Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Creationism vs Evolution, Equal? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33612335)

Action Jackson 20-04-2007 13:29

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34279929)
I see a soul on similar level to life force so it wouldn't surprise me if animals and non-humans will be there. After all, strip away the outer shell and we're all the same, every living thing.

I think I can safely say I agree with you on this. Every living creature has the same life force(I have no problems calling it a soul).

The only thing that elevates us in the animal kingdom(we are animals after all) is our intelligence.

But I do believe that our superior intelligence is because of evolution, which is obviously where we disagree.

Russ 20-04-2007 13:34

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
And opposing thumbs.

Action Jackson 20-04-2007 13:34

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34279892)
Right, you've made your point numerous times in this thread. Any real need for you to continue to post in it?


Admittedly I tend to get very passionate about this topic, so regrettably I end up making statements(sometimes personal) that only end up harming my purpose in the first place.


But my frustrations are usually born out of a lack of answers from the religious community, but mostly by an unwillingness of religion to review new evidence as it arrives and possibly adapt their view of God(I seriously doubt that if God exists then any one person knows him inside out - so why not be willing to learn more and concede where initial thinking may have been flawed?)


It's Friday and all is well. Spread the love(but not in a Jesus way). :D

Ramrod 20-04-2007 13:55

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34279913)
I can see what you're suggesting but I don't redard neanderthals to be close enough to humans to play by the same physical rules.

Current thinking is that neanderthals were just as advanced as humans at that point.

---------- Post added at 12:55 ---------- Previous post was at 12:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34279954)
Yes, it IS untrue. It's the classic case of taking one part of the bible out of context, adding a touch of ridicule and telling everyone it's right - typical armchair expert tactics.

.......thats what ID proponents do all the time.........see Chris's posts about it being ridiculous that the eye evolved spontaneously (so it must have been designed)....when no one is suggesting that it did evolve spontaneously......

Action Jackson 20-04-2007 14:07

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 34280097)
.......thats what ID proponents do all the time.........see Chris's posts about it being ridiculous that the eye evolved spontaneously (so it must have been designed)....when no one is suggesting that it did evolve spontaneously......


The eye, the flagella bacteria, all explained convincingly from an evolutionary aspect.


If the whole creationist argument against evolution is based around the eye and the flagella, then it only shows how flimsy and desperate the whole argument really is.

danielf 20-04-2007 14:19

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Action Jackson (Post 34280108)
If the whole creationist argument against evolution is based around the eye and the flagella, then it only shows how flimsy and desperate the whole argument really is.

In fairness, it is quite common in Science for debates to center around a few examples that (appear to) illustrate the point being made particularly well.

Ramrod 20-04-2007 14:23

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34280120)
In fairness, it is quite common in Science for debates to center around a few examples that (appear to) illustrate the point being made particularly well.

possibly true but they don't illustrate the point particularly well at all.....:D

danielf 20-04-2007 14:25

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 34280126)
possibly true but they don't illustrate the point particularly well at all.....:D

Absolutely, and it's fine to criticise it for that. Not for choosing examples per se though. That happens all the time.

Action Jackson 20-04-2007 14:38

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34280127)
Absolutely, and it's fine to criticise it for that. Not for choosing examples per se though. That happens all the time.

But the argument just tends to be "We think it's it's too complex to have happened by chance, so it must be down to a creator, so god exists". No evidence is ever provided to support the claim.


What kind of argument is that?

Ramrod 20-04-2007 14:40

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Action Jackson (Post 34280136)

What kind of argument is that?

.......to teach our kids about......

peanut 20-04-2007 14:40

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
One you can't question nor expect a straight answer.

Damien 20-04-2007 14:42

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
The problem is I find a lot of religions misrepresent evolution. They pretend the theory says it happened 'by chance, like magic' which isnt true. Its made it look stupid that it could have happened. When its simply a process of elimination.

danielf 20-04-2007 14:49

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Action Jackson (Post 34280136)
But the argument just tends to be "We think it's it's too complex to have happened by chance, so it must be down to a creator, so god exists". No evidence is ever provided to support the claim.


What kind of argument is that?

The eye and the flagella are supposed to be evidence of items that are too complex to have arisen from evolution (by example, as not everything would be considered too complex). As it is, the evidence doesn't stand up, which is rather unfortunate for them as it leaves the theory unsubstantiated. If the evidence would stand up it would be problematic for the Evolution theory.

Obvously, there is no evidence that a creator exists, that is the implication/speculation. Also, I don't believe they say (out loud), that the creator is (the Christian) God.

Xaccers 20-04-2007 14:55

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danielf (Post 34280147)
. Also, I don't believe they say (out loud), that the creator is (the Christian) God.

Because if they did it would prevent ID being forced into schools in the US because it would be teaching a religious belief.
That is the whole purpose behind ID, not to further science, not to further knowledge, but to force the creation beliefs of certain christians upon children without getting caught doing it.

---------- Post added at 13:55 ---------- Previous post was at 13:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34280079)
And opposing thumbs.

Opposable Russ, our thumbs are opposable :D /pedant

Or are you saying you're against thumbs in general, which would be kinda cool :D
Although a little bit strange...:erm:

danielf 20-04-2007 14:56

Re: Creationism vs Evolution, Equal?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers (Post 34280151)
Because if they did it would prevent ID being forced into schools in the US because it would be teaching a religious belief.
That is the whole purpose behind ID, not to further science, not to further knowledge, but to force the creation beliefs of certain christians upon children without getting caught doing it.

I know that is the motive behind it, but that's not very relevant in debunking the theory.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum