![]() |
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
They are being prosecuted under the Public Order Act. This act is designed to prevent anti-social behaviour. So, it seems that they may have been behaving like yobs and harassing this woman.
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
The trouble is that we cannot know entirely what exactly what happened because we are only getting one side of the case and only a limited one at that.All this fierce speculation and anger over perceived unfair advantages of one religious community over another is immaterial UNTIL we get to the court case in December and we get the evidence from both sides.
Why not kick back and relax until then...all of us.;) |
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
I dunno but maybe having possibly the most important person in their lives referred to as a "Minor Prophet" they felt the need to express their perception of the woman's faith.
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
If that's the case then someone needs thicker skin. For the last 6 years I've had abuse worse than that about my faith and Jesus, in real life and on Cable Forum.
However until it gets to court we don't yet know the difference between what was said and what the Mail would have us think. |
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Quote:
So the Christian (a term I use very loosely) Institute will have won their immoral high ground and the BNP will cite this case every time they are shouted down because of their vile and abhorrent rhetoric. I wonder if this couple will object about their image being used to promote the BNP at election time. ---------- Post added at 09:57 ---------- Previous post was at 09:48 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Oh something tell me in my water that we WILL be hearing more about this case.I can almost guarantee that.;)
However if the court case ends up being heard around the time of a General Election maybe not..:D |
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
re "minor prophet" - Jesus is regarded (ttbomk) one of the five "leaders of the prophets" in the Islamic faith.
1. Noah 2. Abraham 3. Moses 4. Jesus 5. Muhammad |
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
So, hardly a minor prophet then. I wonder if they understood what she was telling them, or were they so blindly ignorant of the Islamic faith, they heard what they wanted to hear.
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Noah is not such a shining example after the flood abaited he got drunk and danced naked and Moses was not allowed into the holy land because he took credit for the parting of the red sea iirc
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Quote:
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
I take offence of you mocking me I will see you in court lollol
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Quote:
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Quote:
Conversely as a new convert to Islam, the woman may have misunderstood what she had been taught/read and made an incorrect statement - equally possible don't you think? As Russ said, they needed thicker skins and so does she. :) |
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
As far as selective hearing is concerned, it is probable that they had a misconception of an Islamic perspective, on its views on the life of Jesus. So, (only a bit of fun you understand :)) it is entirely possible that she said something like, "Jesus is considered to be one of the Ulul Azmi (the five leaders) and they took it as she meant he was insignificant. But then it is equally conceivable that she did misinterpret her own understanding of the Islamic view on Jesus. Still, that is no excuse then to insult her and tell her that she is under some form bondage, just because she chooses to wear a hijab (which they called a burkha, apparently).
|
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs
Quote:
Why can you not accept this ? Do you know the reason the act was brought out? the purpose of its existence? Imo it's a sledge hammer to crack a nut. Bang the three of their heads together. But as has been said, all will no doubt come to light in court. But from your comments you appear to be siding one way, I would say until it gets to court have an open mind. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 16:26. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum