Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit: Article 50 Has Been Triggered ! (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33704414)

Osem 19-02-2017 12:11

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35886532)
don't worry there will be bad news in bold on the way ;)

Maybe we'll get a weekend off... :D

pip08456 19-02-2017 13:34

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35886536)
Maybe we'll get a weekend off... :D

Don't be silly, remoaners don't take time off!:D

Hugh 19-02-2017 15:47

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886544)
Don't be silly, remoaners don't take time off!:D

Just like Brexiteers, who complain about Remain voters 24/7.

Sore winners.. ;)

Osem 19-02-2017 15:54

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Well we've had Blair crawling out from under his stone so it wasn't going to be long before Mandelson did likewise.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39020252

These people typify the Eurocrats who refuse to listen to anything they don't want to hear. They're only interested in democracy when it yields what they and they want.

---------- Post added at 15:54 ---------- Previous post was at 15:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35886559)
Just like Brexiteers, who complain about Remain voters 24/7.

Sore winners.. ;)

24/7? Is that a fact? :)

By and large it's not Brexiteers who're continually challenging and questioning the process parliament agreed to and it's not Brexiteers who're claiming the other side didn't know what they were voting for. We're just responding to those who are so there's a lot to be done. ;)

pip08456 19-02-2017 15:55

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35886559)
Just like Brexiteers, who complain about Remain voters 24/7.

Sore winners.. ;)

Unfortunately for you I'm not a sore winner and I do take time off as I know it's going to happen no matter what.

I don't feel the need to to put forward suggestions like "soft Brexit" as I know it doesn't exist under the terms of A50. But then again I'm not clutching at straws, I'm quite happy.

I'd also be quite happy for a transition period if that will make remoaners happy, it's the nearest they'll get to "soft Berxit".

1andrew1 19-02-2017 17:57

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Let's hope things don't turn out this way. Google the headline for full article.

EU negotiators push back on Brexit trade talks until next year
Quote:

The EU’s Brexit negotiators expect to spend until Christmas solely discussing Britain’s divorce from the bloc, denying London any trade talks until progress is made on a €60bn exit bill and the rights of expatriate citizens.
A narrow divorce-first approach favoured by Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator, would represent a big setback for Britain’s aim for a fast-track EU trade deal, completed by the end of 2018.
Source: https://www.ft.com/content/4466ffbc-...e-68d53499ed71

RizzyKing 19-02-2017 18:00

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Article 50 rules out any soft break away and as for a transitional agreement that's a dead duck too because the whole 27 nations of the EU will not agree to it, like it or not hard brexit is what will happen and i have no confidence any agreement will be reached because of internal issues in the EU. Before anyone asks or suggests i voted leave on the basis of the above and that it would create problems for the UK for the next 5-10 years after leaving the EU. Recent things have changed my mind on the period of hardship for the UK and I'm still very happy with my leave vote and am now more confident of a more prosperous future for the UK outside of the EU.

pip08456 19-02-2017 18:16

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886595)
Let's hope things don't turn out this way. Google the headline for full article.

EU negotiators push back on Brexit trade talks until next year

Source: https://www.ft.com/content/4466ffbc-...e-68d53499ed71

A bit misleading as May wanted rights of expats to be decided now (not just UK ones either).

The trade talks they refer to are only those with the EU and will hurt them perhaps more than us.

Your pessimism knows no bounds.

papa smurf 19-02-2017 18:17

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35886536)
Maybe we'll get a weekend off... :D

nope he's back in bold oh doom oh gloom oh despair oh heck;)

1andrew1 19-02-2017 18:25

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886597)
A bit misleading as May wanted rights of expats to be decided now (not just UK ones either).

The trade talks they refer to are only those with the EU and will hurt them perhaps more than us.

Your pessimism knows no bounds.

I've not written the article, I've just provided a link to it as it looks like an important development. As Papa Smurf would say, such articles don't necessarily represent my views.

pip08456 19-02-2017 18:32

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886599)
I've not written the article, I've just provided a link to it as it looks like an important development. As Papa Smurf would say, such articles don't necessarily represent my views.

By pessimism I was referring to the fact that the majority of your links to "articles of importance" are continuously of the ""Doom and Gloom" type.

Ramrod 19-02-2017 18:42

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35886559)
Just like Brexiteers, who complain about Remain voters 24/7.

Sore winners.. ;)

Leave voters would be quiet if it wasn't for remainers who have started court cases, insist that we don't really know what we were voting for etc, etc. So it's a bit rich to complain about brexiteers being sore winners!

techguyone 19-02-2017 18:44

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
I'm still waiting for a bold positive from him, have we had one yet?

denphone 19-02-2017 18:58

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35886598)
nope he's back in bold oh doom oh gloom oh despair oh heck;)

It takes all sorts to make a forum Papa.;)

---------- Post added at 18:58 ---------- Previous post was at 18:54 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886600)
By pessimism I was referring to the fact that the majority of your links to "articles of importance" are continuously of the ""Doom and Gloom" type.

Whether one agrees with Andrew or not he is entitled to put his side just as much as others are entitled to put their side as l am sure you don't want a forum made up of members who all agree with each other.:)

Hom3r 19-02-2017 19:13

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
I want a hard brexit

Ramrod 19-02-2017 19:16

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35886609)
I want a hard brexit

But enough of your Saturday nights......:D

1andrew1 19-02-2017 19:24

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35886602)
I'm still waiting for a bold positive from him, have we had one yet?

Like Papa Smurf, I've explained that links to newspaper articles I make do not necessarily represent my views. The newspaper articles I select represent key developments in Brexit.
There's no logic that dictates that 50% of articles will be positive and 50% negative. Posting like this would not make a poster unbiased, it would make them unrepresentative of Brexit developments.
But if you look at the article that I posted before the most recent one "Irish PM calls for Brexit transition deal, warns against punishing UK" I'm sure many Brexiters would have found it encouraging. ;)
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...&postcount=168

pip08456 19-02-2017 19:39

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886611)
Like Papa Smurf, I've explained that links to newspaper articles I make do not necessarily represent my views. The newspaper articles I select represent key developments in Brexit.
There's no logic that dictates that 50% of articles will be positive and 50% negative. Posting like this would not make a poster unbiased, it would make them unrepresentative of Brexit developments.
But if you look at the article that I posted before the most recent one "Irish PM calls for Brexit transition deal, warns against punishing UK" I'm sure many Brexiters would have found it encouraging. ;)
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...&postcount=168

Andrew, I have no problem in you expressing your view and the stance you may wish to take, that is what freedom is about and reasoned discussion is to be welcomed.

What it appears (rightly or wrongly) you are doing is just "cherry picking" news reports postulating nothing but the downside of Brexit with the odd positive one.

You don't even attempt to discuss the issues of the reports you post.

techguyone 19-02-2017 19:41

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Well said Pip

TheDaddy 19-02-2017 19:47

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35886521)
]Meanwhile more good Brexit news:



Linky

Don't you love tabloids, they absolutely will not repeat the same word twice in a paragraph unless it really it really, absolutely cannot be helped, tasty treats, grub etc

passingbat 19-02-2017 20:00

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886611)
But if you look at the article that I posted before the most recent one "Irish PM calls for Brexit transition deal, warns against punishing UK" I'm sure many Brexiters would have found it encouraging. ;)
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/sh...&postcount=168


That's good Andrew (I did have to do a double take to check that it actually was you ;))


But to be fair, I think you've posted one positive article against goodness knows how many negative articles.


But it's important to look at the publishing source of these articles.


Expect the Mail and the Express to publish pro Brexit articles and organisations such as FT and the BBC to feature anti Brexit articles. Multinational organisations such as Google and Facebook, will, pretty much always, have an anti Brexit stance; it's not a coincidence, that they are also anti Trump

pip08456 19-02-2017 20:23

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
So the FT puts forward it will take longer than 2 years to reach a deal. Article 50 says otherwise.

Quote:

1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

4. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.
LINK

1andrew1 19-02-2017 21:16

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35886622)
That's good Andrew (I did have to do a double take to check that it actually was you ;))
But to be fair, I think you've posted one positive article against goodness knows how many negative articles.

Ha ha, I was expecting you to report to the mods that may account had been hacked :) But in all seriousness, I would honestly state that I don't pick bad news stories and that the stories I select are representative of the state of play of Brexit at the moment. Even the keenest Brexiteers have stated that we're in for a rough ride for the next five years or so. So even they should expect a high proportion of negative news.

Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35886622)
But it's important to look at the publishing source of these articles.

Expect the Mail and the Express to publish pro Brexit articles and organisations such as FT and the BBC to feature anti Brexit articles. Multinational organisations such as Google and Facebook, will, pretty much always, have an anti Brexit stance; it's not a coincidence, that they are also anti Trump

The Mail, The Express and The Sun are discredited sources so caution should be used when reading their articles.
The Mail is no longer trusted by Wikipedia
The Express was found to be wrong when it said house prices had risen after the Brexit vote when the data it used covered the month before the vote.
The Sun was censured for incorrectly stating that 1 in 5 British Muslims have sympathy for Jihadis
With regard to Google and Facebook, they're more platforms than news sources themselves.
I look at a wide variety of sources and post articles from reputable sources like The Daily Telegraph, Reuters, Sky News, Financial Times, BBC and The Guardian. I won't venture my opinions of these sources as I think we'll go off on a big tangent. :)

---------- Post added at 21:16 ---------- Previous post was at 20:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886624)
So the FT puts forward it will take longer than 2 years to reach a deal. Article 50 says otherwise.

LINK

My reading of the article was that 2017 is reserved for negotiating the leaving element then after that a trade deal can be considered. Where does the FT talk about two years? I'm not saying it's not there, but I can't find it.

The €60bn is also an issue that has not been given much prominence by the media but is a figure we'll be hearing more of this year.

pip08456 19-02-2017 21:30

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886628)


Where does the FT talk about two years? I'm not saying it's not there, but I can't find it.

The €60bn is also an issue that has not been given much prominence by the media but is a figure we'll be hearing more of this year.

OK 21Mths then.

Quote:

A narrow divorce-first approach favoured by Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief negotiator, would represent a big setback for Britain’s aim for a fast-track EU trade deal, completed by the end of 2018.
60bn is just a figure that's been thrown about at the moment and up to present has no factual basis. Not saying it won't be true.

1andrew1 19-02-2017 21:40

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886632)
OK 21Mths then.

60bn is just a figure that's been thrown about at the moment and up to present has no factual basis. Not saying it won't be true.

Understand where you're coming from. The two years you linked to refers to a country leaving the EU. A trade deal with the EU is a separate process so wouldn't necessarily fall withing the two years - though the UK hopes it will.

techguyone 19-02-2017 21:47

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886624)
So the FT puts forward it will take longer than 2 years to reach a deal. Article 50 says otherwise.



LINK

They're probably right, It only takes one bolshie republic to put the kibosh on all the rest, ask the Canadians, they had a 7 year deal fall over because of a small part of Belgium.

Hard Brexit it is then, 2 years on the dot we just shrug and go WTO tariff.

It's not CMD at the helm now, just go in with that hard brexit front and centre and see what happens, whatever we do, don't show a whiff of fear to them.

They have much more on their plate than we do, with failing economies, migrants coming out of their backsides etc etc, they need us very much more than we need them, and they know it and hopefully they'll know that we know they know it.

Bring it on.

pip08456 19-02-2017 22:09

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35886636)
They're probably right, It only takes one bolshie republic to put the kibosh on all the rest, ask the Canadians, they had a 7 year deal fall over because of a small part of Belgium.

Hard Brexit it is then, 2 years on the dot we just shrug and go WTO tariff.

It's not CMD at the helm now, just go in with that hard brexit front and centre and see what happens, whatever we do, don't show a whiff of fear to them.

They have much more on their plate than we do, with failing economies, migrants coming out of their backsides etc etc, they need us very much more than we need them, and they know it and hopefully they'll know that we know they know it.

Bring it on.

No, at the end of 2yrs everything finishes and it's hard Brexit unless not only the other 27 but the UK as well agree to continue negotiations.

The only way I can see around it is for all EEA trading rules to stay in place pending trade negotiations being concluded. Will the EU agree? I think not because free movement is inextricably linked to it.

WTO rules will then apply. Not good for either party so gives impetus to a deal of some sort to be brokered within 2yrs even if it is only an interim one.

1andrew1 19-02-2017 22:35

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886640)
Not good for either party so gives impetus to a deal of some sort to be brokered within 2yrs even if it is only an interim one.

I strongly suspect some kind of interim deal will be agreed. I know that techguyone criticised Belgium for holding up the Canada deal "It only takes one bolshie republic to put the kibosh on all the rest" but that's their sovereign right. I expect that the EU27's parliaments will want to similarly sign off any trade deal with the UK as well.

pip08456 20-02-2017 06:26

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
It had to happen. Interesting times for the coming week. What power do they think they have?

Quote:

Peers from across the parties will begin efforts to make changes to Theresa May’s plan for Brexit in the House of Lords on Monday, despite warnings from Tory MPs that their actions will increase appetite for reform or abolition of the upper chamber.
I know it's the Guardian but...

TheDaddy 20-02-2017 08:19

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35886653)
What power do they think have?

The power to get themselves abolished, with a bit of luck

heero_yuy 20-02-2017 09:17

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Commenting, Change Britain supporter Anne-Marie Trevelyan said:

‘This Bill is simply about giving the Prime Minister the authority to trigger Article 50 and begin the process of leaving the EU. Nothing more, nothing less. Unelected peers shouldn’t seek to delay this because they refuse to accept the result of the referendum.

‘Many of these Lords are also set to receive generous pensions from the EU. They should declare this so the public know whether they are voting with democracy or their bank account in mind.’
Linky

EU gravytrain peers. :rolleyes:

1andrew1 20-02-2017 10:39

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
An ingenious European lawsuit could finally provide a realistic way to stop Brexit
Quote:

But what ultimately fueled his decision to file the case was the injustice he has seen in his practice of many years fighting tax-avoidance cases, trying to recover money that corporations owed to the government.
“Our systems and institutions don’t protect the weak and the poor,” he said. “For many years, I’ve been working on ensuring that our legal system works for those who do not have much. This Brexit case is a natural, logical extension of that work.”
https://qz.com/906547/an-ingenious-e...tm_source=qzfb

Mick 20-02-2017 11:24

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886669)
An ingenious European lawsuit could finally provide a realistic way to stop Brexit

https://qz.com/906547/an-ingenious-e...tm_source=qzfb

Absolute rubbish. Andrew, you need to stop it with the fantasy stories. Brexit IS happening.

1andrew1 20-02-2017 11:38

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35886680)
Absolute rubbish. Andrew, you need to stop it with the fantasy stories. Brexit IS happening.

I don't have any fantasty stories Mick. And I'm not asking people to agree with the protagonist. This is a link to a news item. I think it's of interest to the thread's readers.

techguyone 20-02-2017 11:49

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Then instead of just posting clickbait stuff for 'discussion' why don't you add your own comments on the articles you post, it's annoying you just posting mainly negative stuff then letting us get on with it, you're not a teacher setting us a subject and then saying 'discuss' it's a forum, so don't just copy & post, comment.

1andrew1 20-02-2017 12:05

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by techguyone (Post 35886683)
Then instead of just posting clickbait stuff for 'discussion' why don't you add your own comments on the articles you post, it's annoying you just posting mainly negative stuff then letting us get on with it, you're not a teacher setting us a subject and then saying 'discuss' it's a forum, so don't just copy & post, comment.

Fair point. I do normally put a comment before any articles but work got in the way on this occasion.

tweetiepooh 20-02-2017 12:45

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
I hope the peers do have input to the debate. The fact they don't have to worry about reelection or popularity means they "CAN" (emphasise "CAN") provide input and insight that those elected may be more reluctant to bring up.

1andrew1 20-02-2017 13:00

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35886687)
I hope the peers do have input to the debate. The fact they don't have to worry about reelection or popularity means they "CAN" (emphasise "CAN") provide input and insight that those elected may be more reluctant to bring up.

With Corbyn dead behind the wheel, we strongly need some independent oversight on the process.

heero_yuy 20-02-2017 13:16

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35886687)
I hope the peers do have input to the debate. The fact they don't have to worry about reelection or popularity means they "CAN" (emphasise "CAN") provide input and insight that those elected may be more reluctant to bring up.

As I posted above many peers are beholden to the EU for income and their pensions. Turkeys don't vote for Xmas.

Ramrod 20-02-2017 13:43

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886691)
With Corbyn dead behind the wheel, we strongly need some independent oversight on the process.

and you honestly think that the peers are the people for the job? :D

1andrew1 20-02-2017 15:11

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35886699)
and you honestly think that the peers are the people for the job? :D

The House of Lords is an essential part of our sovereignty providing useful checks and balances. Obviously, I'd prefer it if Tony and Tim had the final say on A50 as I think they're the best people for the job. :D

tweetiepooh 20-02-2017 15:12

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Surely you mean that Tony and Tim were finally tied up and left on the A50.

heero_yuy 20-02-2017 15:15

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35886703)
Surely you mean that Tony and Tim were finally tied up and left on the A50.

Gets my vote. :tu:

gba93 20-02-2017 15:16

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35886702)
The House of Lords is an essential part of our sovereignty providing useful checks and balances. Obviously, I'd prefer it if Tony and Tim had the final say on A50 as I think they're the best people for the job. :D

Ahh, one T nobody's ever heard of and one that everyone wishes they'd never heard of ;)

Mick 21-02-2017 13:14

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
BoE Gov, Mark Carney, finally admits 'Brexit could be smooth after all.'

http://news.sky.com/story/carney-eye...rates-10776321

Quote:

Bank of England governor Mark Carney has acknowledged that the UK's divorce from the EU may yet proceed smoothly - and that it would mean a higher path for interest rates.

Mr Carney said there was also a "less optimistic" scenario for the economy, which would dampen the path for rates.

But his comments to the Commons Treasury Select Committee about a possible positive outcome to Brexit stand in stark contrast to the dire warnings he issued before the referendum that the UK could slip into recession.
Finally a believer that there is light at the end of the tunnel, none of this doom and gloom crap.

heero_yuy 21-02-2017 13:14

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

SCOTLAND CAN’T stay in the European Union as the rest of the UK leaves, whether the country chooses to become independent or not, the Scottish Secretary is set to say.

David Mundell will tell Members of the Scottish Parliament that Scotland won’t be able to remain in the bloc, even if it holds a second referendum on independence.

David Mundell will tell MSPs that Scotland must exit the EU with the rest of the UK

He will tell Holyrood’s Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee tomorrow that there are no “easy assumptions” of how long it could take Scotland to rejoin the EU if it opts to become independent.

“There is no set of circumstances in which Scotland could remain a member of the EU after the rest of the UK has left,” he will say.

And he will add that Scotland would have to re-apply to become a member after the EU leaves, and Scotland leaves the UK.
Source

Osem 21-02-2017 13:43

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35886830)
BoE Gov, Mark Carney, finally admits 'Brexit could be smooth after all.'

http://news.sky.com/story/carney-eye...rates-10776321



Finally a believer that there is light at the end of the tunnel, none of this doom and gloom crap.

He'll be right about interest rate ones day too.

Trouble and doom is far better for the media since it enables them to investigate, report and rehash all sorts of awful possibilities and thereby stir up a whole load of fear, panic and protest which they can then report on as well. There's a big difference between responsibly reporting news and creating news or circulating speculation and I feel there's rather too much of the latter going on these days. It doesn't just apply to the Brexit and Trump stories either because these organisations are always in need of something to report even if it amounts to sensationalising nothing more than hearsay.

Mick 21-02-2017 14:05

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35886831)

It defies all logic to me why Scotland, or shall we say the foolish SNP, want to remain on the bloc with 27 other EU Countries but become Independent, stupidity knows no bounds.

Taf 21-02-2017 14:09

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35886838)
It defies all logic to me why Scotland, or shall we say the foolish SNP, want to remain on the bloc with 27 other EU Countries but become Independent, stupidity knows no bounds.

EU grants? :dunce:

Mick 21-02-2017 14:20

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35886839)
EU grants? :dunce:

But it would have to probably adopt the Euro, it certainly will not be allowed to maintain British Sterling as it's currency. It would probably also lose all it's UK Grants, which could be substantially more that what the EU gives.

Kursk 21-02-2017 14:27

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 35886839)
EU grants? :dunce:

And how does that pan out in Wales Taf which receives huge amounts of EU funding and yet voted to Leave?

Osem 21-02-2017 18:39

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35886846)
And how does that pan out in Wales Taf which receives huge amounts of EU funding and yet voted to Leave?

The Welsh are more realistic and aren't living in an SNP dream world?*... ;)

* To be fair the the Scots, they did reject that 'dreamworld'.... just... so there is some common sense up there. :)

pip08456 21-02-2017 18:50

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35886831)

So the penny has finally dropped. If they do get another (highly unlikely) Independance referendum which is successful, they will be treated no differently to any other country that applies for membership.

Osem 21-02-2017 18:54

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Sturgeon et al have been a bit quiet about this haven't they?

Maybe the EU's thinking the last thing they need is to admit a tail which likes to wag the dog into their club. :)

heero_yuy 22-02-2017 08:39

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35886902)
Sturgeon et al have been a bit quiet about this haven't they?

Maybe the EU's thinking the last thing they need is to admit a tail which likes to wag the dog into their club. :)

The EU is a rather large dog though. :D

Osem 22-02-2017 09:48

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
So the SNP's pipe dream has been exposed for what it was. It's not looking that good is it - laughable economic projections, retaining Sterling, retained EU membership blah, blah, blah...

1andrew1 24-02-2017 10:30

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Interesting development but if there was any overspending I don't think the organisations exist any longer for any fines etc to be levied.
Quote:

EU referendum campaign spending probed
The spending returns of the Stronger In and Vote Leave campaigns in last year's EU referendum are under investigation, the Electoral Commission has announced.
A total of more than £32m was spent on the campaign - with the Leave side funded by donations totalling £16.4m, outgunning the Remain side's £15.1m.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39075244

Kursk 24-02-2017 10:35

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887303)
Interesting development but if there was any overspending I don't think the organisations exist any longer for any fines etc to be levied.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39075244

Do the figures include Mr Cameron's £9m taxpayer-funded Remain booklet?

Ramrod 25-02-2017 18:24

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
See, whenever a remoaner says something like "you brexiteers are such poor winners. Don't you know that you've won? I don't know what you lot are so worried about" :blah:
......This is the kind of thing that makes us worry and makes me want to shove their heads down a toilet and flush it

Quote:

Theresa May facing double defeat over Brexit Bill as Lords debate amendments on EU citizens and final vote for MPs
:dozey:

papa smurf 26-02-2017 09:29

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Gina Miller demands Lords show 'backbone' in changing Theresa May's Brexit Bill on eve of critical debate




http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7599456.html

Kursk 26-02-2017 11:00

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35887489)
Gina Miller demands Lords show 'backbone' in changing Theresa May's Brexit Bill on eve of critical debate
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7599456.html

Gina was with Andrew Marr this morning. I think she's actually doing damage to her cause every time she opens her gob. I hope we see more of her.

Ramrod 26-02-2017 15:09

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Ministers urged to sack Lord Heseltine after he vows to join Brexit rebellion in Lords over Article 50

passingbat 26-02-2017 17:46

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 

People should not be surprised that, Heseltine and Mandelson are leading the pro Remain group in the Lords; both have Bilderberg links. In the Commons Ken Clarke voted against A50; another person with links to the globalist Bilderberg Group.

Osem 27-02-2017 12:53

Re: UK Exit of EU (Brexit)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35887555)
People should not be surprised that, Heseltine and Mandelson are leading the pro Remain group in the Lords; both have Bilderberg links. In the Commons Ken Clarke voted against A50; another person with links to the globalist Bilderberg Group.

Mandelson has all sorts of 'links' - including that from which his very generous home loan came, enabling him to buy a very swanky house otherwise out of his financial reach*. That aside, being on the in the House of Lords and EU gravy trains simultaneously is very nice 'work' for the privileged few and enables them to assist their even richer mates. Why would these people want to bite the hand that feeds them?

* https://www.theguardian.com/century/...112756,00.html

denphone 27-02-2017 18:18

Re: BREXIT
 
Former Conservative PM launches broadside at Theresa May's Government .

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...uld-mean-cuts/

Quote:

Sir John Major has launched an extraordinary attack on Theresa May's Government over Brexit and warned that leaving the EU could mean cutting the NHS and welfare state.*

heero_yuy 27-02-2017 18:25

Re: BREXIT
 
Silly old fool should go back to watching cricket and drinking warm beer. Yesterday's man, yesterday's ideas.

passingbat 27-02-2017 19:16

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35887712)
Former Conservative PM launches broadside at Theresa May's Government .

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...uld-mean-cuts/


I remember John Major on the Marr show during the referendum. Marr just let Major carry on with his anti Brexit spiel, virtually interrupted. He was followed by Boris, who Marr seemed to interrupt pretty constantly. There was no doubt about the way Mar, at that time, was going to vote in the referendum.

1andrew1 27-02-2017 20:06

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35887712)
Former Conservative PM launches broadside at Theresa May's Government .

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...uld-mean-cuts/

Sensible down-to-earth bloke. I'd happily buy him a beer if we were in the same pub.

Damien 27-02-2017 20:13

Re: BREXIT
 
The Telegraph missed out the best part of his speech IMO:

Quote:

“Freedom of speech is absolute in our country,” he said. “It’s not arrogant or brazen or elitist, or remotely delusional to express concern about our future after Brexit. Nor, by doing so, is this group undermining the will of the people; they are the people. Shouting down their legitimate comment is against all our traditions of tolerance. It does nothing to inform and everything to demean – and it is time it stopped.”
Anyway this kind of thing will happen for a while. At least we're less than a month away from Article 50 been issued so we can get on with the real discussion and deal making and not this limbo.

denphone 27-02-2017 20:19

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887725)
Sensible down-to-earth bloke. I'd happily buy him a beer if we were in the same pub.

Well we all know Brexit is happening but John Major is a pretty moderate conservative who generally talks a lot of sense.

passingbat 27-02-2017 20:29

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887725)
Sensible down-to-earth bloke. I'd happily buy him a beer if we were in the same pub.


Now that is a surprise ;):D

1andrew1 27-02-2017 20:35

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35887727)
Well we all know Brexit is happening but John Major is a pretty moderate conservative who generally talks a lot of sense.

Exactly. When he says "Obstacles are brushed aside as of no consequence, whilst opportunities are inflated beyond any reasonable expectation of delivery." we need to listen.

---------- Post added at 20:35 ---------- Previous post was at 20:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35887729)
Now that is a surprise ;):D

:D

papa smurf 27-02-2017 20:39

Re: BREXIT
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyAMBd_AC_Q

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK-TDfempwY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1l1XGiXgo0

Osem 27-02-2017 21:56

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887730)
Exactly. When he says "Obstacles are brushed aside as of no consequence, whilst opportunities are inflated beyond any reasonable expectation of delivery." we need to listen.

---------- Post added at 20:35 ---------- Previous post was at 20:30 ----------



:D

Just who does he think views the obstacles to leaving as being without consequences and what did he have to say about the consequences of staying? Patronising or what...

Mick 28-02-2017 01:27

Re: BREXIT
 
BREAKING: Lords vote AGAINST Staying in Single Market once we leave EU!

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...-single-market

heero_yuy 28-02-2017 10:28

Re: BREXIT
 
I'm all for a clean break. If there's any vestige of our membership left in tact treasonous remoaners will work behind the scenes to showly sneak us back in. It's the same "mission creep" that suckered us into the EU in the first place.

passingbat 28-02-2017 11:34

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35887790)
I'm all for a clean break. If there's any vestige of our membership left in tact treasonous remoaners will work behind the scenes to showly sneak us back in. It's the same "mission creep" that suckered us into the EU in the first place.


I could not agree more

martyh 28-02-2017 13:05

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35887790)
I'm all for a clean break. If there's any vestige of our membership left in tact treasonous remoaners will work behind the scenes to showly sneak us back in. It's the same "mission creep" that suckered us into the EU in the first place.


Jeez, try to be a bit more OTT why don't you :rolleyes:

By "treasonous remoaners" I take it you mean people with differing views to yours. Whilst I voted to leave I refuse treat those who voted differently with your level of undemocratic hostility, it's pathetic and achieves nothing

1andrew1 28-02-2017 13:32

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35887807)
Jeez, try to be a bit more OTT why don't you :rolleyes:

By "treasonous remoaners" I take it you mean people with differing views to yours. Whilst I voted to leave I refuse treat those who voted differently with your level of undemocratic hostility, it's pathetic and achieves nothing

Agreed. I find such OTT behaviour very bizarre.

passingbat 28-02-2017 13:53

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35887807)
Jeez, try to be a bit more OTT why don't you :rolleyes:

By "treasonous remoaners" I take it you mean people with differing views to yours. Whilst I voted to leave I refuse treat those who voted differently with your level of undemocratic hostility, it's pathetic and achieves nothing

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887812)
Agreed. I find such OTT behaviour very bizarre.


I would not use "treasonous remoaners" as a description for any member of the 'remain' public voters, and the vast majority of the remain politicians, but the phrase is applicable to certain politicians, such as Tony Blair and Ken Clarke who are out and out globalists and want to see the elimination of the British sovereign state.


The essence of heero_yuy's post is spot on; the EU will never give up trying to drag the UK back into the Federal States of Europe. It is imperative that we have completely clean break from the EU laws.

1andrew1 28-02-2017 14:34

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35887817)
I would not use "treasonous remoaners" as a description for any member of the 'remain' public voters, and the vast majority of the remain politicians, but the phrase is applicable to certain politicians, such as Tony Blair and Ken Clarke who are out and out globalists and want to see the elimination of the British sovereign state.

The essence of heero_yuy's post is spot on; the EU will never give up trying to drag the UK back into the Federal States of Europe. It is imperative that we have completely clean break from the EU laws.

I wouldn't rule out another referendum in the future. Could be 40 years' time or it could be sooner if people feel that Brexit has left the country sidelined on the world stage and poorer economically. It's all a big unknown!

pip08456 28-02-2017 14:49

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887821)
I wouldn't rule out another referendum in the future. Could be 40 years' time or it could be sooner if people feel that Brexit has left the country sidelined on the world stage and poorer economically. It's all a big unknown!

That is of course "if" your "doom and gloom" proves to be correct.

Think it'll happen when this country starts prospering again?

All this assumes of course that the EU is still in existance in it's present form.

Chris 28-02-2017 14:53

Re: BREXIT
 
There will be no EU as we currently understand it, 40 years from now.

1andrew1 28-02-2017 15:08

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35887822)
That is of course "if" your "doom and gloom" proves to be correct.

Think it'll happen when this country starts prospering again?

All this assumes of course that the EU is still in existance in it's present form.

lol, the country is prospering at the moment - record employment levels, second highest-growing economy in 2016 after Germany. There is inequality and it's up to the UK Government to sort this out. There are clouds on the Horizon with businesses relocating thousands of staff overseas (eg HSBC, UBS, Medicines Regulator). Car factories like Vauxhall and BMW are certainly in a weaker position than they were before the vote. But I accept that some people think this is a price worth paying.
Compare the present day economy to our pre-EU/EEC days with high inflation and high unemployment and an uncompetitive economy and you appreciate the strides the country has made with the benefit of a large free trade bloc which increased competition in the UK and drove weaker companies into the ground.
I can't predict the future. The fall of the iron curtain and the Eastern bloc was certainly unpredicted and has impacted Europe in a significant way. People have been predicting the fall of the EEC/EU since it was formed and they have not been proved right. The bond between France and Germany will probably ensure some kind of EU in the future and there is great enthusiasm for it from eastern European countries who want the security away from Russian influence that it provides.

denphone 28-02-2017 15:19

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35887824)
There will be no EU as we currently understand it, 40 years from now.

Well l will be in my wooden box by then so l will let you and the forum members argue over that.;)

Mick 28-02-2017 15:37

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35887824)
There will be no EU as we currently understand it, 40 years from now.

And I would only say 10% of that time, if the French elect Marine Le Pen, as their President and she takes her Country out of the EU.

The EU needs to end and diminish and die quickly, it is a corrupted pile of garbage, a hell hole and still does not make sense why people want to be associated with it or remain in it.

---------- Post added at 15:37 ---------- Previous post was at 15:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887825)
lol, the country is prospering at the moment - record employment levels, second highest-growing economy in 2016 after Germany.

Utter nonsense, you have Eastern EU citizens flocking here mainly from Romania, Bulgaria. Most do not work and just scrounge from the benefit system, This may be prosperous to them but not us when they're robbing and stealing from UK Nationals. Only the other day, my sister was telling me about one of her friends being approached by two Romanian women, they employed distraction tactics to try pickpocket her, but she knew their game they were playing and just pushed their hands away.

It was a massive mistake allowing Romania to join the EU.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...oners-EU-jails

Quote:

The Eastern European nation holds the shameful record of having the greatest number of its expats in prison in the EU - with an estimated 11,511 in jail.

The report found: “The crime rate is around three times higher for Romanians abroad than Romanians at home.”

Around one in every 256 Romanian expats is in an EU jail with the majority convicted for crimes such as shoplifting, burglary and mugging.

“Poor education, lack of social mobility, and low incomes in Romania drive many to seek fortune abroad. But instead some turn to crime. Many Romanians who are law-abiding at home, become criminals abroad.”

1andrew1 28-02-2017 15:38

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35887828)
And I would only say 10% of that time, if the French elect Marine Le Pen, as their President and she takes her Country out of the EU..

It will certainly be interesting to see what happens if Le Pen wins. Paddy Power put her at 2-1 to win.
Would she hold a referendum to leave the EU or would her election win be sufficient?

Damien 28-02-2017 15:49

Re: BREXIT
 
I think we sometimes underestimate the emotional attachment to the concept (as opposed to the institution) on mainland Europe. I remember reading an article that speculated that one of the reasons for German reluctance over free movement was the experience of West/East Germans. There are many people in Europe now for whom the cold war isn't that long ago.

---------- Post added at 15:49 ---------- Previous post was at 15:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35887828)
Utter nonsense, you have Eastern EU citizens flocking here mainly from Romania, Bulgaria. Most do not work and just scrounge from the benefit system, This may be prosperous to them but not us when they're robbing and stealing from UK Nationals. Only the other day, my sister was telling me about one of her friends being approached by two Romanian women, they employed distraction tactics to try pickpocket her, but she knew their game they were playing and just pushed their hands away.

Is that really true though?

1andrew1 28-02-2017 15:57

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35887828)
Utter nonsense, you have Eastern EU citizens flocking here mainly from Romania, Bulgaria. Most do not work and just scrounge from the benefit system, This may be prosperous to them but not us when they're robbing and stealing from UK Nationals. Only the other day, my sister was telling me about one of her friends being approached by two Romanian women, they employed distraction tactics to try pickpocket her, but she knew their game they were playing and just pushed their hands away.

It was a massive mistake allowing Romania to join the EU.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...oners-EU-jails

Most do work Mick, there is no automatic entitlement to benefits when people move to another EU country. People can be sent back if they do not have the means to support themselves financially and this does happen. Liverpool recently sent back some street beggars.
Whether allowing Romania to join the EU or not is a different debate but maybe one you feel more comfortable with than with discussing the increased prosperity membership has brought the UK.
Quote:

After becoming an EEC member, Britain slowly began to catch up. Gross domestic product per person has grown faster than Italy, Germany and France in the 42 years since. By 2013, Britain became more prosperous than the average of the three other large European economies for the first time since 1965.
Professor Nauro Campos of Brunel University has estimated how Britain would have fared if it had not joined the common market. He and his colleagues found the best approximation to Britain’s pre-1973 economic performance to be a combination of New Zealand and Argentina, which like the UK fell behind the US and continental Europe.
https://www.ft.com/ or google "What has the EU done for the UK?"

Kursk 28-02-2017 16:04

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887844)
google "What has the EU done for the UK?"

No ta I'm busy cutting my toenails it's more rewarding. :D
Nitwits like Moaning Major have had their (grey) day and thankfully people with more vision and stronger leadership are in place now both here and over the pond.

The EU is yesterday's news.

1andrew1 28-02-2017 16:06

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35887839)
I think we sometimes underestimate the emotional attachment to the concept (as opposed to the institution) on mainland Europe. I remember reading an article that speculated that one of the reasons for German reluctance over free movement was the experience of West/East Germans. There are many people in Europe now for whom the cold war isn't that long ago.

---------- Post added at 15:49 ---------- Previous post was at 15:47 ----------



Is that really true though?

I agree about Continental Europe being emotionally invested in the EU. They've seen two world wars with first-hand territorial occupations. Eastern Europeans have not enjoyed the freedom to travel outside the Eastern bloc nor the prosperity to travel much within the Eastern bloc.

Mick 28-02-2017 16:10

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35887839)



Is that really true though?

Yes it is. I live in a North West Town, not far from Manchester and close to what was a peaceful, quiet Asian area but in the last few years the area has been swamped with Romanians, this area has seen a massive influx of Romanians, of which many do not work, been told many times by the Police to avoid the area at night, muggings have increased tenfold in the area.

The Asian population is not happy, infact they tell us all the time they voted to leave because they are fed up of those 'Eastern Europeans' coming here to live off the state and rob and steal from our locals, they have said they catch them in the act all the time. I said not long ago in the migrant thread that three Romanian men tried to rob a school boy, I mean FFS, they don't care who they steal from. Anyway, as I said in that story, thankfully a car full of Asian men was driving past and came to the boys rescue, I saw the mother on facebook pleading to find the Asian men who saved her son from those disgusting thieving *******s.

pip08456 28-02-2017 16:12

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887844)

https://www.ft.com/ or google "What has the EU done for the UK?"

I often wonder why there is never a negative EU article published by the FT.

Just saying....

1andrew1 28-02-2017 16:25

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35887850)
Yes it is. I live in a North West Town, not far from Manchester and close to what was a peaceful, quiet Asian area but in the last few years the area has been swamped with Romanians, this area has seen a massive influx of Romanians, of which many do not work, been told many times by the Police to avoid the area at night, muggings have increased tenfold in the area.

I'm confused about your statement - is it most do not work or many do not work? They're quite different things.
Anyway, if things are as bad as you portray them, you have my total sympathy. Your council needs to deport them which it has the right to do so if they're not working. Councils with more guts do this and you need to diplomatically help yours step up to the mark to make your community a better place to live.

Mick 28-02-2017 16:59

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35887856)
I'm confused about your statement - is it most do not work or many do not work? They're quite different things.
Anyway, if things are as bad as you portray them, you have my total sympathy. Your council needs to deport them which it has the right to do so if they're not working. Councils with more guts do this and you need to diplomatically help yours step up to the mark to make your community a better place to live.

I fail to see where the confusion lies, most, many.... same thing in my book.

RizzyKing 28-02-2017 17:22

Re: BREXIT
 
There won't be a debate on the EU in 40 years because the EU will not exist, it will either collapse or become a U.S.E there will be no EU. I really don't pay any attention to the media because they are all agenda ridden steaming piles and none of them can be trusted to provide an objective picture for the public. I am still fully confident that after a bumpy 5-10 years the UK will start to prosper far more then it would have done by remaining and that's why i voted leave not for me but my kids their future is brighter out of the EU then it would have been if we stayed in.

Hopefully the EU will completely collapse and greater stability can be achieved by not having a self righteous corrupt monster constantly pushing to extend it's territory and influence. Leaving is not without it's risks but anyone who says there were no risks from staying in instantly loses credibility. If ken, john and michael are really unhappy about our exit from the EU they can sod off to europe and not look back there is definately no loss for the UK in those has beens leaving.

martyh 28-02-2017 18:40

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35887817)
I would not use "treasonous remoaners" as a description for any member of the 'remain' public voters, and the vast majority of the remain politicians, but the phrase is applicable to certain politicians, such as Tony Blair and Ken Clarke who are out and out globalists and want to see the elimination of the British sovereign state.


The essence of heero_yuy's post is spot on; the EU will never give up trying to drag the UK back into the Federal States of Europe. It is imperative that we have completely clean break from the EU laws.

You do realise that Europe didn't want us in the first place ,we where refused admission in the '60's .Our relationship with Europe over the years since our admission has been one of 'put up with the moaning brits' personally i think they'll be glad to see the back of us

pip08456 28-02-2017 18:51

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35887885)
You do realise that Europe didn't want us in the first place ,we where refused admission in the '60's .Our relationship with Europe over the years since our admission has been one of 'put up with the moaning brits' personally i think they'll be glad to see the back of us

In fairness that was mainly because DeGaulle was an anglophobe, I just wish he'd lived long enough for the Maastricht treaty to be implemented so that the British public would have seen what membership entailed.

No "Just a trading block" then!

passingbat 28-02-2017 18:57

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35887885)
personally i think they'll be glad to see the back of us


If only that were true.

Damien 28-02-2017 21:37

Re: BREXIT
 
First possible hump in the Parliamentary process of Brexit tomorrow: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39121562

The Lords might send it back to the Commons in order to seek assurances that EU citizens will be able to stay. I think this is something that is likely to happen anyway, it's more a soft protest to show some resistance. I can't see a scenario where this doesn't happen. It's too expensive and logistically difficult to deport all EU citizens, businesses would hit the roof and the uproar would be difficult to deal with. I think you would even see large scale protests and resistance. Imagine the police trying to rock up one morning in South Kensington to deport French citizens, not gonna happen.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum