![]() |
Re: Brexit
<removed>
|
Re: Brexit
Thats enough.
Stop with the silly personal digs at each other. |
Re: Brexit
May's tour is getting the deal more popular with the public, the 'go with the deal' option has now taken over 'vote it down' in the polls: https://twitter.com/Survation/status...93937412677632
For the Deal: 41% Against: 38%: Don't Know: 22%. It's leading with both Leave and Remain voters. Narrow margins of course but a big step up from where it was initially. I think May's calculation that actually no one cares about the detail they just like the idea of this being over is right. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
At the moment 413 MPs are going to vote against the deal, 226 for. Something big is going to have to change. Labour coming on board seems her only hope. https://www.theguardian.com/politics...y_to_clipboard |
Re: Brexit
No but as said before it doesn't hurt her task if the public are behind it. MPs having to vote against their constituencies is awkward.
I think this might become especially true after what we assume will be the failed first vote. The idea is that the markets will react, no deal will loom and if the public react too then the pressure might be too much.... |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Brexit, Xfactor type decision and it all be over sorted for Xmas and we live happily ever after... tbh (and this is saying something!) think I trust MPs more ! |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
We shouldn't forget that the withdrawal agreement is simply the stepping stone that we must take if we want pause to breathe before the trade deal is agreed. Macron may go on about fishing rights, but we have already stood up to him on this by not acceding to his demands in the withdrawal agreement, and will continue to do so. It's this backstop that's the real problem and the silly thing is that it is not needed. I certainly think we should have insisted that it was made clear in the withdrawal agreement that another way of ditching the backstop would be for us to give, say, three months' notice that we are getting out of that arrangement, with all the consequences (such as no continuance of the withdrawal agreement) that may result. We should not be putting ourselves in a position in which the EU can tell us that we are stuck with it. |
Re: Brexit
Philip Hammond been on the TV today, going on about the government analysis of a what a 'no deal' brexit will look like over the next 15 years, all very well he has new talent and can predict what the economy will look like in 15 years time, however, the Treasury routinely gets its annual forecasts wrong. So go figure....
....I have already have, it's business as usual from the Remainers in government, best described as project fear bollocks. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Which people ?
|
Re: Brexit
It's just been on the news that every single scenario will lead to us being economically worse off than if we had remained as we were.
Whether correct or not, I wonder if this is the start of softening people up for a U turn to staying in the EU? ---------- Post added at 17:12 ---------- Previous post was at 17:08 ---------- Quote:
Perhaps they could hold us to our notice of intention to leave?? Someone mentioned that if we decided to stay that we would lose our rebates, why would this be the case? |
Re: Brexit
The Bank of England has now published its Brexit impact assessment.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/me...9D94CAB8735DFB Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Don't forget den, it's "according to analysis of a worst case scenario by the Bank."
It does not mean that is what will actually happen. |
Re: Brexit
Kind of Bexit related. Theresa May and the Holy Grail.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q40PWlzKdE4 Well worth a watch. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum