Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   This one's going down (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33648048)

Flyboy 22-12-2009 13:48

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 34931363)
At what point in your opinion did he become unfit to be a father?

I really have no idea, do you?

Quote:

When he crashed his car into a drunk 16 year old schoolgirl?
Or when he joined the police force?
What does her status have anything to do with being mowed down at speeds close to one hnundred miles per hour? Does that make it her fault then?

Russ 22-12-2009 13:54

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34931541)
I really have no idea, do you?

Julian isn't the one who seems to be suggesting he's an unfit father.

martyh 22-12-2009 14:43

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyboy (Post 34931541)
I really have no idea, do you?



What does her status have anything to do with being mowed down at speeds close to one hnundred miles per hour? Does that make it her fault then?


because she was drunk she had been drinking in the nearby dean with her friends

and why is he a unfit father ?

Derek 22-12-2009 20:03

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931372)
It was a residential housing estate and no one has the right to barrel down a ordinary road at that speed policeman or not and regardless of the possibility of warning the criminal that he is being pursued the safety of the public should be and must be paramount in any public servants mind and his siren and blue lights should have been switched on.

There is a risk in every car journey. There is a higher risk when you start going above the speed limit. There is a risk when a criminal makes off from the Police. There is a risk in the second it takes to turn on the warning equipment or use the radio.

Everything is a risk, you have to balance all the risks with the interests of justice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931372)
When did the members of the public become second fiddle to a copper handing out a ticket?

It wasn't exactly 'handing out a ticket' He thought he was going after a stolen vehicle.
Unless of course you think thats not something the Police should get involved with. :rolleyes:

If someone drives off from the Police do you think they should be pursued or should the police just sit back and let them go just in case?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931372)
If anyone in your job thinks in this way then they should resign with immediate effect as they are a liability and a danger to the public.

There would be a whole lot of coppers resigning if that were the case.

Peter_ 22-12-2009 20:11

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34931734)
There is a risk in every car journey. There is a higher risk when you start going above the speed limit. There is a risk when a criminal makes off from the Police. There is a risk in the second it takes to turn on the warning equipment or use the radio.

Everything is a risk, you have to balance all the risks with the interests of justice.

So you think he just took a risk that backfired then especially as ther driver of the car was not actually speeding to get away because he was innocent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34931734)
It wasn't exactly 'handing out a ticket' He thought he was going after a stolen vehicle.
Unless of course you think thats not something the Police should get involved with. :rolleyes:

If someone drives off from the Police do you think they should be pursued or should the police just sit back and let them go just in case?

Speed was the issue and his speed killed a young girl unnecessarily all for the sake of a possible stolen car which he pursued at high speed with scant disregard for the public.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34931734)

There would be a whole lot of coppers resigning if that were the case.

Then we would have a lot of potential killers off the road if that is the kind of attitude they have.

Derek 22-12-2009 20:19

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931739)
So you think he just took a risk that backfired then especially as ther driver of the car was not actually speeding to get away because he was innocent.

Yep thats what I think. As I've stated before I don't think he should have been convicted but he was and now he is being treated like any other person convicted of causing death by dangerous driving.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931739)
Speed was the issue and his speed killed a young girl unnecessarily all for the sake of a possible stolen car which he pursued at high speed with scant disregard for the public.

Nice skipping of the question. Do you think the police should pursue drivers of stolen vehicles who may fail to stop?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931739)
Then we would have a lot of potential killers off the road if that is the kind of attitude they have.

Or maybe we'd have a lot of highly capable and competent drivers off the road who are trained to an exceptionally high standard.

Accidents happen. Thats a fact of life.
When you are going at speed and not adhering to all of the rules of the road (within reason) then it pretty obvious the consequences will probably be worse than a 'normal' crash.

Peter_ 22-12-2009 20:24

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34931744)
Nice skipping of the question. Do you think the police should pursue drivers of stolen vehicles who may fail to stop?

No skipping of a question as the was no pursuit required as the driver of the car that was pinged was actually innocent and not trying to get away and actually stopped because he saw the accident in his rear view mirror if I remember correctly.

martyh 22-12-2009 20:27

Re: This one's going down
 
Moldova,police officers make on the spot judgement calls every day of the week at all times of the day if this incident had happened in the day time i doubt very much the officer would have driven like that ,the fact that it was almost midnight on a main road (not a housing estate as you say )he probably wouldn't expect to see a schoolgirl crossing the road so he made a descision and got it wrong ,it's a very easy thing to do ,you could do it ,i could do it, anyone could do it and that is not just limited to drivers ,scaffolders,electricians ,airplane mechanics most jobs involve some risk to peoples lives if not done 100%correct 100%of the time it does not mean that they should be hung ,drawn and quartered by people who think they are beyond fault

Derek 22-12-2009 20:29

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931747)
No skipping of a question as the was no pursuit required as the driver of the car that was pinged was actually innocent and not trying to get away and actually stopped because he saw the accident in his rear view mirror if I remember correctly.

Sadly they dropped the 100% perfect hindsight requirement a few years back.

At the time of the incident the officer involved thought the vehicle was stolen.

So for a third time.

Do you think the police should pursue drivers of stolen vehicles who may fail to stop?

martyh 22-12-2009 20:32

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931747)
No skipping of a question as the was no pursuit required as the driver of the car that was pinged was actually innocent and not trying to get away and actually stopped because he saw the accident in his rear view mirror if I remember correctly.


but modova the drivers innocence could not be verified until he had been stopped because the computer was out of date and the officer didn't know that so the officer was pursuing a stolen car

Maggy 22-12-2009 20:38

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34931751)
Sadly they dropped the 100% perfect hindsight requirement a few years back.

At the time of the incident the officer involved thought the vehicle was stolen.

So for a third time.

Do you think the police should pursue drivers of stolen vehicles who may fail to stop?

Well surely that depends on how dangerous the whole incident becomes and just what crime has been committed.Sometimes it must be a better policy of backing off and trying to calm the situation down so there is no danger to the public from a high speed car pursuit unless a crime of murder or armed robbery or kidnapping are involved.:erm:

Peter_ 22-12-2009 20:44

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek S (Post 34931751)
Sadly they dropped the 100% perfect hindsight requirement a few years back.

At the time of the incident the officer involved thought the vehicle was stolen.

So for a third time.

Do you think the police should pursue drivers of stolen vehicles who may fail to stop?

Through a housing estate at speeds up 100MPH without any warning to potential pedestrians who may not be aware of the fast approaching vehicle I would say not in those circumstances as the is a chance an incident such as this may occur.

He had a radio and could have radioed for assistance gave the registration and just reversed direction and followed the driver out of the estate and then attempted to stop him which then would not have ended in a fatality.

---------- Post added at 21:44 ---------- Previous post was at 21:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34931754)
but modova the drivers innocence could not be verified until he had been stopped because the computer was out of date and the officer didn't know that so the officer was pursuing a stolen car

No reason to pursue at such a high speed through a residential area especially as he could have used his radio to call for assistance.

martyh 22-12-2009 20:47

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Maggy J (Post 34931756)
Well surely that depends on how dangerous the whole incident becomes and just what crime has been committed.Sometimes it must be a better policy of backing off and trying to calm the situation down so there is no danger to the public from a high speed car pursuit unless a crime of murder or armed robbery or kidnapping are involved.:erm:

i think that is the police policy ,to back away if the danger to the public is deemed to great ,in this case an error of judgement was made because the officer didn't expect to see a child crossing that road at that time of night ,and it must be appreciated that the whole incident took place in under 1/4 mile of road so it was a short burst of speed to catch up with the vehicle

---------- Post added at 21:47 ---------- Previous post was at 21:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931758)
Through a housing estate at speeds up 100MPH without any warning to potential pedestrians who may not be aware of the fast approaching vehicle I would say not in those circumstances as the is a chance an incident such as this may occur.

He had a radio and could have radioed for assistance gave the registration and just reversed direction and followed the driver out of the estate and then attempted to stop him which then would not have ended in a fatality.

---------- Post added at 21:44 ---------- Previous post was at 21:42 ----------


No reason to pursue at such a high speed through a residential area especially as he could have used his radio to call for assistance.

Moldova ..it WASN'T a housing estate

Peter_ 22-12-2009 20:52

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34931761)
i think that is the police policy ,to back away if the danger to the public is deemed to great ,in this case an error of judgement was made because the officer didn't expect to see a child crossing that road at that time of night

It could have been anyone as it was a housing estate or residential area


Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34931761)
it must be appreciated that the whole incident took place in under 1/4 mile of road so it was a short burst of speed to catch up with the vehicle

A short burst of speed up to 94MPH was he in a drag race at Santa Pod or a residential area, no excuse works for his excessive speed.

---------- Post added at 21:52 ---------- Previous post was at 21:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34931761)



Moldova ..it WASN'T a housing estate

It was not on a dual carriageway or a motorway but in a residential area.

Derek 22-12-2009 21:03

Re: This one's going down
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Moldova (Post 34931758)
Through a housing estate at speeds up 100MPH without any warning to potential pedestrians who may not be aware of the fast approaching vehicle I would say not in those circumstances as the is a chance an incident such as this may occur.
*snip*
No reason to pursue at such a high speed through a residential area especially as he could have used his radio to call for assistance.

100MPH? Can't recall the speed getting that high on the video or in the evidence at the trial.

Surely you aren't using emotive numbers to try and back up your argument?

Anyway as for the radio part I've no idea whether or not he asked for assistance but I'll refer you to post 285 in this thread which shows the video of the incident that I'd recommend you watch. In case you don't want to check the post I'll repost the highlights.

Quote:

He accelerates hard away up a hill to catch the vehicle. In these 20 seconds or so he has to (he is alone in the car so no neighbour to do it

* Continue driving
* Make ground on the vehicle
* Inform his control room he is pursuing a vehicle
* Decide whether to activate his lights and sirens which may alert the vehicle (still unsighted) he is after it any allow it to dive down a side street
The video - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/7990188.stm

---------- Post added at 22:03 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 34931761)
i think that is the police policy ,to back away if the danger to the public is deemed to great

It is.

That said the entire incident takes place over about 20 seconds. Either you don't spontaneously pursue vehicles or you accept pursuits may start and will go on for a bit before either the cop or the local control room stands it down.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum