![]() |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
|
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
|
Re: Vmng300
Not really that simple
I just upgraded to a product that DIDN'T include a superhub :) |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
|
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
|
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
Haha VM consumer confidence and advice at it's finest :) |
Re: Vmng300
Ahem.I suggest we play nicely with one another.
Oh you are.Seriously be careful how you phrase things as not everyone is as good humoured as Ben. |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
I get completely that some people don't like or want the SuperHub. Fine. However, what I get annoyed with is that when the 100Mbit is advertised as coming with the SuperHub, people then complain that they then get installed with the SuperHub. You chose to upgrade to 100Mbit knowing what the product was. |
Re: Vmng300
Partly,
But VM have attempted to portray the lie that ONLY the superhub is compatible with 100MB VM should let people use existing equipment if they are happy with it in the face if multitudes of complaints of poor superhub performance tbh |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
|
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
The superhub is not a bad bit of kit. For the majority of customers the superhub works great. There are some customers putting the superhub through extreme usage in some cases and once modem only mode is enabled this should resolve the problems they have had. I have had the the superhub for a while and not had any issues at all with it. Even transferring a 4gb file over my network didn't cause it to crash out or anything. |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
As and when connections: Three android smartphones, two laptops (one 11g & one 11n). No wonder my extreme usage upset the two superhubs I had during those three weeks of hell.... I don't know how many devices the average household has these days, but I'd be very very surprised if my usage was atypical. Cheers Grim |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
My mac and laptop are connected and running 24/7 and last night I moved a 4gb file from the mac to the laptop and the superhub coped fine. Maybe some superhubs are faulty. |
Re: Vmng300
Quote:
Virgin Media have only brought this public opinion on themselves, IMO, as they've been less than forthcoming with firmware updates, empty promises of 'modem only' modes, and in some cases breaking the kit with their beta updates. Managing an Active Directory with approx 13,000 live accounts brings me into contact with a lot of people needing advice. They all get told the same thing : Avoid the Superhub at all costs. VM missed the boat when it came to restoring confidence in their kit. My opinion will be forever jaded where this Superhub is concerned and if they insist on carrying it forward as a business decision then I will just sit on my VMNG300 modem with gigabit router and wait for a) other suppliers to catch up in headline speed, or b) cancel my VM service if my VMNG300 fails and can't be replaced. However, if 100MB on a VMNG300 is possible, which it plainly is, then I will take that as an option all day long. |
Re: Vmng300
Only some Stephen?
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum