![]() |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Yeah, but that's load balancing of the network, not of the down streams the guy has. There may be an over-utilisation of the upstream he's on, but even if he was only on one downstream it wouldn't be any better is what I'm saying.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
The packet loss makes me think its not as simple as utilisation. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Considering one downstream channel uses up to 5-10% of the upstream channel capacity to run, fully utilizing 8 downstream channels with one upstream could result in up to 80% of the upstream capacity being utilized just to operate the downstream, while nobody is uploading anything. That leaves very little upstream capacity left over for actual uploading, especially given congestion issues can begin at above 70% upstream utilization ---------- Post added at 03:12 ---------- Previous post was at 03:10 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
The takeaway in the context of Qasi's post is that the frequency of ACKs sent back (through a busy) upstream on data received will slow the download (decrease throughput). Whether or not that is a 5-10% overhead I'll leave to Qasi to justify, if he cares to. But it is an important point that he makes. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
I'd like to know where you're getting your figures, though, 5-10% of upstream per downstream for example. Are you referring to the available bandwidth for the connection (What profile the modem is set to), or the available bandwidth for the channels (8x50Mbit on the downstream, 1x~30Mbit on the upstream?) or what? |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
http://192.168.100.1/VmRouterStatus_upstream.asp Sorry if it's a daft idea. :( (I'll get my coat on the way off the thread. :D ) |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
its fixed now, the issue was it couldnt get a wan ip and I guess whilst in that state in modem mode it isnt responsive. I will post a graph after some uptime.
---------- Post added at 17:52 ---------- Previous post was at 16:10 ---------- http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...22-01-2013.png ---------- Post added at 17:54 ---------- Previous post was at 17:52 ---------- http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...22-01-2013.png http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...21-01-2013.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Seems like a massive improvement on before.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
so far yeah, lets see how it goes at 6pm.
and yeah doh its already gone 6pm, 2US |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
something is going on right now
Maybe is local http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...23-01-2013.png http://www.pingtest.net/result/75986845.png http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...3-01-2013.html |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
2 days after waiting a year or so for the upgrade seems another is needed.
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...24-01-2013.png VM just cant get that modem count down enough. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Where in LE3 are you as I notice you're graph says " Bonded US "
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
fosse road area.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
seems they will load balance it (or whatever they doing) by time |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:19. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum