Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Lifestyle (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=22)
-   -   The existence of God (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33647435)

Gary L 03-04-2009 16:09

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34767989)
Yes, thank you, it also confirms what I said earlier about my accepting some of your theory but you accepting none of mine.

Next? :)

Next is it wasn't my theory to agree to.

:rolleyes:

:)

Russ 03-04-2009 16:11

Re: The existence of God
 
Post #319, in particular this bit...

Quote:

If anything Russ, it's me partly accepting yours. not you accepting mine.
...you're partly accepting my theory, yet you call it all baloney, apparently I'm not accepting your theory even though it was never your theory to start with...I think I need a lie down...

papa smurf 03-04-2009 16:12

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34767663)
Some suggest the Big Bang was the moment God said "Let there be light" - that's the theory I prefer :)

at the time of the big bang there was no light because there was no stars they came much later .

Gary L 03-04-2009 16:19

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34767995)
Post #319, in particular this bit...



...you're partly accepting my theory, yet you call it all baloney, apparently I'm not accepting your theory even though it was never your theory to start with...I think I need a lie down...

Partly accept. you used the word accept. not me :)
Let's move on.

Hugh 03-04-2009 16:20

Re: The existence of God
 
The amusing thing (imho) is the that Big Bang hypothesis was first proposed by a Catholic Priest (who was also a scientist).

---------- Post added at 17:20 ---------- Previous post was at 17:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34768003)
Partly accept. you used the word accept. not me :)
Let's move on.

arf arf.....

Your post #319 "If anything Russ, it's me partly accepting yours. not you accepting mine"

Gary L 03-04-2009 16:20

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 34767998)
at the time of the big bang there was no light because there was no stars they came much later .

If the bang was sufficient enough. wouldn't that be where the light emerged from?

xocemp 03-04-2009 16:22

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34767995)
Post #319, in particular this bit...

...you're partly accepting my theory, yet you call it all baloney, apparently I'm not accepting your theory even though it was never your theory to start with...I think I need a lie down...

I refer you to:
Quote:

Originally Posted by foreverwar (Post 34767970)
It would seem to me that someone is arguing for the sake of arguing, rather than supporting a proposition.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34767969)
I don't have a theory as such. I'm questioning the other theories.
You said you prefered the theory of the Big Bang was the moment God said "Let there be light" after I told you the theory about the Big Bang. it wasn't my theory you were partly accepting.

So we have a better understanding of your stance on the topic, can you tell us to which theory you sway more to, or, if indeed you take no side to a theory, how about sharing your theory or thoughts on the subject or parts thereof.

As for me, I'm with Darwin :)

Gary L 03-04-2009 16:28

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by xocemp (Post 34768009)
So we have a better understanding of your stance on the topic, can you tell us to which theory you sway more to, or, if indeed you take no side to a theory, how about sharing your theory or thoughts on the subject or parts thereof.

I would and could but you can't see my posts.

lucy7 03-04-2009 16:30

Re: The existence of God
 
Im confused, to all these posts now...........anyone else?

I have even confused my self with my own posts I think!!!

Russ 03-04-2009 16:30

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34768012)
Russ and I want to move on.

Excuse me! I'm quite happy to point out where you've double backed on yourself!

edit: ahh, you've removed that part now. Wise move... ;)

xocemp 03-04-2009 16:32

Re: The existence of God
 
Don't avoid the question Gary, you know very well that I can see your posts.

Your thoughts/theory or to which theory you subscribe even if in part would be nice, rather than you picking holes in others thoughts.

Would the honorable gentleman supply us with a thought or theory?

Gary L 03-04-2009 16:35

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34768017)
Excuse me! I'm quite happy to point out where you've double backed on yourself!

edit: ahh, you've removed that part now. Wise move... ;)

? removed? are you saying that I've deleted something? as far as I'm aware I haven't altered or deleted any of my posts on this subject?

Russ 03-04-2009 16:36

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34768022)
? removed? are you saying that I've deleted something? as far as I'm aware I haven't altered or deleted any of my posts on this subject?

Yes, you edited your post. I won't quote the rest of it but as admins, we see much that is hidden, although to be fair it wasn't hidden when I quoted it.

Gary L 03-04-2009 16:39

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by xocemp (Post 34768019)
Don't avoid the question Gary, you know very well that I can see your posts.

Your thoughts/theory or to which theory you subscribe even if in part would be nice, rather than you picking holes in others thoughts.

Would the honorable gentleman supply us with a thought or theory?

No. unless you're saying that I have to?

---------- Post added at 17:39 ---------- Previous post was at 17:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34768023)
Yes, you edited your post. I won't quote the rest of it but as admins, we see much that is hidden, although to be fair it wasn't hidden when I quoted it.

The only post I edited was #338.
I quoted it wrong, but didn't alter either what was quoted or my original reply.

Russ 03-04-2009 16:41

Re: The existence of God
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34768025)
The only post I edited was #338.

Yes, that's what I was talking about

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary L (Post 34768025)
I quoted it wrong, but didn't alter either what was quoted or my original reply.

I took exception to it because you presumed to put words in my mouth, that's why I quoted it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum