Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

The 56-year-old south Florida resident has a criminal history in Broward County, Florida, and arrest records list his place of birth as Brooklyn, New York. A law enforcement source tells Milton he was convicted on state charges in Florida in 2002 with "threatening to throw, place, project or discharge any destructive device." Details of the August 2002 offense weren't immediately clear.


sounds like he's got previous charges from 2002 that's back when George w Bush was the pres.


An attorney who had represented Sayoc in prior legal matters, Ronald Scott Lowy, told CBS News he felt Sayoc "wasn't always in his right mind." Lowy said he represented Sayoc in a case in which Sayoc was accused of making a threat that included a false identification card or driver's license.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cesar-s...ay-2018-10-26/

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

The guy was always going be a bit off. This isn't a rational thing to do obviously. Still a terrorist act of course.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Quite a sizeable criminal record dating back to the early 1990's.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

He's a true Republican Trump fanatic, who had pictures of Hillary with a target on her on his van. A typical Trump devotee. Maybe criminality/insanity goes with the territory ?
Ps. Has the Democrat plot now been abandoned or did Bill/Hillary/ Obama hypnotize him to send to bombs to themselves ? :rolleyes:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Grow the hell up - sick of your immature and humourless posts, i.e you're not very funny. :rolleyes:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

A bit of humour tends to attract people to the debate, lightens the tone and invites further posts. Beats aggressive intimidating posts every time.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Tough luck. This is not a forum for rubbish immature joking - if people want to post unfunny shit - they can post it elsewhere.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I didn't find Mr K's first sentence funny but the sentence "or did Bill/Hillary/ Obama hypnotize him to send to bombs to themselves?" made me laugh. :)

---------- Post added at 00:49 ---------- Previous post was at 00:23 ----------

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...al-khashoggis/

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Wow, everyone's a critic ! :D

I prefer humour to make serious points, rather than abuse/hate which some choose. The honourable Mr Papa Smurf, who I disagree with almost everything does the same, it's far more preferable. If nothing else it's good for my blood pressure ;) If you're abusive to anyone you disagree with, you've lost the argument.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

A bit of humour often is more helpful in making people see the other side of the coin, where abuse and denigration puts peoples backs up.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I don't think Republicans should need to seek out conspiracy theories to distance themselves from this terrorist; they can't chose their supporters. He's obviously got mental health issues.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I would leave it to the FBI than Internet detectives.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

A story is developing that someone has been offering to pay women to make up accusations of assault against Mueller. Several journalists have been emailed this.

---------- Post added at 18:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:55 ----------

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...to-fbi/574411/

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

A new low if it's correct. :(

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

If it's correct..

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

It's very weird. One of the 'journalists' involved seemed to have made up a spy agency: https://www.gq.com/story/the-lasts-tweets-of-jacob-wohl



---------- Post added at 09:35 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------

There is speculation this might be a prank on the media

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Interesting tweet by Trump just now

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I thought this guy didn't believe in anonymous sources or rumours??

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Midterms today: Democrats favorite to take the house, Republicans heavy favorites to keep the Senate.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

If that transpires then its going to be pretty hard for any bill to get passed.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Trump won't like it, that's for sure

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

He will like it even less now the results have come in as it appears that he has lost control of the House of Representatives.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/worl...anada-46104314

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Pretty boring result really. What was expected with both sides being able to take comfort from something

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Not really. This was quite a blow for the Republicans. It was pretty obvious that they would retain control of the Senate as it was mainly Democrat seats up for grabs. All eyes now will be looking at the implications of this landslide for the Presidency in 2020. Not looking good for the Donald.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

It’s getting increasingly difficult for the Democrats to win though. Tonight it seems that they’re winning the popular vote in the house by 9% but if they had a bit lower than that the Republicans could have kept it. You have a situation now where more people can vote for the Democrats in each branch of government and yet still have the Republicans control all three.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I disagree and I wouldn’t use the Mid terms as a Measure of what will happen in 2020 Presidential Election. Remember, Barack Obama, in his first mid term test lost 60+ House Seats for the Democrats, that was a significant mid term defeat for the Democrats. He still won his second term in 2012.

There was suppose to be this “Blue Wave” expected. Damp squib springs to mind.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Not a blue wave IMO but obviously significant in that the Democrats took the house. 2010 is a good comparison although you can’t compare seats directly because it’s not the same cycle.

I think the Democrats can be disappointed it wasn’t a blow out. Earlier in the year people thought even the senate might be up for grabs. To lose seats, even if it was likely, is not great.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

And every candidate backed by Obama took a nose dive and lost ;)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

That can't be statistically possible.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

According to channel 5 it is.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Well either something has been lost in translation or they're wrong. Here is the list of endorsements: https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Barack_Obama

Just taking one: Tina Smith. She is the projected winner in Minnesota. Jacky Rosen is the projected winner in Nevada and Tammy Baldin is the projected winner in Wisconsin: https://edition.cnn.com/election/2018/results/senate

And if you go for the House there are far too many Endorsements for them to have all lost and the Democrats have won the House.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Maybe it was flake news .

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Maybe it was wishful thinking.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

By Channel 5 or the Smurf ? :D

See the Donald is accepting defeat gracefully by bullying reporters ! Give him his due, he won't change. Just aswell he'll now be stopped from doing whatever he wants. I should think he'll keep just keep quiet and accept it, try and work with opposition and abandon being a twonk. May be he'll quit Twitter too, and welcome the homeless into the White House,champion healthcare for all, ban guns etc. I have every faith in him ;)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ice-department

Sessions is out...

https://komonews.com/news/nation-wor...2018-194818413 He ‘resigned’*...




*”At your request, I am submitting my resignation"

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Is he moving to fire Mueller? Almost certainly the democrats would try to impeach him for obstruction.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

He still thinks this Presidency thing is an episode of The Apprentice.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

And that would be idiotic when they don’t have the Senate. Jeff Sessions being fired is justified. The President of the United States is entitled to choose who he wants as his AG as per the Constitution.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

No one is saying he doesn't have the legal ability to fire him. The question is if he is moving to shut down the investigation. That itself would be stupid because Mueller could pass any incriminating information to the House committees, it could find it's way into the press or back to the FBI. Nixon tried to shut down the investigations into Watergate but it doesn't work.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

An investigation that is politically set up can be shut down. The hoax investigation should be shut down, it’s waste of money. There was no collusion except by the DNC and Hillary paying “Russians” for fake intel aka the Dossier.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

According to you and you aren't privy to the materials they are. We don't conduct criminal investigations by the opinions of the internet. If there is no collusion then there is no harm in letting the investigation continue. However the person who is connected, if not a subject, of an investigation having the power to shut it down is very dodgy. Hence why Sessions recused himself in the first place.

Put it this way. If there was an investigation into the Clinton Foundation under a President Clinton and she shut it down because there was no crime would you think that is fair?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Surely an innocent person would want to be exonerated, with the ability to crow about it. This would appeal tremendously to Trump.....

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Let’s just go back to President Bill Clinton, he was guilty of all sorts, as he got impeached in the House and acquitted in the Senate, at the time because every Democrat Senator stood by him even though he was very guilty of serious crimes and misdemeanours.

The Russian investigation is a sham.

And Yes I am privy to the info, as are you. The info was released early in year. This is not “internet information” that you’re classing it as, this is material released by congress.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Mr Clinton was tried and found innocent. Trump is trying to stop being tried at all.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

We don't have access to all the info.

However if Trump is innocent then no harm will be done by allowing the investigation to continue to completion.

As he is so determined to shut down the investigation that screams guilty to me. He has something to hide.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

He has to have committed a crime first to be tried - no evidence exists to date of ANY Russian collusion.

As for your rubbish above about Bill Clinton - This is where you don't bother to do your homework - Fact: Found innocent not by a Judicial court, but by the political motions in Congress / Senate, he was still impeached by the House of Representatives and in a civil case, he had to pay a settlement fine to a woman who accused him of a sexual allegation which he initially denied, causing him to perjure himself when evidence came to light that he had lied about the Monica Lewinsky affair.

On the passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228–206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221–212 vote).

"In April 1999, Judge Wright found President Bill Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay $1,202 to the court and an additional $90,000 to Jones's lawyers for expenses incurred." - Wikipedia.

Bill Clinton Innocent, my arse!!! :rolleyes:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

How is contempt of court in a civil matter mean Clinton being found guilty of the original charges he was found innocent of?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Not necessarily. Unfortunately, all this is distracting from concentrating on fulfilling the promises he made to the electorate, which presumably is the intention of his detractors.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

The man who was on video last week stating he is the first President to fulfill more promises than he had made:monkey::dunce:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Because um, are you being deliberately obtuse?

He was found guilty in the House of Representatives on the two counts, as I said above. Lying under oath and trying to obstruct justice. His party, The Democrats came to his rescue in the Senate. Impeachment is not a standard Judiciary of proceedings like a court room based on evidence, it’s purely a partisan political circus. Bill Clinton lied under oath, that is a federal crime that carries a 5 year prison sentence, but Democrats aligned with their lying President and cleared him via a political motion.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

He wasn't found guilty of anything by the House - they submitted a resolution to impeach him on two grounds - perjury to a grand jury, and obstruction of justice - and then they were approved.

Impeachment is a political process, being found guilty of something is a legal process (impeachment can lead to further legal proceedings, but in itself is not a legal process).

Once the bill had passed though the House, it went to the Senate for an impeachment trial (actually overseen by a Judge) - they did not get a super-majority of votes required to find him guilty (67 out of 100) - it was 45-55 on one charge, 50-50 on the other (5 Republicans voted with the Democrats on that one).

So Clinton was acquitted, and that means, no matter how many times you say it, he wasn't found guilty.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Never mind Mick, you can have a go at Chelsea Clinton next, a subversive liberal for sure ;)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Wow can't give a meaningful response so starting to insult or at least attempt to is really mature.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

He was found guilty of two counts via the votes that’s the same thing- you never learn that I stand by what I say!! Clinton was guilty!

---------- Post added at 16:21 ---------- Previous post was at 16:19 ----------

Wow nothing. If you cannot accept the facts that’s not my problem. Obtuse or TDS, great description for many folk in this dying topic, time to close it soon, me thinks.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Interesting statement from a pro-Trump Judge on "Fox and Friends" today.

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...lify-under-the

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I don't consider it a dying topic at all and neither do the other members of the forum posting in it and discussing it.

I can accept the facts when the facts are acceptable and valid.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

My thread, I can close it if I want, don’t need your permission. (And I’m also one of the site owners that also gives me the right- A very big one too) !!!

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I heard a comedian saying "Trump is to politics , what Josef Fritzl is to child care"

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

At the Remembrance service, we heard stanzas from the moving Ode of Remembrance:

Unless it is raining of course ..

Armistice Day: Growing criticism of Trump WW1 no-show

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Words fail me on this disrespect for those who made the ultimate sacrifice. :td:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Talking of which....

.....Nothing can be worse than attending the 100 Remembrance in a scruffy looking Anorak with a tiny Poppy pin, quite like Jeremy Corbyn did yesterday, that was disgusting and disrespectful.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Maybe Corbyn should have lent Trump his raincoat. Two birds, one stone.

Anyway I am not sure what the official Poppy size is acceptable but the Poppy pin is sold by the Royal British Legion for a higher amount than the paper poppy, I prefer the pin as it's more sturdy.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Apparently, Mick, we aren't permitted to make comparisons with Labour. It's just too uncomfortable for their supporters to bear, and they have no answers.

So it's easier just to whinge on about the Government.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

I think you can make comparisons with them, especially the tendency to label all opposition as fake news, but I think comparing not turning up with wearing a raincoat with a Poppy of insufficient size is not quite the same.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Agreed - I have 2 pins, an enamel one from the RBL, and one with my old unit from Poppypins.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1542027789

(I still drop a fiver in the collection tin each year).

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Cool, I assume it was Germany related from the bird?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

26 Signals Unit, Berlin (Teufelsberg).

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/2017...a8IjbezqT8csLU

Some of the stuff in this is inaccurate (the bits about the satellite dishes in the radomes), the other bits are mostly right...

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

From what I can see he was wearing the poppy pin that the British Legion sell. I bought the same one. I paid more than the cost of the simple poppy as I wanted to make sure the British Legion got more money. What *is* wrong is suggesting that supporting the British Legion by buying one of their poppies is "disgusting".

So we now have "Poppy Fascists" now, do we? People going around measuring the size of your poppy and declaring you "disrespectful" if it does not measure up .. pathetic ..

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

l don't wear a poppy on a jacket or shirt as l wear wristbands with poppies on as that is what l prefer.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Trump attended memorials over the weekend - no rule says he has to bloody attend them all. If he had have attended them all, the TDS sufferers would have had something else to complain about him.

* Wtf is this two birds one stone shit ?

It's posts like yours thinking a debate is a pissing up the wall contest, is exactly why threads like this one, should be closed!!! :rolleyes:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Sometimes you just have to acknowledge the weakness of a politician you might otherwise generally support. Trying to say an attendee is worse than a non-attendee defies common sense.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Have you seen what you type ?

Fascists go around abusing democracy, going on parades, trying to stop a legitimate democratic result!!!

As for the size of ones poppy - Compared to Theresa May's Poppy, Corbyn's was pathetic, along with his apparent, Tesco value anorak!!!

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Two birds, one stone = solving two problems/tasks with one move. Trump could have avoided the rain and Corbyn wouldn't be wearing the raincoat.

I don't actually care if Trump attends a remembrance service, I don't think it's especially surprising. I was just responding to your post about Corbyn wearing a raincoat and having too small a Poppy.

Anyway 2020 is starting to kick-off: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...didates-955261

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Size isn't everything Mick......

Maybe Jezza could lend Donald his anorak?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Talking of which - I believe Crooked Hillary is putting her name forward again, LMFAO :rofl:

---------- Post added at 15:04 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------

Do catch up - Damien, was laps ahead of you on this point.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

How are they allowing a convicted felon to stand ?:confused:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

When was she convicted, last I heard she got let off after actually violating several Federal Statutes that normally carry prison time, if broken?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

'Got let off' = no evidence = innocent

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

She is not innocent. She admitted her mistake!!!

You obviously have not read the official reports then - typical, no wonder you get many things wrong and incorrect when you don't bother to read the full stories and only what your eyes want to see.

The facts are as follows:

• The Justice Department's inspector general was/is looking into the FBI's handling of a batch of Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop before the 2016 presidential election. Some of the emails discovered were TOP SECRET or at Classified level.
  
• Andrew McCabe, who abruptly quit the FBI before being SACKED, is at the centre of the inquiry.
  
• The FBI, under James Comey and Andrew McCabe's watch, didn't act on the discovery of the emails for weeks, according to the report.

So I'd say - She violated the Statutes that cover Classified Material. Classified Hillary Clinton emails being found on an insecure device belonging to the husband of her aide is pretty strong evidence of a violation or two of Federal law. But alas, she got a free pass thanks to the FBI not doing their jobs properly and or being politically motivated at the time, under the former leadership team, 6 of which have now been terminated from their jobs. ;)

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

[QUOTE=Mick;35970291]Talking of which - I believe Crooked Hillary is putting her name forward again, LMFAO :rofl:

---------- Post added at 15:04 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------




That's good news for the republicans ,another term for Trump looks a certainty.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

The only certain things in life are death and taxes.;)

Attachment 27638

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Admitting to a mistake is not the same as being guilty or being found guilty by a court, jury or judge.

She was let off, meaning not guilty.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Once the Democrat controlled House of Representatives have completed their investigations into Trumps affairs, Hillary will look a saint....

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Let off by people who later got fired from the FBI - go figure. It is irrelevant - She violated the laws/Statutes - nothing you say will negate this.

But wow, thanks for yours and others basic Arm chair lesson in law which I will gladly ignore.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

She's not locked up as promised. Btw where's that wall or healthcare reform ? Me thinks the blond buffoon is full of it and his worshippers have a short attention span...

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

There is no substance in the known universe that can polish that turd into a saint.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

As I said the skeletons in Trumps massive cupboard could.....

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Hold on, I thought Robert Mueller was already doing this and after nearly a year, has found NOTHING on Trump ???

Stop getting ahead of yourself - The Democrats Control the House and that's all.

Trump/Republicans control. Senate / White House / Department of Justice / Supreme Court.

All the Democrats have, is subpoena power but that can still fail when it comes to a sitting President. There is no clear authority on compelling presidential testimony before Congress. The Justice Department has repeatedly asserted an absolute presidential immunity from congressional compulsion to testify.

---------- Post added at 20:21 ---------- Previous post was at 20:13 ----------

Yet again you spout utter immature bollocks. This is nothing to do with worshipping someone, I could say you worship Corbyn, but I won't because it is totally immature. Grow up FFS.

I just see facts overriding certain members feelings, just like they are letting their emotions override their benefit of intellect, and I say this given the absolute poor knowledge certain members have regarding the balance of powers in the U.S Government system.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Mueller hasn't reported yet, there's probably too much to tell ! Trump may try and sack him before the truth comes out about Russia, but the truth will come out one way or another...

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

:clap: Dead right there lol.

https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2018/11/3.png

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Mmm, that postal bomber had a picture with Hillary with a target on her on his van. Sometimes you need to step back and think where all this hate directed at one individual leads.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

You should have a think about where devil worship leads.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Or as is more likely the case - nothing to tell because it never happened, except by the DNC and Hillary, paying for the Russian intel via Fusion GPS, in the form of the Dossier.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

It's been quite a productive year for the team. If Trump gets cleared of Russian collusion, as I hope he will, it will have still delivered on the conviction front.

---------- Post added at 20:51 ---------- Previous post was at 20:51 ----------

Can you expand?

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Looks like there was a blue wave after all with late results going the Democrats way.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8631176.html

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Those late votes look very suspicious, given custody of the ballots is being called in to question in some Senate races.

The Crooked Democrats only gained 32 Seats in the House ? - Obama lost 60+ in his first term LMAO.

No, that still was not a blue wave - Republicans still own the Senate / Supreme Court - White House. Try harder next time Mr K. :rolleyes:

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

Some states allow postal voting up until Election Day itself, military and out of state voters tend to come late too. It's also not unusual for votes to be counted way after Election Day, that happened in 2016 too, it's just that normally the margins are high enough for the networks to be confident in calling it based on the existing total in close elections that is not possible.

Besides it's Florida (again) where people are mostly wondering what the hell is going on.

It's not always the same seats up for grabs so it depends where they are. This time the map was not favourable to Democrats. The popular vote exceeded that that the Republicans got in 2010 for example but they got fewer seats for it. Generally Republicans need fewer votes per seat anyway. If the Democrats 'won' the popular vote by 6% they would have lost seats.

Re: President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation
 

There was no blue wave though which Mr K was attributing to, in his last post.