Cable Forum - General WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Sport (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=88)

- - General : WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33613781)

They usually get released when the creative department have nothing for them.

Quote:

Mick Foley to wrestle for TNA
WWE legend Mick Foley will jump to rival wrestling group TNA next month, a close friend has told The Sun

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...cle1553248.ece

Stevie Richards, Robbie McAllister, Rory McAllister, Cherry and Colin Delaney have all been released from their contract by the WWE.

summerslam tonight hope it stays on tonight or else ill woun't be paying for it again ill just whatch it on the net the channel just started

---------- Post added at 01:18 ---------- Previous post was at 00:55 ----------

mvp wins mvp wins get in

---------- Post added at 01:30 ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 ----------

beth and santino win cool

---------- Post added at 01:44 ---------- Previous post was at 01:30 ----------

y2j just hit hbk wife

---------- Post added at 01:45 ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 ----------

hbk has left the wwe

---------- Post added at 01:55 ---------- Previous post was at 01:45 ----------

matt hardy wins by dq in 30sec match

---------- Post added at 02:03 ---------- Previous post was at 01:55 ----------

jbl vs cm punk now
jbl 2 win come on lad jbl jbl jbl

---------- Post added at 02:14 ---------- Previous post was at 02:03 ----------

dam it shut up king he just said punk wins punk wins punk wins

---------- Post added at 02:19 ---------- Previous post was at 02:14 ----------

triple h vs kail now

---------- Post added at 02:41 ---------- Previous post was at 02:19 ----------

triple h wins
next match
john cean vs batista

---------- Post added at 02:58 ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 ----------

batista wins

---------- Post added at 03:02 ---------- Previous post was at 02:58 ----------

guess whats next HELL IN A CELL
DEAD MAN WALKING

undertaker vs edge

---------- Post added at 03:44 ---------- Previous post was at 03:02 ----------

undertaker wins and then after the match chockslam edge trough the ring and then it sets on fire

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34624744)

Swansea wrestler signs for WWE

http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/ne...l/article.html

never heard of him befor

TNA Stars ''Tomko'' and ''Gail Kim'' have both now been Release by TNA and look set to rejoin WWE.

"It's all fake"

Yeah right, fake this then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TV Boy (Post 34625667)

TNA Stars ''Tomko'' and ''Gail Kim'' have both now been Release by TNA and look set to rejoin WWE.

Update

Gail Kim was seen last Friday at the taping of an FCW show.

Tomko will NOT be joining the WWE after all as he reappear on the August 25th taping of TNA iMPACT! (To be shown on Bravo this Saturday.)

As appears on http://xwt-forums.net/1/viewtopic.php?t=17830

Quote:

WrestleZone.com wrote:
PWInsider.com has confirmed that Gail Kim is indeed through with TNA. No details yet regarding this sudden news, but they should be coming out soon.

Kim's profile and photos were quietly removed from the company website earlier today. Regarding the speculation on the removal of her stuff from the website, one TNA source said, "It means exactly what you think it means."

Kim had been with the company for nearly three years - since September 2005. Kim was originally brought in as a pesky heel valet for Jeff Jarrett and America's Most Wanted. When the Knockouts division was created, Kim was pegged as the star babyface. Kim became the first ever TNA Women's Knockout Champion and had a good feud with Awesome Kong. Kim lost the belt on an episode of Impact in January and the focus of the division shifted to some of the other girls. As of late she was a top face in the company, but no longer the top face, sharing the spotlight with Taylor Wilde and ODB.

Quote:

PWMania.com wrote:
In a peculiar deal, Gail Kim's profile has been quietly removed from the TNA website. When you go to her profile page, you get the standard "You are not authorized to view this resource" page, which is what happens to the profile pages after a wrestler parts ways with TNA.

Perhaps proving that the removal of her profile wasn't some sort of accident or error, all of her Knockouts photos have been removed as well. When you go to the Knockouts photo section, Gail's page is nowhere to be found.

TNA almost never announces company departures on the website, so there is no way of knowing what the deal is with missing talent unless you go to a wrestling news website such as PWMania.com. In fact, the only "future endeavors" notes they have announced over the past year were done to further angles involving Christopher Daniels and Frankie Kazarian so they could be written off of television.

It was announced on September 6, 2006 that Gail Kim had a signed a contract with TNA. If by chance her contract were to expire, it would probably be around this time. Team 3D signed three-year deals during this time frame, so perhaps she had the same contract length as well. Talent rarely get four-year deals, five-year deals are usually long, and we never heard anything about Gail renewing her contract on a year-to-year basis, so her original contract was likely a three-year deal.

Quote:

PWMania.com wrote:
The backstage word is that many people are surprised with the departure of Gail Kim from TNA Wrestling. Her contract was due to expire and was being renegotiated with everyone expecting her to re-sign with the company, however negotiations between her and TNA fell through which resulted in her departure.

Plenty of speculation regarding Gail Kim returning to World Wrestling Entertainment at some point has been going round. According to one source, WWE was definitely interested in bringing Gail Kim back if she was unable to reach an agreement on a new deal with TNA.

WWE officials have been keeping their eye on Gail Kim for several months now as they are aware of the success that she has brought TNA with their Knockout division which has been built around Kim.

Another source suggested that there was some conflict between Kim’s TNA contract and contract with her booking agent who has been booking her with several personal appearances.

Quote:

PWInsider.com wrote:
Former TNA Knockout champion Gail Kim will be heading back to World Wrestling Entertainment, according to several WWE sources. From what I am told, it was a pretty sizeable offer so I'd expect her to be pretty heavily in the Diva mix when she debuts.

Kim's contract with TNA was coming up, so once it expires, she is free to start working for WWE. I was told the decision was completely a financial one, not anything stemming from unhappiness over how she was booked or presented by TNA, which made her the nucleus of their Knockouts division when it officially launched last year.

TNA sources indicate that Kim left on extremely good terms and as one person told me, the "door is always open". I am told there was no heat over her departure.

If this somehow breaks the rules of cf I am sorry, just trying to update on the latest news :)

hi im going to see wwe in november at manchester but i brought some tickets to sell on ebay but now i don't know which ones to keep

the ticket i got are block 113 row p the next one is block j row m and bl 206 row g

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2008/09/28.gif

which one do you reckon i should keep

Lower tier is awful if you're towards the back, you never get a decent view.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B (Post 34633882)

Lower tier is awful if you're towards the back, you never get a decent view.

out of the 3 i got which is the one you would say i should keep couse the ones i don't im going 2 sell

I was going to see wwe in cardiff but sold out :(

I've been to the WWE a few times at the MEN and have sat all over. It's a hard call to make but if I had the choice of what you have, I'd pick the ones in block J.

But then again, make sure you pick ones that you want to keep.