![]() |
Re: can we really write it off?
The superhub worked absolutley fine, I had it on 5ghz because of congestion on the 2.4ghz frequency.
Last week I bought a e4200 and now use modem mode. The only advantage I can see, the range of 2.4ghz frequency is greater on the e4200. The 5ghz is only marginally better than the SH in range So, all in all no major differences from a performance perspective such as streaming/gaming etc between the e4200 and the superhub for my use. Of course there will be tech savy folk who want vlans and other flashy gizmos in their home and all that, malarky but not me. |
Re: can we really write it off?
Quote:
several months of using the device and it has never ever changed upstream channel. During the time I was also using the superhub I was able to get it to switch channels. Craig changed to the superhub last week and was immediatly able to switch channels after not been able to switch using the vmng300 at all. its possible only your channel id changed or you had work done by VM forcefully changing the channel. |
Re: can we really write it off?
Quote:
I am happy for you though, even though you dont know it, you have got an amazing router and if VM gave all their customers one of these instead of a shub the world would be a better place and they would be the best isp ever. |
Re: can we really write it off?
Quote:
|
Re: can we really write it off?
Quote:
I have lots of 2.4 ghz devices as well as a few 5Ghz and Nas storage I was recommended to purchase the e4200. I did look through cicsco forums to help me configure it even uploaded new firmware; Yes, it's certainly a clever device. I could probably get much more out of it, but unsure of it's capabilities really and how to maximize it's potential, any ideas welcome! |
Re: can we really write it off?
Quote:
|
Re: can we really write it off?
It's really more a case of needing to do something then checking if the router supports it than looking through the features and seeing what you can do with them.
For example from memory the Superhub didn't support port translation but that won't bother you one iota if you don't see a need for using that option and cause you to curse if you need it but it isn't supported. One feature it may have which the SH doesn't is QoS - playing with that is a great way for the unwary to bork their speeds. Similarly fiddling with a fully fledged router firewall should see folks who are just dabbling lose their internet as easy as pie. There's plenty more ways to screw things up too. This is why VM limit the features on their CPE and why the Superhub suits lots of people who aren't geeks. You've bought a router that does some stuff you needed that the Superhub didn't support. No need to feel you need to use features that are there but which you don't need. |
Re: can we really write it off?
Pretty much every decent router on the planet for half a decade has had some form of QoS
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum