Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

In what way is it in a dire state still Chrys?

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

oversubscribed to point its not useable?

you seem to change your mind a lot, before you thought was bad was still stuck on qpsk and commented that more than once, but now you think its ok again?

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

I didn't make any judgement I merely asked for clarification as the two run on exactly the same network right up to the FPM and RPM at the hub site.

Could be running QPSK as on oversight or may be other reasons.

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

activated now on this and they left superhub mac on for me also so I can switch back without a phonecall.

Channel Type 2.0 N/A N/A N/A
Channel ID 7 N/A N/A N/A
Frequency
(Hz) 45800000 N/A N/A N/A
Ranging Status Success N/A N/A N/A
Modulation 16QAM N/A N/A N/A
Symbol Rate
(KSym/sec) 5120 N/A N/A N/A
Mini-Slot Size 4 N/A N/A N/A
Power Level
(dBmV) 44.25 N/A N/A N/A
T1 Timeouts 0 0 0 0
T2 Timeouts 0 0 0 0
T3 Timeouts 0 0 0 0
T4 Timeouts 0
DS-1 DS-2 DS-3 DS-4
Frequency 299000000 307000000 315000000 323000000
Lock Status
(QAM Lock/FEC Sync/MPEG Lock) Y/Y/Y Y/Y/Y Y/Y/Y Y/Y/Y
Channel Id 133 134 135 136
Modulation 256QAM 256QAM 256QAM 256QAM
Symbol Rate
(Msym/sec) 6.952 6.952 6.952 6.952
Interleave Depth I=12
J=17 I=12
J=17 I=12
J=17 I=12
J=17
Power Level
(dBmV) 1.24 0.57 0.53 0.62
RxMER
(dB) 38.26 37.94 38.26 38.26
Correctable
Codewords 0 1 0 1
Uncorrectable
Codewords 305 278 305 277

the now unhidden error stats look ok?

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Looking good Chrys. Stats are near perfect. How's it performing?

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

a LOT better.

1ms jitter on pingtest.net at 4pm.

browsing noticebly snappier.

speedio able to do 3k connects/sec, on double NAT was 1.6k.

http://speed.io/pics/4161/5872/speed.io.pnghttp://www.pingtest.net/result/38613171.png
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/04/74.png
incidently paris now works again.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/04/75.png

I can look forward now again to downloads not cutting out, youtube etc.

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Yet more proof it is superior kit to the superdud!

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Sorry to bring up this thread but it looks look Montfort is getting FTTC by 2012 !


http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/201...d-rollout.html

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Yes but "by the end of 2012" so probably Jun 2013!
Fingers crossed that our cabs get upgraded though!

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

leics central is getting also.

and its by end of 2012 so could be a year away, and also could be delays as seems common. But its great news we both finally now got in the planning stage.

As VM now is back to how it was early in the year, congestion 24/7 with it extreme at evenings and weekends.

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Only 3 years late eh!

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Checking the exchanges in that ISPreview link shows that my local exchange was originally planned for December 2011 in the September 2010 list. It's now showing as December 2012. Looks like VM don't have a monopoly on project slippages.

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

anyone in LE3 area seen any openreach work been done yet? It be interesting as usually seeing BT vans around here is very rare, they more concetrated in the shorter line areas.

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

Best look out for markings on pavements near cabs.
Most of the civils will be done by subbies so no BT involvement until intergration.
I wouldnt expect anything until late summer at the earliest though!

Re: Terrible performance Leicester (LE3)
 

I agree it wont be within next few months as otherwise the exchange would be coming soon status which it isnt.

since my cab isnt too far away I can keep an eye on it and report any changes,