Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   120M : Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33694172)

DABhand 14-02-2015 12:35

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35759192)
No, they have a drive in their computer already, otherwise it wouldn't be able to start up.

Seriously thats being pedantic now, of course there will be a system drive, but for the sake of storing games on an HDD it, in the example you gave an external drive would be the best option.


Quote:

No, what's silly is your suggestion people download a game, play it once, delete it, then download it again the next day.
Again being pedantic, nobody gets a game plays it just for one day, deletes it and then downloads the next day.

People will download it play it if they really like it, after a few days they finished it, and then delete it, with the option in the future to download and play again.

Lets not talk about silly scenarios that wouldn't happen shall we Qas.

---------- Post added at 12:35 ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35759226)
I torrent with the best of them and i dont come anyway near 200gb a day. If you think you are going to fill your hdd up, buy a bigger hdd or nas to store your movies on. I think you are being a bit OTT though. I have got friends who have got hundreds of games sitting on their hdd.

I don't.

I was replying to Qas silly suggestion. Please do read the full conversation first :)

It is easy to download 200GB in 4-5 hrs with a good constant 17MB/s if you have the top speed on offer and you can get it.

Even at half the speed up to 10hrs.

There is plenty of people who act like a seedbox and download everything, because they sell the stuff to their mates etc, so all the movies, albums and games are constantly grabbed and seeded because most are on tough torrent sites where a good sharing ratio is needed to stay there.

Kushan 14-02-2015 13:02

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DABhand (Post 35759264)
It is easy to download 200GB in 4-5 hrs with a good constant 17MB/s if you have the top speed on offer and you can get it.

Even at half the speed up to 10hrs.

There is plenty of people who act like a seedbox and download everything, because they sell the stuff to their mates etc, so all the movies, albums and games are constantly grabbed and seeded because most are on tough torrent sites where a good sharing ratio is needed to stay there.

You're sort of contradicting yourself here. If someone is downloading at 17MB/s all day every day but is concerned with their share ratio, then they have a very serious problem - their upload speed is, at best, about 1.5MB/s and that will get traffic managed quite harshly through the day.

Also anyone that serious about downloading wouldn't be torrenting the stuff. In any case, only a handful of people are going to be that bad.

I consider myself a fairly heavy downloader and according to Virgin, I only downloaded ~850GB between August and December.

Jumping 14-02-2015 13:08

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Talk about getting away from upstream channel discussion :D

My connection been fine so any work either haven't started on my part of Uddingston or its finished which I don't think as still on 16QAM and this never changed.

qasdfdsaq 14-02-2015 13:30

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DABhand (Post 35759264)
Seriously thats being pedantic now, of course there will be a system drive, but for the sake of storing games on an HDD it, in the example you gave an external drive would be the best option.

No, you're being obtuse and changing your story.

You were the one who suggested people had to re-download their games 30 times a month if they wanted to play them more than once.

Quote:

Again being pedantic, nobody gets a game plays it just for one day, deletes it and then downloads the next day.
Then why did you say exactly that to try back up your case?

Quote:

I was replying to Qas silly suggestion. Please do read the full conversation first :)
Perhaps you should heed your own advice.

DABhand 16-02-2015 00:56

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan (Post 35759271)
You're sort of contradicting yourself here. If someone is downloading at 17MB/s all day every day but is concerned with their share ratio, then they have a very serious problem - their upload speed is, at best, about 1.5MB/s and that will get traffic managed quite harshly through the day.

Also anyone that serious about downloading wouldn't be torrenting the stuff. In any case, only a handful of people are going to be that bad.

I consider myself a fairly heavy downloader and according to Virgin, I only downloaded ~850GB between August and December.

Was giving an example :) Don't take it as what happens with heavy users.

---------- Post added at 00:56 ---------- Previous post was at 00:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35759274)
No, you're being obtuse and changing your story.

You were the one who suggested people had to re-download their games 30 times a month if they wanted to play them more than once.

And you were the one who said they do it every day did you not? I think you did. Which is why I replied to you and said it was Pedantic.


Quote:

Then why did you say exactly that to try back up your case?


Perhaps you should heed your own advice.
You haven't changed one bit Qas, you only talk about the previous post, but never the posts in a whole conversation. So you end up replying about something that is now a larger conversation, but you only talk about the last few sentences.

You were the one who brought up the HDD as a storage medium to stop them downloading games, and of course the silly 1 day example, and I told you that would be silly as people would fill them quite easily.

qasdfdsaq 16-02-2015 22:38

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DABhand (Post 35759605)
And you were the one who said they do it every day did you not? I think you did. Which is why I replied to you and said it was Pedantic.

No, you did, now you're trying to lie your way out of it now it's been totally discredited.

Quote:

You haven't changed one bit Qas, you only talk about the previous post, but never the posts in a whole conversation.
No, once again that's exactly what you're doing. I replied to an earlier post which you're now pretending does not exist, and trying to change the conversation to take my responses out of context.

Quote:

You were the one who brought up the HDD as a storage medium to stop them downloading games, and of course the silly 1 day example
Your example, not mine. You're looking mighty silly right now, discrediting yourself and blaming me for it!

Kushan 16-02-2015 22:41

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
So about dem upstream channels...

DABhand 19-02-2015 09:12

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Yeah they are rubbish from Uddingston :\

Always T3 errors now and again unfortunately.

Martin_D 18-03-2015 16:04

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
2 Attachment(s)
Going down hill again slow speeds at night.

Attachment 26003

Attachment 26004

Martin_D 29-04-2015 09:18

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
1 Attachment(s)
If it's not utilisation what is it

Attachment 26077

Martin_D 18-12-2015 22:58

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
Had some work done on CMTS am on but don't know what it means

I asked over on the VM forum and this is the reply I got

I've checked that ticket reference and I can see it relates to FPM work. It says you were put on to FPM2. It was done on a node by node basis.

I'm no network guru but I believe it stands for forward path matrix. Maybe someone else can shed more detail on this.

The one you provided was linked to your CMTS but not cable. Your cable was done on reference C00684703 but it was the same work anyway.

Ignitionnet 19-12-2015 23:04

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
It's nothing interesting. Routine stuff. Doesn't in and of itself affect service.

Martin_D 13-01-2016 17:59

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
My Broadband is down and the repair time is shocking

F004155238 Fix Time: January 20th by 1pm

vm_tech 13-01-2016 18:18

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
I would imagine that's a noise ticket and your fault is unrelated but they are presuming it is

General Maximus 13-01-2016 18:20

Re: Uddingston ML5 2 Upstream Channels
 
yeah, I have seen stupid estimates like that before where they don't know what the problem is and they give themselves a tonne of leeway just in case. I wouldn't be surprised if it got fixed in the early of the morning.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:03.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum