![]() |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Professor David Andress has a new book out (Cultural Dementia), and I thought one of his lines summed up the ERG (Jacob Rees-Mogg, aka "Lord Snooty" et al), even though he wasn’t specifically talking about them.
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
There is no 3rd option. ---------- Post added at 20:17 ---------- Previous post was at 20:13 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Northern Ireland is to be honest a political and economic basket case. 25% is Northern Irelands income is subsidies from Westminster to the tune of €11bn a year. Ireland doesn't want it on its' books, they are doing well but not that well. To be honest, reunification from an economic point of view would be better for the UK! Here are nice articles found while reading up for my reply; Study on the costs of reunification - https://www.irishtimes.com/business/...y-15-1.3629748 How reunification could happen - https://www.instituteforgovernment.o...-reunification Leo Varadkar opposed to reunification referendum - https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/n...-35932315.html Opinion piece on why reunification will not happen - https://reaction.life/brexit-no-silv...reunification/ |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Your analysis of the Fine Gael position may well be correct. But a pressure to unify isn't an allegation that I'm making. By me saying that the 'EU wants to carve Ulster away from the UK', I mean that they want to force the UK into unpalatable constitutional arrangements; just because they are nasty. TM seems not to have fully averted that because the Backstop includes a deeper arrangement for Ulster alone, which is the carve up to which I am referring. |
Re: Brexit
I am sure that the inhabitants of the 3 counties of Ulster that are in the Republic may disagree with you.
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In Brexit news, Barnier is suggesting that the EU allows the UK an extension to the transition period to allow time for the trade deal to be negotiated. Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
The most depressing part of all of this is that so many are convinced that the principal actors in Leave are doing all of this on behalf of those that have been most affected by the globalism and free market changes since Thatcher & Reagan. The nom-dom Media barons pumping out decades of lies about the EU and immigration, the list goes on. When the truth is that these people, the elite who will not be impacted by Brexit no matter which way it goes and the political chancers driven by ego and ambition will be content to see significant damage to this country if it helps to achieve their aims. Here is one such odious individual: Crispin Odey It’s been a good day for me, claims hedge fund tycoon Crispin Odey Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Meanwhile.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8639216.html Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
The case for leave is that we will once again be able to take key decisions that are for Britain's benefit. ianch's reference to Crispin Odey is completely irrelevant and just shows the contempt with which those on the far left have for anyone who makes money. The reduction in the value of the pound was not caused by this man, he simply predicted that this would happen in the short term. I could have done that. Even the remainers said that would happen. No doubt he will be anticipating a rise in the value of the pound when we have clarity on the future direction of the UK with the free trade deal no doubt that we will get from the EU.
Leaving the EU presents incredible opportunities for this country provided that we are not tied down by continuing EU obligations which, for example, hamper our ability to get new trade deals on terms that benefit us. This will encourage new wealth to this country, made possible by those same wealth creators and risk takers that ianch and his supporters detest so much. Having considered TM's proposed deal with the EU very carefully, I have concluded that the backstop arrangements and the proposed common rulebook should be rejected. The backstop has the potential for locking us into an arrangement we will never get out of and over which the DUP will crash out of the current agreement with the Conservatives, and the common rulebook it seems will hamper our ability to secure new trade deals on the terms we believe will be best for Britain. So unless those two issues can be satisfactorily resolved, I think the deal should be scrapped and we leave without a deal. The proposal to join temporarily into the EEA arrangements signed up to by Norway is a better way forward to give us that transitional breathing space. ---------- Post added at 09:06 ---------- Previous post was at 09:05 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Just to be clear, I do not "detest" wealth creators and risk takers per se. The ones I detest are those who seek to gain personal wealth at the expense of the population they claim to help or represent. The most disturbing aspect of your reply is your casual disregard and contempt for the other citizens of this country. Your willingness to plunge into the abyss of a no-deal Brexit betrays a naivety at best and a frightening level of denial at worse. |
Re: Brexit
Quote:
I don't fancy another 2 years of this, we should just smile as we walk away :Yes: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum