Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33663010)

Angua 07-05-2010 09:20

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MadGamer (Post 35016012)
So now we have a Hung Parliament , what does it mean exactly? Another election?

Firstly - some horse trading. We actually have to have a government to declare an election.

richard1960 07-05-2010 09:21

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MadGamer (Post 35016012)
So now we have a Hung Parliament , what does it mean exactly? Another election?

Too early to tell as all the results are still not in.

Maggy 07-05-2010 09:24

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
It's a pity we can't have something like a mistrial..A miselection.:)

mikegreen 07-05-2010 09:32

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alferret (Post 35015998)
Seems like across the nation thousands of people eligable to vote were turned away from pooling stations.
I think 15hrs is a too short an amount of time to vote and this should be raised to 36 or 48 hours rather than the " I want it now" type of voting.

Took me less than two minutes, in and out.

Cannot understand these people still in line at 10pm :erm:

And if they cannot be bothered to wait then that is there lookout/problem

Chris 07-05-2010 09:42

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 35016026)
Firstly - some horse trading. We actually have to have a government to declare an election.

No, we don't - the Queen can do that all by herself. It's highly unlikely that she will need to though, a bit of horse trading should sort it out before Her Maj has to think about rolling up her sleeves.

---------- Post added at 08:42 ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 ----------

I see Scotland did as Scotland does ... watch which way England's going, then jump in the opposite direction. No change in seats, and an improvement in Labour's share since 2005. :spin:

Cue five years of Wee Eck the Smug whingeing about Scotland being governed by an 'English' party.

Maggy 07-05-2010 09:44

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35016039)


I see Scotland did as Scotland does ... watch which way England's going, then jump in the opposite direction. No change in seats, and an improvement in Labour's share since 2005. :spin:

Cue five years of Wee Eck the Smug whingeing about Scotland being governed by an 'English' party.

We all have our cross to bear..:erm:

Chris 07-05-2010 09:53

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alferret (Post 35015998)
I would guess that if any of these are in areas where the seats were gained by a very small amount then the runners up will have an argument about "they may have won the seat if only"

One of the problems seems that because of the high turnout polling station ran out of ballot papers.

I think 15hrs is a too short an amount of time to vote and this should be raised to 36 or 48 hours rather than the " I want it now" type of voting.

15 hours is absolutely tonnes of time. It has worked that way for decades and there is no reason why it couldn't have worked this time.

Doubtless there were cock ups, and heads should roll, however it turned out last night that the Angry Old Woman the Beeb interviewed - and replayed endlessly for the next 3-4 hours - had gone down to he local polling station at 6pm and didn't fancy the queue. She went home, had another look at the queue at 7, 8 and 9pm, and only thought it might be a good idea to join the line at 9.15pm. Surprise, surprise, the door was slammed in her face at 10pm, as legally it must be.

Chris 07-05-2010 10:44

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Hung!

---------- Post added at 09:44 ---------- Previous post was at 09:43 ----------

Officially, that is. The results in so far mean it is now mathematically impossible for any party to get an outright majority.

dilli-theclaw 07-05-2010 10:44

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
What - now we get to choose who should be hung? ;)

Chris 07-05-2010 10:45

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
If only ... :D

mikegreen 07-05-2010 10:47

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas T (Post 35016071)
What - now we get to choose who should be hung? ;)

:) If only it were that simple

arcamalpha2004 07-05-2010 11:02

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35016050)
15 hours is absolutely tonnes of time. It has worked that way for decades and there is no reason why it couldn't have worked this time.

Doubtless there were cock ups, and heads should roll, however it turned out last night that the Angry Old Woman the Beeb interviewed - and replayed endlessly for the next 3-4 hours - had gone down to he local polling station at 6pm and didn't fancy the queue. She went home, had another look at the queue at 7, 8 and 9pm, and only thought it might be a good idea to join the line at 9.15pm. Surprise, surprise, the door was slammed in her face at 10pm, as legally it must be.


Ofcourse 15 hours is plenty of time, it has worked before, or are we seeing cuts even in the resources at the polling stations?
That can be one of the reasons why 15 hours was not enough to process people wanting to vote.
Anyway, Gawd should now do the right thing, he was not even democratically elected, he should resign and go for a pint with his friend Nick ;)

zing_deleted 07-05-2010 11:04

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
my understanding is minimal but the Liberals aint really got enough to form a coalition with Labour have they? even with their seats it wont take Labour to 326 or does a coalition just need more seats than the other party?

dilli-theclaw 07-05-2010 11:05

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zing (Post 35016079)
my understanding is minimal but the Liberals aint really got enough to form a coalition with Labour have they? even with their seats it wont take Labour to 326 or does a coalition just need more seats than the other party?

As I understand it that's pretty spot on. As long as the coalition has the 326 they 'win'. There are still some seats to be declared so I think we're still waiting. If no-one gets that figure I guess we'll have a re-vote.

Pierre 07-05-2010 11:08

Re: 2010 General Election: The Cable Forum Exit Poll
 
No matter how we go forward, Brown has been given a clear message that he's had his chips.

Time to go Gordon.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum