![]() |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
Quote:
Basically I'm saying that the power levels are more of a guideline and the +/- 6 max is just what'll work best for everyone. The SNR can theoretically drop to as low as 20 and still work but once again, there's a lot more variables that are hard to check that makes it easier to just say 28+ Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
funny to see VM continue upgrading lower utilisation areas ahead of heavy utilisation areas and they wonder why people like me and QTX are leaving.
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping/s...17-01-2013.png My area is also back down to 4 downstream channels. |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Quote:
---------- Post added at 13:37 ---------- Previous post was at 13:36 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
As Qasi says. The SNR strikes me as being the key value. I published in another post somewhere a table of low power levels and the necessary SNR with headroom published in the DOCSIS 3 specs. In practice, the SNR headroom needs to be DOCSIS value + 6dB to allow for impairments not attributable to the foreseen DOCSIS environment.
Yet mine currently seems to be running OK with one channel at 28 dB SNR & power at -11.5 dBmv (albeit some DS speed loss). When I had a VMNG 300, it was plain shocking when I had that brief spell at 28 dB SNR. Is my SH a good'n? LOL! |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Superhubs do tend to report a higher SNR than VMNG300's on the same line.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I'm on 100mb and have reported that i've received bad latency gaming in the evenings and they just fobbed me off saying their was healthy utilisation in my area, I really wonder what he meant by healthy?
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/26.png |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I think you've got more than a utilisation issue there, trikz. What's your modem stats?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
here are my stats http://puu.sh/1QG0X
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Hmm. Those stats, while not perfect, seem reasonable enough that you shouldn't have such terrible pings. There must be an area issue after all.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
8 downstreams with only 1 upstream? Yeah that's begging for problems...
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
Anyone with a clue know why my connection falls apart between 4pm and Midnight exactly every day, I mean, utilisation problems shouldn't be so well scheduled and there's nothing running on my end to swamp my connection during those times by the way.
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2013/01/62.jpg |
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
So you think another upstream could fix this? What's the sort of time-frame for them to do something like that?
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
after your downstream upgrades are done. i waited around 5months after my download double ETA was met. others have had to wait less than that and some more. in short no one knows.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
I don't think the number of downstreams versus the number of upstreams has any impact.
|
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)
load balancing Kushan?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:35. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum