![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
It's only ever been about the NHS and making sure there was an ICU and Ventilator there for you if you needed it, and other NHS services for everyone. Quote:
It's only taken 2 months but at least he has it now. Others on here should take note. |
Re: Coronavirus
Added
Quote:
Do you know if there is there any good reason why France & Ireland are exempt from the quarantine requirements? The EU are now saying that this should include every country in the EU and are threatening a legal challenge! Seems ridiculous as we only have 7 months to go: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ine-exemption/ |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Also I don't want to give the impression everything the government says is right and everything the scientists say is sacrosanct. There's already been blatant lies and manipulation from some sectors. It's not clear to me there is an overwhelmingly optimal strategy so there will be political disagreement. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
However, from a CV perspective, while we're bound by the WA the EU is right. The Guvmin's announcement excluding the French from quarantine in the UK is arbitrary and I would expect better from them especially since it seems that Boris responded to a threat from Germany's running dog, France. |
Re: Coronavirus
Public Health England have approved a new Roche test for coronavirus antibodies. It seems that the original test, which we ordered in early May, which was shown to have ......
Quote:
Quote:
I just hope these tests really do work and that we will be able to see whether the antibodies have a long life span, whether mild cases can even develop the antibodies and hopefully see whether we are any where near to herd immunity. If they can be used to get results on people who had a recorded positive test for CV19 early on it may give us a small measure of hope. |
Re: Coronavirus
This is an interesting development.
Coronavirus: New 100% accurate COVID-19 antibody test approved for use in UK |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Always strikes me as suspicious that a test, done by a professional body, can suddenly change from 50% accuracy to 100% accuracy.
Makes me wonder where the original failing was, and what else they've got wrong over the last few months aaah, seems I misunderstood the post by joglynne, and this is a new test, not the old one revisited |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
The Government and still significantly restricting the numbers and types of social interactions that it wants to take place, and will continue to do so for the rest of 2020. |
Re: Coronavirus
I think the original test was based on a self applied pin prick test which from past experience is not as accurate as a blood tests taken as an Arterial sample or the most commonly used, and less painful, Venipuncture Sampling. I suspect that using the Venipuncture sampling method is what has give the test a better end result.
To be honest I am only basing my theory on my experiences of using a prick test versus a V sample when obtaining accurate blood glucose levels. So don't try to engage me any scientific arguments 'cause I not joining in on this treads play times.. :D Add/ I certainly hope they don't use Arterial testing as that is what I have when I have my quarterly checkup on the state of my immune system problem and that way of obtaining a sample is bloody painful. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum