Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

Mr K 24-05-2022 20:53

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36123461)
I think this one is new but I suspect they’ll need a couple of weeks worth of dead cats :D

If the dead cat is giving us all a bit of cash, by all means go for it Bozza ! We're all open to bribery like politicians...

We will of course have to pay back tenfold at a later date but like a good socialist he doesn't care. Survival of Big Dog is everything, I'm sure the opposition will agree too. Unfortunately the parliamentary inquiry will do for him. Sacked yet again for lying....

jfman 24-05-2022 20:54

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
A random person’s table yes, but if the original image has location data, date, time and you can make out the name on the lanyard you could reasonably conclude someone was having a party. That’s an odd seating arrangement for 2 folk as well.

I’m sure people would appreciate help with the cost of living crisis, I’m sure it would have been useful when Rishi did the budget back in March too.

Mr K 24-05-2022 20:54

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36123459)
New photo: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politi...-no10-27055402

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2022/05/18.jpg

This one seems to be new and was NOT investigated by the police.

Some very cheap wines there, Bozza should be embarrassed....

jfman 24-05-2022 20:55

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36123464)
If the dead cat is giving us all a bit of cash, by all means go for it Bozza ! We're all open to bribery like politicians...

We will of course have to pay back tenfold at a later date but like a good socialist he doesn't care. Survival of Big Dog is everything, I'm sure the opposition will agree too. Unfortunately the parliamentary inquiry will do for him. Sacked yet again for lying....

I mean surely even Conservatives don’t find him very Conservative as he throws a few billion on the country credit card to save his own skin?

The “free market” stipulates these folk belong in workhouses working longer hours and undercutting each other’s wages to curb inflation.

Mick 24-05-2022 21:01

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36123467)
Some very cheap wines there, Bozza should be embarrassed....

As I said, we got a figure of a headless person who could be absolutely anyone, stood at a table, could have been taken in last half hour at Mirror HQ for all we know.

Mr K 24-05-2022 21:07

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123470)
As I said, we got a figure of a headless person who could be absolutely anyone, stood at a table, could have been taken in last half hour at Mirror HQ for all we know.

Just like our PM, the press never lie Mick ;)

1andrew1 24-05-2022 21:17

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36123467)
Some very cheap wines there, Bozza should be embarrassed....

The money was spent on the wallpaper instead. :D

Damien 24-05-2022 21:24

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36123467)
Some very cheap wines there, Bozza should be embarrassed....

The Tesco on Whitehall is rubbish though. What's worse is Berry Brothers and Rudd is only a quick cross of St James's Park from No 10. Poor showing all around really.

---------- Post added at 21:24 ---------- Previous post was at 21:20 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123470)
As I said, we got a figure of a headless person who could be absolutely anyone, stood at a table, could have been taken in last half hour at Mirror HQ for all we know.

The accusation is that it's at No 10, not directly implicating Johnson directly. They claim to have WhatsApp messages and the wider photo presumably shows No 10 staff.

I guess they can hand this over to the police and let them investigate.

1andrew1 24-05-2022 21:43

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36123474)

The accusation is that it's at No 10, not directly implicating Johnson directly. They claim to have WhatsApp messages and the wider photo presumably shows No 10 staff.

I guess they can hand this over to the police and let them investigate.

Yes, it's not another FPN for Johnson but it does speak to a booze culture at No. 10. And perhaps also suggests, maybe unfairly, that the Met have not been as thorough as they could have been if this boozy gathering was not investigated.

jfman 24-05-2022 21:45

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
The Met should investigate every officer who stood outside while these pissheads fell out late at night.

Mick 24-05-2022 22:06

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36123481)
The Met should investigate every officer who stood outside while these pissheads fell out late at night.

Police don’t investigate police, that’s the job of IPCC. ;)

GrimUpNorth 24-05-2022 22:11

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
You could quite easily confuse No. 10 with an out of control frat house in a cheesy 80's teen movie.

jfman 24-05-2022 22:11

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Just don’t hold it against me for six years :D

Julian 24-05-2022 23:11

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36123486)
You could quite easily confuse No. 10 with an out of control frat house in a cheesy 80's teen movie.

Toga Toga Toga :D

OLD BOY 24-05-2022 23:19

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36123459)
New photo: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politi...-no10-27055402

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2022/05/18.jpg

This one seems to be new and was NOT investigated by the police.

Why would it be? And if it is significant (which I doubt) why wasn’t it handed over before now?

1andrew1 25-05-2022 09:02

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

It's (almost certainly) Sue Gray day - here's what you can expect

Number 10 is braced for the publication of Sue Gray's full report into parties in Downing Street and Whitehall during the coronavirus lockdown.

It is likely to include damaging further details about what went on, potentially including the names of some of those who attended gatherings.

It is expected that the report will be handed to Number 10 this morning. Downing Street have said they will publish the document swiftly - which means, barring any last-minute hitches, it could be in the public domain within hours.

Boris Johnson will then face Keir Starmer at PMQs at noon, and if the report has been published, make a statement to MPs in the Commons immediately after.

A Downing Street news conference is also expected later in the day, and the prime minister is scheduled to address the 1922 Committee of backbench Tories this evening.
https://news.sky.com/story/politics-...-turn-12593360

papa smurf 25-05-2022 09:18

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
It's arrived https://news.sky.com/story/partygate...kdown-12619559

Julian 25-05-2022 10:16

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36123516)

Sky being made to look justifiably stupid by calling that early. :)

That’s the problem with Sky believing what they read on twatter

Mick 25-05-2022 11:50

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123515)

:zzz:

Get a life.

I want to hear what the government is doing to curb rising cost of living. I don’t need to read something that I already know about. Starmer can only say so much too, given he is still under criminal investigation for Beergate.

jfman 25-05-2022 12:09

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
The birthday party ironically looks tamer than the leaving do photo ITV leaked.

Sephiroth 25-05-2022 12:35

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
For anyone who was hoping for killer conclusion, the Sue Gray report is an utter damp squib. You have to deduce (the otherwise obvious) unwritten conclusion that Boris allowed the breach of Covid regulations.

1andrew1 25-05-2022 14:00

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123525)
:zzz:

Get a life.

I want to hear what the government is doing to curb rising cost of living. I don’t need to read something that I already know about. Starmer can only say so much too, given he is still under criminal investigation for Beergate.

I think Johnson is less triggered by the report than his supporters are.

It's possible to want good governance and for the government to address the cost of living crisis.

Damien 25-05-2022 14:13

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36123542)
For anyone who was hoping for killer conclusion, the Sue Gray report is an utter damp squib. You have to deduce (the otherwise obvious) unwritten conclusion that Boris allowed the breach of Covid regulations.

It's not great for him obviously, some bad stuff in there, but not a killer blow. Everything always seems to fall just short of a killer blow to leave him wounded but in place.


papa smurf 25-05-2022 14:20

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
How terrible, photographed in the same room as some sandwiches and pop.

1andrew1 25-05-2022 14:50

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36123549)
It's not great for him obviously, some bad stuff in there, but not a killer blow. Everything always seems to fall just short of a killer blow to leave him wounded but in place.

Labour's dream, a wounded PM in place with the next enquiry about misleading Parliament still to come.

pip08456 25-05-2022 15:24

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
For those interested, the report is here.

https://assets.publishing.service.go...GATHERINGS.pdf

OLD BOY 25-05-2022 15:33

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123560)
Labour's dream, a wounded PM in place with the next enquiry about misleading Parliament still to come.

That one should be a doddle. He’s over the worst.

So it seems he has either been fined and/or officially criticised for:

1. Attending the birthday event, which the police have decided to call a party and to fine him. I have said from the start that this seems grossly unfair. The event lasted less than 10 minutes between other work activities and all those there met while at work anyway. And that is it from the point of view of the ‘criminality’ allegations, which really does not deserve all the arguments, debates and condemnations that have occurred over the months since the story broke.

2. Sue Gray has determined that there was a lack of senior leadership at No 10, for which the PM has accepted responsibility and is in the process of addressing.

Alll these other comments coming out of the woodwork are from disenchanted people who want to screw Boris, but if there was anything in this, Sue Gray or the police would have picked it up.

As I suspected from the start, this has been much ado about nothing as far as the PM is concerned. However, I do not condone the behaviour of those who were blatantly breaking the rules and carrying on as if it were like 1999.

Chris 25-05-2022 15:35

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123595)
As I suspected from the start, this has been much ado about nothing as far as the PM is concerned. However, I do not condone the behaviour of those who were blatantly breaking the rules and carrying on as if it were like 1999.

If this is your takeaway, you’re either high, or reading something else entirely.

OLD BOY 25-05-2022 15:40

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36123596)
If this is your takeaway, you’re either high, or reading something else entirely.

Well at least I’m not obsessed by this trivia. It’s fluff, nothing more. It’s been addressed, it’s ended.

What a disappointment for you guys who wanted rid of Boris.

Now let’s get on with the real issues of the day. The fun is over all but that final vote, and I know which way that will go.

Up next: Starmer’s after work party. Hoist by his own petard!

GrimUpNorth 25-05-2022 15:47

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123595)
That one should be a doddle. He’s over the worst.

So it seems he has either been fined and/or officially criticised for:

1. Attending the birthday event, which the police have decided to call a party and to fine him. I have said from the start that this seems grossly unfair. The event lasted less than 10 minutes between other work activities and all those there met while at work anyway. And that is it from the point of view of the ‘criminality’ allegations, which really does not deserve all the arguments, debates and condemnations that have occurred over the months since the story broke.

2. Sue Gray has determined that there was a lack of senior leadership at No 10, for which the PM has accepted responsibility and is in the process of addressing.

Alll these other comments coming out of the woodwork are from disenchanted people who want to screw Boris, but if there was anything in this, Sue Gray or the police would have picked it up.

As I suspected from the start, this has been much ado about nothing as far as the PM is concerned. However, I do not condone the behaviour of those who were blatantly breaking the rules and carrying on as if it were like 1999.

As OB says, there's nothing to see here.

Where I work, we have many work events where people throw up and have a punch up - don't you know it's all part of the team building and bonding experience in the public service.

As for the cleaners and security staff, well they only come to work to be abused and ridiculed, they must do because when you consider the low wages they probably get they surely wouldn't come to earn a living so it must be their superb working conditions that keeps them coming back. In fact, thinking about it, I'm surprised these people don't offer to pay to for the privilege to work in the inner sanctum of government.

papa smurf 25-05-2022 15:51

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
what a riveting read, my glass eye fell asleep, i could recommend this as a cure for insomnia, boza is going nowhere if this all they have against him.

1andrew1 25-05-2022 16:12

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
The Good Law Project is threatening legal action over the Met's apparent failure to send a questionnaire to Johnson for three gatherings. It was only after the Good Law Project began judicial review proceedings this January that the Met agreed to investigate at all; previously it had said it didn't investigate events that had taken place in the past!

Quote:

Our interest is in three such gatherings:
1. On 13 November 2020, a gathering in No. 10 on the departure of a special adviser (understood to be the former Downing Street Director of Communications)
2. On 17 December 2020, a gathering in the Cabinet Office on the departure of a senior Cabinet Office official (understood to be a defence advisor)
3. On 14 January 2021, a gathering at No. 10 on the departure of two No. 10 private secretaries.

Together, these are known as the “Three Gatherings”.

It is reported that the Prime Minister did not receive questionnaires in respect of the Three Gatherings despite evidence that he attended them. Other attendees did receive questionnaires. We do not understand the decision to investigate some attendees but not the Prime Minister.

We invite the Met to confirm it will rectify its failures to investigate the Prime Minister’s participation in the Three Gatherings, or provide us with its reasons so we can assess the lawfulness of its refusal. Unless it does, and we have given it 14 days to comply, we will begin further judicial review proceedings.
https://goodlawproject.org/news/the-...fairly-to-all/

Julian 25-05-2022 16:38

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123602)
The Good Law Project is threatening legal action over the Met's apparent failure to send a questionnaire to Johnson for three gatherings. It was only after the Good Law Project began judicial review proceedings this January that the Met agreed to investigate at all; previously it had said it didn't investigate events that had taken place in the past!



https://goodlawproject.org/news/the-...fairly-to-all/

Hopefully, for those that choose to throw money at maugham's* vanity project, they will be more successful than many of his previous judicial review attempts. ;)

* This is the retard that beat a fox to death in his garden whilst wearing his wife's kimono. Then boasted about it on soshul meeja. :rolleyes:

papa smurf 25-05-2022 16:43

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36123606)
Hopefully, for those that choose to throw money at maugham's* vanity project, they will be more successful than most of his previous judicial review attempts. ;)

* This is the retard that beat a fox to death in his garden whilst wearing his wife's kimono. Then boasted about it on soshul meeja. :rolleyes:

Putin's got loadsa money to fund these idiots, the EU is giving him billions for blood soaked gas.

Chris 25-05-2022 17:26

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123597)
Well at least I’m not obsessed by this trivia. It’s fluff, nothing more. It’s been addressed, it’s ended.

What a disappointment for you guys who wanted rid of Boris.

Now let’s get on with the real issues of the day. The fun is over all but that final vote, and I know which way that will go.

Up next: Starmer’s after work party. Hoist by his own petard!

Ah, I forgot the third option … you’ve been pushing your own fantasy so hard, for so long, you actually think it’s true. Sad.

Hugh 25-05-2022 17:31

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36123607)
Putin's got loadsa money to fund these idiots, the EU is giving him billions for blood soaked gas.

So true…

Quote:

Russian Tory donor married to ex-Kremlin deputy minister recently gave Conservatives £80,000

The Conservative Party has faced calls to hand over Lubov Chernukhin's donations - about £2m since 2012 - to Ukrainian humanitarian causes.
https://news.sky.com/story/russian-t...0-000-12555719

Quote:

Tory coffers have been swelled by £2 million from donors with Russian links since Boris Johnson became PM - and a quarter of ministers attending cabinet have benefited from cash from just three well-connected sources
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politi...-took-25123091

Quote:

The 6 Russian oligarchs who donated £2m to Tory party since Boris became PM
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/15...tory-donor-evg

Mick 25-05-2022 19:01

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
But despite all those alleged totals. It’s a drop in the ocean to how much the corrupted EU has and still is giving to Russia for its gas.

jfman 25-05-2022 19:14

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I’d rather buy Russian gas and stay warm than sell weapons to Saudi Arabia to kill innocent civilians with.

ianch99 25-05-2022 19:16

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
While we're on the subject of Corruption, the Corrupt Tory Party has only the single master. No, it is not the country and no, it is not the electorate:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FTQ4EKtW...jpg&name=small

1andrew1 25-05-2022 21:17

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123617)
But despite all those alleged totals. It’s a drop in the ocean to how much the corrupted EU has and still is giving to Russia for its gas.

Not entirely correct - the EU itself does not pays Russia anything.

Individual countries (including the UK) have paid for and continue to pay Russia for energy - fortunately we were less dependent than many and we're ending our contract for diesel. But I agree that many countries in the EU especially Germany need to end Russian energy use as soon as possible. To their credit, Germany do recognise this but we need to continue to hold them to account.

---------- Post added at 21:17 ---------- Previous post was at 19:32 ----------

An example of how leopards don't change their spots:

Johnson: "I am humbled and I have learnt a lesson"

A few minutes later

Johnson: "Sir Beer Korma"

papa smurf 25-05-2022 21:54

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
‘Raises new questions’ Tory MP demands police confirm details of Starmer beergate probe
DURHAM Police need to be transparent over whether a senior Labour politician was consulted in the decision to clear Sir Keir Starmer in the original investigation into beergate when its current inquiries are concluded, a Tory MP has demanded.

focus has turned to whether the Labour leader will be fined for his event last year in the North East. Durham Police initially cleared him of wrongdoing last year at the event on April 30 during an election campaign, but has since reopened the case. This week the force turned down a freedom of information request over whether the force’s Labour Police and Crime Commissioner Joy Allen was consulted during the original investigation.



https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...Smith-sue-gray

Mick 25-05-2022 22:20

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36123618)
I’d rather buy Russian gas and stay warm than sell weapons to Saudi Arabia to kill innocent civilians with.

But it’s totally fine Russia getting its war chest filled to kill innocents in Ukraine. Got it. :rolleyes:

1andrew1 25-05-2022 22:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
Johnson fans lectured us to wait until the Sue Gray Report was published. Yet if you bought a paper from a Johnson-supporting tabloid, you might think the report wasn't published today!
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1653513651

Mick 25-05-2022 22:30

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123627)
Johnson fans lectured us to wait until the Sue Gray Report was published. Yet if you bought a paper from a Johnson-supporting tabloid, you might think the report wasn't published today!
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1653513651

:zzz: You still moaning ?

Julian 25-05-2022 23:19

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123627)
Johnson fans lectured us to wait until the Sue Gray Report was published. Yet if you bought a paper from a Johnson-supporting tabloid, you might think the report wasn't published today!
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1653513651

Those aren’t tomorrow’s front pages??

OLD BOY 25-05-2022 23:42

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36123612)
Ah, I forgot the third option … you’ve been pushing your own fantasy so hard, for so long, you actually think it’s true. Sad.

You want it to be true so much that, without any evidence to the contrary, you rubbish the police investigation and the Sue Gray report. Your hatred for Boris has clouded your judgement, Chris. That’s what’s sad.

---------- Post added at 23:42 ---------- Previous post was at 23:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123627)
Johnson fans lectured us to wait until the Sue Gray Report was published. Yet if you bought a paper from a Johnson-supporting tabloid, you might think the report wasn't published today!
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1653513651

That’s because partygate has been shown to be a waste of time, Andrew.

1andrew1 25-05-2022 23:58

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123634)
You want it to be true so much that, without any evidence to the contrary, you rubbish the police investigation and the Sue Gray report. Your hatred for Boris has clouded your judgement, Chris. That’s what’s sad.

I don't get why you still support Johnson, Old Boy. Fellow Conservatives Seph and Chris see how he's brought the Party into disrepute and he's been tanking with the electorate for a long time now.

What will it take for you to cease giving him support? Found guilty of misleading the House?

GrimUpNorth 26-05-2022 00:19

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123638)
I don't get why you still support Johnson, Old Boy. Fellow Conservatives Seph and Chris see how he's brought the Party into disrepute and he's been tanking with the electorate for a long time now.

What will it take for you to cease giving him support? Found guilty of misleading the House?

Now we've had the Sue report, it was always going to morph towards wait for the Standards Committee report and to be honest I'm surprised OB hasn't used it already. I also don't think we're at the end of the story yet, I'd not be surprised if there are plenty more photos out there.

They'll also try hard to kick any discontent towards the long grass tomorrow when the £400 per fuel bill is announced, hoping they can buy the public's forgiveness.

jfman 26-05-2022 06:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
“Hatred for Boris”.

Defending him at all costs has almost a cult like following without many members.

Mick 26-05-2022 07:42

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36123646)
“Hatred for Boris”.

Defending him at all costs has almost a cult like following without many members.

Wow, what a pathetic remark. Do better FFS

OLD BOY 26-05-2022 08:00

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123638)
I don't get why you still support Johnson, Old Boy. Fellow Conservatives Seph and Chris see how he's brought the Party into disrepute and he's been tanking with the electorate for a long time now.

What will it take for you to cease giving him support? Found guilty of misleading the House?

I accept that this has divided opinion, and that the breaches of the Covid rules should not have happened. But it is the extent of BJ's involvement that is in question here. The police have found that he breached the rules once, in an event which was a very marginal breach of the law, if that, for which he received a fine. He was not fined for anything else.

Some of the other events that went on at no 10 were serious breaches, but BJ was only involved in a small number of these, and in a situation the police did not consider meriting a fine. Leaving presentations, with or without alcohol, were deemed to be legal, as they were clearly work events, but some of these went on to become social events and BJ was not present when that happened.

BJ says he was unaware of those events which were, or became parties, and indeed he wasn't even there when they occurred. The office of Prime Minister is an extremely busy one, and yet some people on this forum seem to think he had so much time on his hands that he should have been aware of everything that was going on in that building, despite the fact that it is a building that is both residential and office accommodation and is used by over 1,000 people. When he discovered what was going on, he took immediate steps to reform the staffing structure to ensure that such a situation did not recur.

As I have said repeatedly, most of the noise over this has been from people who dislike Boris Johnson and want him gone, some of them Conservatives. But those of us who support him staying in office want him to do so because on the issues that are still outstanding and are important to this country, BJ is considered the best person to deal with them, because he knows how to do it and how to make it happen.

That is why, in context, partygate is seen by many as an unwanted distraction and completely out of proportion with the scheme of things.

Many (not all) of those same people try to leap to Sir Kier Starmer's defence, despite the fact that his breach of the rules appears to be far greater than BJ's, because his event happened AFTER work, and not between work events. If that turns out to be true, he will be deserving of the fine that he gets.

---------- Post added at 07:58 ---------- Previous post was at 07:50 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36123642)
Now we've had the Sue report, it was always going to morph towards wait for the Standards Committee report and to be honest I'm surprised OB hasn't used it already. I also don't think we're at the end of the story yet, I'd not be surprised if there are plenty more photos out there.

They'll also try hard to kick any discontent towards the long grass tomorrow when the £400 per fuel bill is announced, hoping they can buy the public's forgiveness.

If there are more photos, they should have been forwarded to the police. In any case, the photos alone need to be put into context. I’m sure that if there was anything else of relevance, it would have emerged by now unless people are deliberately suppressing evidence. If more evidence was produced now, people would be rightly accused of wasting police time.

---------- Post added at 08:00 ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36123646)
“Hatred for Boris”.

Defending him at all costs has almost a cult like following without many members.

The cult comprises the people who are part of the campaign to unseat BJ. That is what this is all about.

jfman 26-05-2022 08:09

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123647)
Wow, what a pathetic remark. Do better FFS

I think we can do better than dismissing anyone who questions Johnson’s honesty, integrity or capability as having “hatred” for him. The reality he just isn’t very good, and even worse for those on the other side of the fence from me he’s not very conservative.

---------- Post added at 08:07 ---------- Previous post was at 08:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123648)
.Many (not all) of those same people try to leap to Sir Kier Starmer's defence, despite the fact that his breach of the rules appears to be far greater than BJ's, because his event happened AFTER work, and not between work events. If that turns out to be true, he will be deserving of the fine that he gets.

An entirely subjective analysis.

And on the other hand if/when he’s cleared it will be demonstrably the case that according evidence held Johnson broke the rules and Starmer did not.

---------- Post added at 08:09 ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123648)
The cult comprises the people who are part of the campaign to unseat BJ. That is what this is all about.

Do you genuinely believe that, OB? Nobody just wants a better PM? One who isn’t a liar? One who does have attention to detail to understand the agreements he backed? One that doesn’t abandon manifesto commitments when it’s politically expedient? One who won’t max out the country credit card to save his own skin?

People back him because of one policy delivered in a haphazard manner that makes them blind to his many obvious failings. It’s quite tragic really.

Mick 26-05-2022 08:18

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36123651)
I think we can do better than dismissing anyone who questions Johnson’s honesty, integrity or capability as having “hatred” for him. The reality he just isn’t very good, and even worse for those on the other side of the fence from me he’s not very conservative.

Boring. More utter bollocks. The problem is, you’re not adding anything new, you’re just rabbiting on, droning on about Sweet FA. Going on about cults, all the while, you’re in a stupid cult, aligned with the con jobs SNP, all in for Scottish independence. Yawn, yawn & more yawn. :zzz:

jfman 26-05-2022 08:23

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123654)
Boring. More utter bollocks. The problem is, you’re not adding anything new, you’re just rabbiting on, droning on about Sweet FA. Going on about cults, all the while, you’re in a stupid cult, aligned with the con jobs SNP, all in for Scottish independence. Yawn, yawn & more yawn. :zzz:

It’s not bollocks Mick. 20 years ago politics was just people who disagreed about the size/role and purpose of the state. What should we fund and what shouldn’t we.

Now it’s supposedly defined by personality cults based on populist leaders Johnson and Trump.

Scottish independence is the vehicle to escape it. I pity the little Englanders for whom there’s no prospect of escape. Only the erosion of the state and extraction of their wealth to offshore tax havens, while the Daily Mail blames Johnny Foreigner. It’s alright though Rishi will give you £400 back of your own money for the energy companies to take it off you.

ianch99 26-05-2022 08:56

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I think Chris summarised the real issue our country faces and that is the erosion and re-basing of the moral authority that underwrites our Governance. Whether or not you support the Cult of Johnson and his populist agenda, the journey he is taking us all on is a dangerous one.

By redefining the rules of truth, integrity and accountability, we are being taken to a place where literally anything goes and anything is possible. You may watch his lips move but don't for one second assume that what his says means anything.

I saw this yesterday, sort of summed it up for me:

Quote:

Boris Johnson: "it was only right to say goodbye to colleagues who were leaving"

My aunt Joyce, on a borrowed phone in ICU: "David, I'm scared, I don't want to die, I've so much living left to do"
Me: "I love you, you're my hero, I will see you soon"
The next day she died.

Mick 26-05-2022 09:10

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36123661)
I think Chris summarised the real issue our country faces and that is the erosion and re-basing of the moral authority that underwrites our Governance. Whether or not you support the Cult of Johnson and his populist agenda, the journey he is taking us all on is a dangerous one.

By redefining the rules of truth, integrity and accountability, we are being taken to a place where literally anything goes and anything is possible. You may watch his lips move but don't for one second assume that what his says means anything.

I saw this yesterday, sort of summed it up for me:

The trust in Johnson is eroded and permanently damaged. The partying from No. 10, not just Johnson but his staff and civil servants, means the rules they placed on rest of us, they didn’t believe in.

I too will never forgive what Tories have done to Health care sector. I lived it and continue to do so, it’s bloody horrible and hard work on the front line.

I’m angry but it doesn’t mean, all is forgiven with Labour. I could be politically homeless in the longer term.

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 09:20

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123648)
I accept that this has divided opinion, and that the breaches of the Covid rules should not have happened. But it is the extent of BJ's involvement that is in question here. The police have found that he breached the rules once, in an event which was a very marginal breach of the law, if that, for which he received a fine. He was not fined for anything else.

Some of the other events that went on at no 10 were serious breaches, but BJ was only involved in a small number of these, and in a situation the police did not consider meriting a fine. Leaving presentations, with or without alcohol, were deemed to be legal, as they were clearly work events, but some of these went on to become social events and BJ was not present when that happened.

BJ says he was unaware of those events which were, or became parties, and indeed he wasn't even there when they occurred. The office of Prime Minister is an extremely busy one, and yet some people on this forum seem to think he had so much time on his hands that he should have been aware of everything that was going on in that building, despite the fact that it is a building that is both residential and office accommodation and is used by over 1,000 people. When he discovered what was going on, he took immediate steps to reform the staffing structure to ensure that such a situation did not recur.

As I have said repeatedly, most of the noise over this has been from people who dislike Boris Johnson and want him gone, some of them Conservatives. But those of us who support him staying in office want him to do so because on the issues that are still outstanding and are important to this country, BJ is considered the best person to deal with them, because he knows how to do it and how to make it happen.

That is why, in context, partygate is seen by many as an unwanted distraction and completely out of proportion with the scheme of things.

Many (not all) of those same people try to leap to Sir Kier Starmer's defence, despite the fact that his breach of the rules appears to be far greater than BJ's, because his event happened AFTER work, and not between work events. If that turns out to be true, he will be deserving of the fine that he gets.

---------- Post added at 07:58 ---------- Previous post was at 07:50 ----------



If there are more photos, they should have been forwarded to the police. In any case, the photos alone need to be put into context. I’m sure that if there was anything else of relevance, it would have emerged by now unless people are deliberately suppressing evidence. If more evidence was produced now, people would be rightly accused of wasting police time.

---------- Post added at 08:00 ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 ----------



The cult comprises the people who are part of the campaign to unseat BJ. That is what this is all about.


Quote:

When he discovered what was going on, he took immediate steps to reform the staffing structure to ensure that such a situation did not recur.
It took several months and photographs of Boris attending whatever parties for him to "discover what was going on". The man has no conscience. There was the disgraceful Owen Paterson affair, for which he had to apologise; he has broken sacred manifesto commitments; there is the ridiculous net-zero policy that rushes us into unsustainable technology and will beggar everyone with a gas boiler.

One commentator said "Is he running a country or a frat house?". That is a very widely held perception of Boris and if that is what it's come to, he is a liability to Tory success at the next election. Labour will play on the tragedies faced by families during lockdown while Boris was drinking with his colleagues at No. 10.

OB's support for Boris sadly reflects on OB.



Pierre 26-05-2022 09:25

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
The way I see it is, he was democratically elected. I know he's not a president but it was him and his ability to transcend across the regions that helped win the massive majority.

Since then, he's made a few mistakes, he's also pulled off some big wins.

But I do not think it is up to the media or the opposition to topple him, if he is to be removed he should be removed democratically by the people who put him there, if they so wish.

Now, if he is deposed by his own party, then that's a matter for them, but there doesn't seem to be a massive appetite for that either at the moment.

ianch99 26-05-2022 10:01

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123663)
The trust in Johnson is eroded and permanently damaged. The partying from No. 10, not just Johnson but his staff and civil servants, means the rules they placed on rest of us, they didn’t believe in.

I too will never forgive what Tories have done to Health care sector. I lived it and continue to do so, it’s bloody horrible and hard work on the front line.

I’m angry but it doesn’t mean, all is forgiven with Labour. I could be politically homeless in the longer term.

What you say is totally correct. You are also right to point out that Johnson is just part of the problem, the culture of arrogance at the centre of Government is appalling.

Your point on how the NHS has been deliberately mis-managed is one that everyone should listen to. They rely on the NHS workers' good nature and sense of duty to their fellow citizens while they trash the place, fail to give essential pay rises and blame the NHS staff for their (Central Government) failings. Don't tell me for one minute that they are not setting up the NHS to fail.

Of course with their enablers in MSM, the right wing comics that pump out Pravda-esque misinformation, they will fool enough people enough of the time.

Fun times!

richard-john56 26-05-2022 10:36

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36123661)
I think Chris summarised the real issue our country faces and that is the erosion and re-basing of the moral authority that underwrites our Governance. Whether or not you support the Cult of Johnson and his populist agenda, the journey he is taking us all on is a dangerous one.

By redefining the rules of truth, integrity and accountability, we are being taken to a place where literally anything goes and anything is possible. You may watch his lips move but don't for one second assume that what his says means anything.

I saw this yesterday, sort of summed it up for me:

Spot on. I am pretty sure all those thousands who have perished from Covid their relatives and friends will also think so to.

1andrew1 26-05-2022 10:55

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36123663)
The trust in Johnson is eroded and permanently damaged. The partying from No. 10, not just Johnson but his staff and civil servants, means the rules they placed on rest of us, they didn’t believe in.

I too will never forgive what Tories have done to Health care sector. I lived it and continue to do so, it’s bloody horrible and hard work on the front line.

I’m angry but it doesn’t mean, all is forgiven with Labour. I could be politically homeless in the longer term.

Absolutely agree. No 10 have taken us all for fools and lowered the trust between the people and their government.

The only way to do rebuild trust is for Johnson to be replaced.

The way they dumped untested patients on care homes and procured poor quality PPE from their friends were two scandals which endangered the lives of run-down NHS staff.

papa smurf 26-05-2022 11:06

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I can't think of a government of any party that i thought i could trust, apart from trust them to make my life worse than it was before they got elected.

Maggy 26-05-2022 11:07

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
We need a Cynics party.;)

mrmistoffelees 26-05-2022 11:51

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123648)
<SNIP>

That is why, in context, partygate is seen by many as an unwanted distraction and completely out of proportion with the scheme of things.


The issue I take here, is that hundreds if not potentially thousands of people obeyed the laws that were in place at time, meaning they couldn't visit loved ones in care homes or hospitals, in some cases they couldn't say goodbye to loved ones who died in care homes or hospitals.

As with most things in life, it's proportion is defined by the perspective it's viewed from.

Consider this, Had, you been unable to visit a loved one that for example suffered from dementia or for example was in palliative care and subsequently lost their life would you view it as something distracting?

I'll admit, i loathe the floppy haired pillock, but, I'll balance this by saying if Starmer is issued with an FPN he should be out on his backside

We seem to be ok with accepting mediocrity from our politicians

1andrew1 26-05-2022 12:59

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Compare and contrast:

Quote:

Boris Johnson urged by two more Tory MPs to step down over Sue Gray's partygate report

The latest announcements, which follow the report detailing drunkenness and partying at Number 10, mean that a total of 18 backbenchers are now calling on the prime minister to quit.

The announcements by John Baron and David Simmonds follow a similar call by their backbench colleague Julian Sturdy on Wednesday.

Mr Baron said the findings by senior civil servant Ms Gray as well as the Met Police investigation into the episode "paint a shameful pattern of misbehaviour during the pandemic as the rest of us kept to the COVID regulations".

Mr Simmonds said it was "clear that while the government and our policies enjoy the confidence of the public the prime minister does not" and that it was time for "new leadership".
Meanwhile, in Norfolk

Quote:

A Conservative MP has defended Boris Johnson and suggested it was likely NHS staff had also been "letting their hair down" during the Covid pandemic.

Richard Bacon was speaking after Sue Gray's report highlighted the extent of lockdown parties at Downing Street.

Reacting to the report, Mr Bacon said: "The fact that [Mr Johnson] goes round thanking his staff for working very, very hard, 18 hours a day, to try and keep the show on the road when we were in a global pandemic is not, I think, a crime.

"And I don't think it's something he should be condemned for and I certainly don't think it's something he should resign for. I support Boris."

Mr Bacon, who represents South Norfolk, said the prime minister should not be "condemned".

Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting called for Mr Bacon to withdraw the statement and apologise.

In the interview with BBC Look East on Wednesday, he was asked if he was "comfortable" with the revelations around the drinking and partying at Downing Street during lockdown.

He replied: "No, of course I'm not but then I think they were working under huge pressure.

"You haven't gone and investigated it but there are one and a half million people who work in the NHS. I bet if you tried hard enough you could find some people letting their hair down who were working 24/7 in the NHS as well."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-61587994

TheDaddy 26-05-2022 13:34

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123695)
Compare and contrast:



Meanwhile, in Norfolk


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-61587994

What's that plank on about, I was doing 72 hours per week throughout the lockdown because someone deemed me a key worker and was to knackered to let hair down and what's this clowns definition of letting hair down, fighting and puking up in the heart of government, abusing the help trying to clean up the mess and puke

1andrew1 26-05-2022 13:45

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I've just been reading a really good thread on a side to Partygate that's not been covered yet.
Quote:

Every essential worker I know, for bodies small or large (and my partner is one such essential worker), was subject to strict shift rotations, staggered arrival times, work bubbles - to minimise the chance of infection leaving the organisation without even a skeleton staff.

Not Downing St. Not even after several ministers were infected and the PM, reportedly, nearly died. No. The PM would meet MPs (one of them infected), then have a COBRA meeting, then speak at a leaving do with senior staff packed in a room, then go to another party in his flat.

The PM would toast his birthday, with his Cabinet Secretary, wife and decorator, in the same room as the Chancellor (any basic risk planning would keep those two, during an infectious pandemic), then usher his entire scientific staff for a Covid meeting IN THE SAME ROOM.

THIS, in my view, is the most shocking and truly unforgivable aspect of #Partygate. And the aspect that cannot be explained away by any rules interpretation. What was happening in Downing St was not just a breach of the rules. It was dangerous - for them and for us.

At a minimum, staff should have been split into three multi-discplinary teams which never came into physical contact with each other. At a minimum, the offices key to our response - PM, Chancellor, Health Sec, Home Sec, Foreign Sec, should never have breathed the same air.
https://twitter.com/sturdyAlex/statu...39456068067328

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 13:53

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123710)
I've just been reading a really good thread on a side to Partygate that's not been covered yet.

https://twitter.com/sturdyAlex/statu...39456068067328

Excellent. In other words the key management of the UK could have been laid low (on several occasions) by flouting the regulations intended to prevent that, amongst other things.

Pierre 26-05-2022 15:59

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123710)
I've just been reading a really good thread on a side to Partygate that's not been covered yet.

https://twitter.com/sturdyAlex/statu...39456068067328

Quote:

Every essential worker I know, for bodies small or large (and my partner is one such essential worker), was subject to strict shift rotations, staggered arrival times, work bubbles - to minimise the chance of infection leaving the organisation without even a skeleton staff.
and I know lots of essential workers where that wasn't the case......

Hugh 26-05-2022 16:16

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://twitter.com/pippacrerar/stat...5dsmZFo5SR4sUw

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1653578044

OLD BOY 26-05-2022 16:45

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123677)
Absolutely agree. No 10 have taken us all for fools and lowered the trust between the people and their government.

The only way to do rebuild trust is for Johnson to be replaced.

The way they dumped untested patients on care homes and procured poor quality PPE from their friends were two scandals which endangered the lives of run-down NHS staff.

God, how many times are you going to repeat the same old guff?

And it was the NHS Chief who ordered the care home patients out of hospital without checks, not Matt Hancock.When he became aware of Simon Stephens’ circular letter, he withdrew that decision.

There was also a worldwide shortage of PPE, and all efforts were made to procure more through as many routes as possible.

Are you working on the basis that if you keep repeating this stuff, people will start believing it?

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 16:58

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Andrew is right.

Quote:

The only way to do rebuild trust is for Johnson to be replaced.
Polls say that 59% of the population want Boris to go - there is insufficient trust. Indeed, anyone can openly see Boris for what he is - a man of poor judgement, insensitive and absolutely insincere in his apology.

All he wants is to remain as PM. Never mind the good calls previously ascribed to him - that goodwill was cashed in long ago. He's a laughing stock in Europe and a national embarrassment.


1andrew1 26-05-2022 17:04

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123734)
God, how many times are you going to repeat the same old guff?

It's not every day Mick and I agree. You should rejoice in this special moment.

TheDaddy 26-05-2022 17:26

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123734)
God, how many times are you going to repeat the same old guff?

Projected the tiresome rebuttaller churning out more old guff than anyone else on the forum has ever

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 17:38

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36123741)
Projected the tiresome rebuttaller churning out more old guff than anyone else on the forum has ever

Whoa.

OB has made two postulations:

1. Wait & see what Sue Gray reveals (OB leaned towards his exoneration);
2, What's all the fuss about - a non-criminal FPN?

OB has avoided commenting on Boris' judgement over matters such as the Owen Paterson affair. Hence OB is not criticising Boris for his serious errors of judgement (that the rest of us know about.)

OB wants the PM to get on with what needs to be done. I agree, so long as it's not Boris.

TheDaddy 26-05-2022 17:58

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36123743)
Whoa.

OB has made two postulations:

1. Wait & see what Sue Gray reveals (OB leaned towards his exoneration);
2, What's all the fuss about - a non-criminal FPN?

OB has avoided commenting on Boris' judgement over matters such as the Owen Paterson affair. Hence OB is not criticising Boris for his serious errors of judgement (that the rest of us know about.)

OB wants the PM to get on with what needs to be done. I agree, so long as it's not Boris.

The postulations aren't the issue the endless sycophantic defence of bozo is, seriously get out more, not even Nadine Dorries is that devoted and that's without pointing out if a politician wants to take the steam out of a scandal the best and easiest thing to say is wait for the report or inquiry and hope everyone loses interest in the meantime

Hugh 26-05-2022 18:04

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123734)
God, how many times are you going to repeat the same old guff?

And it was the NHS Chief who ordered the care home patients out of hospital without checks, not Matt Hancock.When he became aware of Simon Stephens’ circular letter, he withdrew that decision.

There was also a worldwide shortage of PPE, and all efforts were made to procure more through as many routes as possible.

Are you working on the basis that if you keep repeating this stuff, people will start believing it?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-61227709

Quote:

Lord Justice Bean and Mr Justice Garnham found the decisions of the then health secretary to make and maintain a series of policies contained in documents issued on 17 and 19 March and 2 April 2020 were unlawful.
And before you go down the path of "PHE didn’t tell him", here is an article from your newspaper of choice disproving that…

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://www....h-court-rules/

Quote:

Mr Hancock, who was replaced by Sajid Javid last year, claimed the High Court ruling had exonerated him and the had been cleared "of any wrongdoing", because PHE "failed to tell ministers what they knew about asymptomatic transmission"...

… However, the risks of asymptomatic transmission had been highlighted by Sir Patrick Vallance, the Government's chief scientific adviser for England, who said it was "quite likely" as early as March 13 2020. Varying levels of risk had been outlined in papers from late January, the ruling said

pip08456 26-05-2022 18:45

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36123737)
Andrew is right.



Polls say that 59% of the population want Boris to go - there is insufficient trust. Indeed, anyone can openly see Boris for what he is - a man of poor judgement, insensitive and absolutely insincere in his apology.

All he wants is to remain as PM. Never mind the good calls previously ascribed to him - that goodwill was cashed in long ago. He's a laughing stock in Europe and a national embarrassment.


Is Ukraine part of Europe? I think you'll be hard pressed to find anyone in Ukraine to condier him to be a laughing stock or National embarassment.

I agree he will have to go but I don't think the time is now.

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 18:55

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123754)
Is Ukraine part of Europe? I think you'll be hard pressed to find anyone in Ukraine to condier him to be a laughing stock or National embarassment.

I agree he will have to go but I don't think the time is now.

That's a bit of a reach to single out Ukraine. I'll narrow it done to specific nationals who have mocked him (cruelly I would add) to me.

Austrians; Belgians; Danes; French; Germans; Swedes.

pip08456 26-05-2022 19:04

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36123757)
That's a bit of a reach to single out Ukraine. I'll narrow it done to specific nationals who have mocked him (cruelly I would add) to me.

Austrians; Belgians; Danes; French; Germans; Swedes.

Yes but it's why I don't think it is the time. He can still be of benefit to Ukraine to push for the supply of the longer range artillery that they are crying out for to go on the offensive.

To me, Ukraine is far more important than partygate.

Damien 26-05-2022 19:09

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36123737)
Andrew is right.



Polls say that 59% of the population want Boris to go - there is insufficient trust. Indeed, anyone can openly see Boris for what he is - a man of poor judgement, insensitive and absolutely insincere in his apology.

All he wants is to remain as PM. Never mind the good calls previously ascribed to him - that goodwill was cashed in long ago. He's a laughing stock in Europe and a national embarrassment.


I don't think the trust will ever be fully rebuilt either. If he has a good few months now the polls will recover a bit and the appetite for him to go will decline within the party but every time his trustworthiness comes up it'll be punching an open wound. He'll never completely shake the image of being a lair.

---------- Post added at 19:09 ---------- Previous post was at 19:07 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123761)
Yes but it's why I don't think it is the time. He can still be of benefit to Ukraine to push for the supply of the longer range artillery that they are crying out for to go on the offensive.

To me, Ukraine is far more important than partygate.

You don't need Johnson for that though. The whole British political system is pretty much behind our actions in Ukraine and Ben Wallace has been the lead guy on the issue.

GrimUpNorth 26-05-2022 19:18

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36123734)
God, how many times are you going to repeat the same old guff?

Thought you were replying to one of your own posts for a minute there!

OLD BOY 26-05-2022 19:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36123766)
Thought you were replying to one of your own posts for a minute there!

Fair comment, Grim - I would just point out that I have said the same things over and over because so many of Boris’s detractors are on repeat and just keep regurgitating the same points again and again.

I’m calling it a day on this now as I think these people are obsessed and beyond help and certainly beyond reason.

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 19:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123761)
Yes but it's why I don't think it is the time. He can still be of benefit to Ukraine to push for the supply of the longer range artillery that they are crying out for to go on the offensive.

To me, Ukraine is far more important than partygate.

Yes - but it doesn't need Boris to support Ukraine.

mrmistoffelees 26-05-2022 19:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123761)
Yes but it's why I don't think it is the time. He can still be of benefit to Ukraine to push for the supply of the longer range artillery that they are crying out for to go on the offensive.

To me, Ukraine is far more important than partygate.

We managed to change prime minister during ww2 certainly once,
perhaps twice ? and we of course were directly involved in that

1andrew1 26-05-2022 19:45

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36123771)
We managed to change prime minister during ww2 certainly once,
perhaps twice ? and we of course were directly involved in that

Exactly. Johnson supporters' last stand is to state he's the only person capable of handling the cost of living crisis and in supporting Ukraine.

There's many Conservative MPs capable of doing this whilst also maintaining the trust of the British public through their words and deeds. Johnson has shown in a couple of years he's not one of them.

Sephiroth 26-05-2022 19:51

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36123773)
Exactly. Johnson supporters' last stand is to state he's the only person capable of handling the cost of living crisis and in supporting Ukraine.

There's many Conservative MPs capable of doing this whilst also maintaining the trust of the British public through their words and deeds. Johnson has shown in a couple of years he's not one of them.

E.g: John Redwood.

Mr K 26-05-2022 20:14

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36123776)
E.g: John Redwood.

Yes, he's a man of the people for sure :D

Goes down great in Wales. https://youtu.be/JA1gBGtOlZU

Julian 26-05-2022 20:52

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Interesting analysis HERE regarding Johnson only receiving one fine, by a legal writer for the FT.

1andrew1 26-05-2022 21:20

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36123791)
Interesting analysis HERE regarding Johnson only receiving one fine, by a legal writer for the FT.

Great find and a good theory as to why Johnson was only fined once. I'm sure Johnson's not the only leader of a political party capable of invoking such a reason, especially someone familiar with the law.

I've read some of his takes before, always interesting.

pip08456 27-05-2022 01:36

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36123771)
We managed to change prime minister during ww2 certainly once,
perhaps twice ? and we of course were directly involved in that

Yes but take into consideration what happened.

As regards Chamberlain. He is best known for his foreign policy of appeasement, and in particular for his signing of the Munich Agreement on 30 September 1938, ceding the German-speaking Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany led by Adolf Hitler. Following the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939, which marked the beginning of the Second World War, Chamberlain announced the declaration of war on Germany two days later and led the United Kingdom through the first eight months of the war until his resignation as prime minister on 10 May 1940. (the majority of which referred to as the "phoney war")

Winston Churchill was appointed First Lord of the Admiralty on 3 September 1939, the day that the United Kingdom declared war on Nazi Germany. He succeeded Neville Chamberlain as prime minister on 10 May 1940 and held the post until 26 July 1945.

VE day was 8 May 1945.

VJ day was 15 August 1945

So yes, you are correct in 3 Prime Ministers, one for 8 months, one for 5 Years and one for 2 months.

Now consider why 3 Prime Ministers.

First Chaimberain. An appeaser who accomplished nothing, did not stop the war and (it could be argued) gave Hitler the confidence to continue his expansion of his armed forces and go to war against Poland.

So why Chrchill, why him considering Chaimberlain and wanted Lord Palmestom as his successor.being the appeaser that he was Lord Palmestom refused as he knew Paliament would have objected so who was left?

That famous war mongeror Winston Churchill. Even King George wasn't happy in the beginning but that changed eventually.

Winston then lead the country with a coalition Governmentr until Vicctory in Europe was decclared. For some reason that was disbanded (I don't know by whom) and election was called even though our forces were still at war with the Japenese, our forgotten army and agree with them. I've met many over the years.

So, tell me who should Boris should be replaced by who would not be anRussian apologist or appeser? Both Germany (who should know bwtter) and France and indeed some in the US who think agereeing to Russian claims in the Donbas and other areas is the way for peace. It didn't work with Hitler and it won't work with Putin.

---------- Post added at 01:36 ---------- Previous post was at 00:56 ----------

So,as regards Ukraine where sholud we do now? IMHO suppliy them with whatever they need to actually drive Russia out of Ulraine.
Thet are crying out for long range artillery to go on the offensive and I have no doubt they can do it if the equipment was supplied.
I'll leave you with this brilliant analisys. (note she says the ISW has witheld info as well as other strategists).


Damien 27-05-2022 09:06

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123812)
So, tell me who should Boris should be replaced by who would not be anRussian apologist or appeser?

Pretty much anyone in the Tory Parliamentary Party? Johnson isn't Churchill. Unless Corbyn makes a surprise defection to the Tories, everyone is on the same page with Ukraine in Britain.

mrmistoffelees 27-05-2022 09:27

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
You make good points... However, you're reasoning comes down to 'who is there that's better than him to replace him' If the Tory party don't have someone who is more competent than the liability that is Bors then that in itself, is a damning indictment as to the state of British politics.

To add balance, I don't believe that the Labour party are any better whatsoever at the moment.

Supplying Ukraine with 'whatever they need' is a dangerous move, I thought that we were only supplying weapons that were classed as defensive.

To shift towards supplying offensive weapons could lead to a further escalation which lead to a full NATO engagement.

1andrew1 27-05-2022 09:30

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36123818)
Pretty much anyone in the Tory Parliamentary Party? Johnson isn't Churchill. Unless Corbyn makes a surprise defection to the Tories, everyone is on the same page with Ukraine in Britain.

Agreed. The UK's support for Ukraine is not dependent on Johnson. I'm not sure the situation in the US, France etc is relevant here.

pip08456 27-05-2022 09:40

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36123818)
Pretty much anyone in the Tory Parliamentary Party? Johnson isn't Churchill. Unless Corbyn makes a surprise defection to the Tories, everyone is on the same page with Ukraine in Britain.

I wasn't saying Boris is another Churchill. Far from it even though he made sure the UK was in the lead in Europe for support for Ukraine.

It is not long ago posts were made here about money from Russians to the Conservative Party and some MP's sort of saying it would give Russia influence over policy. Well Boris has shown that to be untrue.

Personally I don't think in normal times Boris should stay but as these are not normal times it is not a time for leadership change, nor would it be whoever was leader unless we had a Russian apologist in power. (there's plenty of those in the Labour party).

Damien 27-05-2022 09:57

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123823)
Personally I don't think in normal times Boris should stay but as these are not normal times it is not a time for leadership change, nor would it be whoever was leader unless we had a Russian apologist in power. (there's plenty of those in the Labour party).

I don't think it makes too much difference. The way our Government is set-up means it's not too dramatic for the Prime Minister to change and I can't see it having a big impact on Ukraine.

As I said Ben Wallace, the Defence Minister, has been the main guy when it comes to Ukraine to the point he has been working for years on arming them. Since there isn't much debate or contention in the U.K on our support for Ukraine I think it'll just tick on merrily in the background. Any additional funding required would be provided without a PM having to work to get it. You mention the Labour Party but even there Starmer has said he would kick anyone out of the PLP who tries to use this to blame NATO.

I think the cost of living crisis is a bigger argument as to why the Government can't have a leadership challenge. That's an issue that is more contentious and requires political direction.

1andrew1 27-05-2022 09:59

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123823)
I wasn't saying Boris is another Churchill. Far from it even though he made sure the UK was in the lead in Europe for support for Ukraine.

It is not long ago posts were made here about money from Russians to the Conservative Party and some MP's sort of saying it would give Russia influence over policy. Well Boris has shown that to be untrue.

Personally I don't think in normal times Boris should stay but as these are not normal times it is not a time for leadership change, nor would it be whoever was leader unless we had a Russian apologist in power. (there's plenty of those in the Labour party).

I'm not sure there ever is a normal time. The only genuine Russian apologists in the UK I've heard are not in mainstream parties eg George Galloway.

Hugh 27-05-2022 13:41

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36123812)
Yes but take into consideration what happened.

As regards Chamberlain. He is best known for his foreign policy of appeasement, and in particular for his signing of the Munich Agreement on 30 September 1938, ceding the German-speaking Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany led by Adolf Hitler. Following the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939, which marked the beginning of the Second World War, Chamberlain announced the declaration of war on Germany two days later and led the United Kingdom through the first eight months of the war until his resignation as prime minister on 10 May 1940. (the majority of which referred to as the "phoney war")

Winston Churchill was appointed First Lord of the Admiralty on 3 September 1939, the day that the United Kingdom declared war on Nazi Germany. He succeeded Neville Chamberlain as prime minister on 10 May 1940 and held the post until 26 July 1945.

VE day was 8 May 1945.

VJ day was 15 August 1945

So yes, you are correct in 3 Prime Ministers, one for 8 months, one for 5 Years and one for 2 months.

Now consider why 3 Prime Ministers.

First Chaimberain. An appeaser who accomplished nothing, did not stop the war and (it could be argued) gave Hitler the confidence to continue his expansion of his armed forces and go to war against Poland.

So why Chrchill, why him considering Chaimberlain and wanted Lord Palmestom as his successor.being the appeaser that he was Lord Palmestom refused as he knew Paliament would have objected so who was left?

That famous war mongeror Winston Churchill. Even King George wasn't happy in the beginning but that changed eventually.

Winston then lead the country with a coalition Governmentr until Vicctory in Europe was decclared. For some reason that was disbanded (I don't know by whom) and election was called even though our forces were still at war with the Japenese, our forgotten army and agree with them. I've met many over the years.

So, tell me who should Boris should be replaced by who would not be anRussian apologist or appeser? Both Germany (who should know bwtter) and France and indeed some in the US who think agereeing to Russian claims in the Donbas and other areas is the way for peace. It didn't work with Hitler and it won't work with Putin.

---------- Post added at 01:36 ---------- Previous post was at 00:56 ----------

So,as regards Ukraine where sholud we do now? IMHO suppliy them with whatever they need to actually drive Russia out of Ulraine.
Thet are crying out for long range artillery to go on the offensive and I have no doubt they can do it if the equipment was supplied.
I'll leave you with this brilliant analisys. (note she says the ISW has witheld info as well as other strategists).


Thatcher resigned during Operation Granby (Gulf War 1), when we actually had troops and aircraft in the Gulf.

https://www.forces.net/news/gulf-war...flict-30-years

Quote:

The first Royal Air Force aircraft arrived in Saudi Arabia on 10 August to begin Operation GRANBY (the codename of the British operation)…

… The force grew over the following months, with RAF aircraft including Torondos, Jaguars and Hercules transport planes situated in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.

Hundreds of UK soldiers were arriving in the Gulf each day.

By October 1990, 7th Armoured Brigade had left Germany for Saudi Arabia to establish their presence in the region.

A second British Army of the Rhine brigade joined them, with Challenger tanks specially adapted for the desert dust, and extensive training being carried out.

Chris 27-05-2022 14:08

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36123845)
Thatcher resigned during Operation Granby (Gulf War 1), when we actually had troops and aircraft in the Gulf.

https://www.forces.net/news/gulf-war...flict-30-years

I think this wins the thread …

Hugh 27-05-2022 16:26

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Man facing breaches of Ministerial Code changes rules about people who breach Ministerial Code....

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...droidApp_Other

Quote:

Boris Johnson changes ministerial code to avoid need to resign over breaches

New rules say ministers can apologise or temporarily lose pay for breaking code, which PM is accused of doing...

...Johnson has also rewritten the foreword to the code, removing all references to honesty, integrity, transparency and accountability.

In his first foreword, published in 2019, he wrote: “There must be no bullying and no harassment; no leaking; no breach of collective responsibility. No misuse of taxpayer money and no actual or perceived conflicts of interest. T

“The precious principles of public life enshrined in this document – integrity, objectivity, accountability, transparency, honesty and leadership in the public interest – must be honoured at all times; as must the political impartiality of our much admired civil service.”

The 2022 foreword simply lists the government’s priorities, with only a brief mention of standards and behaviour of ministers


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:02.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum