![]() |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
Unfortenatly even with this good news this wont be released as a standalone update, there is no GUI to enable/disable it and VM have already stated that will be part of R27 which includes other updates hence the delay. I expect late june possibly early july at a guess for normal release. ---------- Post added at 04:16 ---------- Previous post was at 04:12 ---------- agree the dir615 is good. I considered buying a dir825 (which can run ddwrt), or some other alternative gigabit cable router which would allow me to remove my adsl router from my LAN, however at over £100 to buy one and that I already have a decent gigabit router and wireless access point I find it hard to justify just to save bit of cabling and power. For me the dir615 is the router, dhcp server. But only has the xbox360 connected directly to it, my desktop pc's and laptop (wireless) go via my 7402nx gigabit wireless N router which is acting as a switch and wireless access point. LAN only traffic doesnt touch the dir615. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Things are sounding positive by the sounds of it. Thanks for the update.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
Sorta half missing the beta test of the Superhub, as I managed to get it swapped for a VMNG300. Ah well, that's life! :) |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
Phil |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Phil-ntl, any idea if the Superhub uses less power in bridge mode?
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
To be honest, I havent metered it but with the wireless turned off etc I would guess that there will be slightly less power used but dont forget that this will be negated by using a seperate router. So overall, the power usage will be slightly higher.
hope this helps Phil |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Currently I have a modem and a Netgear FVS338 router. What I would like to know is the power usage of the Superhub in bridge mode compared to my current modem.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Something that uses 1w was costing about £1 a year to run when I last did the sums - possibly a tad more now. The Superhub PSU is rated at 1.5A 12v iirc so it will use less than 18w. Just about any router will use about the same. Even doubled up I don't think anybody is going to have to put their missus on the streets or starve the kids to pay the bill.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
I will get you an answer within a week or 2 weeks, I plan to get a watts meter for my new air cooler (since am running that almost 24/7 want to make sure it uses what it says on box), I can check the superhub as well no problem. My guess is any saving will be minimal if any.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Thanks, you'll be able to compare it to the VMNG300 too.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
I'm sure it's been explained somewhere else, but what exactly does bridge mode get you? I'm guessing it just turns the superhub into a basic modem. However would the wireless functionality still work or would I need to dust off my old router.
I am frustrated with the lag and the random slowing down of my local traffic of the super hub. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Hi, modem mode as it's now called turns off all routing features including wireless. So yes you would then need your own router attached to the superhub.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
you wouldn't want to use wireless on the Superhub anyway dude so no loss there.
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Seriously stop with the silly name calling of the Superhub! You have all been reminded a few times to the post that details this.
I am currently connected to the Superhub wirelessly and my connection is solid and am getting a full 50MB speed on it. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
The superhub is a decent router, but it doesn't have a great wireless range - possibly because it's got internal antennae vs my ASUS's three external antennae. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum