![]() |
Re: Benefit Cap v No work
Quote:
So what if things take a long time? Quote:
but i agree with you, job seekers should be allowed to undertake courses, as long as they pay back the costs for their tuition when they get a job, same as students. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
So now Arthur suddenly agrees HMG needs to incentivise companies to do business here to create jobs, he won't keep whining about what they might do to achieve just that e.g. corporation tax cuts, reduced bureaucracy, simpler employment rules, etc...
Funny how 5 minutes ago he was arguing that mining uncompetitive coal is a good way to create jobs and that the unions of the 70's were a good thing... :rolleyes: Perhaps dear old Arthur might like to explain how private companies can enjoy a level playing field and create the jobs he wants when they're competing with heaviliy subsidised state controlled ones. |
Re: Benefit Cap v No work
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
My son (on ESA) has just been passed from one "course provider" to another (after taking a fee I suspect). He was given 8 weeks to complete the PC-based course with no support apart from being told which PC he should use.
He completed the course and got 100% in the final "exam" in less than 12 hours in the first week. He was told his results will be passed to the JC after the eight week period has passed. In the meantime he was told to "go out and enjoy yourself" when what he actually wants is to get qualifications that count and get a job. So he goes to the JC and the central library every weekday, both looking for employment and studying the only type of work he is probably suited to. A full 6 hours each day. He says that he has learned more in his own self-study time than on any course (school or college) that he has ever done. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
So I would effectively be wasting tax payers money which also doesn't sit too well with me so basically I can't win either way. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: Benefit Cap v No work
Quote:
it wasn't really clear. but £500 per week. that's a lot of money if you're working. but I am really fed up with hearing Dave and his fellow nutters constantly repeating that it pays to work. and how they come across that every single person on benefits doesn't want to work. *can* get a job tomorrow. and are scroungers. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Doesn't matter one little bit, how many suitable jobs do or don't exist, over £500 a week in benefits for somebody with just 2(ie not 8 or more) children is ridiculous and wrong.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
I am on about the claimant actually choosing the course at a collage or similar |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
Quote:
---------- Post added at 18:53 ---------- Previous post was at 17:48 ---------- There's an anti Maggie protest building up in Trafalgar Square. 3.000 now. it was only 250 not too long ago. Supposed to be Millwall fans heading there. as well as the EDL. Not looking good. |
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
It'll enter Camorons's mind at some point that those on the capped level of benefits should pay the same bills as those in work at that level of income. Byebye help with the rent and poll tax.
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Who's paying poll tax? :confused:
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread. Many merged.
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum