Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media TV Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Virgin Media News (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33607146)

braysoj1 25-02-2008 17:22

Virgin files appeal on Sky/ITV ruling
 
Virgin Media today appealed the Competition Commission's ruling on Sky's stake in ITV - saying the regulator and the business secretary made "significant errors".


http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcas...tv-ruling.html

info from digital spy

grabbi 25-02-2008 18:51

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Virgin Media to Challenge the Competition Commission on ITV Ruling

This also says that Virgin Media is taking this complaint to Ofcom's Investigation of the Pay TV Market (The one that kicked off because of the Sky Basics) which mounts pressure on Sky.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008...rss&feed=media

---------- Post added at 18:51 ---------- Previous post was at 18:42 ----------

Virgin Media to be SUED... by Cat Owner?#

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/gener...r_lost_cat.php

Apparently, the dosy mare didnt lock her cats up in a safe place, and allowed them to run around whilst the Installation was going on.

Virgin Media DID lose the lock, and not close the gate behind them, and that is the reason the £300+ cat has been lost.

Shes suing for the price of the cat, as Virgin have replaced the lock and refunded postage costs.

Whacky, eh?

tex 26-02-2008 10:07

Re: Virgin Media News
 
hi there,
what i would like to know is when are we going to get more hd channels, what with sky pushing on with new channels with or with out hd, evening freeview are now pushing aheard with hd, so why is vm getting so far behind, is it R.B. is more interrested in the internet side of things.
tex

Toto 26-02-2008 11:22

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tex (Post 34495735)
hi there,
what i would like to know is when are we going to get more hd channels, what with sky pushing on with new channels with or with out hd, evening freeview are now pushing aheard with hd, so why is vm getting so far behind, is it R.B. is more interrested in the internet side of things.
tex

R.B, Richard Branson has nothing to do with the day-to-day running of Virgin Media. Neil Burkett, acting CEO for Virgin Media has stated that their strength is in Broadband, but they are also strong on content with their VOD service. Whether HD content on Virgin Media will improve is anyones guess at the moment.

Que The BlueRaja.

grabbi 26-02-2008 15:20

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Id say, from what Neil Berkett said, more HD Content via VOD is the way.

Not channels, Im afraid.

grabbi 26-02-2008 20:41

Re: Virgin Media News
 
DirecTV Sale Finalised.

Not really Virgin Media news, but kind of related.

Sky's owners, News Corp. have agreed to release DirecTV, the US' Satellite Broadcaster, to Liberty Media, ran by John Malone.

As some might remember, John Malone was said to be interested in Virgin media last year, before the Credit Crunch scuppered the Cable Co's chance of being sold.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcas...lised.html?rss

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ----------

Anyone find it ironic, that News Corp. want nothing to do with Satellite TV in the US, but its the complete opposite in this country?

Toto 26-02-2008 20:45

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grabbi (Post 34496164)
DirecTV Sale Finalised.

Not really Virgin Media news, but kind of related.

Sky's owners, News Corp. have agreed to release DirecTV, the US' Satellite Broadcaster, to Liberty Media, ran by John Malone.

As some might remember, John Malone was said to be interested in Virgin media last year, before the Credit Crunch scuppered the Cable Co's chance of being sold.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcas...lised.html?rss

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ----------

Anyone find it ironic, that News Corp. want nothing to do with Satellite TV in the US, but its the complete opposite in this country?

Don't find it ironic really, Cable is much stronger in the US than satelite.

lostandconfused 27-02-2008 13:09

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grabbi (Post 34495435)

Virgin Media to be SUED... by Cat Owner?#

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/gener...r_lost_cat.php

Apparently, the dosy mare didnt lock her cats up in a safe place, and allowed them to run around whilst the Installation was going on.

Virgin Media DID lose the lock, and not close the gate behind them, and that is the reason the £300+ cat has been lost.

Shes suing for the price of the cat, as Virgin have replaced the lock and refunded postage costs.

Whacky, eh?

the comments on that page are actually quite funny!:D

webcrawler2050 27-02-2008 13:36

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Funny as chuff - just shows how f*cked this country is - may as well call it USA. ;)

tweetypie/8 27-02-2008 14:52

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TV Boy (Post 34209819)
1) Challange +1 is coming to the ex-Telewest viewers on Thursday and will have EPG Channel 153.

2) THE following channels will be appearing on NTL from Thursday:

Bravo2 on channel 139
( NTL Telewest moving this channel on the old Telewest Network soon. )

Trouble+1 on ch 141

UKTV History +1 on ch204

UKTV Food +1 on ch261

UKTV Documentary+1 on ch226

3) Bad News for Golf fans NTL Telewest are moving Setanta Golf to their new 'Setanta Sports Package' from this Thursday.

thanks tv boy for keeping up the good work.;)

Horizon 27-02-2008 16:35

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by grabbi (Post 34496164)
DirecTV Sale Finalised.

Not really Virgin Media news, but kind of related.

Sky's owners, News Corp. have agreed to release DirecTV, the US' Satellite Broadcaster, to Liberty Media, ran by John Malone.

As some might remember, John Malone was said to be interested in Virgin media last year, before the Credit Crunch scuppered the Cable Co's chance of being sold.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcas...lised.html?rss

---------- Post added at 20:41 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ----------

Anyone find it ironic, that News Corp. want nothing to do with Satellite TV in the US, but its the complete opposite in this country?

I've already gone into the Murdoch vs Malone saga before on this forum, so what repeat, except....

Malone built up a sizeable stake in Murdoch's News Corp company to such an extent that Malone tried to wrestle control of News Corp away from Murdoch. Murdoch took measures to prevent this, the so called "poison pill". But while Malone still had a sizeable stake in News Corp, he was still a considerable threat to Murdoch. So, Murdoch has finally sold his stake in Direct TV to Malone in return for his share of News Corp's shares.

Murdoch has spent the last 20 years building up global satellite ventures that would've eventually all have been merged into one company to create a "Global Sky" type business, the only one in existence.

Murdoch has spent a lot of time and money on his satellite business', now only to have to sell his most important part of it only a few years after finally getting it (Direc TV). Murdoch will not see any irony in this what so ever.

grabbi 28-02-2008 16:23

Re: Virgin Media News
 
SKY BASICS.

Quote:

BSkyB and Virgin Media are working towards an amicable resolution of their carriage disputes comes as some relief after all the mud-slinging between the two companies over the last year or so.
From New Media Markets - 27 February 2008.

Too bad its a subscription News service Website......

jfman 28-02-2008 23:07

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Utter rubbish. Same thing has been said at the last two quarterly conference calls - 'in talks' - doesn't mean its going to go anywhere.

Realistically it suits Virgin to have the facade of being 'in negotiation' when it gets to court or OFCOM rule on the market.

grabbi 29-02-2008 02:04

Re: Virgin Media News
 
I know, but I thought it might shut all the Sky One lovers up for 5 mins. ;)

starsailor123uk 01-03-2008 11:41

Re: Virgin Media News
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Toto (Post 34496175)
Don't find it ironic really, Cable is much stronger in the US than satelite.

Better investment in city in the firs place plus the reason that News Corp Offloaded Direct TV to John whatsisname is that he and muroch senior are bitter "business" enemies and John had made a significant investment in Newscorp which could have been a pain in RM butt. Swap that holding for the Direct TV

Both sides win-win

---------- Post added at 11:41 ---------- Previous post was at 11:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neptune (Post 34496762)
I've already gone into the Murdoch vs Malone saga before on this forum, so what repeat, except....

Malone built up a sizeable stake in Murdoch's News Corp company to such an extent that Malone tried to wrestle control of News Corp away from Murdoch. Murdoch took measures to prevent this, the so called "poison pill". But while Malone still had a sizeable stake in News Corp, he was still a considerable threat to Murdoch. So, Murdoch has finally sold his stake in Direct TV to Malone in return for his share of News Corp's shares.

Murdoch has spent the last 20 years building up global satellite ventures that would've eventually all have been merged into one company to create a "Global Sky" type business, the only one in existence.

Murdoch has spent a lot of time and money on his satellite business', now only to have to sell his most important part of it only a few years after finally getting it (Direc TV). Murdoch will not see any irony in this what so ever.

teach me to read the whole thread and not be so long since visiting site

his explanation was right!


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum