![]() |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Just to update this thread, it's been a while.... but as I speculated many moons ago, John Malone has created the media empire he was planning with the Warner Discovery merger completing tonight.
It certainly didn't go as I thought, but the question is, has he finished? And my reply to that would be, hell no! It's clear that all of Hollywood will be gobbled up by the tech giants pretty soon, so before that happens to this company, will there be one more step? I think there will be and I wouldn't be surprised if we see this new company go after Paramount. New corporate website at: https://www.wbd.com/ |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Warner Bros Discovery Merger Closes, Altering Media Landscape; Company To Start Trading Monday
https://deadline.com/2022/04/warner-...pe-1234997171/ ---------- Post added at 23:50 ---------- Previous post was at 23:27 ---------- Quote:
With Shari Redstone keeping a "CBS" name for Paramount USTV network As no one can own two Major commercial network in America. Comcast own NBC Paramount own CBS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ision_channels |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
I thought that too MB at one point, but would be the point of Redstone keeping CBS, if the studio that makes all the shows for the channel is owned by someone else?
One option could be a full split up of Paramount between Comcast and Warner Discovery, but I just don't see the point of Paramount selling out to Comcast, when it wouldn't be allowed to offload CBS too. |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Paramount have only just managed to pull themselves back together. Not sure they'll now want to split up again unless they had to.
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
I think they do have to.
I go back to what I said yonks ago about Murdoch's comments when he it was announced he was selling out to Disney and his comments went something like, "we used to be the big fish once, but there you go" or words to that affect. Meaning with the likes of trillion and now two trillon dollar companies, Murdoch thought there was zero chance he could compete against them. I think he was right and the same goes for all the rest of Hollywood. There used to be the Big Six Hollywood companies:Fox, Disney, Warner, Sony, Paramount and Universal and there probably still will be in the future, except the names will be Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft, Google and perhaps Sony. |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
That certainly appears to be the way things are going.
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
Warner Bros Discovery and Disney are now strong enough as they are. Comcast is getting there so could remain independent unless it decides to split itself up between broadband infeastructure and content. Sony lacks a streaming arm or US network so a tie-up with Paramount might be logical but could attract a counter-bid from Microsoft, its strong gaming rival. Google doesn't seem keen on content acquisition yet. |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
Amazon and Apple are now involved in sports and this will only increase. Even as big as Comcast and Disney are, they are still tiny compared to Big Tech and will have to sell out to them at some point, I believe. Google has youtube, so has everyone else's content..., so I don't predict a big move by them onto Hollywood and although Sony has been silent on the issue, I reckon they will succumb to the inevitable at some point too and sell. |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Murdoch quit due to scale. Warner Bros Bros Discovery and Disney have scale.
|
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
Quote:
Yes the tech giants (the actual tech giants - not the ones drowning in debt) are cash heavy and will be looking to invest and gobble up smaller players where they see the potential for longer term profits. Is it the pay-tv market? A long established oligopoly at best? |
Re: John Malone/Liberty/VM General News Thread
It's just one oligopoly being replaced by another, one with deeper pockets. So once this transition finishes, it won't really seem that different. There still be 5/6 big Hollywood companies.
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum