![]() |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
I was getting 0.9MB - 1.0MB on uTorrent last night on a 10Mb/s line (and no, I am not getting MB and Mb confused ;) ).
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
virgin own their own network, all of their backhaul linking up cable customers. an isp like zen has to pay BT wholesale to get the traffic from the customers house to zen's network, so zen has to pay BT wholesale to shift the traffic across the country. You are reffering to internet transit which is something different. to give you an idea how expensive BT backhaul is entanet said they can send traffic to australia for about 10% of the cost they have to pay BT to send customer traffic to them. Isp's such as sky and BE bypass these costs as they dont use BT wholesale backhaul, although they then have to pay for their own backhaul it is significantly cheaper hence they more competitive, VM also has their own backhaul. |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
obviously they need to pay to upgrade capacity etc. but my point was the costs are not comparable to other isps who apply this kind of traffic shaping especially when you consider the revenue VM get as well.
The only conclusion I have come to is that investment in the backhaul has become significantly constrained in favour of profits and subsidising tv losses hence the need to traffic shape, time will tell if the introduction of docsis3 eases the need to shape (it should do), if they protocol shape then its probably just to cram as many customers as possible onto the service. |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Here's something that we can only hope will make VM remove traffic shaping, that's sky making their max package truly unlimited. Hopefully VM are taking note
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
His reply was "Truely Unlimited, Like Ours" |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread....sid=1&pageNo=2
Quote:
3 755 ms 709 ms 470 ms wapk-t2cam1-b-v100.inet.ntl.com [80.1.170.237] 4 660 ms 848 ms 823 ms walt-dpim1-2-coc-1-gw.service.virginmedia.net [62.255.80.165] 5 679 ms 612 ms 498 ms pop-bb-b-so-020-0.inet.ntl.com [213.105.174.238] Quote:
---------- Post added at 00:18 ---------- Previous post was yesterday at 23:56 ---------- Oh Dear.. Quote:
Source is Ignition. |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Eugh you've got to be kidding.
|
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
Is that lot active now? |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
Now we have to wait to see if they extend the current trials and/or roll it out alltogether. |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
I wonder if since thats an old wow post (14/03/08) same time as that which must not be mentioned ;), they have covered it up now and no DPMI shows up on hop tracerts would explain the extra hop i keep seeing on any reverse traceroute but dont see that hop on a normal outbound tracert :S.
http://www.giganews.com/line_info.html |
Re: Application Throttling/Management
Quote:
Much as those of us using newsgroups don't like it, at the end of the day it's a non-realtime service with minimal impact to being throttled when the network is struggling. Throttling realtime critical data resulting in poor service for customers who (in most cases) won't know any better and will start calling faults to be told this is normal seems like commercial suicide for a residential ISP. Do we have any reason why they're targetting gamers specifically? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum