Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:28

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36109025)
That was awful, he must be gone surely?

Never seen anything this bad before.

OLD BOY 12-01-2022 12:31

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

Damien 12-01-2022 12:32

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

Haha come on. You must be on a wind up at this point surely?

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:33

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

It wasn’t a work meeting, it was people meeting after work to socialise, relax, and have drinks.

Quote:

"Hi all,

"After what has been an incredibly busy period we thought it would be nice to make the most of the lovely weather and have some socially distanced drinks in the No10 garden this evening.

"Please join us from 6pm and bring your own booze!"

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:33

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?

It's too late for technicalities, Old Boy.

Perceptions count and the public and his Party have found him guilty and want his head.

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:37

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109032)
I think that’s all he has to prove. It wasn’t a party, it was working time out in the fresh air rather than cooped up in the office.

What’s safer - working inside or working outside?


Do you two take it in turns, or can you both fit up there at the same time?

OLD BOY 12-01-2022 12:38

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36109033)
Haha come on. You must be on a wind up at this point surely?

Just sayin’…. :D

I still want to see the result of the inquiry before passing judgement, but I agree it’s not a good look.

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:43

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109037)
Do you two take it in turns, or can you both fit up there at the same time?

Damien's right, they're both in a gentle wind-up mode!

Hugh 12-01-2022 12:44

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...2&d=1641991417

https://twitter.com/garius/status/14...860695041?s=21

1andrew1 12-01-2022 12:47

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36109038)
Just sayin’…. :D

I still want to see the result of the inquiry before passing judgement, but I agree it’s not a good look.

Are you disappointed that he has now admitted to being at the party?

Pierre 12-01-2022 13:07

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36109034)
It wasn’t a work meeting, it was people meeting after work to socialise, relax, and have drinks.

Much like the family Pierre did with friends and neighbours at the same time.

Damien 12-01-2022 13:09

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109046)
Much like the family Pierre did with friends and neighbours at the same time.

You aren't the ones who made it illegal to do so.

Pierre 12-01-2022 13:18

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36109048)
You aren't the ones who made it illegal to do so.

I know, and that's the reason he'll probably not get out of this but I wouldn't criticise as that would make me a hypocrite.

Along, I'm sure, with millions of others that also ignored the rules that are currently putting the boot in.

Halcyon 12-01-2022 13:31

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Send him packing immediately!


The fact he dismissed the idea of telling the truth for so long shows how much he contemplates lying to us all.


This is not how a leader of a country should be.

---------- Post added at 13:31 ---------- Previous post was at 13:29 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.




Are you one of the people he has obviously brain washed?
It was a party to reward his staff. You don't have alcohol in a business meeting!

BenMcr 12-01-2022 13:35

Re: That No.10 Christmas Party
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36109050)
I know, and that's the reason he'll probably not get out of this but I wouldn't criticise as that would make me a hypocrite.

Along, I'm sure, with millions of others that also ignored the rules that are currently putting the boot in.

I'm sure the majority of the UK did follow the rules, and have the ability to rightly outraged that those in charge didn't.

---------- Post added at 13:35 ---------- Previous post was at 13:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36109024)
A workplace meeting was within the rules.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halcyon (Post 36109051)
Are you one of the people he has obviously brain washed?
It was a party to reward his staff. You don't have alcohol in a business meeting!

Indeed. My work had literally everyone they could working from home including lots of people that previously didn't have the option.

https://www.virginmedia.com/corporat...work-from-home

All office gatherings were banned unless it was essential and a 40+ meeting would not have met that criteria. Anything that needed a 40+ attendance would have been a video conference.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:22.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum