![]() |
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
I suspect the Conservative vote will decline further in the coming days, as people read of ministers' support for Johnson. |
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
The poll was conducted yesterday morning apparently so missed his apology/admittance.
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
It’ll last as long as it takes to find someone else to take the wheel of the sinking ship I suppose. |
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Is there no one in this government who really can’t think about how they are truly accountable to the electorate without being shamed into it? Although it’s hard to see any real heartfelt shame being expressed by anyone.
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Don't worry, some civil servants will be fired for not informing ol' Boris this wasn't a work event.
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Apparently Boris has discovered a covid case in his extended/many families. So he has to hide for a week....
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Should it be here or the Coronavirus thread??
Jonathan Van-Tam has left his role https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59979504 |
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
---------- Post added at 09:25 ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
I wonder if all those calling for heads to roll would be willing to be subject to investigation and prosecution for past events in quite the same way. "You have been found guilty of an event with 7 people attending when the limit was 6 on the evening of 21 May 2020, £200 fine."
If the event was illegal then prosecute accordingly, if not then so what? Foolish, insensitive all possible but investigate, deal and move on. |
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
Quote:
Why so? Because your average member of the public does not set the rules, nor do they stand up in Parliament and advise the House that they condemned parties that took place at their house and then subsequently admit to being at one. The issues here are rule-breaking, honesty and poor decision-making. Not features you want from someone in the highest position of authority. The only moving-on will be done by Johnson. Either this summer when the 1922 Committee gets enough votes to run a leadership challenge, or in 2024's general election. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum