![]() |
Re: Coronavirus
Here's the link to the actual 50 pages of Guvmin guff.
https://assets.publishing.service.go...v2_WEB__1_.pdf 25 pages of waffle before you get to the nub. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
---------- Post added at 19:49 ---------- Previous post was at 19:38 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
|
Re: Coronavirus
It's all perfectly clear as Boris has explained:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WT59lu4tCU |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
The role of Government and Central Banks is to support the economy. It can easily do this because government budgets do not operate like household budgets. The economy tanks either way - the global recession was underway far before lockdown. Death, sick leave and self isolation aren’t good for consumer confidence. The economic crisis is twinned with the health crisis. If you can’t solve the former without solving the latter, regardless of how many deaths you wish to create by not managing the health emergency the fall in the FTSE is here for a while, as are the supply and demand side shocks that have brought forward a recession that was in the cards anyway. Protect people’s jobs and incomes for the duration and the economy comes out healthier in the end. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
In regards to Boris’s message yesterday and today. Only those that don’t want to understand, don’t understand. |
Re: Coronavirus
Shock horror. Capitalist raising own money and risking own assets to prop up failing company. Well I never...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52596273 Surprised Tricky Dicky hadn’t considered this sooner. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
If you had R at 0.5 and maintained that the infection rate would reduce to zero before it hit 80% of the population. Say there’s a million people with it currently - they’d infect half a million - then quarter of a million - 125k - 64k - and so forth until there’s no infections in the population. However maintaining R at 0.5 would be challenging without considerable restrictions - greater than those proposed in England for the next few weeks. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
In reality you couldn't maintain R at 0.5. And that's herd immunity. |
Re: Coronavirus
Poor old jfman! At 0.5, the factor is applied only to the number of new cases not the original total. But no matter, the series leads to an almost complete defeat of the virus providing it can be maintained. The time it takes to do this is for the statisticians and epidemiologists to tell us but at its simplest, using a two week window, it would take a year for the number of new case to dip below 100 starting with 1 million.
To put that into UK perspective, if you started with 250,000 cases then R=0.5 would still take around 24 weeks to dip below 100. If R=0.7 then it would take 46 weeks to dip below 100. BUT - nobody knows the real R rate nor how to fix it to within reasonable margins of error. |
Re: Coronavirus
The late national & local news this evening featured the police, schools & local authorities who either don't understand what Johnson was trying to say, or say that it will be impossible or challenging to deliver what is expected of them.
The police said that it will now be imposdible to police as if they stop anyone, all they have to do is say that they are taking their daily excercise, which they will now be allowed to do all day long. Seaside places say that they don't want flocks of people now coming to their towns to sit on the beach. Nowhere is open, including toilets and there are still people dying in hospitals. One said that there was a high proportion of elderly people that lived there and they didn't want them putting at risk. What an absolute mess. |
Re: Coronavirus
Yes we already have people peeing in the seafront shelters here in my seaside village.
|
Re: Coronavirus
I think the message of common sense is a good one. If you make it very prescriptive there will always be people with valid reasons to break the rules. e.g. you can only travel 5 km to go shopping. What if you live 5.2km from "the shop"? What if you really do live 20km from nearest shop? You can exercise for 1hr, what if you cycled out for 30 mins and on way back had a bike problem or the road is closed forcing a detour over 30 mins? If you prescribe things you have to prescribe exceptions and counter exceptions and so on.
To high-jack Brexit type issue, it's why Eurorules work in some places not others or it gets very complex in countries that have very precise legal frameworks. It's why rules on benefits are complex to try to ensure the entitled are helped but not those who don't need it. The story continues with other areas of life. So a general relaxation with emphasis on "common sense" both to behaviour and policing of behaviour. Unfortunately those that abuse common sense either because they are selfish or simple lack any can spoil things for the majority. As at the start before lockdown when it was hinted not to travel beauty spots recorded record visitor levels. |
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Whereas in the UK, apart from some very precise laws such as speed limits, etc, our legal framework is much looser. As an example, the Coronavirus lock down regulations allows a potential offender to have a "reasonable excuse". Spot on. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum