicians to be honest that the low tax economy is essentially a deception funded from one off windfalls.

Mr K 26-11-2019 16:28

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018370)
Individuals no, but collectively yes. Maybe not consciously, but politicians took one off windfalls from privatisation and squandered it leaving us where we are today. 2 trillion in debt.

I'm interested in how 2 trillion is sustainable but 2.2 trillion and holding state assets - like broadband networks - isn't.



The starting point is for politicians to be honest that the low tax economy is essentially a deception funded from one off windfalls.

Voters have to take some of the blame here not just politicians. We want tax cuts and increased spending on public services. We're conning ourselves and vote for those that promise the impossible.

OLD BOY 26-11-2019 16:51

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018370)
Individuals no, but collectively yes. Maybe not consciously, but politicians took one off windfalls from privatisation and squandered it leaving us where we are today. 2 trillion in debt.

I'm interested in how 2 trillion is sustainable but 2.2 trillion and holding state assets - like broadband networks - isn't.



The starting point is for politicians to be honest that the low tax economy is essentially a deception funded from one off windfalls.

It's about time you started being honest. The £2 trillion debt was not caused by privatisation. You are trying to move the goalposts. Unsuccessfully, I would add.

---------- Post added at 16:51 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018358)
A man of his expensive education would have been able to articulate himself better if that was actually true.

I don't need to see it through your rose tinted spectacles to know that, at all costs, you will defend the Conservative party.

Once again, read the article.

jfman 26-11-2019 16:56

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018372)
It's about time you started being honest. The £2 trillion debt was not caused by privatisation. You are trying to move the goalposts. Unsuccessfully, I would add.

Putting words in my mouth I see. I said despite privatisation, selling off all state assets to the private sector, that for 40 years your neo-liberal economic model has failed this country. These assets didn’t generate revenue at privatisation because they were competitive markets - they did so because of the limited scope for competition that we say today. They were selling future profits.

2 trillion of debt. 40 years of failure.

Hugh 26-11-2019 17:05

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Going round in circles again - move on, please (or expect fracks).

Paul 26-11-2019 17:06

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36018375)
Going round in circles again - move on, please (or expect fracks).

The first one has been given, more to follow if people cant follow instructions.

Dave42 26-11-2019 17:20

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018371)
Voters have to take some of the blame here not just politicians. We want tax cuts and increased spending on public services. We're conning ourselves and vote for those that promise the impossible.

all parties been guilty of that though that's the problem

Sephiroth 26-11-2019 17:24

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Looking at the Labour vote count on the forum, I'm not sure that the antisemitism thing is fully understood.

In terms of Jewish feelings, there are several factors in play here

1. Historic persecution in Europe (and UK 500 years ago);

2. Nazism & the Holocaust;

3. A leaning towards socialism as an antithesis to fascism;

4. Inner security that they could always bolt to Israel if things get bad.

Corbyn's past championing of terrorist causes, including Arab terrorism, makes Jews nervous.

Momentum's hatred of Israel (as in support for Palestine) which then affects Jews who have an obvious degree of support for Israel (and not necessarily their settlements activities) then begin to feel uncomfortable.

It is utterly unacceptable that a mainstream UK political party should be so inconsiderate towards the Jewish minority in the UK.

So the Chief Rabbi then recommends to Jews that their vote should not go to Labour - which is unnatural for most Jews. For Jews to be considering the Israel bolthole from our country is so far beyond the pale that I'm lost for the best words.

Those on this forum who will vote Labour are accepting this awful situation and need to re-evaluate their position.



Angua 26-11-2019 18:29

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36018382)
Looking at the Labour vote count on the forum, I'm not sure that the antisemitism thing is fully understood.

In terms of Jewish feelings, there are several factors in play here

1. Historic persecution in Europe (and UK 500 years ago);

2. Nazism & the Holocaust;

3. A leaning towards socialism as an antithesis to fascism;

4. Inner security that they could always bolt to Israel if things get bad.

Corbyn's past championing of terrorist causes, including Arab terrorism, makes Jews nervous.

Momentum's hatred of Israel (as in support for Palestine) which then affects Jews who have an obvious degree of support for Israel (and not necessarily their settlements activities) then begin to feel uncomfortable.

It is utterly unacceptable that a mainstream UK political party should be so inconsiderate towards the Jewish minority in the UK.

So the Chief Rabbi then recommends to Jews that their vote should not go to Labour - which is unnatural for most Jews. For Jews to be considering the Israel bolthole from our country is so far beyond the pale that I'm lost for the best words.

Those on this forum who will vote Labour are accepting this awful situation and need to re-evaluate their position.



Problem Corbyn in particular had, was a weak response to accusations of Anti-Semitism, no proper in-depth enquiry. This has allowed the extreme RW to capitalise on this. The irony being the extreme RW are the most racist leaning of all.

Mick 26-11-2019 22:36

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36018386)
Problem Corbyn in particular had, was a weak response to accusations of Anti-Semitism, no proper in-depth enquiry. This has allowed the extreme RW to capitalise on this. The irony being the extreme RW are the most racist leaning of all.

There is no such terms. You cannot be, just a little bit racist, or more racist than someone else or group of people. Racism is racism.

Mr K 27-11-2019 07:36

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018406)
There is no such terms. You cannot be, just a little bit racist, or more racist than someone else or group of people. Racism is racism.

Indeed, whether it it anti-Semitism or Islamophobia. You can't just call one out and ignore the other.

Chris 27-11-2019 08:03

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36018386)
Problem Corbyn in particular had, was a weak response to accusations of Anti-Semitism, no proper in-depth enquiry. This has allowed the extreme RW to capitalise on this. The irony being the extreme RW are the most racist leaning of all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018414)
Indeed, whether it it anti-Semitism or Islamophobia. You can't just call one out and ignore the other.

Which is the reason Corbyn is in such hot water at the moment.

Labour has a large and quite specific problem with anti-Semitism, brought about by the hard left’s obsession with Palestine. They are powerless to affect the issue directly because Israel doesn’t export that much to us, so they can’t demonstrate their righteousness with a high-profile boycott, so they do the next best thing, which is to put the boot in to anyone they perceive as an ideological opponent. The difference between the state of Israel and the traditional religion of Israel becomes blurred and hey presto.

Meanwhile on the far right there is the same old obsession with people who look a bit funny, sound a bit funny and are attacking our way of life. But their hatred lacks the focus of the anti-Semitism of the left. There are no Tory-affiliated fringe groups organising meetings where the platform is regularly given over to people who question a nation state’s right to exist. Their racism is no less serious in itself but it simply is not the same embedded, organised, campaigning cancer that it is on the left.

Crucially, the leader of the Tories is not an ideological bedfellow of those on the far right who express anti-Islamic racism. (No, he just isn’t, and no amount of whataboutery will alter that essential fact). Johnson is prone to writing buffoonish caricatures because he is a newspaper columnist who is used to being read only by those who share his casual disregard for the power of words to offend those of different backgrounds. Senior Muslims have called him out over it. But none of them has ever gone so far as to say their entire community is beginning to question its safety in the UK in the way the Chief Rabbi did yesterday.

Corbyn, while I’m certain he does not consider himself racist, seems absolutely blind to what his personal obsession with the Palestinian question has enabled his ideological supporters to do. The Left is obsessed with who it shares a platform with, yet Corbyn is unable to see how his repeated sharing of platforms with his “friends from Hamas” has thereby domesticated and justified those in his party who think it is justified to believe a nation state should be driven into the sea. Labour has a serious, organised problem with anti-Semitism among the very people within the party who put Corbyn in his post. And yet Corbyn just can’t see how he is damaging his own cause by refusing to call them out, directly and specifically, preferring instead to stick to his usual formula of generic condemnation of all bad things everywhere at all times. No matter how sincere he is, he sounds evasive and unfocused.

Above all, Corbyn makes himself look like he doesn’t know how to handle a crisis. In fact he makes himself look like he doesn’t necessarily see a crisis, even when it’s right on top of him. In the middle of a general election campaign, that’s not a good look.

GrimUpNorth 27-11-2019 08:03

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018414)
Indeed, whether it it anti-Semitism or Islamophobia. You can't just call one out and ignore the other.

You can when one of them is your team.

Anyway, had our first election leaflet yesterday from Mary Creagh (let's be generous and call her very remain leaning). Wakefield voted leave but there's no mention of leaving the EU anywhere in her begging leaflet - quite a risky approach I think as she's only got a small majority. If she'd confronted the issue head on I think many people would have some respect for her. As it is she's come across as ignoring a big issue which just makes her appear arrogant.

TheDaddy 27-11-2019 08:33

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36018415)
The difference between the state of Israel and the traditional religion of Israel becomes blurred and hey presto.

And that's just how the Israeli government likes it, they regularly conflate criticism of Israel as antisemitic,
Labour should have remembered their shared history of sticking up for and being allied with British Jews rather than allienating them, stupid and so avoidable imo, the standard of politician we're turning out is truely abysmal

Maggy 27-11-2019 08:49

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36018415)
Which is the reason Corbyn is in such hot water at the moment.

Labour has a large and quite specific problem with anti-Semitism, brought about by the hard left’s obsession with Palestine. They are powerless to affect the issue directly because Israel doesn’t export that much to us, so they can’t demonstrate their righteousness with a high-profile boycott, so they do the next best thing, which is to put the boot in to anyone they perceive as an ideological opponent. The difference between the state of Israel and the traditional religion of Israel becomes blurred and hey presto.

Meanwhile on the far right there is the same old obsession with people who look a bit funny, sound a bit funny and are attacking our way of life. But their hatred lacks the focus of the anti-Semitism of the left. There are no Tory-affiliated fringe groups organising meetings where the platform is regularly given over to people who question a nation state’s right to exist. Their racism is no less serious in itself but it simply is not the same embedded, organised, campaigning cancer that it is on the left.

Crucially, the leader of the Tories is not an ideological bedfellow of those on the far right who express anti-Islamic racism. (No, he just isn’t, and no amount of whataboutery will alter that essential fact). Johnson is prone to writing buffoonish caricatures because he is a newspaper columnist who is used to being read only by those who share his casual disregard for the power of words to offend those of different backgrounds. Senior Muslims have called him out over it. But none of them has ever gone so far as to say their entire community is beginning to question its safety in the UK in the way the Chief Rabbi did yesterday.

Corbyn, while I’m certain he does not consider himself racist, seems absolutely blind to what his personal obsession with the Palestinian question has enabled his ideological supporters to do. The Left is obsessed with who it shares a platform with, yet Corbyn is unable to see how his repeated sharing of platforms with his “friends from Hamas” has thereby domesticated and justified those in his party who think it is justified to believe a nation state should be driven into the sea. Labour has a serious, organised problem with anti-Semitism among the very people within the party who put Corbyn in his post. And yet Corbyn just can’t see how he is damaging his own cause by refusing to call them out, directly and specifically, preferring instead to stick to his usual formula of generic condemnation of all bad things everywhere at all times. No matter how sincere he is, he sounds evasive and unfocused.

Above all, Corbyn makes himself look like he doesn’t know how to handle a crisis. In fact he makes himself look like he doesn’t necessarily see a crisis, even when it’s right on top of him. In the middle of a general election campaign, that’s not a good look.

So do we choose Boris who seems to be a proven liar and also has some dubious remarks about Muslims in his past? Seems we are between the devil and a hard place at the moment for choice.

JMcB 27-11-2019 09:00

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Is it ok that the news keep running the Corbin story but never run this one

Muslim Council criticises Tories over Islamophobia

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50561043

pip08456 27-11-2019 09:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JMcB (Post 36018421)
Is it ok that the news keep running the Corbin story but never run this one

Muslim Council criticises Tories over Islamophobia

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50561043

Says he posting a link to a news site.

Mr K 27-11-2019 09:13

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JMcB (Post 36018421)
Is it ok that the news keep running the Corbin story but never run this one

Muslim Council criticises Tories over Islamophobia

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50561043

Yes it's ok given the media bias. The poll on this thread is a bit irrelevant given the forums bias.

OLD BOY 27-11-2019 09:16

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JMcB (Post 36018421)
Is it ok that the news keep running the Corbin story but never run this one

Muslim Council criticises Tories over Islamophobia

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50561043

The difference being that the Conservatives are taking positive action to prevent it. As the article says:

The party suspended a number of members earlier this month after the Guardian supplied it with a dossier produced by an anonymous Twitter user containing examples of allegedly Islamophobic social media posts.

A number of members were also suspended in September, after the BBC highlighted 20 cases to the party of members posting or endorsing Islamophobic material online.


Boris Johnson has already explained that his remarks were in defence of Muslim women.

There is no comparison. People are just clutching at straws with this through sheer desperation.

Mr K 27-11-2019 09:16

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Back at in the real world of polls Labour is closing the gap, just like 2017...

OLD BOY 27-11-2019 09:20

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018426)
Back at in the real world of polls Labour is closing the gap, just like 2017...

Don't hold your breath, Mr K. That's just the manifesto bounce. Once those who were taken in by it realise that this is a much bigger con than the tuition fees wheeze, they will be less excited about the prospect of a Labour Government.

Mr K 27-11-2019 09:34

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018427)
Don't hold your breath, Mr K. That's just the manifesto bounce. Once those who were taken in by it realise that this is a much bigger con than the tuition fees wheeze, they will be less excited about the prospect of a Labour Government.

If only they all thought like you OB ;) A gap of less than 7 points probably denies the Tories a majority, that would be a win for the majority of the country who don't want the Tories or Labour in power.

Carth 27-11-2019 09:45

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
I'm saddened - but not really surprised - that a General Election in this country is descending into the farcical and deeply troubling issues of people voting for a candidate simply on the grounds of where they stand on Religious orientated issues.

Racism is alive and doing very well thankyou, pushed into the everyday world by those who use its power as a tool.

Chris 27-11-2019 09:50

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018429)
If only they all thought like you OB ;) A gap of less than 7 points probably denies the Tories a majority, that would be a win for the majority of the country who don't want the Tories or Labour in power.

Polling averages suggest the Tories have a 12-13 point lead at the moment, and electoral calculus is predicting a 68 seat Tory majority.

The manifestos have all come out in the last week to 10 days, we probably need another week for all those to feed through to the polls. Thereafter it will be the campaign trail that makes the difference. Personally I think the chances of Boris cacking that up anywhere near as badly as Teresa May did are next to zero.

Mr K 27-11-2019 09:53

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36018431)
I'm saddened - but not really surprised - that a General Election in this country is descending into the farcical and deeply troubling issues of people voting for a candidate simply on the grounds of where they stand on Religious orientated issues.

Racism is alive and doing very well thankyou, pushed into the everyday world by those who use its power as a tool.

Well the result of a certain referendum we had has just encouraged those with those views. The current PM thinks nothing of making derogatory remarks on religious clothing, or the 'not we'. Things have got worse not better.

Carth 27-11-2019 09:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018434)
Well the result of a certain referendum we had has just encouraged those with those views. The current PM thinks nothing of making derogatory remarks on religious clothing, or the 'not we'. Things have got worse not better.


'sigh'

*shakes head, walks away*

Mr K 27-11-2019 09:59

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36018433)
Polling averages suggest the Tories have a 12-13 point lead at the moment, and electoral calculus is predicting a 68 seat Tory majority.

The manifestos have all come out in the last week to 10 days, we probably need another week for all those to feed through to the polls. Thereafter it will be the campaign trail that makes the difference. Personally I think the chances of Boris cacking that up anywhere near as badly as Teresa May did are next to zero.

And they were 17 points ahead at this point last time. On election day they were 8 points ahead, but the actual vote ended up being 2. Make of that what you will; if you think people love BJ more than TM, you're mistaken.

Record no. of last minute registrations too, 3 million mainly young voters. Wonder what effect that will have?
Who knows? We'll have to wait and see... ;)

Hugh 27-11-2019 10:05

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36018406)
There is no such terms. You cannot be, just a little bit racist, or more racist than someone else or group of people. Racism is racism.

Does that mean that someone who tries to avoid talking to (insert minority here) because they are uncomfortable with (insert minority here) is as racist as someone who beats up and seriously injures, perhaps kills, someone from a (insert minority here) because they hate that (insert minority here)?

Hugh 27-11-2019 10:09

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36018433)
Polling averages suggest the Tories have a 12-13 point lead at the moment, and electoral calculus is predicting a 68 seat Tory majority.

The manifestos have all come out in the last week to 10 days, we probably need another week for all those to feed through to the polls. Thereafter it will be the campaign trail that makes the difference. Personally I think the chances of Boris cacking that up anywhere near as badly as Teresa May did are next to zero.

https://www.itv.com/news/2019-11-22/...-polls-change/
Quote:

At the same point in the 2017 election campaign, the polls showed the Tories on 47%, with Labour on 31%, the Lib Dems on 8%, Ukip on 5% and the Greens on 3%.

But on election day, the Tories finished on 43% – four points below where they had been three weeks earlier – while Labour had risen 10 points to 41%.

While the Lib Dems remained on 8%, both Ukip and the Greens dropped to 2%.

The change was enough to deny the Tories a majority and produce a hung parliament.

Mick 27-11-2019 11:05

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36018437)
Does that mean that someone who tries to avoid talking to (insert minority here) because they are uncomfortable with (insert minority here) is as racist as someone who beats up and seriously injures, perhaps kills, someone from a (insert minority here) because they hate that (insert minority here)?

It means what I said and I’m sticking to what I said. No one can be just a “little bit” racist. Utter nonsense.

Chris 27-11-2019 12:03

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36018438)

As I said ... the difference between the run in now, and the run in in 2017, is the Tory party leader. I think it’s fairly widely agreed that Theresa May did an extraordinarily poor job of it, especially with the Tories’ pension-stealing manifesto commitment having come out.

Will Boris fare as badly? I can’t see it myself.

Dave42 27-11-2019 13:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36018433)
Polling averages suggest the Tories have a 12-13 point lead at the moment, and electoral calculus is predicting a 68 seat Tory majority.

The manifestos have all come out in the last week to 10 days, we probably need another week for all those to feed through to the polls. Thereafter it will be the campaign trail that makes the difference. Personally I think the chances of Boris cacking that up anywhere near as badly as Teresa May did are next to zero.

they were 24 points ahead last time and look what happened

Mr K 27-11-2019 13:38

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36018449)

Will Boris fare as badly? I can’t see it myself.

I can, TM is a saint compared to the liar incarnate.

Chris 27-11-2019 14:07

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018456)
I can, TM is a saint compared to the liar incarnate.

I don’t think moral fortitude is what will decide this election.

TheDaddy 27-11-2019 14:13

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36018437)
Does that mean that someone who tries to avoid talking to (insert minority here) because they are uncomfortable with (insert minority here) is as racist as someone who beats up and seriously injures, perhaps kills, someone from a (insert minority here) because they hate that (insert minority here)?

Degrees of hate really...

OLD BOY 27-11-2019 16:32

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018456)
I can, TM is a saint compared to the liar incarnate.

He's nothing compared to Corbyn, who is still insisting that the NHS is up for sale. Who does he think will be taken in by this?

Mr K 27-11-2019 16:38

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018462)
He's nothing compared to Corbyn, who is still insisting that the NHS is up for sale. Who does he think will be taken in by this?

Anybody with a knowledge of Boris's track record of broken promises.

OLD BOY 27-11-2019 17:54

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36018464)
Anybody with a knowledge of Boris's track record of broken promises.

Well, the tuth is that only the civil servants have been scoping the nature of possible negotiations - Conservative ministers have not been involved.

So bang goes that deflection story from Corbyn.

Hugh 27-11-2019 18:00

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018466)
Well, the tuth is that only the civil servants have been scoping the nature of possible negotiations - Conservative ministers have not been involved.

So bang goes that deflection story from Corbyn.

Source?

jfman 27-11-2019 18:10

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36018466)
Well, the tuth is that only the civil servants have been scoping the nature of possible negotiations - Conservative ministers have not been involved.

So bang goes that deflection story from Corbyn.

That's quite an audacious claim that the Civil Service are undermining Ministers and wasting resourcing considering possible options that will not happen.

I see on my day off you've continued to peddle the Conservative at all cost mantra.

nomadking 27-11-2019 18:18

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36018467)
Source?

Link

Quote:

Labour obtained uncensored government documents covering six rounds of talks between US and UK officials in Washington and London between July 2017 and July 2019.
They are all preparatory meetings ahead of formal trade talks.
The main push for "privatisation" of the NHS came under Labour.

jfman 27-11-2019 18:20

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018471)
Link

The main push for "privatisation" of the NHS came under Labour.

Doesn't matter if the Conservatives want to push further though now, does it?

Hugh 27-11-2019 18:21

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018471)
Link

The main push for "privatisation" of the NHS came under Labour.

so in 2 years of trade talks, there has been no involvement of Government Ministers to review progress and provide direction?

jfman 27-11-2019 18:22

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36018473)
so in 2 years of trade talks, there has been no involvement of Government Ministers to review progress and provide direction?

Arguably I could believe the second part, but due to incompetence on the part of Ministers rather than it being the normal practice in the Civil Service.

nomadking 27-11-2019 18:23

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018470)
That's quite an audacious claim that the Civil Service are undermining Ministers and wasting resourcing considering possible options that will not happen.

I see on my day off you've continued to peddle the Conservative at all cost mantra.

Nothing at all has been agreed. It's just things they might want to discuss and agree upon. "Everything is up for discussion" is very different to "Agree to everything or nothing will be agreed".

jfman 27-11-2019 18:24

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36018475)
Nothing at all has been agreed. It's just things they might want to discuss and agree upon. "Everything is up for discussion" is very different to "Agree to everything or nothing will be agreed".

And discussing items that are non-negotiable is a total waste of time.

Nothing has been agreed but we certainly have the Ministerial steer.

nomadking 27-11-2019 18:25

Re: Election 2019 - Week 3
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36018472)
Doesn't matter if the Conservatives want to push further though now, does it?

At best, it's disingenuous of Labour to squeal about "privatisation", And the evidence of pushing for much further privatisation is...........?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum