1andrew1 |
31-08-2022 22:04 |
Re: Britain outside the EU
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
(Post 36132893)
Good luck getting treated in A&E for the whiplash caused by that complete change of direction… :D
|
I thought the addition of 10 years on the streaming thread was substantive but nothing compared to this handbrake U-turn! :shocked:
---------- Post added at 21:55 ---------- Previous post was at 21:42 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
(Post 36132881)
I didn’t take you for an Irish nationalist Andrew.
Mainland GB may be beyond the usual election territory of the DUP but as I’m sure you’re very well aware, a referendum is not an election and the DUP does not consider Great Britain to be another country.
|
Were I an Irish nationalist, I would have advocated Brexit as the fastest route to achieving unification.
The purchase of the wrap-around by the DUP in GB where it does not field any candidates was very strange. As the article says
Quote:
Geoghegan contends in Democracy for Sale that the money was channelled to the DUP through the official Vote Leave campaign because Vote Leave had almost used up its permitted spending of £7 million. Vote Leave and the DUP have denied the claim.
To prop up his Vote Leave-DUP connection conviction, Geoghegan writes, "Two months before the referendum, Matthew Elliott, Vote Leave's chief executive, wrote in an email to senior staff: 'The DUP also have a £700k spending limit, which can be spent nationwide!' "
“At that stage the DUP had yet to register as a referendum participant,” Geoghegan writes. “It only did so in late May. When the CRC started giving money to the DUP, Vote Leave had almost completely exhausted its spending allowance.”
Geoghegan writes how the DUP’s Brexit “spending spree began on June 9th, exactly two weeks before the vote, when the DUP bought £100,000 worth of placards, bags, window stickers, T-shirts and badges from a small branding agency called Soopa Doopa”.
This company was based in the Cambridgeshire cathedral town of Ely. The location and the company was a “surprising choice” for the DUP, thought Geoghegan. The fact that it published more than £800,000 of material for various Leave-supporting groups reinforced his belief that this was part of the alleged Vote Leave-DUP nexus.
|
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...aign-1.4320055
---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 21:55 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
(Post 36132888)
Some people didn't realise how childish and awkward the EU would be because they were classed as our 'friends'.
Had both sides co-operated with each other, the DUP would not have got the hump, would they?
|
Johnson was just pandering to the right-wing of the Conservative Party instead of holding normal negotiations. No amount of throwing our toys out of the pram will alter our geography or the importance of the EU as a trading partner. In fact, recent figures show a decline in non-EU trade. Not saying the EU is perfect as it's not.
The DUP are just using this as an excuse in the same way that Johnson blamed cake for his transgressions. As Hugh says, the're behaving in an undemocratic manner and it's disappointing that you fail to condemn this.
|