Originally Posted by mmm (Post 35771026)

The main thing that usually confuses is that you must NOT be logged in to the modem to get to those screens

Originally Posted by dragon (Post 35771043)

Load-Balanced, "Bonded" or Just used individually?.

I'm currently using an LRT224 to balance which works on threaded transfers but some sites/applications hate the sudden IP change.

I did think of "bonding" mine but it would require a lot of Resources to pull off, I've done it before on slow DSL lines and it worked reasonably well but it tends to be CPU intensive on faster connections, prob need X86 boxes at each end.

Then of course there's the bandwidth requirements at the end doing the bonding, It would be doing ~378Mbit/s in + 378Mbit/s out (excluding overheads) depending on how the bandwidth is billed and how much your provider charges for bandwidth usage that could hurt.

Originally Posted by dragon (Post 35771043)

Load-Balanced, "Bonded" or Just used individually?.

I'm currently using an LRT224 to balance which works on threaded transfers but some sites/applications hate the sudden IP change.

I did think of "bonding" mine but it would require a lot of Resources to pull off, I've done it before on slow DSL lines and it worked reasonably well but it tends to be CPU intensive on faster connections, prob need X86 boxes at each end.

Then of course there's the bandwidth requirements at the end doing the bonding, It would be doing ~378Mbit/s in + 378Mbit/s out (excluding overheads) depending on how the bandwidth is billed and how much your provider charges for bandwidth usage that could hurt.

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35771046)

and nowhere have I said that you needed to log into the router. My instructions clearly indicate that you need to go to the router's ip and click on router status. It isn't ambiguous because 3 other forum users have followed those instructions recently and had no issues at all.

Originally Posted by mmm (Post 35771070)

@Hom3r - are you also on trial 200 config, it is difficult to get faster with wireless, despite what marketing hype about wireless speeds say!

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35770987)

Click this link and scroll down to the fifth post (mine) so you can see what you are looking for. If you are using the shub in router mode (which I am sure you will be) go to http://192.168.0.1 (you can click that) it will take you to the router login page which is the first pic on that link I gave you and you are looking for the Operation Config tab.

Originally Posted by arcimedes (Post 35771216)

It makes sense as they still haven't changed the number of my upstream channels to be more than one but I've given up on that one until something goes wrong.

Originally Posted by JPAC (Post 35770781)

For some maybe.

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35771217)

Why on earth would they want to be stressing non-upgraded areas?

To me that's almost incomprehensible!

Igni will no doubt be onto this shortly.

Originally Posted by Ignitionnet (Post 35771288)

There are no single upstream areas, must be an issue there.

I'll let VM know - this will both potentially cause issues in the area and skew results.

---------- Post added at 16:02 ---------- Previous post was at 14:49 ----------

Okay - you definitely shouldn't be on a single upstream channel. That is not acceptable and is not the correct architecture, it's a fault that should be fixed.