![]() |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
The government are right not to remove him from the succession. It opens a huge can of worms where the government would taste the ability (which they will still have) of getting rid of someone they don't want to be King.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Thankfully Parliament has more recently chosen to pass legislation in order to ensure the heir is determined by law rather than by pure birthright. Three times, most recently in 2013. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Removing Andrew from the line of succession does require an Act of Parliament, but as he is, what, 8th in line, it doesn’t really seem necessary. Of course is things were to change due to some really unlikely catastrophic issue then I suspect that Parliament would act so fast it will make his head spin! |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
So I have not really kept up with this so please excuse me if I am missing something here.
First part: I fail to understand why he is being labelled as a Pedo/Rapist etc, that is Andrew when from what I can see no seems to be able to prove he did anything? The commentary on TV etc never mentions any police reports, DNA, the only thing that seems to be mentioned is "Her Words" and a "Photo" that they say people cannot confirm if it's legit or fake?? If that is all there is, then this is another case of a Man being found guilty of something just because a women says so and it's wrong, annoying and quite frankly sickening that again another man has his life ruined because of an allegation. Second Part (Probably more important): There is though the other side of it, that there are reports he paid her off after the first time she accused him and made her sign an NDA? If that is the case, that makes him look real guilty to me because, I am sorry but no man knowing it will basically end his career, reputation etc sign an NDA and payoff a false accuser, so that makes me think there was something that happened?? The mainstream media and anti-royals seem to be saying that "Because he was friends with epstein he is guilty" but if that is the case, why are they not saying the same for everyone that was friends with him, why is it only Andrew? Am I missing something here, is there more to this than what is being shown on the news etc or is it something that we will probably never know fully what was going on? |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
The man has never been charged with an offence or been near a court of law people seem to be taking this book as the new gospel according to saint virginia, and as far as i can see this story is now about charlie windsor preserving his opulent lifestyle |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
He went to the island, his explanations were not at all convincing, and that photo does appear to be real.
It's not enough for a court of law, but people are going to have their own opinions. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
And that’s fine, at worse, absolutely worse, Andrew slept with a girl who was 17 at the time. Now let’s assume that is true - he denies it, but she was over 16 so the ‘pedo’ label is obviously wrong, ‘rapist’, well you would need to show that he knew that the girl was being coerced into doing it, and it was ‘against her will’. If you can't show that, then ‘rapist’ is inappropriate. ""Her Words" and a "Photo" that they say people cannot confirm if it's legit or fake??” No the photo does seem genuine, so we can conclude that Andrew did meet and knew Guthrie. What else happened is speculation. But any claim that ‘he had never met her’, is palpably wrong. But it’s the lying, there is simply too much evidence that Andrew kept up some kind of relationship with Epstein even when it became obvious of the type of person he was, but this was denied. It’s the steady trickle of revelations, things denied and then shown to be likely to be true, that eventually build up and lead to what happened to him. Now I’ve never met the man, he could well be the nicest and most naive person in the world. Or he’s a self-absorbed narcissist who regards himself as better than anyone else and is simply deserving of respect, because! OK his actions in 1982, yes he did put himself in a position of danger, and could have cried off, so some credit there, but then again did everyone else who was serving at the time. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
I don't think he's a pedo/rapist either. But he is a pos from my first hand knowledge about his behaviour toward people in his orbit. So, he's getting his come-uppance.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
"She told me she was 17, my Worship".
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
"being an adjudicated rapist”
Sorry but in the interest of being fair (and I’m certainly not Trumps biggest fan), but what does that mean? No, he was never convicted of a ‘rape’ change, legally he isn’t a rapist. "his own seedy words about his behaviour at underage beauty . Would I let him make me think there is nothing in there about his sexual predilections we don't already know about, so what is it? “ Oh now right, he certainly has said some things, that most people would go WTF. So yes, I do get your point, I don't think he is a good person! Would I want him within a mile of my daughters? Absolutely not! Be truthful, don’t make stuff up to tar him - frankly he does a good job of doing that himself! |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
He was held liable for a form of sexual assault which was rape in common parlance; rape in every way except the very narrow and specific legal definitions used in NY State law. This was stated in a civil court, on the record, by the trial judge, who explicitly said that ‘rape’ was a reasonable term to use to describe what Trump did. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
It would have come out by now. Not awaiting political correction.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
So the victims don't have a voice?
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Huh :confused:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
The e-mails are pretty bad. Pretty much just there in the open.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
I can understand why Trump is keen to talk about suing the BBC now! It would be a useful distraction from this.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
To be honest, this Epstein stuff is boring now . . . 'special' news updates, a 'fresh' look at what's happening, books, documentaries, films
I guess it does make a decent distraction from all the other stuff though |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
True. The Starmer stuff is now getting interesting. But as you’re reading the Epstein emails, please let me know if anyone with kinky boots emerges.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
I haven't, and won't, read any emails about Epstein & Friends, however the mention of kinky boots for some reason started me humming the Black Sabbath track 'Fairies Wear Boots'
yes, I'm definitely odd :D |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
https://bsky.app/profile/datadrivenm.../3m5hh7cfqu22t
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Sadly I'm not a member :rolleyes:
---------- Post added at 17:25 ---------- Previous post was at 16:49 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Bubba?
:shocked: |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
1 Attachment(s)
They come in a pack of 5, ribbed too... (Sized according to South Park).
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
So there's more pictures of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ein-files.html Can't knock a man for having some fun can you :erm: Do one will you! :mad: |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
The redacted bit said (Andrew to Trump): "I'll show you mine if you can show me yours".
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Gives the impression of a bit of silly play acting. She could be smiling and laughing for all we know. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Yes, who amongst us has not invited a recently freed sex offender to dinner...
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Patterns of behaviour. You appear to be defending someone who paid a couple million pounds out of court settlement to keep an accuser quiet. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
To be honest, from the many (apparently) files released, if they are the worst photo's in the latest batch there must be quite a few showing . . well, nothing but trees in bloom and vases containing pretty flowers ;) |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
There is just nothing disturbing about those pictures. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
What's he playing, doctor? :LOL:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
It’s rather unbecoming of a Prince, to say the least. Most men would be faced with the prospect of divorce if they were pictured in this way.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
He could have done what she said, but he could have also fell victim like many blokes have where our justice systems in many countries find blokes guilty with no evidence, only to decades later be proven to be innocent. Unless you were there, have seen the paperwork etc you cannot know just like I cannot know he didn't do it all we can do is make a personal decision, which for me is 50/50, I won't say he is innocent but I won't also say he is guilty. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Parting company with millions to shut up? Billionaire Trump didn't do that.
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
Since the "E Jean Carroll" thing where as far as I am aware there was no actual evidence just hers and 2 of her friends word for it, a photo of him being at the party and taking "his words" possibly relating to it or something else from an interview Trump was found Guilty of raping her, or sorry was found to have "likely raped her", Trump's reputation has been impacted by it, so has his businesses, his friends and his families, but it's not been enough to stop people voting for him etc. Like him or not, you should not be found guilty or likely guilty of a crime on the basis of someones "word", and frankly if it were switched so a bloke was accusing a women and they had the same "evidence" it would be thrown out. As for Andrew, well his reputation again has been impacted significantly, his families reputation and the reputation of England has been damaged by the accusations made against him. Paying someone millions by either one of them could be seen as a way to try to reduce the impact of those allegations. This is where society and "Social Justice" is a big problem though because the accused is a man, they are automatically guilty and no matter what is proved they will always be looked at as guilty in the eyes of social media and the general public, they could have been in another country to where the "Assault" was supposed to take place but there will still be people who say they did it, and the person seen in another country was a "Body Double placed there so they could get away with the assault" etc etc. Look at Johnny Depp Vs Amber Heard, he was accused and based of that accusation alone lost millions in lost roles, sponsors, lost friends, lost family members trust etc etc, for years he fought to prove she was lying and she was still given everything she wanted. Now she has finally got her just deserts, she has been basically blacklisted in hollywood it would seem, it seems no companies want anything to do with her and she is one of the few females who make a false accusation especially in hollywood who get penalised for it, just not in terms of jail time etc. Depp could have met her and paid her millions to stop her and she may have taken the money, but he decided to fight her and thankfully he did because he is seen by a fair few blokes as the inspiration to really start fighting back against false accusations. So yes I can see people paying hundreds of thousands or even millions to shut someone up because in terms of damage control it maybe more beneficial to keep them quiet than fight it. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
The "unbecoming" was being photographed. |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
:D |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1769888875 |
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
I can't quite make out what the *writing* on the back wall says, but the bit in the middle of the women says "© Banksy "
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
|
Re: Jeffery Epstein and friends
Quote:
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-f...gress-13501106 Money rules the world |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum