Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

mrmistoffelees 01-09-2021 23:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091752)
I don't know what you're sniffing, but I don't do desperation.

No deal meant hard border on paper. What would actually have happened we don't know. Ireland would have been the desperate party, with the prospect of its economy being trashed and being forced by its darling EU to put up a hard border. We would be looking on with some amusement - or at minimum 52% of us.

We appear to have moved from desperation to delusional. No it meant hard border full stop. As I said Ireland may have had to erect the border but potential global trading partners would have held the U.K. wholly accountable.

Let’s not forget, Ireland would have had the EU in its corner

1andrew1 01-09-2021 23:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091752)
I don't know what you're sniffing, but I don't do desperation.

No deal meant hard border on paper. What would actually have happened we don't know. Ireland would have been the desperate party, with the prospect of its economy being trashed and being forced by its darling EU to put up a hard border. We would be looking on with some amusement - or at minimum 52% of us.

He's right I'm afraid, Seph, there is a distinct odor of desperation in the air.

It is WTO membership that would require a hard border. If the UK had ventured down the route of no deal then all its trade globally would have tariffs which would wreck its economy as companies fled the UK. (As it is, it is just the slowly deflating tyre effect that the country is enjoying.) Ireland would have counted the US and the EU nations on its side. Who would have supported the UK?

mrmistoffelees 01-09-2021 23:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Parallels can be drawn between may/Boris in Brexit and trump/Biden Afghanistan

Riddle me this? as Biden could have overruled Trumps Afghan antics he didn’t

Boris could of quite easily taken out on no deal, he frequently stated that no deal was better than a bad deal, yet here we are with a bad deal. So, why didn’t he ?

Sephiroth 01-09-2021 23:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091755)
We appear to have moved from desperation to delusional. No it meant hard border full stop. As I said Ireland may have had to erect the border but potential global trading partners would have held the U.K. wholly accountable.

Let’s not forget, Ireland would have had the EU in its corner

You shouldn't reject out of hand that Ireland would not implement an order from the EU to erect a hard border. Remember, their economy would be trashed. It would have been very interesting.

You seem to be obsessed with everyone saying it was the UK's fault. You have no way of knowing that. A strong, resolute government (we don't have that) would have its ducks lined up and in any case, which countries outside the EU and US would care? They'd be eating their popcorn same as us.

mrmistoffelees 01-09-2021 23:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091760)
You shouldn't reject out of hand that Ireland would not implement an order from the EU to erect a hard border. Remember, their economy would be trashed. It would have been very interesting.

You seem to be obsessed with everyone saying it was the UK's fault. You have no way of knowing that. A strong, resolute government (we don't have that) would have its ducks lined up and in any case, which countries outside the EU and US would care? They'd be eating their popcorn same as us.


Had we gone no deal who else’s fault could it have been???

As a Brexiteer you get funnier by the second, first of all it doesn’t matter if we upset the EU now it doesn’t matter if we upset the EU & the US

1andrew1 02-09-2021 00:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091759)
Parallels can be drawn between may/Boris in Brexit and trump/Biden Afghanistan

Riddle me this? as Biden could have overruled Trumps Afghan antics he didn’t

Boris could of quite easily taken out on no deal, he frequently stated that no deal was better than a bad deal, yet here we are with a bad deal. So, why didn’t he ?

I think you'll find many Brexiters willing to blame Theresa May but they will be evasive as a Raab when this question is put to them. I would say it is best discussed over a beer but that's a bit hard these days. https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/wethe...rtage-24883987

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 00:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091763)
Had we gone no deal who else’s fault could it have been???

As a Brexiteer you get funnier by the second, first of all it doesn’t matter if we upset the EU now it doesn’t matter if we upset the EU & the US

It's not the point. You seem obsessed with this. But if you need an answer - then it would have been Theresa May's fault. The UK would have slid out from the blame game because, as I said, only the EU and US would be up in arms.

On your second point, all the upset by the EU and US would be posing.
The US would get over it (the special relationship) and the EU would have a problem with Eire.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 00:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091765)
I think you'll find many Brexiters willing to blame Theresa May but they will be evasive as a Raab when this question is put to them. I would say it is best discussed over a beer but that's a bit hardy these days. https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/wethe...rtage-24883987


I’m still waiting for answer to the question I asked regarding why we haven’t taken the EU to court as some believe they’re breaking international law….

Re the beer running out ? Oh well never mind, just a shame all of his pubs haven’t caught fire. It’s alright though the staff that would be out of jobs could just retrain as hgv drivers

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 00:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091765)
I think you'll find many Brexiters willing to blame Theresa May but they will be evasive as a Raab when this question is put to them. I would say it is best discussed over a beer but that's a bit hard these days. https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/wethe...rtage-24883987

At least I'm not evasive.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 00:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091766)
It's not the point. You seem obsessed with this. But if you need an answer - then it would have been Theresa May's fault. The UK would have slid out from the blame game because, as I said, only the EU and US would be up in arms.

On your second point, all the upset by the EU and US would be posing.
The US would get over it (the special relationship) and the EU would have a problem with Eire.


I’ll accept the above being possible in a far of crayola based reality

Why didn’t Boris take us out on no deal? He had the opportunity

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 00:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091769)
I’ll accept the above being possible in a far of crayola based reality

Why didn’t Boris take us out on no deal? He had the opportunity

Indeed.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 00:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091770)
Indeed.

I thought you weren’t evasive ?

I’d genuinely like to understand why you think he didn’t do it ?

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 00:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091772)
I thought you weren’t evasive ?

I’d genuinely like to understand why you think he didn’t do it ?

Because he didn't have the balls to do what was right.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 00:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091773)
Because he didn't have the balls to do what was right.


I see

Therefore, as we continue meandering down this never ending discussion of politics Can we safely say you won’t be blaming May anymore as per your earlier post? Quite odd really, May has more balls than Boris, at least she was prepared to do what she believed in. Unless of course Boris didn’t believe in no deal all along ???

I’ll bid you good night and say thank you for a pleasant discussion, no doubt the shenanigans will continue tomorrow

Carth 02-09-2021 02:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Oh Christ I hope not . . .

OLD BOY 02-09-2021 08:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091758)
He's right I'm afraid, Seph, there is a distinct odor of desperation in the air.

It is WTO membership that would require a hard border. If the UK had ventured down the route of no deal then all its trade globally would have tariffs which would wreck its economy as companies fled the UK. (As it is, it is just the slowly deflating tyre effect that the country is enjoying.) Ireland would have counted the US and the EU nations on its side. Who would have supported the UK?

You are right to say that WTO membership requires a hard border, but Seph is right when he says that this could be on paper only. The EU was given options on how to regulate goods going in and out through the use of technology, but the EU was not playing ball.

Boris accepted a bad deal rather than a no deal because firstly it got Brexit done without too much more aggro, but he also decided that any problems arising could be dealt with after the event, when we would be in a position of strength.

This is only just starting to play out, but I can see him making the argument in the not too distant future that we will give the EU notice of termination, and he will explain that the existing deal was not working. Without the nonsense of having a hung parliament and with the advantage of having left the EU, plus the prospect of this unfolding chaos of EU malice under this bad deal, he will get more of the public on side.

1andrew1 02-09-2021 10:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091788)
You are right to say that WTO membership requires a hard border, but Seph is right when he says that this could be on paper only. The EU was given options on how to regulate goods going in and out through the use of technology, but the EU was not playing ball.

Boris accepted a bad deal rather than a no deal because firstly it got Brexit done without too much more aggro, but he also decided that any problems arising could be dealt with after the event, when we would be in a position of strength.

This is only just starting to play out, but I can see him making the argument in the not too distant future that we will give the EU notice of termination, and he will explain that the existing deal was not working. Without the nonsense of having a hung parliament and with the advantage of having left the EU, plus the prospect of this unfolding chaos of EU malice under this bad deal, he will get more of the public on side.

Sadly I don't believe that technology exists yet so the border would be more than a paper one. What is your source for
Quote:

Originally posted by OLD BOY
The EU was given options on how to regulate goods going in and out through the use of technology, but the EU was not playing ball.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091783)
Oh Christ I hope not . . .

Somehow I don't believe you. You wouldn't want to be anywhere else on a cold September's day. :angel:

tweetiepooh 02-09-2021 11:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36091725)
What would have happened with Northetn Ireland then? In other news Weatherspoons has run out of beer, this is getting serious now!!

From the BBC report the stuff that they are running out could hardly be called beer. (e.g. Coors).

heero_yuy 02-09-2021 11:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36091800)
From the BBC report the stuff that they are running out could hardly be called beer. (e.g. Coors).

Only if they run out of Stella could it be called serious. :beer: :D

1andrew1 02-09-2021 11:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36091800)
From the BBC report the stuff that they are running out could hardly be called beer. (e.g. Coors).

Agreed - I think we may have finally found a Brexit benefit after all. :D

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 11:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091788)
You are right to say that WTO membership requires a hard border, but Seph is right when he says that this could be on paper only. The EU was given options on how to regulate goods going in and out through the use of technology, but the EU was not playing ball.

Boris accepted a bad deal rather than a no deal because firstly it got Brexit done without too much more aggro, but he also decided that any problems arising could be dealt with after the event, when we would be in a position of strength.

This is only just starting to play out, but I can see him making the argument in the not too distant future that we will give the EU notice of termination, and he will explain that the existing deal was not working. Without the nonsense of having a hung parliament and with the advantage of having left the EU, plus the prospect of this unfolding chaos of EU malice under this bad deal, he will get more of the public on side.

Hang on, it wasn't a hung parliament when Boris was elected. He could of quite easily taken us out on no deal. So the question i asked last night to Sephi, I'll ask to you. Why did Boris not take us out on no deal?

1andrew1 02-09-2021 11:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091804)
Hang on, it wasn't a hung parliament when Boris was elected. He could of quite easily taken us out on no deal. So the question i asked last night to Sephi, I'll ask to you. Why did Boris not take us out on no deal?

I'm afraid that some are so beholden to the hung Parliament myth that they overlook the fact that Boris could have taken us out without a deal. In the rest of the negotiations, they lean heavily into the "EU wouldn't allow us" line as a get-out clause but that's simply not possible with this question!

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 12:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091806)
I'm afraid that some are so beholden to the hung Parliament myth that they overlook the fact that Boris could have taken us out without a deal. In the rest of the negotiations, they lean heavily into the "EU wouldn't allow us" line as a get-out clause but that's simply not possible with this question!

Tis a wonder with that we possess so many armchair politicians on CF who are able to raise complex political arguments but seem to fall short at providing an answer to two very simple questions.

A wonder indeed.......

Carth 02-09-2021 13:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Could Boris just have picked up the phone, rang that Barnier chap and said

"Right I've had enough, no more games, I'm buggering off, bye" ?

or would it have had to be agreed by everyone who had a say in it . . including those who were totally against a no deal :shrug:

Plenty of people were willing to scupper any kind of deal using delaying tactics.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 13:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091833)
Could Boris just have picked up the phone, rang that Barnier chap and said

"Right I've had enough, no more games, I'm buggering off, bye" ?

or would it have had to be agreed by everyone who had a say in it . . including those who were totally against a no deal :shrug:

Plenty of people were willing to scupper any kind of deal using delaying tactics.

Nope, Boris had the ability & the numbers when the Tories took their landslide election victory to take us out on no deal.

1andrew1 02-09-2021 14:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091835)
Nope, Boris had the ability & the numbers when the Tories took their landslide election victory to take us out on no deal.

It's somewhat perplexing that those professing a need for greater sovereignty don't understand the difference between a hung Parliament and a Parliament with an 80-seat majority.

---------- Post added at 13:20 ---------- Previous post was at 13:06 ----------

i think this thoughtful article neatly summarises where the country is at on Brexit.
Quote:

Happily for the Tories, there is no pressure from the opposition. Keir Starmer wants to woo back voters who abandoned his party because they felt it had stopped listening to them on the whole suite of issues relating to the referendum, from immigration control to the democratic principle of honouring the result once the votes had been counted. That relationship will not be fixed with lectures on the enduring folly of Brexit. Labour sees no route back to power treading the European side in arguments that Johnson can frame in terms of national dignity.

British politics still has remainers and leavers, but those labels tend to describe emotional attachments, not policy prescriptions. Pro-Europeans are not interested in fixing Johnson’s deal, which they see as irredeemable; and leavers cannot concede that their fundamental premise was flawed. Neither side is yet ready to work with the banal reality that Brexit is an unspectacular failure: neither triumph, nor apocalypse. It is the damp smell in British politics that can be endured, but not quite ignored. The longer it is left untreated, the more expensive it will be to fix.

But there is no realistic conversation about the relationship Britain should have with the rest of Europe, if not the one it has now; and the relationship it has now is the product of avoiding realistic debate for decades. As a result, the government – and perversely the opposition too – is committed to the task of finding a purpose in something that will keep proving itself pointless.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...elves-empty-eu

Carth 02-09-2021 14:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091836)
It's somewhat perplexing that those professing a need for greater sovereignty don't understand the difference between a hung Parliament and a Parliament with an 80-seat majority

Was that an 80 seat majority for Tory rule, or an 80 seat majority for 'no deal'?

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 14:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091775)
I see

Therefore, as we continue meandering down this never ending discussion of politics Can we safely say you won’t be blaming May anymore as per your earlier post? Quite odd really, May has more balls than Boris, at least she was prepared to do what she believed in. Unless of course Boris didn’t believe in no deal all along ???

I’ll bid you good night and say thank you for a pleasant discussion, no doubt the shenanigans will continue tomorrow

You really aren't paying attention, MrM.

May is blamed for the Withdrawal Agreement which included the NI Protocol.
Boris is blamed for not having the balls to unpick/undo this one way or another.

As for shenanigans, they are not of my making.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 14:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091839)
Was that an 80 seat majority for Tory rule, or an 80 seat majority for 'no deal'?


Mon dieu... the desperation.....

Carth 02-09-2021 14:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091841)
Mon dieu... the desperation.....

ahh, another that doesn't understand . . . ever considered lorry driving?

1andrew1 02-09-2021 15:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091839)
Was that an 80 seat majority for Tory rule, or an 80 seat majority for 'no deal'?

We elect parties not 'no deals' in the UK.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 15:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091842)
ahh, another that doesn't understand . . . ever considered lorry driving?


I couldn’t take the pay cut ;)

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 15:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091843)
We elect parties not 'no deals' in the UK.

Please forgive me, but you've just made a totally irrelevant statement. The sentence makes no sense.

Carth 02-09-2021 15:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091845)
Please forgive me, but you've just made a totally irrelevant statement. The sentence makes no sense.

No I think he's right. What does an '80 seat majority' mean . . ?

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 15:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091840)
You really aren't paying attention, MrM.

May is blamed for the Withdrawal Agreement which included the NI Protocol.
Boris is blamed for not having the balls to unpick/undo this one way or another.

As for shenanigans, they are not of my making.

And good afternoon to you too

Any withdrawal agreement had to contain provisions to protect the peace in Northern Ireland that is a simple fact.

Boris knew what no deal meant, for all his gibberish & lunacy he’s not stupid.

Shenanigans are fun ;)

Carth 02-09-2021 15:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Shenanigans are better fun than sitting staring out of the window wondering if it will start to rain when/if I get the lawn mower out :D

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 15:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091848)
Shenanigans are better fun than sitting staring out of the window wondering if it will start to rain when/if I get the lawn mower out :D

Get a robotic lawnmower ;)

1andrew1 02-09-2021 15:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091845)
Please forgive me, but you've just made a totally irrelevant statement. The sentence makes no sense.

Which bit would you like clarification on?

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 15:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091847)
And good afternoon to you too

Any withdrawal agreement had to contain provisions to protect the peace in Northern Ireland that is a simple fact.

Boris knew what no deal meant, for all his gibberish & lunacy he’s not stupid.

Shenanigans are fun ;)

No it didn't - at least not to the extent of the straightjacket negotiated by May. The Protocol was negotiated on the EU's terms not on any basis of mutual negotiation. The EU was egged on by the perfidious Varadkar, anxious to protect his economy and nothing else. There were other available solutions to keeping the border open that the EU bluntly refused to entertain.

Looking forward while we rebuild after Covid, we can diverge including on GB/NI trade; and we should and take no legalistic nonsense from the EU.

The EU is a bad egg.


---------- Post added at 14:26 ---------- Previous post was at 14:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091851)
Which bit would you like clarification on?

None - your sentence made no sense.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 15:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091852)
No it didn't - at least not to the extent of the straightjacket negotiated by May. The Protocol was negotiated on the EU's terms not on any basis of mutual negotiation. The EU was egged on by the perfidious Varadkar, anxious to protect his economy and nothing else. There were other available solutions to keeping the border open that the EU bluntly refused to entertain.

Looking forward while we rebuild after Covid, we can diverge including on GB/NI trade; and we should and take no legalistic nonsense from the EU.

The EU is a bad egg.


---------- Post added at 14:26 ---------- Previous post was at 14:25 ----------



None - your sentence made no sense.

Wahey !!!!!!

How else could a hard border have been prevented ? The much vaunted technological route was quickly dismissed as the technology is approx five years away.

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 15:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091851)
Which bit would you like clarification on?

Nothing. The sentence makes no sense so doesn't need clarification. You may wish to post what you really meant to say in words that do make sense. For example:

"We elect people to Parliament, usually from a particular party that we support in one way or another. Parliament votes on draft laws presented to it by government. Sometimes, government executes policies without further reference to Parliament and this can be subject to legal challenge (and has been).

From that, if it was what you meant, who knows what Parliament would have done with a No Deal decision.

But Boris didn't have the balls to try this.


1andrew1 02-09-2021 15:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091854)
Wahey !!!!!!

How else could a hard border have been prevented ? The much vaunted technological route was quickly dismissed as the technology is approx five years away.

Exactly. I'm still waiting for Old Boy to post a link to this working technology he keeps on citing. Alas, he's thrown his 10p's worth in and then fled more quickly than a Yodel courier at Christmas. :D

Carth 02-09-2021 15:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091855)
>snip< . . Parliament votes on draft laws presented to it by government. Sometimes, government executes policies without further reference to Parliament and this can be subject to legal challenge (and has been).

From that, if it was what you meant, who knows what Parliament would have done with a No Deal decision.

But Boris didn't have the balls to try this.


I think the amount of 'Shenanigans' (;)) by remain orientated people in the previous few years would have shown him it wasn't a route that would be cleared anytime soon :D

1andrew1 02-09-2021 15:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091857)
I think the amount of 'Shenanigans' (;)) by remain orientated people in the previous few years would have shown him it wasn't a route that would be cleared anytime soon :D

That makes no sense. Article 50 had been triggered so the countdown to no deal was ticking.

Carth 02-09-2021 16:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091859)
That makes no sense.

Just trying to fit in Andrew, lots of irrelevant waffle about something that happened ages ago, and some of us have already put behind us ;)

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 16:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36091857)
I think the amount of 'Shenanigans' (;)) by remain orientated people in the previous few years would have shown him it wasn't a route that would be cleared anytime soon :D

So Boris isn't capable of getting his own party into line? Well, why no leadership contest to replace him ?

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 16:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091862)
So Boris isn't capable of getting his own party into line? Well, why no leadership contest to replace him ?

Dunno.

joglynne 02-09-2021 16:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Maybe whoever wants to take the lead in the future knows that doing so now would buy them a poison chalice.

1andrew1 02-09-2021 17:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joglynne (Post 36091864)
Maybe whoever wants to take the lead in the future knows that doing so now would buy them a poison chalice.

Why? Surely they will be playing a leading role in delivering us to the sunny uplands.

Unshackled from the burdens of Johnson's immigration policy, they will be able to devise an immigration policy that works for the country and helps fill Wetherspoons with lagers and supermarkets with great British produce.

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 17:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by joglynne (Post 36091864)
Maybe whoever wants to take the lead in the future knows that doing so now would buy them a poison chalice.

An interesting point. There are crunch points coming.
31-October is one when the 3 month grace on NI expires; the court cases whenever they are re-invoked will be another.

The EU holds the trade agreement over the UK's head if we default on the NI Protocol and what's more the EU decides on whether or not the UK has defaulted.

So, the wobble point now is GB/NI trade. My understanding is that the UK intends to honour the customs border in the Irish sea, though the necessary systems appear not to be ready. However the meat products trade is likely to remain the flash point on which someone needs to bend over. I don't think Boris has the balls to stand firm after the grace extension finishes. So expect the EU to get difficult and pretend that they were always reasonable.


mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 17:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091866)
An interesting point. There are crunch points coming.
31-October is one when the 3 month grace on NI expires; the court cases whenever they are re-invoked will be another.

The EU holds the trade agreement over the UK's head if we default on the NI Protocol and what's more the EU decides on whether or not the UK has defaulted.

So, the wobble point now is GB/NI trade. My understanding is that the UK intends to honour the customs border in the Irish sea, though the necessary systems appear not to be ready. However the meat products trade is likely to remain the flash point on which someone needs to bend over. I don't think Boris has the balls to stand firm after the grace extension finishes. So expect the EU to get difficult and pretend that they were always reasonable.



AKA when two organisations try to reach an economic agreement the org with the biggest economic clout generally gets to dictate the terms.

Still, I'm sure our newly agreed or soon to be agreed trade deal with the mighty economy that is New Zealand will make significant inroads into any issues we may face. Long way for the lorry drivers mind you.

Chris 02-09-2021 17:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
On the contrary - dictation only occurs when there is a gross imbalance of power or influence. At all other times there is negotiation, and give and take, and in any situation as complex as this one, size isn’t everything. The significance of individual parts of the deal, even the relatively small ones, can come to dominate for all sorts of reasons.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 17:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36091868)
On the contrary - dictation only occurs when there is a gross imbalance of power or influence. At all other times there is negotiation, and give and take, and in any situation as complex as this one, size isn’t everything. The significance of individual parts of the deal, even the relatively small ones, can come to dominate for all sorts of reasons.


Which in this case due to economic 'power' between the EU & the UK there is. There has been a negotiation, the EU let us have some bits, but on the bits they really wanted i would hazard a guess they got their way. Just IMHO

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 17:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091867)
AKA when two organisations try to reach an economic agreement the org with the biggest economic clout generally gets to dictate the terms.

Still, I'm sure our newly agreed or soon to be agreed trade deal with the mighty economy that is New Zealand will make significant inroads into any issues we may face. Long way for the lorry drivers mind you.

Sure, but that's no reason to be ruled by them - hence Brexit.

mrmistoffelees 02-09-2021 17:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sephiroth (Post 36091870)
sure, but that's no reason to be ruled by them - hence brexit.

bwah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

papa smurf 02-09-2021 18:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091849)
Get a robotic lawnmower ;)

And put the gardener out of a job:shocked:

1andrew1 02-09-2021 18:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36091873)
And put the gardener out of a job:shocked:

There's always an HGV to be driven.

Taf 02-09-2021 18:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A food order arrived in a big box today (the missus decided to pamper herself). Picked and packed in France last evening. Here with us this afternoon.

Brexit problems?

1andrew1 02-09-2021 19:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36091877)
A food order arrived in a big box today (the missus decided to pamper herself). Picked and packed in France last evening. Here with us this afternoon.

Brexit problems?

There should not be any at this stage. We're currently treating EU imports exactly the same as we did when we were an EU member state, so we are not inspecting them.

The new Brexit rules and inspections will commence from 1st October. You could compare and contrast by ordering a similar box in October and report back.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/webinars...-great-britain

OLD BOY 02-09-2021 20:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091804)
Hang on, it wasn't a hung parliament when Boris was elected. He could of quite easily taken us out on no deal. So the question i asked last night to Sephi, I'll ask to you. Why did Boris not take us out on no deal?

Boris may have won the election with a stunning majority, but there was still nervousness in the party about leaving without a deal. It was also clear that a lot of people outside of Parliament wanted a deal. So my guess is he took the easier option of signing up to a deal so we could get out when he said we would, rather than delay leaving in order to make the necessary preparations.

I am sure it was Boris himself who said the deal was not great, but it would be easier to amend or ditch it once Brexit had been achieved. And the way the EU nonsense is playing out, I think he will be able to make the argument that a no deal is better than a bad deal, with the evidence laid out for all to see.

jfman 02-09-2021 20:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091893)
Boris may have won the election with a stunning majority, but there was still nervousness in the party about leaving without a deal. It was also clear that a lot of people outside of Parliament wanted a deal. So my guess is he took the easier option of signing up to a deal so we could get out when he said we would, rather than delay leaving in order to make the necessary preparations.

I am sure it was Boris himself who said the deal was not great, but it would be easier to amend or ditch it once Brexit had been achieved. And the way the EU nonsense is playing out, I think he will be able to make the argument that a no deal is better than a bad deal, with the evidence laid out for all to see.

Historical revisionism at it’s finest here, OB. Top drawer stuff.

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 20:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091893)
Boris may have won the election with a stunning majority, but there was still nervousness in the party about leaving without a deal. It was also clear that a lot of people outside of Parliament wanted a deal. So my guess is he took the easier option of signing up to a deal so we could get out when he said we would, rather than delay leaving in order to make the necessary preparations.

I am sure it was Boris himself who said the deal was not great, but it would be easier to amend or ditch it once Brexit had been achieved. And the way the EU nonsense is playing out, I think he will be able to make the argument that a no deal is better than a bad deal, with the evidence laid out for all to see.

.. if he can regain his balls.

OLD BOY 02-09-2021 20:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091847)
And good afternoon to you too

Any withdrawal agreement had to contain provisions to protect the peace in Northern Ireland that is a simple fact.

Boris knew what no deal meant, for all his gibberish & lunacy he’s not stupid.

Shenanigans are fun ;)

This is another fallacy. If a hard border was put in place, it would simply mean that the importing and exporting of goods could not take place. There is no reason why there shouldn’t be free movement of people, though.

jfman 02-09-2021 20:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091897)
This is another fallacy. If a hard border was put in place, it would simply mean that the importing and exporting of goods could not take place. There is no reason why there shouldn’t be free movement of people, though.

How ironic.

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 21:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36091898)
How ironic.

Not at all. There is a case to be made for free movement as long as the rules to keep out/deport riff-raff are used.

OLD BOY 02-09-2021 21:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091854)
Wahey !!!!!!

How else could a hard border have been prevented ? The much vaunted technological route was quickly dismissed as the technology is approx five years away.

I don’t know where you get that from. The problem isn’t related to any current inability for such technology to work. The main difficulty is that both jurisdictions have systems that do not talk to each other. How much easier would it be if for example, if you could raise an export health certificate in Northern Ireland or from other parts of the UK and to transmit this seamlessly across to the EU system? It’s just another IT project, not some pipe dream that cannot be implemented due to a lack of existing capability.

It would require an application programming interface, similar to what has already been put in place for New Zealand lamb exports. Defra claims that such a system could be up and running within ten weeks.

You guys are throwing everything negative at this to try to prove that Brexit won’t work, and you add to that your group ridicule and baiting to try to silence those with an alternative viewpoint. Typical left-wing tactics, always used when losing an argument. Why can some of you not engage in intelligent discussion rather than all this schoolboy idiocy?

I would just like to remind you that we are out of the EU and there will be no turning back. Now we have to look at the best ways of making this work, like it or not. It’s what we as a country voted for, after all.

---------- Post added at 20:32 ---------- Previous post was at 20:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091862)
So Boris isn't capable of getting his own party into line? Well, why no leadership contest to replace him ?

There are still remainers in the Conservative Party who would have voted against a no deal.

And besides which, you had all these opponents lining up to suggest that the country didn’t vote for a no deal - and the last thing Boris would have wanted was a legitimate charge that he had been undemocratic.

No, this deal either has to be made to work in a sensible manner, or he will have to prove to thinking people that the deal was a bad one and should be ditched.

---------- Post added at 20:36 ---------- Previous post was at 20:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091869)
Which in this case due to economic 'power' between the EU & the UK there is. There has been a negotiation, the EU let us have some bits, but on the bits they really wanted i would hazard a guess they got their way. Just IMHO

This appears to be a complete failure to understand that countries enter into trade deals for mutual benefit. It is not a Goliath and David contest. David can simply decide not to agree and walk away. No stones thrown.

---------- Post added at 20:38 ---------- Previous post was at 20:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36091894)
Historical revisionism at it’s finest here, OB. Top drawer stuff.

I think your memory leaves things to be desired, jfman. Champagne problems?

1andrew1 02-09-2021 21:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36091894)
Historical revisionism at it’s finest here, OB. Top drawer stuff.

Agreed. Citing willful optimism as your source doesn't cut it for me.

As a reminder, Johnson did not say that the deal was not great. He said it was “a good deal for the whole of Europe”.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...nouncement-evg

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 21:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091906)
Agreed. Citing willful optimism as your source doesn't cut it for me.

As a reminder, Johnson did not say that the deal was not great. He said it was “a good deal for the whole of Europe”.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...nouncement-evg

I think that idiot even called it a "fantastic deal".

1andrew1 02-09-2021 22:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091900)
And besides which, you had all these opponents lining up to suggest that the country didn’t vote for a no deal - and the last thing Boris would have wanted was a legitimate charge that he had been undemocratic.

According to many Leave advocates, we would still be in the Single Market. Didn't stop Johnson leading us out of it so in your book that's undemocratic.

Quote:

"Absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the Single Market" Daniel Hannan MEP
Quote:

"Only a madman would actually leave the Market."
Owen Paterson MP, Vote Leave backer
Quote:

Wouldn't it be terrible if we were really like Norway and Switzerland? Really? They're rich. They're happy. They're self-governing
Nigel Farage


---------- Post added at 21:07 ---------- Previous post was at 21:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091907)
I think that idiot even called it a "fantastic deal".

Now, now, don't be so harsh on Old Boy. :D

Joking aside, I think Johnson cleverly called it a "fantastic moment".

But Johnson's speech does show jfman's assertion of revisionism to be a valid one.

jfman 02-09-2021 22:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091900)
I think your memory leaves things to be desired, jfman. Champagne problems?

My memory serves me perfectly well. It’s a fine Belgian beer this evening.

If you genuinely believe that, as opposed to just being contrary, I’d seriously consider a man of your age speaks to your GP.

Sephiroth 02-09-2021 22:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36091910)
My memory serves me perfectly well. It’s a fine Belgian beer this evening.

If you genuinely believe that, as opposed to just being contrary, I’d seriously consider a man of your age speaks to your GP.

Tut, tut jfman. Really not the right thing to say.

Apart from that the Wokingham Medical Centre is still barriered off with a metal trellis gate. See a GP? No chance.

OLD BOY 03-09-2021 09:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091906)
Agreed. Citing willful optimism as your source doesn't cut it for me.

As a reminder, Johnson did not say that the deal was not great. He said it was “a good deal for the whole of Europe”.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...nouncement-evg

Yes, but we were where we were. And given where we were, it was the best deal that could be achieved. You remember very well, I am sure, that he was very critical of the May deal, which gave too much away. But starting again from scratch was not an option.

---------- Post added at 08:01 ---------- Previous post was at 07:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091908)
According to many Leave advocates, we would still be in the Single Market.

More old ground. I thought we had established way back that if we remained in the single market, we would not be leaving Europe. This is a point that even many politicians didn't grasp at the beginning of the process.

Had anyone said to me that we would be staying in the Single Market, I would have asked why we were trying to 'leave' at all, because this would have been disadvantageous to us without reaping the benefits of Brexit.

---------- Post added at 08:03 ---------- Previous post was at 08:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36091910)
My memory serves me perfectly well. It’s a fine Belgian beer this evening.

If you genuinely believe that, as opposed to just being contrary, I’d seriously consider a man of your age speaks to your GP.

I was just bigging you up as a man of taste when I mentioned the champagne, but now you've ruined that image. :D

---------- Post added at 08:05 ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36091898)
How ironic.

Between NI and the Republic, jfman. You know, like what happens now.

1andrew1 03-09-2021 09:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091932)
Yes, but we were where we were. And given where we were, it was the best deal that could be achieved. You remember very well, I am sure, that he was very critical of the May deal, which gave too much away. But starting again from scratch was not an option.

You seem to have forgotten my point! My point was that you believed Johnson said the deal was a bad one at the time. I pointed out that he had not said this.
You just needed to agree that you misremembered. Your comments above are entirely irrelevant to the point I raised.

mrmistoffelees 03-09-2021 10:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091900)
I don’t know where you get that from. The problem isn’t related to any current inability for such technology to work. The main difficulty is that both jurisdictions have systems that do not talk to each other. How much easier would it be if for example, if you could raise an export health certificate in Northern Ireland or from other parts of the UK and to transmit this seamlessly across to the EU system? It’s just another IT project, not some pipe dream that cannot be implemented due to a lack of existing capability.

It would require an application programming interface, similar to what has already been put in place for New Zealand lamb exports. Defra claims that such a system could be up and running within ten weeks.

<SNIP>

Well done, you've managed to read an article I've read too. what you fail to mention is the time period to design and agree the specification of the API which is potentially two years.

From the same article you also conveniently neglect to mention the other two services that are required for this to work. one being the surveillance system for automated customs checks, which does not exist and would be years away from implementation, this is a key system which would be required at the launch of any API integration.

Secondly you forget to mention the automated tax reimbursement system that to a lesser degree is also required, and guess what that doesn't exist either.

Would you like to post that article link, or shall i? Or, would you like to pipe down on a subject you have absolutely no knowledge of whatsoever ?

Carth 03-09-2021 13:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091944)

'big snip'

. . would you like to pipe down on a subject you have absolutely no knowledge of whatsoever ?

If we all did that, there would be about 6 posts in this thread :D

OLD BOY 03-09-2021 13:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091906)
Agreed. Citing willful optimism as your source doesn't cut it for me.

I know Andrew. Wilful negitivism is much more your style.

---------- Post added at 12:39 ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091944)
Well done, you've managed to read an article I've read too. what you fail to mention is the time period to design and agree the specification of the API which is potentially two years.

From the same article you also conveniently neglect to mention the other two services that are required for this to work. one being the surveillance system for automated customs checks, which does not exist and would be years away from implementation, this is a key system which would be required at the launch of any API integration.

Secondly you forget to mention the automated tax reimbursement system that to a lesser degree is also required, and guess what that doesn't exist either.

Would you like to post that article link, or shall i? Or, would you like to pipe down on a subject you have absolutely no knowledge of whatsoever ?

If I can remind you, what you said was that the technology was five years away, and that is what I was referring to.

It's not five years away in terms of technology - we could do it now. I agree that the two sides would have to agree on the specification, etc, and it will certainly take a couple of years, particularly when you take into account that the EU moves at a snail's pace.

We put forward these ideas well before any deal was agreed, and the EU's refusal to consider the technology solution is why it could not be implemented yet. But the solution is there if indeed a solution is wanted.

As for surveillance systems, there are other ways to accomplish all this with agreed methods of packaging, labelling and security. If the will is there, these problems can be resolved. Insulting me does not prove your argument. On the contrary, it shows that you are on shaky ground and wouldn't welcome a reply.

All par for the course in this place, I suppose. Shame.

1andrew1 03-09-2021 13:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091969)
I know Andrew. Wilful negitivism is much more your style..

IMHO, threads where posters link to their sources result in more stimulating debates and fewer unnecessary and cantankerous arguments.

mrmistoffelees 03-09-2021 14:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091969)
I know Andrew. Wilful negitivism is much more your style.

---------- Post added at 12:39 ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 ----------



If I can remind you, what you said was that the technology was five years away, and that is what I was referring to.

It's not five years away in terms of technology - we could do it now. I agree that the two sides would have to agree on the specification, etc, and it will certainly take a couple of years, particularly when you take into account that the EU moves at a snail's pace.

We put forward these ideas well before any deal was agreed, and the EU's refusal to consider the technology solution is why it could not be implemented yet. But the solution is there if indeed a solution is wanted.

As for surveillance systems, there are other ways to accomplish all this with agreed methods of packaging, labelling and security. If the will is there, these problems can be resolved. Insulting me does not prove your argument. On the contrary, it shows that you are on shaky ground and wouldn't welcome a reply.

All par for the course in this place, I suppose. Shame.


No, we, can't

The monitoring and surveillance technology required to monitor the automated customs routines via the as of yet unspecified & uncreated API does not exist and will not exist for five years. These systems must be automated and implemented at the same time as the API.

The only technology that does not have to go in at the same time is the automated rebate service.

Having spent some time in my past roles designing architecture & services for government IT projects, specifically in my case the home office. I can tell you that the pace set by the EU will be Usain Bolt esque compared to UK.


A technological solution is the answer but is not deliverable at the moment.

1andrew1 03-09-2021 15:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091975)
No, we, can't

The monitoring and surveillance technology required to monitor the automated customs routines via the as of yet unspecified & uncreated API does not exist and will not exist for five years. These systems must be automated and implemented at the same time as the API.

The only technology that does not have to go in at the same time is the automated rebate service.

Having spent some time in my past roles designing architecture & services for government IT projects, specifically in my case the home office. I can tell you that the pace set by the EU will be Usain Bolt esque compared to UK.


A technological solution is the answer but is not deliverable at the moment.

Some useful insights there which I hope are not forgotten.
:clap::clap::clap:

Sephiroth 03-09-2021 15:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091979)
Some useful insights there which I hope are not forgotten.
:clap::clap::clap:

Attack by proxy!

OLD BOY 03-09-2021 15:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091973)
IMHO, threads where posters link to their sources result in more stimulating debates and fewer unnecessary and cantankerous arguments.

Do you have a link for that opinion? :D

Sephiroth 03-09-2021 15:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091973)
IMHO, threads where posters link to their sources result in more stimulating debates and fewer unnecessary and cantankerous arguments.

Having inferred that the remark was slantwise directed at OB, where has he been cantankerous? Or were you only taking the narrow definition of "argumentative" as your meaning? Does OB really need to see his GP (which he can't)?

OB's insights into Brexit have been interesting and valuable - not to be sneered at as some here do.


1andrew1 03-09-2021 16:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36091982)
Do you have a link for that opinion? :D

IMHO on this occasion so can be challenged and ripped apart at will. :D

mrmistoffelees 03-09-2021 16:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091983)
Having inferred that the remark was slantwise directed at OB, where has he been cantankerous? Or were you only taking the narrow definition of "argumentative" as your meaning? Does OB really need to see his GP (which he can't)?

OB's insights into Brexit have been interesting and valuable - not to be sneered at as some here do.


A percentage of his Brexit posts do you're right, However, a percentage of them are so hysterically funny or misguided that he almost comes across as a character from 'the late night mash'

1andrew1 03-09-2021 16:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091983)
Having inferred that the remark was slantwise directed at OB, where has he been cantankerous? Or were you only taking the narrow definition of "argumentative" as your meaning? Does OB really need to see his GP (which he can't)?

OB's insights into Brexit have been interesting and valuable - not to be sneered at as some here do.


Whilst it's true that Old Boy has been rather forgetful of late on this thread (qv Boris's comments on the Brexit deal and the forgotten technological issues that MrMistoffess highlighted) and I'm sure he appreciates your neighbourly concern, I'm really not the right person to advise whether he sees his GP or not.

People's opinions tend to come up for for criticism a lot when they've been built largely upon incorrect information. No one's perfect and I've rightly been called out for this too but that's why his recent postings here have met with the reception they have. And some posts do have a Comical Ali feel to them, which I'm sure he would be the first to acknowledge. :D

Sephiroth 03-09-2021 17:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Turning to the topic, I see that the perfidious Varadkar (the Irish tanasty) is on manoeuvres as he visits NI.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-58422191

I've taken a highly selective quote! My bold highlights.

Quote:

Mr Varadkar said he "certainly wouldn't have any objection" to grace periods being extended, but it would be up to the UK and EU to agree to it.

"The difficulty is it doesn't deal with underlying difficulties - it just puts things off," he added.

He also said he and Taoiseach (Irish PM) Micheál Martin recognised unionists had "genuine and heartfelt concerns" about the Northern Ireland Protocol.

But he said the focus needed to be on finding practical solutions that ensured the Republic of Ireland's position in the EU single market is protected.
Why does the UK have to help protect RoI's position in the EU single market?


1andrew1 03-09-2021 18:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36091993)
Turning to the topic, I see that the perfidious Varadkar (the Irish tanasty) is on manoeuvres as he visits NI.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-58422191

I've taken a highly selective quote! My bold highlights.

Why does the UK have to help protect RoI's position in the EU single market?

The sentence in question is
Quote:

But he said the focus needed to be on finding practical solutions that ensured the Republic of Ireland's position in the EU single market is protected.
He's saying that solutions to the Brexit border problem in Ireland need to be practical and can't be at the expense of Ireland's position in the Single Market. So basically reiterating his country's red line.

mrmistoffelees 03-09-2021 18:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091999)
The sentence in question is

He's saying that solutions to the Brexit border problem in Ireland need to be practical and can't be at the expense of Ireland's position in the Single Market. So basically reiterating his country's red line.


Surely that's his country's perfidious red line ?

papa smurf 03-09-2021 18:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091999)
The sentence in question is

He's saying that solutions to the Brexit border problem in Ireland need to be practical and can't be at the expense of Ireland's position in the Single Market. So basically reiterating his country's red line.

Who is he again:shrug:

1andrew1 03-09-2021 18:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36092002)
Surely that's his country's perfidious red line ?

My bad. :D

TheDaddy 03-09-2021 18:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Just been told that there's over 70 000 excess pigs in the country due to the abattoirs and meat processing plants being so short of staffed.

Sephiroth 03-09-2021 18:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091999)
The sentence in question is

He's saying that solutions to the Brexit border problem in Ireland need to be practical and can't be at the expense of Ireland's position in the Single Market. So basically reiterating his country's red line.

Understood. But we are still in the irresistible force/immovable object situation. It cannot be resolved unless one side bends over or the EU trusts the UK (which it won't). Never mind the blame for that (Boris) but that is the situation.

mrmistoffelees 03-09-2021 18:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36092005)
Just been told that there's over 70 000 excess pigs in the country due to the abattoirs and meat processing plants being so short of staffed.

Most of them will be in the Bigg Market on a Friday night i guess

1andrew1 03-09-2021 18:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36092006)
Understood. But we are still in the irresistible force/immovable object situation. It cannot be resolved unless one side bends over or the EU trusts the UK (which it won't). Never mind the blame for that (Boris) but that is the situation.

People were sold a pig-in-a-poke. I'd take it up with Redwood if I were you, maybe ask for a refund.

TheDaddy 03-09-2021 18:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36092007)
Most of them will be in the Bigg Market on a Friday night i guess

Poor blighters, they'll wish they were at the abattoirs come Saturday morning

OLD BOY 03-09-2021 20:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091985)
A percentage of his Brexit posts do you're right, However, a percentage of them are so hysterically funny or misguided that he almost comes across as a character from 'the late night mash'

Clearly, you believe that you know better than the majority of the British public, who want Brexit to be a success.

You really need to get over yourself. Time will prove me right and you wrong. In the end, the evidence will be undeniable.

Once again, you are insulting me because you don’t actually like being challenged on your negative remainer views.

Sephiroth 03-09-2021 20:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36092012)
People were sold a pig-in-a-poke. I'd take it up with Redwood if I were you, maybe ask for a refund.

Not at all. People wanted out of the EU and expected glitches and gremlins in the early months/years.

That some of the more stupid sales pitches didn't come to fruition has nothing to do with the wish to be out. People aren't that stupid as to believe the hype.


OLD BOY 03-09-2021 20:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36091986)
Whilst it's true that Old Boy has been rather forgetful of late on this thread (qv Boris's comments on the Brexit deal and the forgotten technological issues that MrMistoffess highlighted) and I'm sure he appreciates your neighbourly concern, I'm really not the right person to advise whether he sees his GP or not.

People's opinions tend to come up for for criticism a lot when they've been built largely upon incorrect information. No one's perfect and I've rightly been called out for this too but that's why his recent postings here have met with the reception they have. And some posts do have a Comical Ali feel to them, which I'm sure he would be the first to acknowledge. :D

You need to do some more research before criticising other people’s posts, Andrew. The main difference between Boris Johnson’s deal and Theresa May’s was that he abolished the backstop. And this is what he said of the Theresa May deal:

https://www.politicshome.com/news/ar...ys-brexit-deal

He proceeded because it was the only way of getting Brexit done by the end of the year. I have not misremembered. Look at his tweet in that link.

‘I have been and remain intensely critical of the deal. But we have a choice to make now, and that means choosing between options that actually exist. I have come to the sad conclusion that neither this government nor this parliament is willing to leave with no deal.’


And I have not forgotten the technical issues either. We can overcome this problem, but the will needs to be there on the EU side. In the meantime, we could have a straight forward and secure system of packaging and labelling which would overcome the questions relating to the transitional period.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36091985)
A percentage of his Brexit posts do you're right, However, a percentage of them are so hysterically funny or misguided that he almost comes across as a character from 'the late night mash'

Nah, you are just in denial that we can ever make a success of Brexit. We will overcome these initial problems, one way or another, and then you will see all your predictions about Brexit come undone.

The more nonsense you spout now, the more it will all come back and haunt you in due course.

That’s OK. I can wait.

1andrew1 03-09-2021 21:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36092024)
You need to do some more research before criticising other people’s posts, Andrew. The main difference between Boris Johnson’s deal and Theresa May’s was that he abolished the backstop. And this is what he said of the Theresa May deal:

https://www.politicshome.com/news/ar...ys-brexit-deal

He proceeded because it was the only way of getting Brexit done by the end of the year. I have not misremembered. Look at his tweet in that link.

‘I have been and remain intensely critical of the deal. But we have a choice to make now, and that means choosing between options that actually exist. I have come to the sad conclusion that neither this government nor this parliament is willing to leave with no deal.’


And I have not forgotten the technical issues either. We can overcome this problem, but the will needs to be there on the EU side. In the meantime, we could have a straight forward and secure system of packaging and labelling which would overcome the questions relating to the transitional period.

That's all very interesting but 100% irrelevant. You constructed an entire argument around your misplaced belief that Johnson had criticised his own Brexit deal whereas he criticised May's. Seph acknowledged that Johnson had not criticised his own deal at the time as well and I even provided a link to the Br'Express article reporting his announcement of the deal.

The transitional period is over Old Boy. We left the Single Market and from 1st October we will be inspecting EU imports.

What technical issues does your suggestion of labelling provide, and what labelling do you mean given that goods are labelled and now require extensive documentation when being exported to the EU?

---------- Post added at 20:36 ---------- Previous post was at 20:31 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36092023)
Not at all. People wanted out of the EU and expected glitches and gremlins in the early months/years.

That some of the more stupid sales pitches didn't come to fruition has nothing to do with the wish to be out. People aren't that stupid as to believe the hype.


It was originally gritches and gremlins in the early days and weeks. Now it's become months and even years! When will it become decades and centuries?
You seem to be a tad unhappy about the Irish situation though, and a tad idealistic in expecting a country backed by the large EU bloc to give in to the UK.

Sephiroth 03-09-2021 21:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36092032)
<SNIP>
It was originally gritches and gremlins in the early days and weeks. Now it's become months and even years! When will it become decades and centuries?
You seem to be a tad unhappy about the Irish situation though, and a tad idealistic in expecting a country backed by the large EU bloc to give in to the UK.

I'm totally realistic and far from idealistic. The Brexit situation is far from ideal. But the way I'd play it (admittedly sat at my office chair at home) is to squeeze Ireland. The threat of scrapping the NI Protocol is a threat to the Irish economy, something they dread more than anything else (perhaps other than having to put corporation tax up!). It's then a blinking game.

I want my Guvmin to play this right by not allowing th NI Protocol to stand in its present form.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum