![]() |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
|
Re: US Election 2016
I'm still unsure if its still not just a big joke from Trump just to see how far along he can go. Pretty far it turns out. Merica... you scare me.
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Blame social media.
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
She is massively trying to face up to Putin and then revealing Nuclear secrets about how long it takes to launch a Nuclear missile from the order to strike. Talk about giving the enemy an advantage there. Putin is now probably laughing and thinking, well, thanks thicko, I can now work on trying to improve on that timing and make the order for only half of what HC said. I think it was the most dumbest thing she said and she has said many stupid things, DJT has too, but she is in a whole different class, having been in the government and made stupid errors of judgement, that cost lives, Benghazi being a prime example, she made many errors of judgment over the years, along with her interfering buddy Obama. |
Re: US Election 2016
So she isn't possibly clever enough to up the game? I mean may be it's her that wants the time improved or doesn't US politic work like that?
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
Telling the World how long it takes to launch a Nuclear missile from the order being given, don't you think it's dumb? You and a few others here, also need to stop wearing those rose tinted glasses when it comes to stupid, dumb, crooked HC. I have already agreed DJT has his flaws and is not one the best candidates but she is massively a huge liability, more so over Trump. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
To be honest though Twitter is the last place I'd look for affirmation of anything. It's an echo chamber that resounds most loudly with the sentiments of whichever group is best organised (or has the most bots). The problem for the American voters is that so much of what Trump says about Clinton is true. She has a shocking lack of judgment and is in every way an establishment figure standing at a time in history when that isn't what voters want. Yet at the same time, the anti-establishment figure they're asked to vote for instead, is a reckless misogynist with borderline racist tendencies. Clinton is awful, but Trump is a complete train wreck. Personally I think all the data so far shows Clinton will win, but unless she proves to be utterly different in office than everyone expects, her chances of getting re-elected next time will be slim. If only the Republicans can neutralise the Tea Party nut cases on their right wing and nominate someone electable, that is. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
Got to laugh at your rose tinted glasses comment and don't think that Twitter is reliable for telling me whats going on. |
Re: US Election 2016
Talking to a friend tonight whose a serving gunney in the marine corp he said he'd handed his paper's in and taken early retirement as he couldn't serve with either clinton or trump as commander in chief. Doesn't sound much but for him it's a massive change in his life as he loves the marine corp and if you sawed him in half you'd find the stars and stripes. He said he isn't the only one that's come to the same decision and apparently whatever branch of the military you pick has some very experienced and valuable personnel quitting.
Add in the division within american society that this election has highlighted and worsened and there are going to be troubling times ahead. I haven't watched any of the debates but if it's true clinton has revealed the timeframe from order to launch of their nukes if she wins there will be very little if any support from the military who because of events in the past already have a deep mistrust of clinton. That trump is the best the republican party could put up is also deeply worrying and the splits he has created within that party could be very bad for the US. Things just seem to be spiralling out of control all over the western world at the minute lurching from one disaster to the next and at a time when Russia seems prepared to push it's luck this could have very serious consequences for us all. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:18 ---------- Previous post was at 11:12 ---------- Quote:
This is if the Republican party doesn't turn in on itself for the next 4 years gifting her the next election too. |
Re: US Election 2016
Doesn't seem that big of a secret the timeframe in between order being given and nuclear launch; here's the process in a fair degree of detail.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/gr...weapon-launch/ Clinton's comment matches this article. About a minute for conference then, once decision made and order given, 4 minutes for ICBM launch, about 14 minutes for SLBM. |
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
|
Re: US Election 2016
Quote:
As far as having 4 minutes to kiss your hindmost goodbye goes I'm afraid not. Depending on where you are you could have less than a minute between detection and ending up on your way to the stratosphere, and at most perhaps 2 or 3. Aren't I a shining light? :D |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum