![]() |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
The VMNG doesn't have wireless :D |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
It's got to be a lot more than a few |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
I am sure VM would still be introducing newer firmware regardless of a few people complaining on a forum ;)
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
It is no where near as bad as people say.... its worse! Much worse! Words can not describe how bad it is.... :)
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Of course my story like yours is completely irrelevant as WiFi is notoriously fickle anyway. That said the Fonera+ WiFi signal never drops yet the hub one often does and I find my phone on the Fonera when sitting right next to the hub. I don't doubt that your hub is fine - mine is too apart from the sparse feature set which on a giveaway unit is understandable and the dodgy WiFi which is less so - as the WiFi problem seems to be widespread maybe it is a common hardware fault - do you think I should call in for a replacement? |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
First, it's vastly more than a few and even more vastly more than the number of people reporting satsifaction with this wretched device here in this thread. Second, as Lowei insightfully points out, those "few people" have led to VM's three formware changes. They shouldn't have been necessary anyway - at least the thing should have been released at a standard where firware upgrades were BAU (covering your point) and not us the result of user outrage. You only have to look at the VM forum thread to see that VM are reactive to the criticism and using the feedback to guide their future firmware changes. |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
My superhub was largely fine once I relieved it of wireless and LAN related duties.
It is now absolutely fine as it's running in bridge mode. The cable modem side of the firmware is pretty generic stuff so hasn't been messed up by Netgear. I had a process I could follow that would make the Superhub lock up and keel over every time - in bridge mode this doesn't happen, yay. ---------- Post added at 09:37 ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 ---------- Quote:
Again I am sure by now we all appreciate having had it repeated to us over and over again that apart from the guy who is doing service calls on this device all the office based people have Superhubs that work perfectly, and are unaware of any issues. We are aware that there are no major issues and that the rushed R26 firmware for example was purely done to keep a tiny minority happy as your Superhubs were working flawlessly and you couldn't see anyone else reporting issues. Repeating yourself as infinitum makes you no better than the people who say that everything VM do sucks because their service sucks. I have no idea when VM staff took it upon themselves to largely quit being helpful and start being wilfully argumentative with customers. Maybe I'm feeling nostalgic for when ntl (were no Telewest guys on here) staff bent over backwards to try and fix issues for customers, and tried to treat people with respect unless they were really going OTT. Maybe there's some corporate theme going here given which of the parent companies the more argumentative people come from. This last page of this thread. 1 VM staffer saying the three thousandth time that their Superhub is fantastic. 1 VM staffer making the latest in a string of pithy comments having no actual value to add to the thread. 1 VM staffer making a throwaway comment about firmware updates. 1 VM staffer reporting he had attended 3 service calls for poor Superhub performance that day. 4 posts, excluding mine, from customers. |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Who is being rude to customers? Any staff post here personally and can offer support and help where needed. It is in no way official.
Also it doesn't help that some people constantly put down the superhub and all we are doing is counteracting that with some facts that not everyone finds it terrible. |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Igni puts it so well.
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
Constantly repeating the 'facts' as you see them doesn't make the 'facts' as other people see them any less relevant, and your constant repetition isn't going to change anyone's point of view. I am entirely justified in putting the thing down as, in my experience, it sucked. In yours it doesn't, fine, but telling other people they are wrong just because yours is ok is no better than them saying they are all abysmal because theirs performs poorly. Whatever you may think, and evidently the Superhub is fantastic for you, there are issues with a significant enough proportion of the devices to generate service calls and force emergency firmware updates tested for a matter of hours before being released. The truth is, as always, somewhere in between the two, frankly excessively for a cable modem gateway, polarised sides of the discussion. |
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:17. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum