Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708171)

Mr K 16-02-2020 10:12

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36024923)
The EU needs us far more.

Plus put the Royal Navy in our fishing waters and kick out any fishing vessels we want.

Especially thos big buggers that can take the entire stock with one sweep.


What Royal Navy ? It's been cut back massively in recent years and has more important things to do than guard fish. Even when we did have a Navy we lost the 'Cod Wars' to the mighty Iceland....

papa smurf 16-02-2020 10:30

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36024931)
What Royal Navy ? It's been cut back massively in recent years and has more important things to do than guard fish. Even when we did have a Navy we lost the 'Cod Wars' to the mighty Iceland....


UK to strengthen sea patrols to ward off post-Brexit fishing wars

https://www.theguardian.com/business...t-fishing-wars

Carth 16-02-2020 10:49

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36024929)
EU's requirements don't seem to be going down too well with BoJo. To the Government's credit, it's made a strong case but the UK has handed the negotiating edge to the EU by insisting upon a December deadline.
https://news.sky.com/story/boris-joh...nable-11935283

Looks good to me. If the EU want to play the game they don't have long to pass the ball . . and I think we all know the result if they insist on keeping it ;)

nomadking 16-02-2020 11:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36024929)
EU's requirements don't seem to be going down too well with BoJo. To the Government's credit, it's made a strong case but the UK has handed the negotiating edge to the EU by insisting upon a December deadline.
https://news.sky.com/story/boris-joh...nable-11935283

So, maybe the obvious thing would be for the UK to ramp up relationships with other countries, to put some pressure on the EU?
The opposite has happened!

https://twitter.com/LeaveEUOfficial
Maybe like the EU does, the rest of world just needs to understand that need us more than we need them, and they'll have to come knocking on our door?

We should simply walk away until they face reality. The introduction of the backstop only applies if the EU shows "good faith" in the negotiations. Little sign of that, so goodbye backstop.:)

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 11:09

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Andrew's contribution above is tinged with Remainer sentiment. So I'll add Leavers' sentiment to what's going on.

The Guvmin is basically saying that we are a sovereign nation and must not have its laws and regulations dictated by the EU. Never mind that collectively they are bigger than we are - we must stand our ground and take complete control of our destiny.

We aren't going to go hungry (as one contributor said earlier in this thread) and if the EU are frightened of our potential competitive edge, then we should exploit that and to hell with them.

The December deadline is exactly right. The EU would otherwise drag things on as they did before. This time, we mean it - I hope.


1andrew1 16-02-2020 12:21

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36024936)
We should simply walk away until they face reality. The introduction of the backstop only applies if the EU shows "good faith" in the negotiations. Little sign of that, so goodbye backstop.:)

I think BoJo got rid of the backstop
Quote:

Boris Johnson was praised by his Tory MPs in the Commons today for abolishing the backstop that had doomed Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreements.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/11...resa-May-viral

nomadking 16-02-2020 12:45

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36024941)
I think BoJo got rid of the backstop

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/11...resa-May-viral

AFAIK it's just in a different form.
Link

Quote:

Technical adaptations to the Withdrawal Agreement following the revision of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland as agreed at negotiators’ level
ARTICLE 184
Negotiations on the future relationship
The Union and the United Kingdom shall use their best endeavours, in good faith and in full respect of their respective legal orders, to take the necessary steps to negotiate expeditiously the agreements governing their future relationship referred to in the Political Declaration of [XX] October 2019 and to conduct the relevant procedures for the ratification or conclusion of those agreements, with a view to ensuring that those agreements apply, to the extent possible, as from the end of the transition period.

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 13:01

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36024942)
AFAIK it's just in a different form.
Link

I cannot in any way read into what you quoted as comprising a Backstop of any kind.

nomadking 16-02-2020 13:16

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36024944)
I cannot in any way read into what you quoted as comprising a Backstop of any kind.

The detail is in the rest of the document. It is only about NI, so if everything about the backstop has gone, what is there to negotiate separately on? Whatever arrangements there are in that document can be ignored in the future, if a lack of good faith is demonstrated.


From 2 page explainer on the protocol.
Quote:

7. Both parties therefore believe that the backstop protects both the EU single market and the UK
internal market without prejudice to the future UK-EU relationship, as set out in the December
Joint UK-EU Report, and respecting the overarching requirement to avoid a hard border.

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 17:39

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Looks to me that it’s some careless text that slipped through the revision process.

nomadking 16-02-2020 17:42

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36024987)
Looks to me that it’s some careless text that slipped through the revision process.

It's still 63 pages of special rules involving NI, if no alternatives are set in place by the end of this year. That is what the term "backstop" refers to.

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 18:39

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36024988)
It's still 63 pages of special rules involving NI, if no alternatives are set in place by the end of this year. That is what the term "backstop" refers to.

However, nothing in the Withdrawal Agreement binds the UK to anything, let alone in relation to the Backstop.

You seem to think otherwise. Can you be very clear as to how the Backstop is obligatory?


nomadking 16-02-2020 18:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025000)
However, nothing in the Withdrawal Agreement binds the UK to anything, let alone in relation to the Backstop.

You seem to think otherwise. Can you be very clear as to how the Backstop is obligatory?


The Withdrawal Agreement is legally binding, it's the Political Declaration that isn't.

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 18:56

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36024941)
I think BoJo got rid of the backstop

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/11...resa-May-viral

So Boris did get rid of the Backstop.

As he seems to be an accomplished liar, he wouldn't care if the Backstop appeared in the political protocol, especially if there will be no trade agreement made.

nomadking 16-02-2020 19:26

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025005)
So Boris did get rid of the Backstop.

As he seems to be an accomplished liar, he wouldn't care if the Backstop appeared in the political protocol, especially if there will be no trade agreement made.

One of the key differences is that the "unless and until" part has gone, and NI can independently of the EU and GB decide to end the arrangements.
Quote:

Article 18
Democratic consent in Northern Ireland
1. Within 2 months before the end of both the initial period and any subsequent period, the United Kingdom shall provide the opportunity for democratic consent in Northern Ireland to the continued application of Articles 5 to 10.
The backstop has gone, but a backstop is still there.

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 19:53

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36025010)
One of the key differences is that the "unless and until" part has gone, and NI can independently of the EU and GB decide to end the arrangements.
The backstop has gone, but a backstop is still there.

Ah - you mean the customs border in the Irish Sea. Yes - fair enough.

nomadking 16-02-2020 20:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025012)
Ah - you mean the customs border in the Irish Sea. Yes - fair enough.

And where exactly does it say that?:rolleyes:

Sephiroth 16-02-2020 20:51

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36025015)
And where exactly does it say that?:rolleyes:

You're messing me around. What Backstop is still in place?

nomadking 16-02-2020 20:55

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025016)
You're messing me around. What Backstop is still in place?

The term "backstop" is just a term for an alternative subset of arrangements that are put in place if no other arrangements are there by the end of this year. Where does it say there would be a customs border in the Irish Sea?

Hugh 16-02-2020 21:00

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36025017)
The term "backstop" is just a term for an alternative subset of arrangements that are put in place if no other arrangements are there by the end of this year. Where does it say there would be a customs border in the Irish Sea?

In the House of Commons Library.

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk...reland-border/

Quote:

Boris Johnson’s plan
When Boris Johnson became Prime Minister he pledged to remove the backstop. He said it was undemocratic and he wanted the Northern Ireland Assembly to agree to any new Withdrawal Agreement. He wanted the whole of the UK to leave the EU’s Customs Union at the end of the transition period, and Northern Ireland to remain part of the UK’s customs territory but to follow EU rules on goods.

This was essentially option A – a special status for Northern Ireland. It meant the customs border would be between Ireland and Northern Ireland.

The EU did not accept all these conditions, but Mr Johnson was able to change the Withdrawal Agreement significantly in respect of Northern Ireland.

The details
Under the terms of the new Withdrawal Agreement, Northern Ireland remains part of the UK customs territory, so Northern Ireland will be included in UK free trade agreements. Northern Ireland will also technically be part of the UK’s VAT area.

In practice, however, Northern Ireland will apply many EU customs rules and there will effectively be a customs and regulatory border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the Irish Sea.

The Northern Ireland Assembly will have an opportunity to vote periodically on whether this arrangement should continue. The first opportunity will be four years after the end of the transition period.

The other major difference is that Mr Johnson’s Agreement for Northern Ireland, unlike the backstop, is no longer temporary. It is, unless the Northern Ireland Assembly votes otherwise, the permanent end state for Northern Ireland.

The level-playing field rules that were part of the backstop are not part of the new Agreement. However, the trade relationship between Great Britain and the EU is still to be agreed; the EU is likely to request that the UK sign up to similar guarantees.

nomadking 16-02-2020 21:13

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

2. In any circumstances in which it would be required, Article 6 of the Protocol establishes a
single UK-EU customs territory, with the details of its operation to be codified by the UK-EU
Joint Committee. Accordingly, Northern Ireland is part of the same customs territory as Great
Britain with no tariffs, quotas, or checks on rules of origin between Great Britain and Northern
Ireland.
The UK will represent itself, including Northern Ireland, at the WTO.

1andrew1 16-02-2020 22:16

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Where's that information from, and is it newer than Hugh's info of 14/1/2020?

TheDaddy 18-02-2020 07:36

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36025027)
Where's that information from, and is it newer than Hugh's info of 14/1/2020?

I'd say that's from October last year...

papa smurf 18-02-2020 08:48

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Looks like our future relationship is going to be a tad frosty.

Hugh 18-02-2020 09:05

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025138)
Looks like our future relationship is going to be a tad frosty.

I thought the "oven ready" deal would keep it warm...

papa smurf 18-02-2020 09:20

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025141)
I thought the "oven ready" deal would keep it warm...

Nah the EU can't be trusted they keep trying to move the goal posts.

Mr K 18-02-2020 09:23

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025143)
Nah the EU can't be trusted they keep trying to move the goal posts.

We're the ones that have left the team and want to play by our own rules...

papa smurf 18-02-2020 09:26

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025144)
We're the ones that have left the team and want to play by our own rules...

I'm not that bothered,i still think we will leave without a deal at the end of the year and go our own way once again.

Hugh 18-02-2020 10:02

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025143)
Nah the EU can't be trusted they keep trying to move the goal posts.

Funnily enough, a pro-Brexit group disagree with you - they say the EU are sticking to what they said originally.

https://facts4eu.org/news/2019_dec_cooking_boris
Quote:

EU’s top priority is “level playing field” obligations to prevent UK becoming more competitive
Statement refers back to Mrs May’s deal in Nov 2018
All previous EU statements and positions stand, with the exception of the Northern Ireland Backstop
Negotiations to be “sequenced” to favour EU agenda
Michel Barnier is back, reappointed as Chief Negotiator
Quote:

What is even more worrying is the EU’s referral back to their position when Mrs May was still Prime Minister. This is because the Withdrawal Agreement being proposed by Boris Johnson is unchanged from Mrs May’s Withdrawal Agreement, and they wished to restate that all their positions from that time still stand.

Chris 18-02-2020 16:05

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
The EU is going to manoeuvre for the most favourable outcome for themselves. It’s a negotiation, that’s what happens. I’m not remotely surprised or bothered by this.

What I do find instructive is the extent to which the EU perceives its interests as deep alignment of UK standards and regulations with theirs, the parliament even going so far as to demand dynamic alignment (ie we adopt their new directives automatically as they are issued, possibly having been consulted as per the Norway model, but without our direct negotiating influence, or veto). It seems clear to me that the EU is aware that much of its regulatory framework makes business uncompetitive, and it only gets away with it because (until now) every major economy in Europe was locked into the same level, but decidedly boggy, playing field.

The UK being unshackled from this gives them a major headache, as does the UK’s starting point in the negotiations, which is that we won’t accept alignment and will accept a looser arrangement with the EU as a result. In other words, we’ve already told them we don’t want very much, and are therefore not going to pay their very high price to get it. In these circumstances the UK’s immovable negotiating deadline pressurises them, not us.

OLD BOY 18-02-2020 16:55

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
It is so predictable that all those remainers who tried to overturn the decision of the electorate and argued that we would never get the EU to agree to the Withdrawal Agreement, and then argued that we'd never be able to re-negotiate the backstop, are now saying we will never get a tariff-free trade deal without signing up to the EU's demands on equivalence and fishing.

Will they never stop being so negative and talking this country down? They never learn from their mistakes, do they?

Hugh 18-02-2020 17:29

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Remainers aren’t saying it, the EU is...

papa smurf 18-02-2020 17:36

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025165)
Remainers aren’t saying it, the EU is...

They're the ones who want us to remain ;)

Sephiroth 18-02-2020 23:35

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Apparently the EU are chucking in the Elgin Marbles alongside the fish!

Hugh 19-02-2020 00:23

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025191)
Apparently the EU are chucking in the Elgin Marbles alongside the fish!

Dont you mean the Parthenon Marbles that were stolen by Lord Elgin? ;)

papa smurf 19-02-2020 07:31

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025191)
Apparently the EU are chucking in the Elgin Marbles alongside the fish!

The EU stole Greece,of course they wan't the artifacts that go with their conquest.

Pierre 19-02-2020 08:39

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025196)
The EU stole Greece,of course they wan't the artifacts that go with their conquest.

Made me chuckle.

Sephiroth 19-02-2020 10:17

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025193)
Dont you mean the Parthenon Marbles that were stolen by Lord Elgin? ;)

Not the point at all. It’s the EU being so far up themselves and the countries being so petty (and greedy for the fish).

---------- Post added at 10:17 ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025196)
The EU stole Greece,of course they wan't the artifacts that go with their conquest.

Didn’t the EU buy Greece? Or was it Germany?

papa smurf 19-02-2020 10:57

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025215)
Not the point at all. It’s the EU being so far up themselves and the countries being so petty (and greedy for the fish).

---------- Post added at 10:17 ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 ----------



Didn’t the EU buy Greece? Or was it Germany?

This is just a typical divorce scenario, ie one side wants custody of the ornaments as well as all the money/ resources;)

Carth 19-02-2020 12:00

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Can I suggest they keep all the Fiats and Citroens while we get to keep the fish?

Hugh 19-02-2020 14:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025215)
Not the point at all. It’s the EU being so far up themselves and the countries being so petty (and greedy for the fish).

---------- Post added at 10:17 ---------- Previous post was at 10:16 ----------



Didn’t the EU buy Greece? Or was it Germany?

Was that after the IMF bought the U.K.?

papa smurf 19-02-2020 14:21

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025226)
Was that after the IMF bought the U.K.?

Sorry can't afford to read that,got anything free?

Hugh 19-02-2020 15:45

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025227)
Sorry can't afford to read that,got anything free?

1967 - https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/1...sterling-1967/

1976 - https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/1...risis-of-1976/

Hope this helps...

papa smurf 19-02-2020 15:51

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025229)

Ah Labour ran out of money for a change;)

Pierre 19-02-2020 17:35

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025226)
Was that after the IMF bought the U.K.?

Who, Tom Cruise!

Damien 19-02-2020 20:12

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025193)
Dont you mean the Parthenon Marbles that were stolen by Lord Elgin? ;)

If we have to start giving back the stuff we 'borrowed' the British Museum is screwed. :shocked::D

---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025215)
[COLOR="Blue"]Not the point at all. It’s the EU being so far up themselves and the countries being so petty (and greedy for the fish).

I don't understand why you wanted to leave the EU so much when every element of negotiation so outrages you. The EU is going to make demands, some will be met and others will be conceded.

Sephiroth 19-02-2020 20:30

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36025245)
If we have to start giving back the stuff we 'borrowed' the British Museum is screwed. :shocked::D

---------- Post added at 20:12 ---------- Previous post was at 20:09 ----------



I don't understand why you wanted to leave the EU so much when every element of negotiation so outrages you. The EU is going to make demands, some will be met and others will be conceded.

I understand your point - but during yhe WA negotiations I was pointing out much of the sentiment evolving here. The EU are making petty demands plus Spain has a veto if they don't like the arrangements for Gibraltar. What's not to outrage? The whole point of Brexit was to regain sovereignty. I personally would like to see Varadkar stiffed and Macron as well - the enemy.

Mr K 19-02-2020 20:51

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025248)
I understand your point - but during yhe WA negotiations I was pointing out much of the sentiment evolving here. The EU are making petty demands plus Spain has a veto if they don't like the arrangements for Gibraltar. What's not to outrage? The whole point of Brexit was to regain sovereignty. I personally would like to see Varadkar stiffed and Macron as well - the enemy.

Your still 'stiffing' everyone and trying to find enemies I see. This is what Brexit was all about, picking a fight because we like that sort of thing. Living in peace and harmony with our neighbours has always irritated us. 'We're better and superior to you' seems to be the argument - we're really not.

Damien 19-02-2020 20:56

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025248)
I understand your point - but during yhe WA negotiations I was pointing out much of the sentiment evolving here. The EU are making petty demands plus Spain has a veto if they don't like the arrangements for Gibraltar. What's not to outrage? The whole point of Brexit was to regain sovereignty. I personally would like to see Varadkar stiffed and Macron as well - the enemy.

It's not a mature way to view international relations or politics. Macron is not the enemy but his interests lie in France and the French economy not ours, so he'll be looking to exploit every advantage he can from the current situation.

In the end what matters is the skill of the negotiators a bit and the cards they have to play the most. It is not up to Macron to help us out. If our hand is so strong then let him talk all he wants because he has no cards to play. If he succeeds in getting an advantage over us then that would only be him having done his job and us failing in ours.

France, Ireland, Germany and the EU. As far as trade goes they're currently on the other side of the table. Once it's all done and dusted then amicability will return and the only people will be upset will be those who seemed to want to leave the EU purely out of spite that other countries exist - and they'll always be unhappy anyway but thankfully they're a very small minority.

Sephiroth 19-02-2020 21:11

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025250)
Your still 'stiffing' everyone and trying to find enemies I see. This is what Brexit was all about, picking a fight because we like that sort of thing. Living in peace and harmony with our neighbours has always irritated us. 'We're better and superior to you' seems to be the argument - we're really not.

Yes - still stiffing; but the same villains as before Brexit.
It's consistency on my part. Most Brexiters want to see those two get got.

As to the rest of your paragraph - it's totally non-sequitur. "Better &* superior" doesn't come into it. It's all about sovereignty and thus not being judged by the ECJ.


---------- Post added at 21:11 ---------- Previous post was at 21:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36025252)
It's not a mature way to view international relations or politics. Macron is not the enemy but his interests lie in France and the French economy not ours, so he'll be looking to exploit every advantage he can from the current situation.

In the end what matters is the skill of the negotiators a bit and the cards they have to play the most. It is not up to Macron to help us out. If our hand is so strong then let him talk all he wants because he has no cards to play. If he succeeds in getting an advantage over us then that would only be him having done his job and us failing in ours.

France, Ireland, Germany and the EU. As far as trade goes they're currently on the other side of the table. Once it's all done and dusted then amicability will return and the only people will be upset will be those who seemed to want to leave the EU purely out of spite that other countries exist - and they'll always be unhappy anyway but thankfully they're a very small minority.

Macron is not the enemy but his interests lie in France and the French economy not ours, so he'll be looking to exploit every advantage he can from the current situation. . We know all that. His demands make him stiffable.


In the end what matters is the skill of the negotiators a bit and the cards they have to play the most. It is not up to Macron to help us out. If our hand is so strong then let him talk all he wants because he has no cards to play. If he succeeds in getting an advantage over us then that would only be him having done his job and us failing in ours.
What does Macron expect us to do? Cave in? Does he want to sell us his poxy Citroens?
His smelly cheese? His wines that are equalled by the New World?


France, Ireland, Germany and the EU. As far as trade goes they're currently on the other side of the table. Once it's all done and dusted then amicability will return and the only people will be upset will be those who seemed to want to leave the EU purely out of spite that other countries exist - and they'll always be unhappy anyway but thankfully they're a very small minority. They ought to think about what will get them in the right position to trade with us not get up our nose. I hope you're not associating me with what I've highlighted in red. Obviously I want a trade deal with them, but those two perfidious individuals are way high on my shit list.

nomadking 19-02-2020 21:14

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
So what exactly has the EU been saying that is even remotely "a mature way to view international relations or politics"?:rolleyes: They're making demands of the UK that no other country would ask, never mind accept.

Mr K 19-02-2020 21:22

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36025257)
So what exactly has the EU been saying that is even remotely "a mature way to view international relations or politics"?:rolleyes: They're making demands of the UK that no other country would ask, never mind accept.

We need to find the solutions, not the EU, our choice to leave. I'm sure we thought about all this before we left, and aren't suddenly panicking with no plan...

Sephiroth 19-02-2020 21:36

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025258)
We need to find the solutions, not the EU, our choice to leave. I'm sure we thought about all this before we left, and aren't suddenly panicking with no plan...

What - they don't want to sell us their Skodas, BMWs, Mercs and the rest? They don't want our intelligence and defence cooperation? Don't we both need to find solutions and certainly not be publicly needled by those perfidious individuals?

Mr K 19-02-2020 21:40

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025260)
What - they don't want to sell us their Skodas, BMWs, Mercs and the rest? They don't want our intelligence and defence cooperation? Don't we both need to find solutions and certainly not be publicly needled by those perfidious individuals?

That's what make me laugh most about Brexiteers, they're all driving German cars ! They are going to cost quite a bit more now. Never mind we can always resurrect the Austin Allegro....

Pierre 20-02-2020 08:06

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025261)
That's what make me laugh most about Brexiteers, they're all driving German cars ! They are going to cost quite a bit more now.

That’s the whole point of doing a trade deal. But if the EU don’t want a deal and want to increase the cost their cars, there’s plenty of choice out there.

I’ve recently ditched my two Audi’s for two new Fords.

Sephiroth 20-02-2020 08:12

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025261)
That's what make me laugh most about Brexiteers, they're all driving German cars ! They are going to cost quite a bit more now. Never mind we can always resurrect the Austin Allegro....

Typical lefty misinformation. Whatever makes you laugh, though.


Carth 20-02-2020 08:49

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025261)
Never mind we can always resurrect the Austin Allegro....

Hey . . nothing (much) wrong with the old Allegro . . well mebbe the steering wheel was a bit odd . . but it was a car I could fix myself without the need of expensive computer equipment, it didn't have a myriad of pointless sensors that failed and required costly replacing before you could drive it again, a full exhaust cost about £50, and I could change the bloody headlight bulb in 5 minutes :D

. . the awful Talbot Horizon was a different kettle of fish though :shocked:


ooops, sorry to mention fish ;)

jonbxx 20-02-2020 08:54

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36025276)
That’s the whole point of doing a trade deal. But if the EU don’t want a deal and want to increase the cost their cars, there’s plenty of choice out there.

I’ve recently ditched my two Audi’s for two new Fords.

Which Fords did you go for;

Fiesta - made in Germany
Focus - made in Germany
B-Max - made in Germany
C-Max - made in Germany
S-Max - made in Spain
Galaxy - made in Spain
Kuga - made in Spain
Ecosport - made in Romania

Pierre 20-02-2020 09:04

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Never mind we can always resurrect the Austin Allegro...
well if Labour hadn't single-handedly killed the UK car industry, we might have had something better by now.

---------- Post added at 09:04 ---------- Previous post was at 09:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36025281)
Which Fords did you go for;

Fiesta - made in Germany
Focus - made in Germany
B-Max - made in Germany
C-Max - made in Germany
S-Max - made in Spain
Galaxy - made in Spain
Kuga - made in Spain
Ecosport - made in Romania

Mustang v8 5.0 convertible, made in the USA

Ford Ranger Wildtrack, made in the USA

Chris 20-02-2020 09:08

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
There are three decent Nissan models built in the UK that won’t attract import duties no matter what. Or there’s the Astra if you have no self respect at all.

jonbxx 20-02-2020 09:17

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36025282)
well if Labour hadn't single-handedly killed the UK car industry, we might have had something better by now.

---------- Post added at 09:04 ---------- Previous post was at 09:00 ----------



Mustang v8 5.0 convertible, made in the USA

Ford Ranger Wildtrack, made in the USA

Import duties from US;
  • 22% for trucks (including pickups, when the cargo area is more than 50% of the length of the wheelbase)
  • 10% for passenger cars (this includes pickup trucks, when the cargo area is less than 50% of the length of the wheelbase)

(of course we pay the same either directly or indirectly for all the BMW SUVs as they are made in the US)

Sephiroth 20-02-2020 09:44

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36025281)
Which Fords did you go for;

Fiesta - made in Germany
Focus - made in Germany
B-Max - made in Germany
C-Max - made in Germany
S-Max - made in Spain
Galaxy - made in Spain
Kuga - made in Spain
Ecosport - made in Romania

They should be gagging for a trade deal with us.

Hugh 20-02-2020 11:30

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025287)
They should be gagging for a trade deal with us.

Yes, that has been said before*...

For your edification...

https://publications.parliament.uk/p...is/379/379.pdf (page 9)
Quote:

In the view of the German automotive industry, everything must be done to maintain the free movement of goods and services between Britain and the other EU countries in the future. But there is a clear priority: the cohesion and the integrity of the EU are both a foundation and precondition for reaching a reasonable understanding.

Around 56 per cent of UK vehicle exports go to Europe; only about 7 per cent of European vehicle exports come to the UK. In a no deal scenario, German manufacturers would still be able to export to the rest of the EU, tariff free; those in the UK would not.
Quote:

Whilst a “no deal” scenario would certainly be damaging to the automotive sector in many EU countries, especially Germany, the impact on the UK automotive sector would be far greater than that on each of the remaining EU Member States

(*wasn't true then, either... ;) )

jonbxx 20-02-2020 11:56

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Joking aside, as the UK is not really a primary manufacturing base (we build, not make) and the way the car industry across Europe works with components moving around all over the place before being assembled in to a car, there are some interesting side issues in whatever upcoming deal extremely relevant to the car industry...

As well as tariffs, rules of origin are a huge deal for that industry. Cumulation is a hell of a subject all of its' own...

Hugh 20-02-2020 12:49

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36025295)
Joking aside, as the UK is not really a primary manufacturing base (we build, not make) and the way the car industry across Europe works with components moving around all over the place before being assembled in to a car, there are some interesting side issues in whatever upcoming deal extremely relevant to the car industry...

As well as tariffs, rules of origin are a huge deal for that industry. Cumulation is a hell of a subject all of its' own...

Yup, that's mentioned on page 20 of the link I posted.
Quote:

Free trade deals and rules of origin

42. The priority on trade deals for the industry is the rolling over of existing EU trade deals so the UK can continue to enjoy their enhanced trading arrangements. The Government has announced its objective of establishing “continuity arrangements” for these agreements. This is not necessarily a straightforward matter, due to the rules of origin provisions in these and other trade deals. Typically, an EU FTA will require 60 per cent of the content of a product to be locally sourced to be included under the terms of the agreement. Were this provision to be simply rolled over in a UK-South Korea deal, UK manufactured vehicles would not contain sufficient UK content to qualify. At present their typical UK content for rules of origin purposes amounts to no more than 20–25 per cent of the vehicle. Unless the terms of existing FTAs are altered, the UK would not benefit from the tariff-free access that they provide. The Government will therefore need to renegotiate every existing EU FTA and reach agreement on a new threshold for rules of origin, or agree that, for the purposes of the agreement, EU content can count as UK and vice versa.

Pierre 20-02-2020 13:07

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36025285)
Import duties from US;
  • 22% for trucks (including pickups, when the cargo area is more than 50% of the length of the wheelbase)
  • 10% for passenger cars (this includes pickup trucks, when the cargo area is less than 50% of the length of the wheelbase)

(of course we pay the same either directly or indirectly for all the BMW SUVs as they are made in the US)

The latter, 10% or not, the price was not prohibitive. The Mustang was only the same price as a mid-range BMW 3 series.

The pick up looks great and was only a couple of grand more expensive than the Mustang.

If tariffs were slapped on Audi's and BMW's they would start to look much less attractive.

---------- Post added at 13:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025292)
Yes, that has been said before*...

For your edification...

https://publications.parliament.uk/p...is/379/379.pdf (page 9)


(*wasn't true then, either... ;) )

You can look at it other ways.

The UK is BMW's 4th biggest market

https://www.statista.com/statistics/...-of-bmw-group/

The UK is Audi's 4th biggest market

https://www.best-selling-cars.com/br...les-worldwide/

The UK is the 4th Biggest Market for Mercedes Benz

https://www.statista.com/outlook/100...-globalRevenue

You see the pattern?

Regardless of export volumes back and forth. The UK is the 4th biggest market for German cars and slapping tarriffs on them would hurt them.

papa smurf 20-02-2020 13:28

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36025301)
The latter, 10% or not, the price was not prohibitive. The Mustang was only the same price as a mid-range BMW 3 series.

The pick up looks great and was only a couple of grand more expensive than the Mustang.

If tariffs were slapped on Audi's and BMW's they would start to look much less attractive.

---------- Post added at 13:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 ----------



You can look at it other ways.

The UK is BMW's 4th biggest market

https://www.statista.com/statistics/...-of-bmw-group/

The UK is Audi's 4th biggest market

https://www.best-selling-cars.com/br...les-worldwide/

The UK is the 4th Biggest Market for Mercedes Benz

https://www.statista.com/outlook/100...-globalRevenue

You see the pattern?

Regardless of export volumes back and forth. The UK is the 4th biggest market for German cars and slapping tarriffs on them would hurt them.

That's a lot of drug dealers:(

Hugh 20-02-2020 13:59

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36025301)
The latter, 10% or not, the price was not prohibitive. The Mustang was only the same price as a mid-range BMW 3 series.

The pick up looks great and was only a couple of grand more expensive than the Mustang.

If tariffs were slapped on Audi's and BMW's they would start to look much less attractive.

---------- Post added at 13:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:51 ----------



You can look at it other ways.

The UK is BMW's 4th biggest market

https://www.statista.com/statistics/...-of-bmw-group/

The UK is Audi's 4th biggest market

https://www.best-selling-cars.com/br...les-worldwide/

The UK is the 4th Biggest Market for Mercedes Benz

https://www.statista.com/outlook/100...-globalRevenue

You see the pattern?

Regardless of export volumes back and forth. The UK is the 4th biggest market for German cars and slapping tarriffs on them would hurt them.

And the EU is our biggest market - It accounted for 54.8% of UK-built vehicle exports.

What do you think will hurt more - losing your 4th biggest market (around 6-9% of your market), or losing your biggest market (losing around 55% of your market)?

Pierre 20-02-2020 15:31

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025305)
And the EU is our biggest market - It accounted for 54.8% of UK-built vehicle exports.

What do you think will hurt more - losing your 4th biggest market (around 6-9% of your market), or losing your biggest market (losing around 55% of your market)?

It would hurt both, it’s not a question of who can hurt each other more.

As was the original argument, the CEO of BMW, VW, Audi & Mercedes most likely could not give a toss about U.K. imports into the EU. They are concerned with their sales only and their workers.

The German chancellor is not accountable to the EU, She/He is accountable to their voters and if they fail to get a deal and that adversely impacts the German motor industry they will know about it.

And that goes for all EU leaders and their respective economies, they can put on a united front but they also have to look after themselves.

It is in everyone’s interest to have good trading relationship, and a good relationship in general.

So there will be much brinkmanship in 2020, I’m sure an agreement will be sorted.

My own personal view though, is that access to U.K. fishing waters will be sacrificed on the alter of any future relationship.

Hugh 20-02-2020 16:52

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36025309)
It would hurt both, it’s not a question of who can hurt each other more.

As was the original argument, the CEO of BMW, VW, Audi & Mercedes most likely could not give a toss about U.K. imports into the EU. They are concerned with their sales only and their workers.

The German chancellor is not accountable to the EU, She/He is accountable to their voters and if they fail to get a deal and that adversely impacts the German motor industry they will know about it.


And that goes for all EU leaders and their respective economies, they can put on a united front but they also have to look after themselves.

It is in everyone’s interest to have good trading relationship, and a good relationship in general.

So there will be much brinkmanship in 2020, I’m sure an agreement will be sorted.

My own personal view though, is that access to U.K. fishing waters will be sacrificed on the alter of any future relationship.

Germany’s leading industry (and automotive) representatives disagree with you...

https://www.politico.eu/article/germ...t-over-brexit/
Quote:

German industrialists have reiterated that retaining the integrity of the single market is their goal. “Defending the single market, a key European project, must be the priority for the European Union,” Dieter Kempf, president of the German Federation of Industries lobby group which represents around 100,000 companies, told the Observer.

This echoes similar concerns from the German Employers Association and an earlier intervention from the country’s powerful automotive lobby which said the integrity of the EU must come first in talks over the Brexit settlement.

Carth 20-02-2020 18:33

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
(from above)

Quote:

“Defending the single market, a key European project, must be the priority for the European Union,”

the integrity of the EU must come first

Well they would say that wouldn't they :p: and to be honest, if they said anything different they'd be complete muppets.

I'm sure the 'gang of two' (Germany/France) will be wanting to push the hard line to save face . . wouldn't want the other (lower) member states getting ideas above their station eh ;)

Pierre 20-02-2020 18:41

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025319)
Germany’s leading industry (and automotive) representatives disagree with you...

https://www.politico.eu/article/germ...t-over-brexit/

From an article 2 and a half years ago, before we’d left, before we even had a transition agreement.

An absolute age, in regards to this process.

The German automotive industry is facing tough headwinds, it would be foolish to make things worse.

https://www.cityam.com/decline-in-ge...n-its-economy/

Business is business.

Sephiroth 20-02-2020 19:45

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Looks like that perfidious Vardkar has at last been stiffed.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...F-il-Fine-Gael

Might help the negotiations.


papa smurf 20-02-2020 20:27

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025341)
Looks like that perfidious Vardkar has at last been stiffed.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...F-il-Fine-Gael

Might help the negotiations.


don't worry the EU will order new votes untill it gets the result it wants.

Hugh 20-02-2020 20:32

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36025342)
don't worry the EU will order new votes untill it gets the result it wants.

The poll had nothing to do with the EU...

Mr K 20-02-2020 20:32

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025341)
Looks like that perfidious Vardkar has at last been stiffed.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...F-il-Fine-Gael

Might help the negotiations.


Varadkar or Sinn Fein, who do you prefer?

Sephiroth 20-02-2020 20:43

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025343)
The poll had nothing to do with the EU...

Where's your sense of humour?


---------- Post added at 20:43 ---------- Previous post was at 20:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025344)
Varadkar or Sinn Fein, who do you prefer?

Obviously not Varadkar. Who ever else becomes their PM will have the opportunity to avoid perfidy.

papa smurf 20-02-2020 20:47

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025343)
The poll had nothing to do with the EU...

i didn't mention poll.

Pierre 20-02-2020 21:00

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36025344)
Varadkar or Sinn Fein, who do you prefer?

Irrelevant, unless you are eligible to vote in the Irish elections.

I prefer, whoever the Irish vote for.

Hugh 22-02-2020 22:01

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
From the gov.uk website - our new "blue" British passport*.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/i...urn-next-month
Quote:

Britons will be able to travel with a blue passport when the traditional colour returns for the first time in almost 30 years.

The distinctive blue cover will be re-introduced now the UK has left the EU, and will replace burgundy passports which were gradually rolled out from 1988.

The first new passports will be issued and delivered early next month. Full introduction will be phased in and from mid-2020 all new passports will be blue.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1582408445

Looks black** to me - I suppose I just have to believe it’s blue more...

*made in Poland by a French company

(**Same colour as my passport from the 80’s, which I still have (with the corner cut off).

Chris 22-02-2020 22:13

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
The pre-EU passport has always been described as blue even though it was a very dark shade (I think it’s what you call “midnight blue” ... my first car was that colour). I don’t think there’s much (any) controversy here. For those who value the symbolism of the colour change, reverting to the same very dark shade of the pre-EU passport will be much more in line with their hopes than some of the lighter blue mock-ups that appeared in the media when the change was first announced.

Sephiroth 22-02-2020 22:15

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
My blue passport with serial number 200200A also contains the autographs of the 1966 England football team, including Bobby Moore, Alan Ball, etc.

I think it's right to further differentiate ourselves from the EU in this way.

Btw, I learnt at school maths that differentiation was the opposite of integration. Funny that.

Damien 22-02-2020 22:29

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
I actually prefer the black tone to the blue. Looks more sleek and professional.

Pierre 22-02-2020 22:56

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Could be pink with yellow stripes for all I care.

Damien 23-02-2020 08:55

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36025488)
Could be pink with yellow stripes for all I care.

Nah, that would look awful.

I think they should have gone more radical though. The ones in Norway are amazing: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2...assport-design

The symbolism of changing the passport should have been to something altogether new rather than reverting to the past although I don't really care that much.

Hugh 23-02-2020 10:02

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36025483)
The pre-EU passport has always been described as blue even though it was a very dark shade (I think it’s what you call “midnight blue” ... my first car was that colour). I don’t think there’s much (any) controversy here. For those who value the symbolism of the colour change, reverting to the same very dark shade of the pre-EU passport will be much more in line with their hopes than some of the lighter blue mock-ups that appeared in the media when the change was first announced.

From the gov.uk passport application site - even they aren’t sure... :D

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1582452070

Black is blue, and war is peace, ignorance is strength, Airstrip One has always had a blue passport, etc... ;)

btw, here’s the mock up Theresa May showed people..

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1582452393

Now that’s blue.

jonbxx 24-02-2020 09:01

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36025511)
Nah, that would look awful.

I think they should have gone more radical though. The ones in Norway are amazing: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2...assport-design

The symbolism of changing the passport should have been to something altogether new rather than reverting to the past although I don't really care that much.

I like the Swiss passport - https://www.ofs.ch/products-services...tems/passport/

And the New Zealand one - https://images.app.goo.gl/eUcM9KUQMCcnQqtd8

In other news, the CBI have published what they would like to see from an ongoing relationship with the EU - https://www.cbi.org.uk/articles/the-...-relationship/

Sephiroth 26-02-2020 17:58

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
I see that positions are hardening.

UK is saying that fishing rights are not part of the trade negotiations. The EU is adamant on the opposite.

UK is saying we will be sovereign and not subject to any EU rules. The EU is adamant that their rules/standards will be the reference point.

We talk about our "European friends"; they talk about our "British friends". Isn't it time that this patronising language changed - especially from our side?


Hugh 27-02-2020 09:26

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...10riyo?ocid=sf
Quote:

Boris Johnson is poised to abandon part of the Brexit deal he signed with Brussels setting up a furious row with the EU when the trade talks get underway next month.

The Government will publish its negotiating mandate later today after Number 10 cast serious doubts over whether it will stick to promises it made in the political declaration it signed alongside the withdrawal agreement.

Downing Street sources suggested the declaration the Prime Minister signed setting out the framework for a future trade deal had been usurped by the Tories’ manifesto, which helped the party secure a thumping general election victory.

On Wednesday, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said the “political declaration was agreed alongside the withdrawal agreement and sets out aspirations and parameters for the upcoming negotiations on the future relationship”. The spokesman added: "The political declaration is clear that this will be based on a free trade agreement."

While not legally-binding, the political declaration is an international agreement signed between the European Commission and the UK Government.

papa smurf 27-02-2020 09:45

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36025761)

:bigcry:

ooh le sob, le sob.;)

Carth 27-02-2020 13:24

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Maybe it's only me, but I always thought both sides would rip up parts of any 'agreement' in order to stop the other side from having a perceived advantage.

In the history of the world, I doubt there's ever been a plan drawn up that remained unchanged from conception to completion.

Anyway, I much prefer the word Haggling instead of Negotiating :p:

Hugh 27-02-2020 14:26

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
That would be an incorrect assumption - Agreements/Treaties last for (an agreed) fixed term, or until superseded by another Agreement/Treaty.

If any country (not just the UK) decided that they could abrogate International Agreements when they wanted to, the Agreements/Treaties would be worthless, so why would any other country sign any Treaties or Agreements with that county?

Here is the UKG "Future Relationship" document - https://assets.publishing.service.go...ith_the_EU.pdf

A couple of points it makes are
Quote:

6. The parameters for that future relationship are set out in the UK / EU Political Declaration of 17 October. As that Declaration makes clear, a Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) should be at its core. This Agreement should be on the lines of the FTAs already agreed by the EU in recent years with Canada and with other friendly countries
Quote:

83. The Agreement should include provisions for governance arrangements that are appropriate to a relationship of sovereign equals, drawn from existing Free Trade Agreements, such as those the EU has with Japan and Canada
Each of those treaties took around 7 years, and they didn't have anywhere near the amount of Services to trade as the UK does - the UK is stating it has to be done by the end of the year.

Chris 27-02-2020 14:45

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Meanwhile, el gov has been extremely specific in Parliament today about how there will be no alignment, no continuing EU access to British fishing waters and if it doesn’t look like the outline of a deal is emerging by June, it is prepared to walk away and focus on preparing for WTO.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-51650961

Sephiroth 27-02-2020 15:02

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
[COLOR="Navy"][/[QUOTE][/well done the Guvmin.

On Hugh’s point about Canada taking 7 years, the difference is that we start in perfect alignment. It’ll be the EU’s pig headedness that will put a spanner in the works.

QUOTE]COLOR]

jonbxx 27-02-2020 15:26

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Here's an interesting blog post by David Allen Green on the hazards of moving away from the non-binding commitments made in the Political Declaration - https://davidallengreen.com/2020/02/...l-declaration/

Hugh 27-02-2020 15:42

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
[QUOTE=Sephiroth;36025770][COLOR="Navy"][/
Quote:

[/well done the Guvmin.

On Hugh’s point about Canada taking 7 years, the difference is that we start in perfect alignment. It’ll be the EU’s pig headedness that will put a spanner in the works.

QUOTE]COLOR]
I bet you don't try that line with your wife - "we started off agreeing, I'm being reasonable and you're being pig-headed!"... :D

Julian 27-02-2020 15:53

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
[QUOTE=Hugh;36025773]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025770)
[COLOR="Navy"][/I bet you don't try that line with your wife - "we started off agreeing, I'm being reasonable and you're being pig-headed!"... :D

I thought the name SWMBO was there for a reason..... ;)

nomadking 27-02-2020 16:04

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Agreeing to try and come to a further agreement, does not mean simply surrendering to whatever the EU says.
It's the EU trying to overturn these.

Quote:

It must also ensure the sovereignty of the United Kingdom and the protection of its internal market, while respecting the result of the 2016 referendum including with regard to the development of its independent trade policy and the ending of free movement of people between the Union and the United Kingdom.
...71. The Parties should cooperate bilaterally and internationally to ensure fishing at sustainable levels, promote resource conservation, and foster a clean, healthy and productive marine environment, noting that the United Kingdom will be an independent coastal state.
...
75. The Parties recognise the importance of global cooperation to address issues of shared economic, environmental and social interest. As such, while preserving their decision-making autonomy, the Parties should cooperate in international fora, such as the G7 and the G20, where it is in their mutual interest, including in the areas of:

Carth 27-02-2020 16:25

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
Just a thought regarding the fishing stuff . .

Would it be better for the UK if the EU could catch their own?

or

Would it be better for the UK if we caught it all and SOLD it to the EU?

asking for a friend ;)

Sephiroth 27-02-2020 16:39

Re: [Updated] The UK’s future relationship with the EU
 
[QUOTE=Hugh;36025773]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36025770)
[COLOR="Navy"][/I bet you don't try that line with your wife - "we started off agreeing, I'm being reasonable and you're being pig-headed!"... :D

Irrelevant. But one way of dodging the obvious point.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:46.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum