Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33707507)

OLD BOY 26-05-2019 17:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996381)
That's conflating. A US trade deal isn't the only set of circumstances that could bring about further privatisation. It's not an exclusive one though.

---------- Post added at 16:54 ---------- Previous post was at 16:53 ----------



If there's any such analysis feel free to share it.

It's the fact that this hasn't been done that has led to the dire forecasts. All the negatives have been calculated but none of the positives.

jfman 26-05-2019 18:02

Re: Brexit
 
So despite the finance sector being full of companies seeking to get an edge on each other in the post Brexit world literally nobody has done any analysis on which areas will be worth investing in? None of these capitalists in multi billion pound investment firms has commissioned any research into it? Nobody?

nomadking 26-05-2019 18:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996381)
That's conflating. A US trade deal isn't the only set of circumstances that could bring about further privatisation. It's not an exclusive one though.

---------- Post added at 16:54 ---------- Previous post was at 16:53 ----------



If there's any such analysis feel free to share it.

And one of those other set of circumstances is remaining in the EU.

jfman 26-05-2019 18:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35996388)
And one of those other set of circumstances is remaining in the EU.

You're ignoring likelihood.

pip08456 26-05-2019 18:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996381)
That's conflating. A US trade deal isn't the only set of circumstances that could bring about further privatisation. It's not an exclusive one though.

---------- Post added at 16:54 ---------- Previous post was at 16:53 ----------



If there's any such analysis feel free to share it.

Believe it or not even though I'm a Brexiteer I am educated enough to know that conflating and combining are exactly the same.

Conflating is used by those who wish to appear superior.

BTW I also enjoy doing The Times, Telegraph and Daily Fail cryptic crosswords.

nomadking 26-05-2019 18:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996387)
So despite the finance sector being full of companies seeking to get an edge on each other in the post Brexit world literally nobody has done any analysis on which areas will be worth investing in? None of these capitalists in multi billion pound investment firms has commissioned any research into it? Nobody?

Anything positive they will keep to themselves. No good letting everybody else know about your research and analysis.

Investment firms have to produce a prospectus with hypothetical worst case scenarios. That is because investors will complain that nobody warned them, if they are caught out. The key word being "hypothetical".

OLD BOY 26-05-2019 18:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996387)
So despite the finance sector being full of companies seeking to get an edge on each other in the post Brexit world literally nobody has done any analysis on which areas will be worth investing in? None of these capitalists in multi billion pound investment firms has commissioned any research into it? Nobody?

Do you know of any?

The problem is to know which opportunities capitalists will go for. Any predictions would be pointless because exactly how businesses will react is unknown.

But the opportunities are there, and freed up from the dead hand of the EU, the UK can only prosper.

jfman 26-05-2019 18:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35996391)
Believe it or not even though I'm a Brexiteer I am educated enough to know that conflating and combining are exactly the same.

Conflating is used by those who wish to appear superior.

BTW I also enjoy doing The Times, Telegraph and Daily Fail cryptic crosswords.

As much as I enjoy getting bogged down in semantics on this forum, I think you know that I mean you are conflating/combining two issues that aren't linked for the purposes of derailing the conversation.

Privatisation by New Labour has no effect on the likelihood (or otherwise) of further privatisation as part of any future US-UK trade deal.

---------- Post added at 17:19 ---------- Previous post was at 17:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35996393)
Do you know of any?

The problem is to know which opportunities capitalists will go for. Any predictions would be pointless because exactly how businesses will react is unknown.

But the opportunities are there, and freed up from the dead hand of the EU, the UK can only prosper.

I'm aware of exactly none, which is why I asked if you knew of any.

pip08456 26-05-2019 18:25

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996395)
As much as I enjoy getting bogged down in semantics on this forum, I think you know that I mean you are conflating/combining two issues that aren't linked for the purposes of derailing the conversation.

Privatisation by New Labour has no effect on the likelihood (or otherwise) of further privatisation as part of any future US-UK trade deal.

---------- Post added at 17:19 ---------- Previous post was at 17:18 ----------



I'm aware of exactly none, which is why I asked if you knew of any.

So its OK for New Labour to privatise part of the NHS but not anyone else?

Why should any US deal include privatisation of the NHS? It may be something the US wants but will not necessarily get.

Pierre 26-05-2019 18:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996395)

Privatisation by New Labour has no effect on the likelihood (or otherwise) of further privatisation as part of any future US-UK trade deal.

And should therefore not be referred to in debate?

Good privatisation v bad privatisation?

New labour privatisation - good, Privatisation post Brexit - Bad.

I get it now, thanks.

ianch99 26-05-2019 20:25

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35996391)
Believe it or not even though I'm a Brexiteer I am educated enough to know that conflating and combining are exactly the same.

Conflating is used by those who wish to appear superior.

BTW I also enjoy doing The Times, Telegraph and Daily Fail cryptic crosswords.

You need to remove the chip on your shoulder.

---------- Post added at 19:14 ---------- Previous post was at 19:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35996385)
It's the fact that this hasn't been done that has led to the dire forecasts. All the negatives have been calculated but none of the positives.

The negatives are quantifiable since they can be assessed. The positives cannot not be as noone has articulated any to the level of detail required for assessment.

---------- Post added at 19:22 ---------- Previous post was at 19:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996398)
And should therefore not be referred to in debate?

Good privatisation v bad privatisation?

New labour privatisation - good, Privatisation post Brexit - Bad.

I get it now, thanks.

You are deliberately conflating ( :) ) the PFI initiative started under New Labour as a "good" thing. It was not and has been proved not to be so. Yes, I hate to break the news but Governments do make bad decisions.

The privatisation referred to as likely under a right of centre Tory government is one based on the US free market model where the healthcare companies seek to put profit ahead of the patient.

---------- Post added at 19:25 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35996397)
So its OK for New Labour to privatise part of the NHS but not anyone else?

Why should any US deal include privatisation of the NHS? It may be something the US wants but will not necessarily get.

Farage wants the US healthcare model so if you voted for Brexit Party, I am afraid you voted for this along with a whole litany of other great policies e.g. climate change denial, relaxing gun control, etc.

denphone 26-05-2019 20:35

Re: Brexit
 
Britain Elects forecast for this year's UK European elections has...

Quote:

Brex: 24 MEPs (+24 vs 2014)
LDem: 15 MEPs (+14)
Lab: 14 MEPs (-6)
Con: 10 MEPs (-9)
Grn: 4 MEPs (+1)
SNP: 2 MEPs (-)
PC: 1 MEP (-)
UKIP: 0 MEPs (-24)
Also a exit poll has been released in France.

Quote:

Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally party is estimated to have topped the European election vote in France, dealing a blow to the pro-European, centrist president Emmanuel Macron.

A projection for France 2 television, based on exit polls, showed Le Pen’s party coming first with 23.2%, ahead of Macron’s centrist grouping on 21.9%.

pip08456 26-05-2019 20:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35996420)
You need to remove the chip on your shoulder.

---------- Post added at 19:14 ---------- Previous post was at 19:12 ----------



The negatives are quantifiable since they can be assessed. The positives cannot not be as noone has articulated any to the level of detail required for assessment.

---------- Post added at 19:22 ---------- Previous post was at 19:14 ----------



You are deliberately conflating ( :) ) the PFI initiative started under New Labour as a "good" thing. It was not and has been proved not to be so. Yes, I hate to break the news but Governments do make bad decisions.

The privatisation referred to as likely under a right of centre Tory government is one based on the US free market model where the healthcare companies seek to put profit ahead of the patient.

---------- Post added at 19:25 ---------- Previous post was at 19:22 ----------



Farage wants the US healthcare model so if you voted for Brexit Party, I am afraid you voted for this along with a whole litany of other great policies e.g. climate change denial, relaxing gun control, etc.

I've never had a chip on my shoulder.

Farage can want whatever policies but in the EU election only one mattered. Leave! The whole litany of others have absolutely nothing to do with the EU elections.

Mick 26-05-2019 21:05

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35996420)

Farage wants the US healthcare model so if you voted for Brexit Party, I am afraid you voted for this along with a whole litany of other great policies e.g. climate change denial, relaxing gun control, etc.

Rubbish. Voting for European Parliamentary Election has no relevance to Domestic policies. You see, what you have missed during his new campaign for Brexit Party, is that Farage insisted that Party policies would be decided by its supporters, once it got past European Parliamentary Elections first, their focus was winning most seats which current forcasts say they will win the most seats.

Hom3r 26-05-2019 21:36

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35996426)
Britain Elects forecast for this year's UK European elections has...

Brex: 24 MEPs (+24 vs 2014)
LDem: 15 MEPs (+14)
Lab: 14 MEPs (-6)
Con: 10 MEPs (-9)
Grn: 4 MEPs (+1)
SNP: 2 MEPs (-)
PC: 1 MEP (-)
UKIP: 0 MEPs (-24)


I hope the breixit traitor party AKA lim dem doesn't do well.

I found it highly offensive to their "Bollocks to Brexit"

So much so that the leader should be strip of his knighthood.

Damien 26-05-2019 21:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35996435)
I hope the breixit traitor party AKA lim dem doesn't do well.

I found it highly offensive to their "Bollocks to Brexit"

So much so that the leader should be strip of his knighthood.

Bit over the top.

denphone 26-05-2019 21:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35996435)
I hope the breixit traitor party AKA lim dem doesn't do well.

I found it highly offensive to their "Bollocks to Brexit"

So much so that the leader should be strip of his knighthood.

Less of the word traitor Hom3r as no one is a traitor whoever they cast their vote for.

Mick 26-05-2019 22:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35996438)
Less of the word traitor Hom3r as no one is a traitor whoever they cast their vote for.

He wasn’t having a go at the voters, mainly the parties. I happen to agree with Hom3r. We have a party called Liberal Democrat’s but they’re being anything but Democratic with their immature profanity laden slogan, wanting to over turn one of the largest Democratic process in modern British history.

Mr K 26-05-2019 22:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996444)
He wasn’t having a go at the voters, mainly the parties. I happen to agree with Hom3r. We have a party called Liberal Democrat’s but they’re being anything but Democratic with their immature profanity laden slogan, wanting to over turn one of the largest Democratic process in modern British history.

If they are being attacked must mean the LDs have done well at the expense of other parties ;)

pip08456 26-05-2019 22:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35996448)
If they are being attacked must mean the LDs have done well at the expense of other parties ;)

I think everyone would agree the LD's will be the party of choice for remainers.

Damien 26-05-2019 22:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996444)
He wasn’t having a go at the voters, mainly the parties. I happen to agree with Hom3r. We have a party called Liberal Democrat’s but they’re being anything but Democratic with their immature profanity laden slogan, wanting to over turn one of the largest Democratic process in modern British history.

The Liberal Democrats and their voters are entitled to use the democratic system to register protest and seek to influence previous democratic decisions. The idea that they are traitors and the leader of the party should be stripped of a Knighthood for standing on an electoral platform you disagree with is hardly democratic is it?

1andrew1 26-05-2019 22:47

Re: Brexit
 
On the Brexit front, the key election result is surely that for the next Prime Minister. If Theresa May was not leaving next month, the European results might have had more of an impact but events have overtaken them.

Damien 26-05-2019 22:52

Re: Brexit
 
Any surprise result might influence things.

Labour getting decimated by Brexit voters in Leave seats might make them even more wary of any referendum whereas Liberal Democrat surges in Tory seats might make them more wary of No Deal.

I mean how would Boris react to the Lib Dems doing well in Uxbridge for example?

jfman 26-05-2019 23:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35996397)
So its OK for New Labour to privatise part of the NHS but not anyone else?

Why should any US deal include privatisation of the NHS? It may be something the US wants but will not necessarily get.

Moving from conflating two issues to putting words in my mouth! Nice.

Damien 26-05-2019 23:22

Re: Brexit
 
Looking like a great night so far for Brexit Party and the Liberal Democrats.

1andrew1 26-05-2019 23:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996456)
Looking like a great night so far for Brexit Party and the Liberal Democrats.

And the Green Party too.

---------- Post added at 22:30 ---------- Previous post was at 22:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996454)
Any surprise result might influence things.

Labour getting decimated by Brexit voters in Leave seats might make them even more wary of any referendum whereas Liberal Democrat surges in Tory seats might make them more wary of No Deal.

I mean how would Boris react to the Lib Dems doing well in Uxbridge for example?

Fair points.
Labour look set to be squeezed in both Leave and Remain areas.

Mick 26-05-2019 23:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996452)
The Liberal Democrats and their voters are entitled to use the democratic system to register protest and seek to influence previous democratic decisions. The idea that they are traitors and the leader of the party should be stripped of a Knighthood for standing on an electoral platform you disagree with is hardly democratic is it?

Democratic decisions that have not yet been bloody implemented. :rolleyes:

Damien 26-05-2019 23:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996459)
Democratic decisions that have not yet been bloody implemented. :rolleyes:

Well that's why the Brexit Party is doing so well but it's still the democratic right for the Liberals to stand against it.

nomadking 26-05-2019 23:48

Re: Brexit
 
But there isn't a right to block and/or frustrate a democratic decision.


Would be interesting to do an analysis of the final figures and see how much better the Brexit party figures would be if UKIP had disbanded or not stood. An extra 3/4% might have made a big difference in the number of seats won.

Mick 27-05-2019 00:00

Re: Brexit
 
East of England results:

Brexit Party 604,715
Liberal Democrats 361,563
Green 202,460
Labour 139,490
Tory 163,830
Change UK 58,274

pip08456 27-05-2019 00:04

Re: Brexit
 
Early days yet as not a lot of results returned but Brexit party showing 38% and labour the nearest at 17%.

Damien 27-05-2019 00:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35996465)
Early days yet as not a lot of results returned but Brexit party showing 38% and labour the nearest at 17%.

Lib Dems are closer on 21%. Looks like they'll come 2nd. Brexit are on 31% as I write this.

Mick 27-05-2019 00:10

Re: Brexit
 
Change UK have posted 1,542 votes in Broxtowe (Notts). That's Anna Soubry's seat.

Meanwhile, the Brexit Party has won 11,668. :rofl:

Damien 27-05-2019 00:11

Re: Brexit
 
Change UK also lost the Lib Dems a seat in the North East (if you assume those votes would have gone there)

1andrew1 27-05-2019 00:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35996462)
But there isn't a right to block and/or frustrate a democratic decision.


Would be interesting to do an analysis of the final figures and see how much better the Brexit party figures would be if UKIP had disbanded or not stood. An extra 3/4% might have made a big difference in the number of seats won.

That happens all the time when a new Government is elected. Doubt adding the Ukip votes to the Brexit Party votes will have an effect as the former seems to have been wiped out.

pip08456 27-05-2019 00:16

Re: Brexit
 
Forget Cons & Lab this is going to end up between Brexit & LD's.

Damien 27-05-2019 00:21

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35996470)
Forget Cons & Lab this is going to end up between Brexit & LD's.

Brexit Party will definitely win. Question is if the Lib Dems will stay ahead of Labour. Greens doing very well too.

---------- Post added at 23:21 ---------- Previous post was at 23:19 ----------

https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/sta...71699949228032

Quote:

UK: 40% counted.

Hard Brexit parties: 33.8%
Conservatives/Labour: 23.8%
Remain parties: 40.8%
SO FAR.....

Brexit Party will pick up more votes later. The above includes London after all.

papa smurf 27-05-2019 00:31

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996467)
Change UK have posted 1,542 votes in Broxtowe (Notts). That's Anna Soubry's seat.

Meanwhile, the Brexit Party has won 11,668. :rofl:

Anna who ?

Pierre 27-05-2019 00:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996460)
Well that's why the Brexit Party is doing so well but it's still the democratic right for the Liberals to stand against it.

Indeed, at least the LibDems have decided on where they will stand and fight. That’s they’re dong well.

pip08456 27-05-2019 00:35

Re: Brexit
 
Brexit 12 seats
LD's 6 seats
Lab 5 Seats
Others (Greens) 3 seats
Cons 2 seats

1andrew1 27-05-2019 00:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996454)
I mean how would Boris react to the Lib Dems doing well in Uxbridge for example?

Despite winning London, and I appreciate you only gave it as a what-if scenario, the Liberal Democrats came third in Uxbridge but were ahead of the Conservatives:

The Brexit Party 19,123
Labour Party 16,788
Liberal Democrats 12,372
Conservative and Unionist Party 8,812
Green Party 5,949
https://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/articl...elections-2019

---------- Post added at 23:48 ---------- Previous post was at 23:41 ----------

Farewell, no-deal Brexit. ;)
Quote:

Boris Johnson and Dominic Raab have been warned that Tory MPs would be prepared to bring down any prime minister backing a no-deal Brexit, triggering a general election, amid fears the leadership hopefuls will veer to the right in response to a surge in support for Nigel Farage at the European election.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-backs-no-deal

pip08456 27-05-2019 01:05

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35996478)
Despite winning London, and I appreciate you only gave it as a what-if scenario, the Liberal Democrats came third in Uxbridge but were ahead of the Conservatives:

The Brexit Party 19,123
Labour Party 16,788
Liberal Democrats 12,372
Conservative and Unionist Party 8,812
Green Party 5,949
https://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/articl...elections-2019

---------- Post added at 23:48 ---------- Previous post was at 23:41 ----------

Farewell, no-deal Brexit. ;)

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-backs-no-deal

Still dreaming I see.:)

Damien 27-05-2019 01:12

Re: Brexit
 
I think the result is sort of known now.

Brexit Party have come from nowhere to storm these elections.
Liberal Democrats are probably coming a comfortable second and won London, including Corbyn's own constituency.
Greens have done very well too.
Labour and Tory have had a very bad night. Maybe even worse than expected.
SNP and Plaid Cymru have done well too.

If you want No Deal you can say Brexit trounced the other parties.
If you want Remain you can say that the revoke/referendum parties won more voters than the No Deal parties. (but this might change as the voters come in).
If you want a compromise then good luck.

Best thing is UKIP got 3%. Turns out people don't like edgy YouTubers and embracing the far-right. Brexit voters didn't like that and went elsewhere instead. That's good.

OLD BOY 27-05-2019 01:23

Re: Brexit
 
Time for Vince Cable to change his party’s name so that it actually describes what it stands for. I would suggest Liberal AntiDemocrats since it is putting forward the notion that the democratic will of the people should be ignored.

Mick 27-05-2019 02:38

Re: Brexit
 
BREAKING: The Brexit Party is the biggest single party in the European Parliament. Bigger even than the German CDU.

1andrew1 27-05-2019 03:56

Re: Brexit
 
Great to see the Remain parties getting 40.3% of the vote compared to UKIP-Brrxit Party's 34.9%.

Paul 27-05-2019 05:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35996487)
Great to see the Remain parties getting 40.3% of the vote compared to UKIP-Brrxit Party's 34.9%.

You mean several parties added together got more than one .. wow, talk about grasping at straws. ;)

denphone 27-05-2019 06:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996456)
Looking like a great night so far for Brexit Party and the Liberal Democrats.

And a bleak night of tsunami type proportions for the Conservative party and the Labour party...

TheDaddy 27-05-2019 08:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35996488)
You mean several parties added together got more than one .. wow, talk about grasping at straws. ;)

If it's the second referendum Ann Widicombe claimed then how else do you add up the votes, it's bad enough having to leave the Tory and Labour votes out because they don't know what they want!

---------- Post added at 07:49 ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996486)
BREAKING: The Brexit Party is the biggest single party in the European Parliament. Bigger even than the German CDU.

Not yet is isn't. Think it will be though and I think that could turn out to be very useful in us getting a better deal

Maggy 27-05-2019 09:42

Re: Brexit
 
However as we are leaving it all seems like a pointless exercise..

Damien 27-05-2019 10:07

Re: Brexit
 
All shows just how split the country is. Whatever happens with Brexit we're heading for disaster.

Pierre 27-05-2019 10:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35996487)
Great to see the Remain parties getting 40.3% of the vote compared to UKIP-Brrxit Party's 34.9%.

How do you work that out?

Damien 27-05-2019 10:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35996487)
Great to see the Remain parties getting 40.3% of the vote compared to UKIP-Brrxit Party's 34.9%.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996502)
How do you work that out?

Libs + Green + SNP + PC + Change UK.

Pierre 27-05-2019 10:13

Re: Brexit
 
What this does, above all else, is put to bed the Remainers mantra of “you didn’t know what you were voting for” and that I’d there was another referendum it would be slam dunk for Remain.

When they quite obviously did and it would quite obviously would not be.

Maggy 27-05-2019 10:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996503)
Libs + Green + SNP + PC + Change UK.

PR in action..:)

nomadking 27-05-2019 10:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996503)
Libs + Green + SNP + PC + Change UK.

Surely SNP is also Leave. By leaving the UK they would automatically leave the EU.

denphone 27-05-2019 10:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996501)
All shows just how split the country is. Whatever happens with Brexit we're heading for disaster.

Deeply divided with fault lines as wide as the San Andreas Fault..

papa smurf 27-05-2019 10:24

Re: Brexit
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35996487)
Great to see the Remain parties getting 40.3% of the vote compared to UKIP-Brrxit Party's 34.9%.

Nice to see your wearing an even bigger set of blinkers.

Pierre 27-05-2019 10:26

Re: Brexit
 
Change U.K. - 3.4
LibDem - 20.3
Plaid - 1
SNP - 3.6
Green 12.1

40.4 = Remain at all cost

Brexit - 31.6 = Leave, with no deal if necessary

Tories - 9.1
Labour - 14.1

23.1 Leave, with a deal only

So I don’t see how Remain won?

Damien 27-05-2019 10:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996509)
Change U.K. - 3.4
LibDem - 20.3
Plaid - 1
SNP - 3.6
Green 12.1

40.4 = Remain at all cost

Brexit - 31.6 = Leave, with no deal if necessary

Tories - 9.1
Labour - 14.1

23.1 Leave, with a deal only

So I don’t see how Remain won?

Well he only said the Remain vs 'Hard' Brexit parties. There were were voters for the former.

The overall question depends how you view the Labour votes IMO. Since Labour's positions is rather split with their backing of a vote if they can't get an election.

I think the vote shows how split the country is.

---------- Post added at 09:40 ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 ----------

If we ignore the whole 'let's add all the parties up' and just concentrate on what it means for Parliament it's not helped much.

The Tories didn't just lose to the Brexit Party, they lost to the Liberal Democrats too.
Labour didn't just lose to the Liberal Democrats, they lost a lot of Northern seats to the Brexit Party.

Pierre 27-05-2019 10:42

Re: Brexit
 
Can we finally put to bed the statement that Leavers didn’t know what they voted for?

jfman 27-05-2019 10:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996513)
Can we finally put to bed the statement that Leavers didn’t know what they voted for?

No. 17.4 million people didn’t vote for the Brexit Party. And those that did might, given new information, still do so because it’s ideological to them.

Although the statement isn’t really helpful anyway. Farage will steamroller PV types if it continues to be commonly used as the establishment talking down to the little guy.

heero_yuy 27-05-2019 10:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Quote from Damien:


Libs + Green + SNP + PC + Change UK.
To allocate all the seats and or votes won by remain supporting parties as meaning only their remain policy counts is very naďve. People vote, for example, Green for many reasons OTHER than their EU membership stance.

Farage's party had but one policy and the majority voted for that and that alone.

jfman 27-05-2019 10:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35996518)
To allocate all the seats and or votes won by remain supporting parties as meaning only their remain policy counts is very naďve. People vote, for example, Green for many reasons OTHER than their EU membership stance.

Farage's party had but one policy and the majority voted for that and that alone.

I agree it’s not as effective as a further referendum.

Pierre 27-05-2019 11:04

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996516)
No. 17.4 million people didn’t vote for the Brexit Party. And those that did might, given new information, still do so because it’s ideological to them.

But given that over 3 years we’ve had the Remain side telling the public they’d been lied to, telling them how much worse of they’ll be, everyone was undoubtedly in full knowledge of the facts, and yet Brexit has swept the board?

Or is every person that voted Brexit a blinkered idealog.

All this has just confirmed that another Referendum would most likely return a similar result so I don’t know why they are pushing for one

Mr K 27-05-2019 11:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996509)
Change U.K. - 3.4
LibDem - 20.3
Plaid - 1
SNP - 3.6
Green 12.1

40.4 = Remain at all cost

Brexit - 31.6 = Leave, with no deal if necessary

Tories - 9.1
Labour - 14.1

23.1 Leave, with a deal only

So I don’t see how Remain won?


https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/375/cp...9-05-27-nc.png

Damien 27-05-2019 11:10

Re: Brexit
 
The results last night don't tell us anything the polling on a second referendum hasn't told us before. The country is deeply spilt down the middle. If Brexit isn't delivered the voters will punish you, if Brexit is delivered the voters will punish you.

The vote last night will be seen as people want to see them. The only real losers are Labour's comprise position and May's deal.

jfman 27-05-2019 11:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996521)
But given that over 3 years we’ve had the Remain side telling the public they’d been lied to, telling them how much worse of they’ll be, everyone was undoubtedly in full knowledge of the facts, and yet Brexit has swept the board?

Or is every person that voted Brexit a blinkered idealog.

All this has just confirmed that another Referendum would most likely return a similar result so I don’t know why they are pushing for one

Brexit Party has unsurprisingly taken the UKIP vote and hammered the Tories. It didn’t win a majority and got less than the 17.4 million votes Leave did. “Swept the board” is exaggerating somewhat. Taking these figures and applying them to a hypothetical referendum with much higher turnout isn’t realistic.

All this has confirmed is the country remains polarised by the issue. We knew that last week.

Mick 27-05-2019 11:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996516)
No.17.4 million people didn’t vote for the Brexit Party. And those that did might, given new information, still do so because it’s ideological to them.

Although the statement isn’t really helpful anyway. Farage will steamroller PV types if it continues to be commonly used as the establishment talking down to the little guy.

YES!!!

In essence. On to last nights results. Great victory for Leavers and the Brexit Party. We won again. BP+UKIP+Con tally beats LD+ChUK+GR+SNP+PC. Around 40% for Remain and 44% for leave. That equates to 52% Leave vs 48% for Remain. No surprise there then.

Lots of bullshit spin being put out here that Remain won, they haven’t. The Lib Dem’s campaigned on a strong Remain ticket but they lost heavy to Brexit Party on a strong Leave ticket. To add all the Remain groups who ran on multiple policies is disingenuous.

1andrew1 27-05-2019 11:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35996488)
You mean several parties added together got more than one .. wow, talk about grasping at straws. ;)

I didn't talk about one party.

jfman 27-05-2019 11:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996526)
YES!!!

In essence. On to last nights results. Great victory for Leavers and the Brexit Party. We won again. BP+UKIP+Con tally beats LD+ChUK+GR+SNP+PC. Around 40% for Remain and 44% for leave. That equates to 52% Leave vs 48% for Remain. No surprise there then.

Lots of bullshit spin being put out here that Remain won, they haven’t. The Lib Dem’s campaigned on a strong Remain ticket but they lost heavy to Brexit Party on a strong Leave ticket. To add all the Remain groups who ran on multiple policies is disingenuous.

To not add them together ignores reality.

1andrew1 27-05-2019 11:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996525)
All this has confirmed is the country remains polarised by the issue. We knew that last week.

Exactly. And that goes back to my statement from yesterday that the most important election result for Brexit wasn't the European one but will be the one for the next Prime Minister.

As an aside, I thought it was interesting to see that senior politicians Michael Heseltine and Alistair Campbell didn't vote for their own parties. Shows the deep divides within the two main parties.

Mick 27-05-2019 11:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996525)
Brexit Party has unsurprisingly taken the UKIP vote and hammered the Tories. It didn’t win a majority and got less than the 17.4 million votes Leave did. “Swept the board” is exaggerating somewhat. Taking these figures and applying them to a hypothetical referendum with much higher turnout isn’t realistic.

All this has confirmed is the country remains polarised by the issue. We knew that last week.

FFS, you keep asking where are all the 17.4 Million leavers for BP, the same can be said, where are all the 16 Million Remainers for Lib Democrats?

It’s always one sided rubbish with some of you Remainers.

You lost AGAIN!

---------- Post added at 10:26 ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996528)
To not add them together ignores reality.

And to add them together, as I showed you, your side lost, yet again!

jfman 27-05-2019 11:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996530)
FFS, you keep asking where are all the 17.4 Million leavers for BP, the same can be said, where are all the 16 Million Remainers for Lib Democrats?

It’s always one sided rubbish with some of you Remainers.

You lost AGAIN!

---------- Post added at 10:26 ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 ----------



And to add them together, as I showed you, your side lost, yet again!

That’s why this poll isn’t a meaningful measure of anything. You can spin it anyway, up to and including the public resoundingly rejecting Farage’s “no deal”.

It doesn’t change anything in Parliament either.

Mr K 27-05-2019 11:36

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996526)
YES!!!

In essence. On to last nights results. Great victory for Leavers and the Brexit Party. We won again. BP+UKIP+Con tally beats LD+ChUK+GR+SNP+PC. Around 40% for Remain and 44% for leave. That equates to 52% Leave vs 48% for Remain. No surprise there then.

Lots of bullshit spin being put out here that Remain won, they haven’t. The Lib Dem’s campaigned on a strong Remain ticket but they lost heavy to Brexit Party on a strong Leave ticket. To add all the Remain groups who ran on multiple policies is disingenuous.

Not all Conservatives are Brexiteers Mick, could be argued the support they had left are the Remainers in the Party. Same for Labour. In which case Remain won by an even bigger margin. No wonder there is paranoia from the Leave side on another vote !

Pierre 27-05-2019 11:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996523)
The only real losers are Labour's comprise position and May's deal.

True, which seems to imply compromise, either way, is a vote loser.

Therefore, Tory and Labour need to decide what side of the coin they’re on. All this talk of “ bringing the country together” won’t get them anywhere.

Mick 27-05-2019 11:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996533)
That’s why this poll isn’t a meaningful measure of anything. You can spin it anyway, up to and including the public resoundingly rejecting Farage’s “no deal”.

It doesn’t change anything in Parliament either.

The public clearly rejects staying in. Lib Dem’s has a single party issue for Remain, their bollocks to Brexit mantra, was heavily defeated by Brexit Party. ChUK didn’t even get on the map, they too, had a strong Remain policy.

Brexit Party are the absolute victors here and are now the largest single party in the European Parliament.

jfman 27-05-2019 11:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996536)
The public clearly rejects staying in. Lib Dem’s has a single party issue for Remain, their bollocks to Brexit mantra, was heavily defeated by Brexit Party. ChUK didn’t even get on the map, they too, had a strong Remain policy.

Brexit Party are the absolute victors here and are now the largest single party in the European Parliament.

The public doesn’t clearly do anything from this result which is why a second referendum is inevitable.

Mick 27-05-2019 11:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35996534)
Not all Conservatives are Brexiteers Mick, could be argued the support they had left are the Remainers in the Party. Same for Labour. In which case Remain won by an even bigger margin. No wonder there is paranoia from the Leave side on another vote !

This is just utter nonsense. Tories campaigned on a “Get Brexit done” in this election. So they are a leave party. Labour are the confusing party they can swing either way. But they also spoke about getting Brexit done and doing a deal during the campaign. They were not singing for Remain, that’s why Lib Dem’s pooled well from them.

Leave won last night (again) , quite heavy in some places. BP had 60% voter turn out in one area.

1andrew1 27-05-2019 11:52

Re: Brexit
 
Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell now favour a people's vote. I wonder if the Conservatives will respond and try and take a harder Brexit line.
Quote:

Labour is edging closer to support for a second Brexit referendum, after a drubbing at the European Parliament elections which saw Remain voters desert them for Liberal Democrats and Greens.
In early-morning messages after seeing the party slump to third place with a 14 per cent share of the vote, both Jeremy Corbyn and shadow chancellor John McDonnell said that the issue of EU withdrawal must be put to a public vote – which could come in a general election or a Final Say referendum.
Notably, neither mentioned Labour’s alternative Brexit deal, which has previously been presented as a preferable option to a second referendum.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8931476.html

Mick 27-05-2019 11:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996537)
The public doesn’t clearly do anything from this result which is why a second referendum is inevitable.

Rubbish. Stop lying. The public rejects staying in. This is perfectly clear in the results last night. “Bollocks to Brexit”, “Stop Brexit” from Lib Dem’s, was clearly not very appealing and lost heavy to Brexit Party in practically every region except London and Scotland.

Damien 27-05-2019 11:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35996535)
True, which seems to imply compromise, either way, is a vote loser.

Therefore, Tory and Labour need to decide what side of the coin they’re on. All this talk of “ bringing the country together” won’t get them anywhere.

Yup and that appears to be what they’re doing.

I think it can only read to disaster and a complete fracturing of the country. This is why I thought May’s deal should have passed first time. Everyone would hate it but at least it wouldn’t be total disaster for either. Instead someone is going to 100% win and the consequences will follow. No one seems to remember everyone has to live together when this is all over.

papa smurf 27-05-2019 11:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996541)
Rubbish. Stop lying. The public rejects staying in. This is perfectly clear in the results last night. “Bollocks to Brexit”, “Stop Brexit” from Lib Dem’s, was clearly not very appealing and lost heavy to Brexit Party in practically every region except London and Scotland.

The message from the lib dem's with their new slogan is bollocks to democracy .

Damien 27-05-2019 11:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996541)
Rubbish. Stop lying. The public rejects staying in. This is perfectly clear in the results last night. “Bollocks to Brexit”, “Stop Brexit” from Lib Dem’s, was clearly not very appealing and lost heavy to Brexit Party in practically every region except London and Scotland.

The Greens are heavily Remain too. They campaigned on free movement for example. Staying in the EU was at the centre of their campaign.

jfman 27-05-2019 12:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996541)
Rubbish. Stop lying. The public rejects staying in. This is perfectly clear in the results last night. “Bollocks to Brexit”, “Stop Brexit” from Lib Dem’s, was clearly not very appealing and lost heavy to Brexit Party in practically every region except London and Scotland.

I’m not lying. 2016 demonstrated that some 17 million people voted to leave. Less than that voted for the Brexit party. Getting into guesswork about what’s in the heads of Conservative/Labour voters, given the multitude of issues those parties stand for, is speculative at best.

Why are you so terrified of a second referendum if you are so certain?

---------- Post added at 11:02 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996544)
The Greens are heavily Remain too. They campaigned on free movement for example. Staying in the EU was at the centre of their campaign.

Plus SNP. Almost 4% of the UK wide vote.

Mr K 27-05-2019 12:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996541)
Rubbish. Stop lying. The public rejects staying in. This is perfectly clear in the results last night. “Bollocks to Brexit”, “Stop Brexit” from Lib Dem’s, was clearly not very appealing and lost heavy to Brexit Party in practically every region except London and Scotland.

The Lib Dems had a brilliant night. As for their slogan it's about time Brexiteers had some of their own abusive type language thrown back at them.

A drop of 52% to 34% shows support for Brexit is declining and will continue to do so.

papa smurf 27-05-2019 12:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35996544)
The Greens are heavily Remain too. They campaigned on free movement for example. Staying in the EU was at the centre of their campaign.

I would suggest that most of the green vote was in response to issues with the planet,ie Climate change ,plastic in the oceans,air pollution etc .
The lib dem's had a clear message to ignore the results of democracy and many bought into that ideology .

1andrew1 27-05-2019 12:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35996549)
I would suggest that most of the green vote was in response to issues with the planet,ie Climate change ,plastic in the oceans,air pollution etc .
The lib dem's had a clear message to ignore the results of democracy and many bought into that ideology .

You can take that weak line with every party that is not a single-issue party.

---------- Post added at 11:20 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35996548)
The Lib Dems had a brilliant night. As for their slogan it's about time Brexiteers had some of their own abusive type language thrown back at them.

A drop of 52% to 34% shows support for Brexit is declining and will continue to do so.

And support for no-deal is even lower - just 26%.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...no-deal-brexit

Damien 27-05-2019 12:22

Re: Brexit
 
The video of people laughing with Tommy Robinson's vote share was read out was a highlight of the evening I must say.

papa smurf 27-05-2019 12:27

Re: Brexit
 
After the huge win by the Brexit party the EU will be looking more closely at refusing any further extensions as we have become toxic to their ideology. more likely we will in effect get kicked out of the club without lifting a finger.

mrmistoffelees 27-05-2019 12:32

Re: Brexit
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35996541)
Rubbish. Stop lying. The public rejects staying in. This is perfectly clear in the results last night. “Bollocks to Brexit”, “Stop Brexit” from Lib Dem’s, was clearly not very appealing and lost heavy to Brexit Party in practically every region except London and Scotland.

He’s not lying, the truth as always is somewhere in between. The nation is as divided and polarised as before

Img from bbc

Mr K 27-05-2019 12:33

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35996555)
After the huge win by the Brexit party the EU will be looking more closely at refusing any further extensions as we have become toxic to their ideology. more likely we will in effect get kicked out of the club without lifting a finger.

They aren't going to lose any sleep over 28 MEPs out of 751. They won't turn up anyway, but will still claim the pay/pensions.
The EU may let us stay if we beg nicely, you never know our luck ;)

1andrew1 27-05-2019 12:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35996555)
After the huge win by the Brexit party the EU will be looking more closely at refusing any further extensions as we have become toxic to their ideology. more likely we will in effect get kicked out of the club without lifting a finger.

With no-deal off the cards*, the reverse could be true. The EU could focus on internal issues and less on negotiating a deal with the UK. Meaning we remain in the EU indefinitely.

* Hammond warns leadership hopefuls over no-deal Brexit stance
Chancellor says a prime minister seeking to leave EU without agreement ‘cannot expect to survive’
https://www.ft.com/content/81a42938-...5-ad75bb96c849[COLOR="Silver"]

OLD BOY 27-05-2019 12:43

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35996534)
Not all Conservatives are Brexiteers Mick, could be argued the support they had left are the Remainers in the Party. Same for Labour. In which case Remain won by an even bigger margin. No wonder there is paranoia from the Leave side on another vote !

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35996546)
I’m not lying. 2016 demonstrated that some 17 million people voted to leave. Less than that voted for the Brexit party. Getting into guesswork about what’s in the heads of Conservative/Labour voters, given the multitude of issues those parties stand for, is speculative at best.

Why are you so terrified of a second referendum if you are so certain?[COLOR="Silver"]

You will always argue that black is white, and vice versa, just for the hell of it!

Let's state the position clearly. Those parties standing on a 'leave' manifesto:

%
Brexit 31.6
Conservatives 9.1
Labour 14.1
UKIP 3.3
_____
58.1

Those standing on a 'remain' manifesto:

Change U.K. 3.4
LibDem 20.3
Plaid 1.0
SNP 3.5
Green 12.1
____
40.3

Now I hope that is clear enough for you. Leave won by a substantial margin. That is a fact and however you spin it, that is an even more of a resounding defeat for remainers than in the referendum.

1andrew1 27-05-2019 12:43

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35996558)
They aren't going to lose any sleep over 28 MEPs out of 751. They won't turn up anyway, but will still claim the pay/pensions.
The EU may let us stay if we beg nicely, you never know our luck ;)

Stop lying Mr K, the Brexit Party has 29 MEPs not 28! :D Maybe you were missing out the Brexit MEP for NE England who lives in France and London? ;)

OLD BOY 27-05-2019 12:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35996557)
He’s not lying, the truth as always is somewhere in between. The nation is as divided and polarised as before

Img from bbc

The analysis is incorrect as both Conservatives and Labour are, as things stand, Leave parties.

Mr K 27-05-2019 12:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35996561)
You will always argue that black is white, and vice versa, just for the hell of it!

Let's state the position clearly. Those parties standing on a 'leave' manifesto:

%
Brexit 31.6
Conservatives 9.1
Labour 14.1
UKIP 3.3
_____
58.1

Those standing on a 'remain' manifesto:

Change U.K. 3.4
LibDem 20.3
Plaid 1.0
SNP 3.5
Green 12.1
____
40.3

Now I hope that is clear enough for you. Leave won by a substantial margin. That is a fact and however you spin it, that is an even more of a resounding defeat for remainers than in the referendum.

Mmm, they weren't standing on their manifestos from the last GE were they? You could ignore Labour/Con as they are split, but you could also argue their Brexit support has gone to the Brexit party.
Don't get so touchy anyway OB, the Press Association chart shows all, even if you discount Con/Lab Remainers.
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/375/cp...9-05-27-nc.png

mrmistoffelees 27-05-2019 12:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35996563)
The analysis is incorrect as both Conservatives and Labour are, as things stand, Leave parties.

If you look at the wording in the article (don’t have link to hand but will dig out) it’s comparing those who advocate a ‘hard Brexit’ vs remain so whilst your data is correct in total it also shows that in direct comparison between leaving with no deal and remaining, remain holds the advantage (at the moment)

jfman 27-05-2019 12:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 35996561)
You will always argue that black is white, and vice versa, just for the hell of it!

Let's state the position clearly. Those parties standing on a 'leave' manifesto:

%
Brexit 31.6
Conservatives 9.1
Labour 14.1
UKIP 3.3
_____
58.1

Those standing on a 'remain' manifesto:

Change U.K. 3.4
LibDem 20.3
Plaid 1.0
SNP 3.5
Green 12.1
____
40.3

Now I hope that is clear enough for you. Leave won by a substantial margin. That is a fact and however you spin it, that is an even more of a resounding defeat for remainers than in the referendum.

Let me state clearly that you’re wrong. You’re applying votes so a single issue for Labour and the Conservatives. If Brexit supporters genuinely believed that to be the case why the exodus from both? You can’t apply Labour/Conservatives either way with any accuracy - there will have been both leave and remain voters in there.

I’m not arguing with anyone here. Simply stating facts.

Mick 27-05-2019 13:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 35996557)
He’s not lying, the truth as always is somewhere in between. The nation is as divided and polarised as before

Img from bbc

That image is not portraying an accurate assessment of the results last night, whatsoever, so yes he is lying.

Tories campaigned on a "Get Brexit Done" - so that 9.1% for Tories can be given straight away to Leave, so it beats Remain.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum