![]() |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I've said it before and still think that with the Premiership having all matches on TV that a fifth official should monitor the TV control room screens and advise the ref via radio of any incidents that he thinks the ref has missed or if the ref asks his opinion. Could be very useful in yellow and red card incidents.
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
What about two extra lines men? Four lines men in total two in each half. One whos job is to watch solely for offsides, the other who watches for off the ball incidents or anything the ref misses.
We could also take an idea from the NHL where because the game is so fast they have a ref in each half which makes them closer to the play. The problem is if the ref is on the edge of the d and then henry makes a break up the field the middle-aged ref has to sprint up the field trying to keep up with the young super-fit player and if there is an incident make a decision while sprinting. If you had two refs then they should be in a better position. Also remember video refs aren't infallible, there was a big incident in the NFL a few years ago when, ever after consulting replays, the refs made the wrong decision resulting in the team losing the game and missing out on the playoffs |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
another case of consistency from the Fa.. Rooney taps someone and gets a three game ban..
Morrison of Birmingham does a similar thing and is likely to get away with a warning |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Rooney's was hands to the face so he got charged with violent conduct. Morrison's was a shove so he's charged with improper conduct. Both seem violent to me, but thats the distinction the FA makes. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I'd agree with gaz, striking the face gives the incident a different perspective. We can't complain about Rooney's treatment - he's had what he deserves.
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
wow a man utd fan that talks sense ;) I do have to say i think the ref should be for it as he saw Morrison push the player and did nothing :dozey: |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
This is why it was classed as violent conduct - any strike to the face is seen as such. An automatic 3 match ban is correct. Rooney chose not to appeal and that's probably the most sensible idea he's had. But SAF really needs to clamp down on his ill-discipline hard.
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I've never throught that board for extra time was any good anyway.. in the first half you always get 1 or 2 minutes. In the second half they are supposed to add on 30 seconds for each sub.. if all three by each team are made in the second half that is 3 mins so when they show a board with 2-3 it means they are saying there was no time wasting or injury time just the subs.. on the subject of TVs it's still a delicate issue.. would you also use it for diving etc or just diving when in the box.. not only that i've seen loads of incidents where people have been barely touched and i've thought they were acting and then they've been taken off and missed a few games.. take Giggs from the last match.. if that had happened from a tackle and he'd rolled on the floor afterwards.. if i was the forth official watcing on TV i'd say that was acting \ simulation and ask the ref to book him even though he's know out for a few games.. Until we get players beinh more honest there isn't much we can do |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Solution to Man United's striking crisis?
Quote:
Quote:
Face it, Rooney is scouse, ugly, dense, ill-disciplined, cheats and has shocking taste in women. Shame, really, if he applied himself and his talent he could be one of the all-time greats. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Quote:
oooOOoooo we are bitter tonight aren't we? He's only been at the club 6 months, you really think a 19 year old is going to change so quickly, especially when he's had little or no discipline in the past? I know it's standard for Arse supporters to have dillusions of grandeur but I think that's a bit much, don't you?? :D And Rooney is all the above? Nothing to do with the fact he scored to SMASH Arse's unbeaten run? Not bitter at all are we?? :rofl: Oh I love it when Arse fans accuse other players of being ill-disciplined and a cheat :p: |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
We have the worst disciplinary record in the country and I'm the most anti-ill-disciplinary person you'll meet, well in a football sense anyway.
Clough's legacy, RIP... |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
And as for what you say about Rooney? You, Arsenal, talking, out of... :D ;) |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
You know us Leicester fans love the forest :tu: . Good luck you need it. :) |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
[as for the avatar, Forest in the summer asked the question the other way round, ie we're serious about promotion are the fans, as an attempt to get season ticket sales higher and to justify yet another rise. But Doughty is a twit and a cheapskate and like **** he's ever going to get ambition for the club] |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Rooney needs more time to change although at the moment I can't see any signs of it true... Trouble is his first game for us was too good and he hasn't quite got to that level since |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
As for being scouse, ugly, dense and having shocking taste in women I can't really see what point you are trying to make, how will any of these affect his football? Or are you just having a dig? |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Now if we look at another fair play table that awards points solely on cards it tells a different story. Last season Arsenal ended up ranked joint 8th while Man Utd were join 2nd http://soccernet.espn.go.com/stats/f...r=2003&cc=5739 This season you are currently joint 11th while Man Utd are 1st http://soccernet.espn.go.com/stats/f...r=2004&cc=5739 |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Can't say i remember us getting 3 reds so far this year though |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
It's standard fare for insecure Arse fans to display their displeasure and opposing teams' star players in that way.... |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Well, at least it's good to see that Villa are even rubbish at playing fair :disturbd:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFing our way down to league 1. Doughty has surpassed himself with the ineptitude of his FOURTH managerial appointment and the FOURTH imminent failure (after Platt, Hart and Kinnear). He can f right out of my club right now. BTW I've been aware of this for 24 hrs and if anything I'm more ****ed than when I heard. We all wanted Pearce, but Doughty hates him, of the field Dave Jones or Anghel Iordanescu would both be better than hoofer ginge. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Anyway, it could have been worse - you could have got Peter Reid :D |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
My problem is Megson's style of play and his attitude, the guy could fight nitrogen...
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I think he is a good appointment, but as the saying goes the proof is in the results he gets, I think all forest supporters should get behind the new manager and give him a chance. Rather than throwing your rattle out of the pram and saying we want someone else...TOUGH you have him deal with it :)
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I was the same when Villa took O'Leary on as manager - didn't like the way he got the team to play, thought he was a chequebook manager and all that, but he turned Villa round and got us to 6th in the Premiership last season. Personally, I think that you could do a lot worse than Megson and, who knows, maybe he'll do a Dowie for you (great bouncebackability :D ) |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Well I understand what you guys are saying but I can't see anything else.
The opinion amongst Forest fans is kinda 50:50 as to whether he's a good choice or not. Like I said the emotional attachment to Psycho won't go away- it was the same when Hart was fired and Kinnear was brought in. Can't believe he's got rid of Mick Harford though, the guy has been the personification of dignity and respect all the time he's been caretaker, and he is after all an excellent coach. Only time will tell but I don't think this is a good move. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Here is an interesting one, Andy Liddell admitted after the game that he was offside when he scored against Villa.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
In fairness, it's very well to come out and say these things, but it smacks a bit of Beckham and his 'I'm clever 'cos I got myself booked' rubbish. Andy Liddell might say that he was blatantly offside but, even after the replays, it was difficult to see that the ball came off a Sheffield United player and not one of ours, so it must have been difficult in the spur of the moment for the linesman. As for the comment about Sorenson well, that's nothing new - a goalkeeper should stop every shot. I just think he's trying to rub salt into the wounds of the Villa fans - with a bit of luck, he'll get done for his comments (although there's no particular reason why he should). I just think that he should engage his brain before speaking - if they play Villa again at some point in the future, he'll probably start moaning if he gets booed every time he touches the ball. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I just guess as these 2 aren't involving Man U they papers will just let me go. look at the Oldham goal that was disallowed for a push on James.. i've seen that a few times and there was nothing wrong with it.. if they had lost the match 2-1 would that have been the worst decision of all time |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Yeah but the point I was making was that strikers who are offside and score never get criticised for "not telling the ref" even when its clear that he knows hes offside - kluivert against the pool as an example. But when a keeper did something similar he was hung up by the media as all that was wrong with cheating footballers. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
IMO, he won't get criticised for saying this because it was a questionable decision anyway, and he's basically just shooting his mouth off. EDIT: More to the point, in the example of Roy Carroll, it was obvious as soon as he did it that the ball was about a yard over the line - this has been seen a blatant attempt to fool the officials (whether it was or not is a fairly moot point). Unfortunately, keepers are the players who get the most scrutinised when they make a mistake, which Carroll did (spilling the ball in the first place). I'm not criticising Carroll for his actions (I believe that most, if not all, keepers would have done the same thing) but the difference is that Carroll denied a clear goal, whereas Liddells 'blatant offside' was a goalscoring opportunity, and I think that's the difference - none of this would have been brought up if the shot had been saved. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
as I said one played for Man U and the others didn't I know what you mean though it would be nice to see some sporting acts from these premiership footballers.. they are meant to be sportsmen after all so acting sporting isn't too much to ask.. maybe they could even stop rolling over 15 times whenever someone goes near them as well ;) the thing is there is so much money involved now both to the clubs and the players that none of them will stamp down on it.. can you imagine Wenger impossing a 6 game ban on Pires for conning a ref during a game or Fergie doing the same with Ronaldo.. The thing that annoys me is that FIFA and UEFA don't seem to want to do anything about it.. look at what they did with Rivaldo at the world cup.. fined him about the equivalent of £10 |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I've just made an edit of my post above - that'll give some clarification to what I think :tu:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Hey Man U and Arsenal fans- stop arguing about who's the best, it's chelsea... :LOL:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
We're not arguing over who's best - it's a competition to see who can make the most pointless petty comments against the other team, and at the moment I'm being soundly beaten :D
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
you both have woeful disciplinary records, what's the argument? proud of it? :LOL: |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
United have a woeful disciplinery record?? Are you sure?
Even if we did then in no way would I be proud of my team. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Anyone else notice that Jose always looks as if hes been out on the **** the night before? Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
He should play his first team. Forest won the league cup, the league and the champions league with a definitive XI. In Clough's opinion (RIP) any game deserves respect, and any competition is worth winning. The amount of other trophies he won is indicative of that opinion. re: United- any team with Rooney, Keane, Scholes, van Divelrooy, Ferdinand is woeful. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
:D :D :D
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
At Forest we don't really have a squad. Alex Ferguson should be thankful he does. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Interesting comments on the state of football and agents by Simon Jordan of Palace
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I saw that on SSN last night, Jordan had a right go about how they looked after Routledge and his mother over the last years. He was furious!
I agree about agents the majority just want to get the most money they can but getting players unsettled so that they move. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
This is something else I don't get....
Quote:
Unless Chelsea are planning to sell Cudichini. Fergie, if you do decide to sign any keeper this season make sure its Cudichini!!! |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
No doubt some bright spark will acuse me of being a glory hunter as well :p: :angel: Edit - nffc i can quite safely say that forest won't be one of them :rofl::rofl: |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
To make it completely fair, all 92 league teams would have to be included - dunno if it would be worth starting a thread so people could say who their team is or not (might be a little tricky to keep up with), but I'll have a think about it. What does anybody else reckon? |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
What about the exeter fans among us though?!? :D
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
;) |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
What about Irish Premier league ;) Can we have an option for my local team - Lisburn Distillery? ;)
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
well i support 2 teams and it's all my Dad's fault.. I started going to footie with him so I follow the same teams...
I'll admit he was abit of a glory boy when he grew up and started watching United.. even though we live in Kent.. they were the best team of the day and he wanted to watch the best players.. in them days you could even get a ticket to a match.. Dad started taking me to United so I follow them.. We both also follow Palace who are our local side.. even when they are in Div 1 or whatever it is called then we still go and watch them.. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Quote:
How people can do this I can't understand. What do you do when they play each other? |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
;) Here is their website if you want to learn more about the mighty whites! http://blue.srv2.com/~lisburn/ |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
So can a mod add poll to this thread then?
for the teams we support... options of Middlesbrough Middlesbrough or Middlesbrough oh and other team as long as its Middlesbrough :p::D:D seems about right to me!! |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Got any decent cures, I probably need to know now. [It is better watching the lower league teams though] |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
sorry i know it wasn't the greatest excuse for supporting Man U
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
;) check out the sig. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
still least they all fairly near each other |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
You guys supporting more than one team aren't proper fans IMO.
I've always been a Forest fan and can't ever see myself supporting another team. It just isn't football. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
It's just the way Dad got me into football by taking me and Palace and Man U and cheering on both teams.. i've just always done it.. i know it can be abit strange but then so can I ;) |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
As I've said- what happens when they play? |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
well earlier in the season when palace when to Man U i wanted Palace to win as Man U seemed out of the title race and don't want palace to get relagated..
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I have also supported the Mighty Reds from just before the Munich disaster and used to go to Old Trafford every other Saturday in the late sixties, so I have seen Charlton, Best & The King ( long before Cantona) in their prime, again work prevented me from keeping up my attendance. So I think I have every right to support all three teams. To answer your other question, when Oldham played United in the premiership or the FA Cup I always wanted Oldham to win, United are a big enough club to lose the odd game without it costing them to much, pity about the late equaliser from Sparky a few years back in the FA Cup, the Latics never recovered from that and got relegated at the end of that season.:( |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
You can support as many as you want - I lived in Ardwick for 4 years up until I was 8 and developed a taste for Man United, then moved back to Port Talbot and started following the Swans as well.
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I thought he was talking about Ralph Milne???
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I have to admit that I follow Oldham's and Sunderland's (my mum's team) results. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
I do have a soft spot for this team :D
http://www.afcwimbledon.co.uk/league...n_id=12&squad= i think its great how they set up a new team in protest to MK dons |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
For me, there is only two teams I have an interest in. Forest and Forest reserves. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Looks like SAF has gone for a three quarters senior squad then.
We're still gonna get stuffed. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
We didn't get stuffed?!
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
No, which surprised me. If I'd not got exams I'd have watched it, but from what I've heard it was about as good as watching paint dry.
Second leg should be interesting... BTW who's first choice, Carroll or Howard? |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I believe Carroll is still number one, Howard was always going to play these two matches. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
The keeper is the most important link in the side. If you don't concede you don't lose. Therefore you should have a definite first choice and play him when available. Another of Clough (RIP)'s great philosophies. A lot you could learn from listening to him (or reading his 442 column) or watching his sides play... |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Why not? Hasn't caused a problem yet, keeps the competition up. |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
You'll be surprised how much a keeper and defence get accustomed to each other. [Probs a hint of jealousy in the fact the Reds have one decent keeper (Gerrard) and two gash ones (Doyle and Roche)] |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
I see what you are saying, lets just hope it affects chelsea in the 2nd leg! |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
Likewise Gerrard was injured for 2 games in august and we shipped 7. [That might be because Roche is ***** though] |
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Football talk
As you probably read Juve have signed Mutu on a 5 year contract.
Now Mutu's ban expires 7 days before the Champions league final. Imagine if this final was between Juve and Chelsea and Mutu popped up and scored the winner! :D :p: |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:47. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum