Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33630601)

Mick Fisher 04-06-2009 19:17

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34808034)
Heres an idea those people that are responsible for letting some of this **** out early take joint responsibility for anything they do once released i gaurantee you'll see less risky people released then. Having been described as liberal in another thread i am going to completely shatter that with my call again for those proven beyond guilt of murder to be executed i don't care if it isn't a general deterrent or not it will gaurantee one murderer can never do it again and thats good enough for me.

Where rehabilitation is a realistic possibility then fine although i would limit it to non or minor violent crime only and would never apply it to murder. Build more prisons so were not letting **** go early because we need the space and increase the sentences massively for violent crime and that will be a start.

Trouble is, in the eyes of the trough snouters, it's not cost effective to build more prisons. It's much more cost effective to release the murderers into the community. Who knows there next victim might also be a benefit recipient. Lovely Jubbly even more to fill the trough with. :rolleyes:

Derek 04-06-2009 23:43

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34807934)
When are we going to get tough on these people? How many more people have to suffer at the hands of **** like this?

While not as bad as this case similar things happen far more frequently than you would think. 99% of cases never make the papers.

While prison isn't for everyone there are some people who don't have a hope in hell of ever being 'reformed' and without fail they get involved in crime, normally at a more serious level, within hours of getting out of pokey.

Osem 04-06-2009 23:51

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34808246)
While not as bad as this case similar things happen far more frequently than you would think. 99% of cases never make the papers.

While prison isn't for everyone there are some people who don't have a hope in hell of ever being 'reformed' and without fail they get involved in crime, normally at a more serious level, within hours of getting out of pokey.

I don't doubt any of that sadly!

Maybe it'd help if the sentence handed down was actually the sentence served. Why wouldn't it be - I mean you don't get away with paying 2/3 of your bills do you?

I reckon each time someone reoffends they ought to have any previous custodial sentences added on. That might focus a few minds but for those who carry on regardless at least it'd mean they're are out of harm's way for longer than is currently the case.

Osem 06-07-2009 16:49

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8136306.stm

:rolleyes:

Sirius 06-07-2009 18:09

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34828306)

Mean while anyone not paying fines will be hunted down with the full force of the law.

papa smurf 06-07-2009 18:12

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 34828390)
Mean while anyone not paying fines will be hunted down with the full force of the law.

what you also have to understand is, its the people who drop litter and fag ends that are the real problem in our society:rolleyes:

Derek 06-07-2009 18:55

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
To be fair

Quote:

"Of those recalled between 1999 and June 2008, just 0.7% of offenders have not been apprehended.
Some of these may have disappeared abroad or disappeared into a hole in the ground. Either way they haven't come to the attention of the Police since release/recall so it could be argued they are re-habilitated ;)

Errgghh. I can't believe I'm sticking up for the Government. I feel dirty now :(

Sirius 06-07-2009 19:38

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34828429)

Errgghh. I can't believe I'm sticking up for the Government. I feel dirty now :(


Where's the carbolic soap :)

:LOL:

Derek 06-07-2009 21:53

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirius (Post 34828449)
Where's the carbolic soap :)

I dropped it in the showers... :shocked: :Yikes: :shocked:

---------- Post added at 20:53 ---------- Previous post was at 18:53 ----------

The always excellent Inspector Gadget has his own take on it.

http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/

Quote:

There is absolutely no point in allowing prisoners to be released early and then being bewildered when they go on to commit more crime and run away to avoid going back inside.

Osem 20-07-2009 10:33

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...l-hostels.html

Some of those believed to have been released early or due for imminent release:

Quote:

Muhedin Ali - jailed for seven years in February 2008; Hamid Elasmar and Mohammed Irfan - Irfan got four years while Elasmar served five months of a three years and four months sentence after trial, and is back at a council flat living on benefits; Adel Yahya - jailed for six years and nine months in November 2007; Abu Mansha - jailed for six years in January 2006 for plotting to kill Corporal Mark Byles; Abdul Rahman - jailed for six years in November 2007; Atilla Ahmet - admitted three charges of soliciting murder and sentenced to just under seven years in March 2008.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009...soners-hostels

Quote:

However, with an estimated 160 people convicted of terrorism offences inspired by al-Qaida currently residing in Britain's jails, there is growing pressure on the authorities to give details of how they intend to deal with convicted terrorists. While most are considered "minor" offenders, several convicted of more serious offences are due to be released soon. Andrew Rowe was given a seven-and-a-half year sentence after being caught with details of how to fire mortar bombs and secret codes to facilitate terror attacks. He is due to appear before the parole board within weeks.
Quote:

A Ministry of Justice spokeswoman said anyone convicted of terrorist offences and sentenced to more than 12 months' imprisonment would be subject to probation supervision on release from prison.
Probation supervision? I'm sure that'll be effective....... :rolleyes:

Derek 25-07-2009 14:28

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
A new low is hit.

http://www.paisleydailyexpress.co.uk...7085-24226288/

6 years (In reality he'll be out before the Olympics) for Murder.

Quote:

A BRUTAL killer who stabbed a man to death during a street fight was yesterday jailed for six years.
John Paul Sheehan, 22, plunged a knife into Christopher McDowall’s back, inflicting an injury that a consultant surgeon described as one of the most destructive wounds he had ever seen.
Arming yourself with a knife, going out to confront someone and plunging a knife into their back inflicting one of the worst wounds an experienced A&E Doctor has ever seen is OK if you don't intend to kill them.

Sirius 25-07-2009 14:44

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Labour are weak on crime tough on the victims of crime.

Osem 25-07-2009 17:08

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34840847)
A new low is hit.

http://www.paisleydailyexpress.co.uk...7085-24226288/

6 years (In reality he'll be out before the Olympics) for Murder.



Arming yourself with a knife, going out to confront someone and plunging a knife into their back inflicting one of the worst wounds an experienced A&E Doctor has ever seen is OK if you don't intend to kill them.

Shocking!

:mad:

RizzyKing 25-07-2009 20:59

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
When the system is like it is why are we surprised anymore at the low levels some are going too it's not as if there is any real detterent to stop these people. We really do need a serious change in this country because if there isn't one it is going to continue downhill till the point that people will start taking matters into their own hands in the search for justice which is not something i want to see.

punky 27-07-2009 18:04

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/8171061.stm

Despite being cautioned twice for the same offence and then being given a 6 month jail service for the 4th office, she goes on to re-offend for a 5th time, and gets.... a 10 month suspended jail sentence.

Honestly, what's the point? I despair at the judgement but also the amount of money gone to get it.

Mick Fisher 27-07-2009 18:59

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
"Serial Bigamist" :D

I just couldn't keep a straight face.

Being married once was plenty for me. :erm:

Derek 28-09-2009 21:08

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
There are a few interesting comments on the Magistrates blog right now.

Basically things are in such a state with the prisons that anyone sentenced to 28 days or less in prison gets immediately turfed out with a payment to help get their lives back on track without seeing the inside of a prison. In some cases people sentenced to 4 months also get punted before going through the gates of prison and compensated for having to sit in the back of a prison van.

Who says crime doesn't pay?

Gary L 28-09-2009 21:20

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34880229)
Who says crime doesn't pay?

Law abiding citizens. and those that tell the kids I know where you live and I'm gonna tell your dad.

Osem 28-09-2009 22:49

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34880229)
There are a few interesting comments on the Magistrates blog right now.

Basically things are in such a state with the prisons that anyone sentenced to 28 days or less in prison gets immediately turfed out with a payment to help get their lives back on track without seeing the inside of a prison. In some cases people sentenced to 4 months also get punted before going through the gates of prison and compensated for having to sit in the back of a prison van.

Who says crime doesn't pay?

Now why doesn't any of that surprise me?.... :mad:

I've been watching UK Border Patrol on Sky lately and it demonstrates perfectly just how cumbersome, wasteful and ineffective parts of our legal 'system' still are despite all those tough talking soundbites issued by numerous Home Secretaries. Vast amounts of time, energy and money spent rounding up illegals only for them to be let go and allowed to abscond because there isn't room to detain them whilst securing the travel documents needed to remove them or whilst they're awaiting the result of appeals... It's absolutely bonkers and is costing us a fortune!!

Osem 09-11-2009 13:22

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
DPP and Met chiefs concerned about the over use of out of court penalties:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/no...on-crime-theft

Quote:

Latest figures show that a total of 2.2 million people were cautioned between 2000 and 2008, including more than 550,000 who were given repeat cautions. Of those, 51,874 had been cautioned four times and 104,915 on three occasions.

Osem 11-11-2009 14:38

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
A teenager who raped a 5 year old boy just a few days after being spared a custodial sentence for another rape has finally been jailed:

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-..._Boy_Is_Jailed

:mad::mad::mad::mad:

Gary L 11-11-2009 14:44

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34907973)
A teenager who raped a 5 year old boy just a few days after being spared a custodial sentence for another rape has finally been jailed:

They probably had to let someone out early and he had their place.

RizzyKing 11-11-2009 14:54

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
After watching the panarama program on monday night this government has absolutely no right to ever talk about being tough on crime i was completely disgusted by what i saw.

punky 11-11-2009 15:16

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34907979)
They probably had to let someone out early and he had their place.

Quote:

Originally Posted by http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/8354316.stm
When being sentenced for the first rape, Judge Smith is believed to have considered the victim's family, who forgave the youth because of their Christian beliefs.


Mick Fisher 11-11-2009 17:40

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34907985)
After watching the panarama program on monday night this government has absolutely no right to ever talk about being tough on crime i was completely disgusted by what i saw.

I felt the same.

I also gained the impression that the fixed penalty system, nowadays, seems to have become more of a REVENUE RAISING exercise with a secondary effect of keeping the prison population down.

Later when watching a report on the News about corrupt Russian Police Officers turning a blind eye upon the acceptance of a bribe I couldn't help see the similarity. The difference being our Police give you a slap on the wrist (turn a blind eye) upon recieving a fine (bribe) on behalf of the State. :shocked:

Escapee 11-11-2009 18:21

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
With the In-justice system we have in this country, I believe that people are sent to prison far too late.

The lefties claim prison is for reform, but in my opinion criminals are usually past the point of reform by the time they are sentenced to prison.

Prison is the most effective method available to keep the public and their property safe.

Osem 11-11-2009 21:16

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
I've heard reports that the lad in question has Aspergers Syndrome. If this indeed the case, it might go some way to explaining why the first judge acted as he/she did but it doesn't explain why sufficient supervisiory conditions weren't applied in order to keep him from reoffending. Where a crime is committed by someone who's mentally ill, I think it should be incumbent upon the authorities to ensure that the punishment imposed is intended first and foremost to protect the public and then to assist that individual, if possible, to modify/control their behaviour. This latter goal may well have been behind the initial decision not to jail the lad but tragically, in the absence of effective supervision/controls, he was able to reoffend.

nomadking 11-11-2009 21:41

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
If someone has been found to have an untreatable medical condition and that condition is alleged to have played a part in them committing a serious crime, that is all the more reason to lock them up, as they are certainly going to commit another offence.

The Gay Mafia are always using the phrase 'its their sexuality', so applying that 'principal', if someone has raped a child who is that young, they should never be even considered for release, as that is 'their sexuality'.

Hugh 11-11-2009 22:12

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
"The Gay Mafia"?

RizzyKing 11-11-2009 22:40

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
We are too damn soft on too many criminals in this country and it's getting worse because we seem unable to build more prisons so things will sadly continue to go downhill.

Osem 11-11-2009 23:05

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908221)
If someone has been found to have an untreatable medical condition and that condition is alleged to have played a part in them committing a serious crime, that is all the more reason to lock them up, as they are certainly going to commit another offence.

The Gay Mafia are always using the phrase 'its their sexuality', so applying that 'principal', if someone has raped a child who is that young, they should never be even considered for release, as that is 'their sexuality'.

I really don't disagree with keeping such people out of harm's way but the punishment needs to fit the crime and the situation. This lad should certainly not have been allowed the freedom to commit another offence but if he is a genuine Aspergers sufferer, the sentence should not just be banging him up in a prison cell.

Arthurgray50@blu 11-11-2009 23:23

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
I have a strong policy on crime;
MURDER - EXECUTE BY HANGING

KNIFE CRIME / MUGGINGS 5/10 YEARS

CHILD SEX OFFENDERS - LIFE, TO SERVE A MINIMUM OF 25 YEARS.

Community service is a waste of time, send them to prison, teach thugs a lesson, to respect other people health and property.

nomadking 11-11-2009 23:24

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
If someone is never going to be 'cured'(Aspergers or 'their sexuality') of thinking it's ok to rape 5 years old kids, then they shouldn't be out roaming the streets.

Hugh 11-11-2009 23:56

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Re "their sexuality" - you appear to be confusing paedophilia with homosexuality, or at least hinting that they are one and the same thing.

Or am I misinterpreting your posts?

Gary L 12-11-2009 00:12

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908309)
Or am I misinterpreting your posts?

I think so.

nomadking 12-11-2009 00:17

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908309)
Re "their sexuality" - you appear to be confusing paedophilia with homosexuality, or at least hinting that they are one and the same thing.

Or am I misinterpreting your posts?

Yes, you are(as usual). The claim is always being made that homosexuality is something that people are born with, as it is 'their sexuality'. If that is the mantra/principal to be followed, then if someone's sexuality means raping 5 year old kids(male or female), then that means they can never be 'cured'. If homosexuals cannot be 'cured', then paedophiles(and other sexualities) cannot be 'cured'.

Gary L 12-11-2009 00:27

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908321)
Yes, you are(as usual). The claim is always being made that homosexuality is something that people are born with, as it is 'their sexuality'. If that is the mantra/principal to be followed, then if someone's sexuality means raping 5 year old kids(male or female), then that means they can never be 'cured'. If homosexuals cannot be 'cured', then paedophiles(and other sexualities) cannot be 'cured'.

I have to admit. it sounds logical :)

Hugh 12-11-2009 09:49

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34908318)
I think so.

Which is why I asked the question - thank you, however, for answering on his behalf.

---------- Post added at 08:49 ---------- Previous post was at 08:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908321)
Yes, you are(as usual). The claim is always being made that homosexuality is something that people are born with, as it is 'their sexuality'. If that is the mantra/principal to be followed, then if someone's sexuality means raping 5 year old kids(male or female), then that means they can never be 'cured'. If homosexuals cannot be 'cured', then paedophiles(and other sexualities) cannot be 'cured'.

Thank you for clarifying that - my confusion was that you appeared to be stating that "Aspergers" or "their sexuality" made them think it was OK to rape 5 year olds, whilst the raping of young children (part of the paedophilia syndrome) has nothing to do with sexuality, and all to do with "power".

Osem 12-11-2009 10:21

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908288)
If someone is never going to be 'cured'(Aspergers or 'their sexuality') of thinking it's ok to rape 5 years old kids, then they shouldn't be out roaming the streets.

Which is pretty much what I've said.

None of us have any idea what aspect(s) of this lad's personality have caused him to behave in this way. The Aspergers may be a significant part of the reason in this case but that will be up to experts to determine. If that is indeed found to be the case and deemed a mitigating factor than punishing this lad in the same manner as a cold, calculating paedophile with no such 'mitigating' conditions would seem to me to be unfair.

Protecting the public is however a different issue and clearly this lad must be held in custody for that reason. Prisons are not the place for mentally ill people yet many such people are languishing inside them. IMO secure units which can offer whatever remedial treatments there may be or at least provide a seccure environment which is less likely to cause the offender's behaviour to spiral out of control are a far better option.

nomadking 12-11-2009 11:14

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
So he should be locked because he allegedly has Asperger's?

Quote:

On 4 July 2009, the second victim, who is now six, was playing outside near his home when he was lured away to look for a lost football but was actually taken to the teenager's house and abused.
How do those sort of actions square up with having Asperger's?
National Autistic Society
Quote:

Asperger syndrome is mostly a 'hidden disability'. This means that you can't tell that someone has the condition from their outward appearance. People with the condition have difficulties in three main areas. They are:
  • social communication
  • social interaction
  • social imagination.

He seemed not to have enough of a problem imagining a ruse of a lost football, communicating and interacting with a young boy about that, in order to achieve his aims.

---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908410)
Which is why I asked the question - thank you, however, for answering on his behalf.

---------- Post added at 08:49 ---------- Previous post was at 08:49 ----------


Thank you for clarifying that - my confusion was that you appeared to be stating that "Aspergers" or "their sexuality" made them think it was OK to rape 5 year olds, whilst the raping of young children (part of the paedophilia syndrome) has nothing to do with sexuality, and all to do with "power".

If it is just about "power", would there be such a thing as paedophilia? Wouldn't it just be a case of wanting "power" over young/old, male/female, human/animal or any combination of those with no specific preference for a single group.

Gary L 12-11-2009 11:19

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908410)
Which is why I asked the question - thank you, however, for answering on his behalf.

I wasn't. I was going to tell you whether you asked him or not.

Flyboy 12-11-2009 12:02

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908432)
So he should be locked because he allegedly has Asperger's?

How do those sort of actions square up with having Asperger's?
National Autistic Society

He seemed not to have enough of a problem imagining a ruse of a lost football, communicating and interacting with a young boy about that, in order to achieve his aims.

---------- Post added at 10:14 ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 ----------


If it is just about "power", would there be such a thing as paedophilia? Wouldn't it just be a case of wanting "power" over young/old, male/female, human/animal or any combination of those with no specific preference for a single group.

I believe that I have yet to see such a distasteful, prejudiced and quite frankly, ignorant series of posts in my entire life. You have absolutley not one iota of evidence that his Autism was the driving force behind his motivations. You have not one inkling of how the condition affects the decision making process of a sufferer and you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Your comments disgusts me and all parents of children who have to live this condition day in and day out. How dare even pretend to know what it is like for a child growing up with Aspergers and how it affects them and all around them. Your belief that reading a few lines on a website makes you an expert in how the condition works, is ignorant and lazy and has no place on this forum. I dare you to call the NAS and spout the same BS to them and see what response you get.

I will not give two hoots about any response you may give to this post, because you have destroyed any credibility you may have in even producing a mere utterance upon the subject.

nomadking 12-11-2009 13:21

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34908463)
I believe that I have yet to see such a distasteful, prejudiced and quite frankly, ignorant series of posts in my entire life. You have absolutley not one iota of evidence that his Autism was the driving force behind his motivations. You have not one inkling of how the condition affects the decision making process of a sufferer and you have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Your comments disgusts me and all parents of children who have to live this condition day in and day out. How dare even pretend to know what it is like for a child growing up with Aspergers and how it affects them and all around them. Your belief that reading a few lines on a website makes you an expert in how the condition works, is ignorant and lazy and has no place on this forum. I dare you to call the NAS and spout the same BS to them and see what response you get.

I will not give two hoots about any response you may give to this post, because you have destroyed any credibility you may have in even producing a mere utterance upon the subject.

I referred to the 'alleged' Asperger's. As such I am not linking the two, in fact I am pointing out that his actions were inconsistent with Autism as specified by the link to the National Autistic Society webpage on Asperger's.

This is the post that brought up Asperger's with regards to this case.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34908211)
I've heard reports that the lad in question has Aspergers Syndrome. If this indeed the case, it might go some way to explaining why the first judge acted as he/she did but it doesn't explain why sufficient supervisiory conditions weren't applied in order to keep him from reoffending. Where a crime is committed by someone who's mentally ill, I think it should be incumbent upon the authorities to ensure that the punishment imposed is intended first and foremost to protect the public and then to assist that individual, if possible, to modify/control their behaviour. This latter goal may well have been behind the initial decision not to jail the lad but tragically, in the absence of effective supervision/controls, he was able to reoffend.

My initial reaction to that post was this:-
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908221)
If someone has been found to have an untreatable medical condition and that condition is alleged to have played a part in them committing a serious crime, that is all the more reason to lock them up, as they are certainly going to commit another offence.
...

I didn't bring up the issue of Asperger's and no link for that claim was provided by the person that did. My reply refers to where an untreatable mental illness of whatever sort is used as mitigation for a serious crime of whatever sort.

This is the post that sought to possibly link Asperger's to it.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34908416)
Which is pretty much what I've said.

None of us have any idea what aspect(s) of this lad's personality have caused him to behave in this way. The Aspergers may be a significant part of the reason in this case but that will be up to experts to determine. If that is indeed found to be the case and deemed a mitigating factor than punishing this lad in the same manner as a cold, calculating paedophile with no such 'mitigating' conditions would seem to me to be unfair.

Protecting the public is however a different issue and clearly this lad must be held in custody for that reason. Prisons are not the place for mentally ill people yet many such people are languishing inside them. IMO secure units which can offer whatever remedial treatments there may be or at least provide a seccure environment which is less likely to cause the offender's behaviour to spiral out of control are a far better option.

I have NEVER tried to link the two things and have only responded to that specific mental condition in reply to what 'Osem' has said. Even then pointing out the general position that a mental condition should not provide a 'get out of jail free' card for a serious offence.

It is my understanding that one of the cornerstones of autism is lack of interaction. I checked that on the National Autistic Society website.

Osem 12-11-2009 13:35

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908432)
So he should be locked because he allegedly has Asperger's?

How do those sort of actions square up with having Asperger's?
National Autistic Society

He seemed not to have enough of a problem imagining a ruse of a lost football, communicating and interacting with a young boy about that, in order to achieve his aims.

I'm a tad confused here because you seem to be disagreeing with someone who isn't entirely disagreeing with you. I'm well aware of the traits associated with Asperger's syndrome but as with all such conditions there is a wide range of expression between the worst and least affected and that's why I couched my sentiments in the way I did. I've said it's up to the experts, who will no doubt examine this lad, to determine what IF ANY part his condition played in the attacks and how best to deal with that. As I've said more than once now, keeping this lad in custody out of harm's way should be paramount but the environment in which he is held should be appropriate and prison isn't necessarily the best option. I haven't stated that because he has Aspergers he shouldn't be punished or locked up.

Since you now have an interest in Asperger's syndrome, take a look at the documentary I linked to here (the relevant section starts about 3 minutes into the programme but is returned to several times during the show) - Cameron, the teenage lad with Aspergers exhibits some very aggressive/threatening behaviour yet in my personal experience those traits aren't the norm with Aspergers sufferers. Does that mean he/they don't really have the condition or that he has it worse or possibly has other issues layered within his personality which account for the aggression etc.?

In this terrible case neither you or I know the answer to these questions so we must leave it to the experts in such fields to ascertain as many of the facts as possible and I would fully support appropriate custodial means by which to treat his issues and keep the public safe.

nomadking 12-11-2009 14:02

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
My understanding of autism is that sufferers can become agitated if their routine or some other thing is disrupted, but they don't tend to seek out the attention of other people, as the offender did in this case. That is what makes me suspicious of a diagnosis of Asperger's.

Osem 12-11-2009 14:15

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908532)
My understanding of autism is that sufferers can become agitated if their routine or some other thing is disrupted, but they don't tend to seek out the attention of other people, as the offender did in this case. That is what makes me suspicious of a diagnosis of Asperger's.

I've come across many autism sufferers and, as stated in my last post, the range of expression of the condition is huge and the behaviour swings can be sudden and pronounced. I know a little autistic lad who for years was so badly affected by his obssession with routine that he wouldn't get on the school bus without a certain routine first and would become extremely agitated if any part of the routine was out of place. With a lot of help, he's now overcome that impediment. On the other hand I've met far more autistic children who don't suffer in that manner and who appreciate routine but are not fixated by it. There are children with autism related diagnoses who live almost in a world of their own yet I've come across others for whom the physical contact/social etiquette aspects of the condition are minimal by comparison.

I should add that, in my experience, diagnoses of Aspergers and autism are not easily obtainable and whilst the terms may be casually bandied around in newspapers and discussions, that's not the same as having a diagnosis. The whole subject is extremely complex and if this lad has a diagnosis it will be documented and will have come about after a whole series of tests and observations by teams of experts in various fields over a good period of time.

Flyboy 12-11-2009 14:16

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 34908532)
My understanding of autism is that sufferers can become agitated if their routine or some other thing is disrupted, but they don't tend to seek out the attention of other people, as the offender did in this case. That is what makes me suspicious of a diagnosis of Asperger's.

You continue to show your complete ignorance of the subject. I think you should quit whilst your are ahead.

punky 12-11-2009 19:09

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
There's a good round of the, quite frankly, baffling judgements previously made the judge in the rapist case here:

http://pcbloggs.blogspot.com/2009/11...gain-oops.html

Hugh 12-11-2009 20:47

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908309)
Or am I misinterpreting your posts?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34908318)
I think so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908410)
Which is why I asked the question - thank you, however, for answering on his behalf.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34908435)
I wasn't. I was going to tell you whether you asked him or not.

Once again, Gary, you make no sense.

Gary L 12-11-2009 21:34

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34908798)
Once again, Gary, you make no sense.

Nobody else thinks that. have you tried reading it slower? :shrug:

Hugh 12-11-2009 21:51

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34908820)
Nobody else thinks that. have you tried reading it slower? :shrug:

On what do you base that assertion?

Derek 04-12-2009 00:51

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Gah! No. Fricking. Way!

http://www.harlowstar.co.uk/harlowst....asp?ID=459627

Quote:

ONE of the country’s most prolific teenage thieves has walked free from court – despite owning up to hundreds of offences in which cash and goods totalling more than £1m were stolen.
Yet despite pleading guilty to 20 offences and asking for another 645 to be taken into account, Wernham was spared a jail sentence.
Instead he was ordered to complete 150 hours of unpaid work
Oh it gets better.

Quote:

he and his partner have been allocated a rent-paid home at an undisclosed address in Chelmsford.
Ooh that sends out a message that crime doesn't pay.

Gary L 04-12-2009 01:35

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34920738)
Ooh that sends out a message that crime doesn't pay.

All down to him coughing up to the previous 645.

if they were all 645 rapes he'd probably get a new identity thrown in.

Flyboy 04-12-2009 01:37

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Err...this is a very old story. I think there is a thread about this on CF already, from months ago.

Gary L 04-12-2009 01:52

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34920749)
Err...this is a very old story. I think there is a thread about this on CF already, from months ago.

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/20...ey-repent.html

Osem 11-02-2010 12:07

Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Thirty Facebook pages have been taken down because prisoners were using them to taunt their victims...
Via smuggled-in mobile phones and even during 'closely supervised' internet access:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...nts-jack-straw

:mad:

Derek 11-02-2010 12:18

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
I still don't understand why they don't install mobile phone jammers inside jails. I'm sure they could be sited to avoid issues with surrounding houses.

Osem 11-02-2010 12:19

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34962136)
I still don't understand why they don't install mobile phone jammers inside jails. I'm sure they could be sited to avoid issues with surrounding houses.

Perhaps the tough talking but ineffectual Jack Straw could explain... :rolleyes:

Russ 11-02-2010 12:22

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34962136)
I still don't understand why they don't install mobile phone jammers inside jails. I'm sure they could be sited to avoid issues with surrounding houses.

The cost?

Derek 11-02-2010 12:26

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34962137)
Perhaps the tough talking but ineffectual Jack Straw could explain... :rolleyes:

I can understand they can't just blanket the area with jammers seeing so many jails have housing nearby but I can't accept its not possible to jam at least the majority of the cells.

Jammers aren't exactly the most expensive pieces of kit and would at a stroke turn most of the smuggled in phones into expensive suppositories.

---------- Post added at 11:26 ---------- Previous post was at 11:22 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34962139)
The cost?

Don't think so. You can pick them up fairly cheaply.

http://www.direct-gadget.com/Scripts...p?idproduct=20

$99 for the first link on google, I'm pretty sure even with the deeply useless public service contract negotiations they could get a similar or cheaper price for buying in bulk.

Russ 11-02-2010 12:27

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Could they affect the prison service's own security though? I know you guys use mobiles a lot, do the guards have a similar system?

Derek 11-02-2010 12:31

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34962142)
Could they affect the prison service's own security though? I know you guys use mobiles a lot, do the guards have a similar system?

Police radios work on a different frequency to mobiles. No idea about prison radios. I would imagine they would be well away from the mobile phone frequencies as well.

Russ 11-02-2010 12:35

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34962145)
Police radios work on a different frequency to mobiles. No idea about prison radios. I would imagine they would be well away from the mobile phone frequencies as well.

What I mean is the police around here use mobiles as well as radios, just wondering if the prison service use them too. Maybe some prisons are close to public buildings and areas where mobile signal blockers could affect civvies too?

Derek 11-02-2010 12:42

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34962149)
What I mean is the police around here use mobiles as well as radios, just wondering if the prison service use them too. Maybe some prisons are close to public buildings and areas where mobile signal blockers could affect civvies too?

Certainly Barlinnie and Greenock prison are right next to housing and I'd imagine others are as well. Even so I think they could arrange the jammers in such a way as to avoid leakage outwith the walls of the prison. Even if not all the cells were covered having the majority jammed would be better than nothing.

We don't really use mobile for work purposes but I have seen other forces using them. Dunno about the prison service but I can't think of any reason why a prison guard would need them. Having a radio with one button to press seems far safer than typing in a number and waiting for it to ring.

martyh 11-02-2010 12:46

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
of course they could take mobiles and computers away ,lock them in the cells and maybe treat the place like prison:shrug:

punky 11-02-2010 12:47

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Maybe a better way of doing this would be to make the prison a Faraday cage.

That way you don't have to disrupt phone signals for civvies but it means no signals will go in and out of the prison. However it means radios and such will work inside within the prison. How often does a guard need a radio to contact outside the prison? If there are sentrys then they can be hard wired.

There is a cost to this but it means the prisoners can't switch to radios with some guy in the back of a van near the prison receiving the transmissions.

Russ 11-02-2010 12:54

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34962155)
Certainly Barlinnie and Greenock prison are right next to housing and I'd imagine others are as well. Even so I think they could arrange the jammers in such a way as to avoid leakage outwith the walls of the prison. Even if not all the cells were covered having the majority jammed would be better than nothing.

We don't really use mobile for work purposes but I have seen other forces using them. Dunno about the prison service but I can't think of any reason why a prison guard would need them. Having a radio with one button to press seems far safer than typing in a number and waiting for it to ring.

I just don't get it though, it seems like such a good idea as well as being relatively low-cost, there must be some legit reason why it's not been adopted. I don't see any negative spin the government could put on it.

TheDaddy 11-02-2010 12:54

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34962157)
of course they could take mobiles and computers away ,lock them in the cells and maybe treat the place like prison:shrug:

Dont be fooled we do keep the majority locked up and any so called luxuries like tv's in cells are there to keep them quiet due to a lack of staff. Prisons like everything else in this country are done on the cheap.

Tidball told MPs on Wednesday that he and his colleagues will be locking prisoners up "for more hours than they were in 1969".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...nsandprobation

Derek 11-02-2010 13:21

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34962165)
I just don't get it though, it seems like such a good idea as well as being relatively low-cost, there must be some legit reason why it's not been adopted. I don't see any negative spin the government could put on it.

No idea. It is currently illegal to operate these devices in the UK but I can't see it being too difficult to find a loophole or amend the law to allow them to be used in prisons and custody suites.

Arthurgray50@blu 11-02-2010 13:57

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
The way to beat all this problem. is to take away ALL computors and mobiles from prison, and if these computors have to be used for classes for example, then get in a wizard on computors to block anything like facebook etc.

In prisons up and down the ground, they are like holiday camps, when you go prison, it is for punishment of the crime, not go to Butlins.

Julian 11-02-2010 15:02

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ (Post 34962149)
What I mean is the police around here use mobiles as well as radios, just wondering if the prison service use them too. Maybe some prisons are close to public buildings and areas where mobile signal blockers could affect civvies too?

My sister and brother in law are prison officers Nr Doncaster, they tell me that mobiles are not permitted to be takin into the prison by prison officers.

Apparently alot of the phones are simply thrown over the wall to the prisoners by "well-wishers" aka relatives/cohorts etc.:erm:

TheDaddy 12-02-2010 14:38

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 34962187)
The way to beat all this problem. is to take away ALL computors and mobiles from prison, and if these computors have to be used for classes for example, then get in a wizard on computors to block anything like facebook etc.

In prisons up and down the ground, they are like holiday camps, when you go prison, it is for punishment of the crime, not go to Butlins.

Are you sure that any of the computers prisoners use have internet access?

Flyboy 12-02-2010 15:35

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34962127)
Via smuggled-in mobile phones and even during 'closely supervised' internet access:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...nts-jack-straw

:mad:

Didn't this story start a few days ago accusing Jack Straw of trying to prevent Facebook from allowing nasty messages being posted. If I remember rightly a lot of people were saying that he shouldn't do that, because it was government interference and "Nanny State". Now, of course, when the true nature of the proposal is brought to light, it seems a good idea. That's odd, isn't it?

RizzyKing 12-02-2010 15:57

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
I am sure there are uni directional mobile jammers now i believe the US military uses them in their penal system. Lets be honest this is a ridiculous problem to be having it really is and will further fuel the anger many have in relation to our prison system. It is simple really make walls that high you cannot just throw them over although personally surely guards walk the perimeter and therefore should be able to stop that.

Or failing all that make them all go through a scanner of some sort that will detect any phones not handed over and add time to any convict who has a friend\relative trying to smuggle one in. Also making that a criminal offence would be good and i bet if people thought they could join said friend\relative for a one to one chat in a cell if they try it many will decide against it. As for computers in prisons yeah ok i can see the need to train those that want too but they should not have unrestricted internet access and that is something that can be sorted quite easily..

Osem 12-02-2010 16:25

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962698)
Didn't this story start a few days ago accusing Jack Straw of trying to prevent Facebook from allowing nasty messages being posted. If I remember rightly a lot of people were saying that he shouldn't do that, because it was government interference and "Nanny State". Now, of course, when the true nature of the proposal is brought to light, it seems a good idea. That's odd, isn't it?

You'd have to take that up with them.

Yes and it is a good idea but so's the idea of preventing the use of mobile phones etc. in our prisons - especially the high security ones. It'd have been even better, however, if these people hadn't been allowed to do it right under the noses of Jack Straw and the prison authorities in the first place wouldn't you say? Hence the reason for the OP and the subject and this thread dedicated to New Labour's tough talking and abject failure to deliver on so many of their promises.

Jimmy-J 12-02-2010 16:36

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
I thought the punishment of a prison sentence was to take away the freedoms of the convicted? Phones, Computers, Games Consoles, TV's Etc etc. Some of them are living the life of Riley. No wonder they re-offend!

Flyboy 12-02-2010 18:19

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34962753)
You'd have to take that up with them.

Yes and it is a good idea but so's the idea of preventing the use of mobile phones etc. in our prisons - especially the high security ones. It'd have been even better, however, if these people hadn't been allowed to do it right under the noses of Jack Straw and the prison authorities in the first place wouldn't you say? Hence the reason for the OP and the subject and this thread dedicated to New Labour's tough talking and abject failure to deliver on so many of their promises.

If these means of communication are successfully prevented, don't you think they will find other ways. Prisoners have been able to communicate with the outside world for centuries. How do you think they did it before the advent of mobile telephony?

---------- Post added at 17:19 ---------- Previous post was at 17:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34962764)
I thought the punishment of a prison sentence was to take away the freedoms of the convicted? Phones, Computers, Games Consoles, TV's Etc etc. Some of them are living the life of Riley. No wonder they re-offend!

Have you ever been inside a prison?

martyh 12-02-2010 18:22

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962824)
If these means of communication are successfully prevented, don't you think they will find other ways. Prisoners have been able to communicate with the outside world for centuries. How do you think they did it before the advent of mobile telephony?

---------- Post added at 17:19 ---------- Previous post was at 17:18 ----------



Have you ever been inside a prison?


well yes i agree to an extent ,but we shouldn't be making things this easy for them

RizzyKing 12-02-2010 21:23

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Innocent law abiding people should have all the convinience of modern living not those found guilty of crimes and sent to prison. This is a problem and has to be sorted out and the growth of the internet is not something that a ******* in prison should be able to use to further intimidate or harass their victims.

Jimmy-J 12-02-2010 21:26

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962824)
Have you ever been inside a prison?

Not yet, but I'm very close to a few people who have been, and some who still are.

Osem 12-02-2010 22:37

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962824)
If these means of communication are successfully prevented, don't you think they will find other ways. Prisoners have been able to communicate with the outside world for centuries. How do you think they did it before the advent of mobile telephony?[COLOR="Silver"]

Yes they may well find alternatives but that's hardly an argument for allowing them to carry on doing what they currently are is it - especially when you've talked as tough as Jack Straw and the succession of ineffectual Home Secretaries have over the years...

Flyboy 12-02-2010 23:16

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34962925)
Yes they may well find alternatives but that's hardly an argument for allowing them to carry on doing what they currently are is it - especially when you've talked as tough as Jack Straw and the succession of ineffectual Home Secretaries have over the years...

Please point to where I said that it was alright for them to use mobile phones.

---------- Post added at 22:16 ---------- Previous post was at 22:15 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34962896)
Not yet, but I'm very close to a few people who have been, and some who still are.

Have you told them about their lives of Reilly?

Osem 12-02-2010 23:29

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962941)
Please point to where I said that it was alright for them to use mobile phones.

Please point out where I said that you'd said that. I couldn't care less what you think - what Jack Straw thinks, says and does/doesn't do is of far more concern to me.

martyh 12-02-2010 23:29

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962941)
Have you told them about their lives of Reilly?


are you serious
,one bloke i know and still know very well was known as a "listener" because he had been in before ,new the score and could show all the new prisoners how "the system works" he had a nice little setee in his cell served 2 years of a nine year sentance and spent the third on home leave at the weekends bangin his girlfriend

Flyboy 12-02-2010 23:42

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34962950)
Please point out where I said that you'd said that. I couldn't care less what you think - what Jack Straw thinks, says and does/doesn't do is of far more concern to me.

Perhaps when you wrote this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem
Yes they may well find alternatives but that's hardly an argument for allowing them to carry on doing what they currently are is it

Jimmy-J 13-02-2010 00:14

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34962941)
Have you told them about their lives of Reilly?

yeah, I'm always banging on about it. I keep telling them if things start to get tough for me, I'll be in there like a shot. Not a bad move, getting looked after for a couple of years. Learn a trade, get fit, fed and bed. No bills to pay, plus get a nice wad of cash to help me out once I've been released, not to mention all the free help and support I'll be offered.

TheDaddy 13-02-2010 00:32

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34962972)
yeah, I'm always banging on about it. I keep telling them if things start to get tough for me, I'll be in there like a shot. Not a bad move, getting looked after for a couple of years. Learn a trade, get fit, fed and bed. No bills to pay, plus get a nice wad of cash to help me out once I've been released, not to mention all the free help and support I'll be offered.

I'd suggest a night course or something to learn a trade rather than prison, people in prison aren't generally know for their honesty and they might just be fibbing to you about how cushy they have it, either that or they'd better start praying they don't get moved.

Hugh 13-02-2010 00:36

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34962972)
yeah, I'm always banging on about it. I keep telling them if things start to get tough for me, I'll be in there like a shot. Not a bad move, getting looked after for a couple of years. Learn a trade, get fit, fed and bed. No bills to pay, plus get a nice wad of cash to help me out once I've been released, not to mention all the free help and support I'll be offered.

I am sure you will get a lot of support - especially if you have a purty mouth......;)

Jimmy-J 13-02-2010 00:40

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34962984)
I am sure you will get a lot of support - especially if you have a purty mouth......;)

No, I'm one hell of an ugly bloke.

RizzyKing 13-02-2010 15:28

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
I know a number of serving prison officers who all say that life within the prison is way too lenient and that far to much accomadation is made to prisoner needs. Most local residents can also recollect a number of occasions where prisoners rioted because food wasn't upto their standard trashed the place and a nice convoy of trucks was taking brand new stuff there within a few days.

This government talked a lot about many things and havn't delivered anywhere near what they said so why we're surprised about crime is a bit of a mystery.

Hugh 13-02-2010 16:33

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Product 13 (Post 34962987)
No, I'm one hell of an ugly bloke.

It's OK, they won't be looking at your face - just the top of your head or your back.....:shocked:

Jimmy-J 13-02-2010 19:05

Re: Prison inmates bullying their victims
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34963173)
It's OK, they won't be looking at your face - just the top of your head or your back.....:shocked:

Bring it on! :kiss:

Flyboy 13-02-2010 23:34

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 34963127)
I know a number of serving prison officers who all say that life within the prison is way too lenient and that far to much accomadation is made to prisoner needs. Most local residents can also recollect a number of occasions where prisoners rioted because food wasn't upto their standard trashed the place and a nice convoy of trucks was taking brand new stuff there within a few days.

This government talked a lot about many things and havn't delivered anywhere near what they said so why we're surprised about crime is a bit of a mystery.

I also know one or two prison officers who think that allowing prisoners food and water is treating them too leniently. Perhaps they are a little bit jaded.

Derek 14-02-2010 00:58

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34963320)
I also know one or two prison officers who think that allowing prisoners food and water is treating them too leniently. Perhaps they are a little bit jaded.

Perhaps a bit far. Anyway in a totally unscientific and unregulated test how about you guess which two prisons in Scotland have the worst problems with inmate disorder and riots.

Then guess which two prisons in Scotland are run by private companies and which two have the laxest regimes outwith open prisons.

Ten points if you answer the same to all three questions. -one million and nine hundred thousand if the answers are different.

RizzyKing 14-02-2010 11:36

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Actually flyboy although i know you won't believe it they all would prefer good conditions for prisoners they just do not like the fact that for many of these prisoners life on the inside is significantly better then the life they bother to build for themselves on the outside. This is not about abuse of prisoners it is about punishment actually happening and very often in todays penal system that isn't the case.

Bar one of the officers they are all what i would class as liberal thinking and more leaning towards the whole prison is for rehabilitation then punishment side of things so when even they complain about how the system is too much in the favour of prisoners i know they are not being as forthcoming as most would be.

Flyboy 14-02-2010 14:47

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34963353)
Perhaps a bit far. Anyway in a totally unscientific and unregulated test how about you guess which two prisons in Scotland have the worst problems with inmate disorder and riots.

Then guess which two prisons in Scotland are run by private companies and which two have the laxest regimes outwith open prisons.

Ten points if you answer the same to all three questions. -one million and nine hundred thousand if the answers are different.

I am sure that you could have provided us with this information.

Osem 19-02-2010 21:25

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/8524834.stm

Quote:

A teenager from Manchester who fatally shot his 12-year-old sister three years ago has been jailed again, after being caught with another gun in October. Kasha Peniston, 19, killed his sister Kamilah at the family home in 2007. He was detained for manslaughter but within months of his release in May 2008, he was found with a revolver.
New Labour - sooooo tough on crime.... :rolleyes:

bjorkiii 19-02-2010 21:29

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Cameron will sort it all out :D his absolutley marvelous

Osem 19-02-2010 21:35

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bjorkiii (Post 34966455)
Cameron will sort it all out :D his absolutley marvelous

Will you give him 13 years to do so?.. I mean it's taken New Labour that long to get to this point so surely you should at least give our next goverment an equivalent timescale before judging them...

Sirius 19-02-2010 21:35

Re: "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bjorkiii (Post 34966455)
Cameron will sort it all out :D his absolutley marvelous

Well someone needs to because Brown has failed miserably:D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum