Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Updated: Boris resigns as party leader (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33710650)

1andrew1 08-05-2022 22:19

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36121626)

It’s funny that you are going on about ‘proving intent’. You didn’t make that point when criticising the PM when, according to you, he lied to parliament.

Neither should be resigning over the trivial event of receiving a fine. We’ve got everything way out of proportion here.

What I actually said when Johnson was fined for breaking his own rules was that he either lied or was incompetent enough to not know his own rules which he had broadcast to the nation about.

Johnson should resign over his fixed penalty notice and if Starmer gets one, he should do the same as well. The trust of a nation in its politicians is not a minor matter. It's the bedrock of a functioning democracy.

---------- Post added at 22:19 ---------- Previous post was at 22:14 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121629)
The Tories are now trying to calm things down hoping Starmer doesn't resign: https://twitter.com/patrickkmaguire/...50692345245696


Be interesting to see if the Daily Mail also tries to pull back a bit. The rumour that Starmer will resign if fined has spooked them.

But Starmer 100% should resign if fined. I hope he doesn't take this as an excuse to stay on.

I'm sure he won't stay on if he is fined. He would become an electoral liability as Johnson has become and the job would cease to be fun. At least if you're PM you get to enjoy power even if you do get difficult TV interviews and even then they're optional.

Pierre 08-05-2022 22:36

Re: All those No.10 lockdown parties
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121571)
Firstly, it should go without saying that if Starmer broke the rules he voted in favour of and called others out on, he should resign.

Everything, beyond this statement is totally irrelevant. But thanks anyway.

Mick 09-05-2022 11:32

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
BREAKING: Labour Party staff were drunk at the Starmer curry and beer gathering in Durham, a person familiar with what happened tells Politico’s Playbook

LOTO, Labour and Mary Foy MP do not deny the claim. - Alex Wickham, Politico’s Playbook.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1652092234

1andrew1 09-05-2022 11:35

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Would you expect LOTO and the Labour Party to respond to such requests on a Sunday? This is not a rhetorical question, I don't know the answer myself.

papa smurf 09-05-2022 11:38

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I thought the labour party under Corbyn was bad but sir beer has brought it to a new low.

Chris 09-05-2022 11:39

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121674)
Would you expect LOTO and the Labour Party to respond to such requests on a Sunday? This is not a rhetorical question, I don't know the answer myself.

Yes, because Sunday morning TV and Sunday newspapers are a big thing, and significant revelations often emerge. There absolutely would be someone in the press office on a Sunday and while it might be Starmer’s day off they absolutely could get a line from him if they wanted to. The choice not to engage is deliberate. You may speculate as to the reasons.

Mick 09-05-2022 11:52

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
NEW: Tells you all you need to know.

A YouGov poll says Labour Supporters say Keir Starmer should resign more than Conservatives.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1652093511

BenMcr 09-05-2022 11:53

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121672)
Alex Wickham, Politico’s Playbook.

Personally I'd wait until there is a reporting source other than Alex Wickham the godfather of Winfred Johnson.

Mick 09-05-2022 12:00

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36121679)
Personally I'd wait until there is a reporting source other than Alex Wickham the godfather of Winfred Johnson.

But using sources like the left leaning guardian/mirror for attacks on Johnson is completely fine…. Got it.

BenMcr 09-05-2022 12:05

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121681)
But using sources like the left leaning guardian/mirror for attacks on Johnson is completely fine…. Got it.

Nothing do to do with it being a left or right site - it's the direct personal link of the reporter to Starmer's/Labour's political rival.

Mick 09-05-2022 12:08

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36121682)
Nothing do to do with it being a left or right site - it's the direct personal link of the reporter to their political rival.

I don’t care who he is. I believe his inside source.

---------- Post added at 12:08 ---------- Previous post was at 12:06 ----------

BREAKING: Keir Starmer considers pledging to resign if fined over ‘beergate’
Colleagues urge Labour leader ‘regain moral high ground’ over Boris Johnson. - The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/k...gate-j7flbzv2n

Damien 09-05-2022 12:13

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I think he should. Otherwise he won’t have an answer to the millions of questions he’ll get on this. Saying he is awaiting the result of the investigation but will resign if found to have broken the rules is an effective answer.

Plus most Labour supporters will want him to go if he did break the rules.

Mick 09-05-2022 12:19

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121685)
I think he should. Otherwise he won’t have an answer to the millions of questions he’ll get on this. Saying he is awaiting the result of the investigation but will resign if found to have broken the rules is an effective answer.

Plus most Labour supporters will want him to go if he did break the rules.

But it’s a bit of a change of tact don’t you think, all last week and over the weekend, Starmer was a confident ‘not broken rules’ to the extreme position of potential resignation by Monday, he ducks out of Q&A session (essentially going in to hiding). Further credible revelations of the event being a total piss up event.

Damien 09-05-2022 13:00

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121686)
But it’s a bit of a change of tact don’t you think, all last week and over the weekend, Starmer was a confident ‘not broken rules’ to the extreme position of potential resignation by Monday, he ducks out of Q&A session (essentially going in to hiding). Further credible revelations of the event being a total piss up event.

Not sure it's a massive change of tact. He'll still say he is confident he didn't break any rules. Just adding if he is found he did break the rules that he would resign.

We'll see if he announces it but it's the easiest way for him to have an answer to this question for the next few weeks.

Mick 09-05-2022 13:06

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121694)
Not sure it's a massive change of tact. He'll still say he is confident he didn't break any rules. Just adding if he is found he did break the rules that he would resign.

We'll see if he announces it but it's the easiest way for him to have an answer to this question for the next few weeks.

I just don’t buy he’s feeling confident. A confident man doesn’t run from the press, which is exactly what he’s done by cancelling the Q&A event he planned for later today.

Damien 09-05-2022 14:59

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121695)
I just don’t buy he’s feeling confident. A confident man doesn’t run from the press, which is exactly what he’s done by cancelling the Q&A event he planned for later today.

If he really does say he'll resign if found to have broken the law I don't think it's a sign of confidence so much as giving in to the reality of the situation. Everyone knows the chances of a fine are high but if he is fined it's better that he resigns anyway, so why not announce that now and avoid weeks of awkward questions?

This story isn't going to stop. The Daily Mail has had, I think, 12-13 days on which this has been their headline in the last 14-15 days. The investigation is reportedly going to take another month. Labour could just say 'we don't believe any rules have been broken, if they'll have Starmer will resign and so now let's await the results of the investigation'.

I say if because I have little faith that a politician would do the right thing.

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ----------

Starmer will make a statement at 4pm where he is rumoured to confirm he'll resign if issues a FPN.

1andrew1 09-05-2022 15:05

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121696)
Starmer will make a statement at 4pm where he is rumoured to confirm he'll resign if issues a FPN.

It's the sensible thing to do. I genuinely think he will be cleared but no skin off my nose if he's not. But if he's not cleared, he will aim to bring down Johnson too.

---------- Post added at 15:05 ---------- Previous post was at 15:03 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121696)
I say if because I have little faith that a politician would do the right thing

That's what false equivalence stories aim to make us think - they're all as bad as each other so I may as well vote for anyone.

Damien 09-05-2022 15:16

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I think it's more likely he'll get fined or not, at least 50/50, so we could be about to have another leadership election in the Labour Party as well.

Mick 09-05-2022 15:46

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I firmly believe he’ll be fined, he’s told that many versions of what’s gone on that it raises strong doubts it was a working session, given what we now know. Boris and No. 10 co got a fine for giving him a cake whilst they claimed they was at work. Organising a piss up and a curry, late on a Friday evening, isn’t working.

Damien 09-05-2022 15:48

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
At least we won't have weeks of speculation on what will happen if he does.

1andrew1 09-05-2022 15:51

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121723)
At least we won't have weeks of speculation on what will happen if he does.

It puts the ball firmly back in Johnson's court so we'll just have weeks of speculation about his position instead.

However, as we saw with Dominic Cummings, Durham police's previous approach was not to issue retrospective fines over lockdown breaches. So Starmer could just be ticked off but not fined so would have no reason to resign if he made his resignation dependent upon being fined. See 3.16pm here: https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

GrimUpNorth 09-05-2022 16:04

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I wonder if Kier will offer to stand aside until the police investigation findings are made public? Might be a good move.

papa smurf 09-05-2022 16:04

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121696)
If he really does say he'll resign if found to have broken the law I don't think it's a sign of confidence so much as giving in to the reality of the situation. Everyone knows the chances of a fine are high but if he is fined it's better that he resigns anyway, so why not announce that now and avoid weeks of awkward questions?

This story isn't going to stop. The Daily Mail has had, I think, 12-13 days on which this has been their headline in the last 14-15 days. The investigation is reportedly going to take another month. Labour could just say 'we don't believe any rules have been broken, if they'll have Starmer will resign and so now let's await the results of the investigation'.

I say if because I have little faith that a politician would do the right thing.[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 14:59 ---------- Previous post was at 13:12 ----------

[/COLOR]Starmer will make a statement at 4pm where he is rumoured to confirm he'll resign if issues a FPN.



will this have any sway on the outcome of the investigation as Durham has a labour police and crime commissioner.

Damien 09-05-2022 16:07

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
It makes it a bigger decision for Durham police but then it always was going to be so. Same with when the Met had to decide if they would fine the Prime Minister.

I don't think the Commissioner gets involved in these decisions and it would be a scandal if they did.

---------- Post added at 16:07 ---------- Previous post was at 16:06 ----------

Starmer is giving his speech now.

Says no laws are broken. Was simply eating late. But if the police issue him with a FPN he'll resign.

TheDaddy 09-05-2022 16:10

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121696)

I say if because I have little faith that a politician would do the right thing.

Least your not naive like me for expecting them to do the right thing

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121722)
I firmly believe he’ll be fined, he’s told that many versions of what’s gone on that it raises strong doubts it was a working session, given what we now know. Boris and No. 10 co got a fine for giving him a cake whilst they claimed they was at work. Organising a piss up and a curry, late on a Friday evening, isn’t working.

I get confused, was the cake ambush the same one as when they went down the off licence with suitcases to replenish or was that a different one?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121696)

This story isn't going to stop. The Daily Mail has had, I think, 12-13 days on which this has been their headline in the last 14-15 days. The investigation is reportedly going to take another month. Labour could just say 'we don't believe any rules have been broken, if they'll have Starmer will resign and so now let's await the results of the investigation'.
.

And yet they were telling us for weeks to move on, don't we know there's a war on :rofl: what a grubby rag

Mick 09-05-2022 16:12

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
He’s only let a select amount of the media in. Absolute set of planks @ Labour Party.

Damien 09-05-2022 16:12

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36121731)
I get confused, was the cake ambush the same one as when they went down the off licence with suitcases to replenish or was that a different one?

Different one. I am not sure the suitcases of wine is being investigated.

papa smurf 09-05-2022 16:17

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121732)
He’s only let a select amount of the media in. Absolute set of planks @ Labour Party.

After the drubbing he just got from Beth Rigby i don't blame him.

I guess he now wishes he hadn't climbed on that high horse when bojo was investigated

Damien 09-05-2022 16:19

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Next Labour Leader Odds:

Andy Burnham: 26/5
Wes Streeting: 9/1
Rachel Reeves: 9/1
Lida Nandy: 10/1
Angela Rayner: 10/1
Yvette Cooper: 14/1
Bridget Phillipson: 25/1

Mick 09-05-2022 16:24

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
BREAKING: Rayner says she’ll go too if she receives a FPN.

Damien 09-05-2022 16:27

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121739)
BREAKING: Rayner says she’ll go too if she receives a FPN.

She'll have to step down if she wants to run for leader ;)

GrimUpNorth 09-05-2022 16:34

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121740)
She'll have to step down if she wants to run for leader ;)

Is there anything in the rules to stop Kier stepping down and standing again?

TheDaddy 09-05-2022 16:37

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36121741)
Is there anything in the rules to stop Kier stepping down and standing again?

His past performance pre this fiasco

---------- Post added at 16:37 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121734)
Different one. I am not sure the suitcases of wine is being investigated.

Thanks

Mick 09-05-2022 16:38

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121732)
He’s only let a select amount of the media in. Absolute set of planks @ Labour Party.

This was the press pool allowed in for the Statement. No room they told other journos. Not a good look Labour! Same old same old!

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1652110578

Damien 09-05-2022 16:50

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I think he is a coward for not drinking a can of 1664 during the speech.

papa smurf 09-05-2022 16:52

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121746)
I think he is a coward for not drinking a can of 1664 during the speech.

He's got 2 glasses of water, must have a very dry throat ;)

Damien 09-05-2022 16:57

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Probably been out on a session. That's why he couldn't be contacted yesterday.

Mick 09-05-2022 17:15

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
How’s everyone’s Monday going?

I know of a few police officers in Durham now have the future of British Politics in the palm of their hands. :D

papa smurf 09-05-2022 17:19

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121749)
How’s everyone’s Monday going?

I know of a few police officers in Durham now have the future of British Politics in the palm of their hands. :D

Starmer has planned it that way ,he's saying the fate of the labour party/ future prime minister is in the forces hands,he's a devious bent git.

Mick 09-05-2022 17:22

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
What if the Durham Police issue the fine because it forces Johnson’s hand, Keir is just collateral damage?

papa smurf 09-05-2022 17:30

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121751)
What if the Durham Police issue the fine because it forces Johnson’s hand, Keir is just collateral damage?

Bojo won't resign, he's paid the fine and apologised to parliament and the people, it was starmer who weaponised a slice of cake to make political gain.
But now starmer is trying to influence the police by releasing this statement.

Damien 09-05-2022 17:48

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121751)
What if the Durham Police issue the fine because it forces Johnson’s hand, Keir is just collateral damage?

It could go either way with this. The statement could be argued to make it less likely they issue the fine because they don't want to be seen to take down the LOTO or more likely because they don't want to have let that influence the decision. And so on.

As with the Met Police these people aren't thick. They know the consequences. I think the level of attention this case is getting makes it more likely rather than less IMO. After all, as with the Met Police and No 10, this case wouldn't have been taken if those accused were ordinary people.

Sephiroth 09-05-2022 18:05

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 

As leader of the opposition, he is paid by the state for his office. Not much less than the PM. Of course he must resign if there is a fine. And 30 people not in his bubble in a closed room is a violation of the law at the time.

1andrew1 09-05-2022 18:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36121761)

As leader of the opposition, he is paid by the state for his office. Not much less than the PM. Of course he must resign if there is a fine. And 30 people not in his bubble in a closed room is a violation of the law at the time.

Absolutely agree that he should resign if there is a fine. Credit to Rayner for saying she will do this too, Sunak could learn from her in this respect.

Two points on your other comments:
  • Everyone seems to take as gospel there were 30 people attending who all had several beers and a curry for £200. These two figures don't reconcile.
  • You were allowed to work together in the same room then and in fact you could even go out for a working meal for 30 people back in Autum 2020
    https://www.squaremeal.co.uk/restaur...486484ec2675be

Mick 09-05-2022 18:44

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121767)
Absolutely agree that he should resign if there is a fine. Credit to Rayner for saying she will do this too, Sunak could learn from her in this respect.

Two points on your other comments:
  • Everyone seems to take as gospel there were 30 people attending who all had several beers and a curry for £200. These two figures don't reconcile.
  • You were allowed to work together in the same room then and in fact you could even go out for a working meal for 30 people back in Autum 2020
    https://www.squaremeal.co.uk/restaur...486484ec2675be

Some people could have shared one single potion of Indian food, some portions can be that large, they may have got a discount, you can’t really measure people there to a £200 curry bill.

Your last point is wrong. Mixing in doors, sharing of food, at the time of Starmers curry & piss up event, wasn’t allowed.

Damien 09-05-2022 18:44

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Didn't it change to 15 people?

Mick 09-05-2022 18:53

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121769)
Didn't it change to 15 people?

It probably did, problem is the accounts of it have changed so many times. :spin:

OLD BOY 09-05-2022 18:54

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36121761)

As leader of the opposition, he is paid by the state for his office. Not much less than the PM. Of course he must resign if there is a fine. And 30 people not in his bubble in a closed room is a violation of the law at the time.

The only reason Sir Kier should resign is because he went on and on at the Prime Minister to do so just for being investigated by the police! Guilty before the evidence was even tested!

A fine for a breach of the lockdown rules is nothing. If it was an offence carrying a prison sentence, that would be different.

Yes, some people are indeed upset because they may have lost loved ones during the pandemic, and that's understandable, but associating the party allegations with their cicumstances is grossly over-egging the pot. The rules were on place to protect them and they would have been in place no matter what was going on at no 10.

People have become very picky in recent years and its time that we started debating the real problems we face in this country and the rest of the world. This self-righteous nonsense needs to cease. We nesd to get a collective grip.

Julian 09-05-2022 19:10

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
He has been very crafty in tying his resignation to a fine being issued. Durham police don't do retrospective fines as Cummings found out.
Starmer will be found guilty and not fined. He has been asked repeatedly whether he would resign under these circumstances and has refused to answer.

He is some piece of work that's for sure.

GrimUpNorth 09-05-2022 19:18

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36121771)
People have become very picky in recent years and its time that we started debating the real problems we face in this country and the rest of the world. This self-righteous nonsense needs to cease. We nesd to get a collective grip.

Genuinely interested to know, where on the scale of law breaking do you feel being picky stops and real concern should begin? Are you suggesting that every law when broken that results in punishments below your bar should be repealed? Quite a strange stance from someone who seems staunchly behind the party that prides themselves as the party of law and order don't you think?

Pierre 09-05-2022 20:26

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36121752)
But now starmer is trying to influence the police by releasing this statement.

100%, make the media work for you.

---------- Post added at 20:26 ---------- Previous post was at 20:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121714)
It's the sensible thing to do.

To influence a police investigation, yes it is.

Damien 09-05-2022 20:36

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121770)
It probably did, problem is the accounts of it have changed so many times. :spin:

I read in The Times it was 15 people. This works out at £13 a person which makes more sense.

ianch99 09-05-2022 21:55

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
So the people who made the rules and told dying people their loved ones could not visit them at their death beds did this, while those people were dying. 15 parties in total. Some with Karaoke machines, swing breaking, official photographers and suitcases of booze:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSORnHUW...jpg&name=small

Yes, just as bad as a constituency office curry ...

Julian 09-05-2022 22:14

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36121790)

Yes, just as bad as a constituency office curry ...

Bless.......

Mick 09-05-2022 22:28

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36121790)
So the people who made the rules and told dying people their loved ones could not visit them at their death beds did this, while those people were dying. 15 parties in total. Some with Karaoke machines, swing breaking, official photographers and suitcases of booze:

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Yes, just as bad as a constituency office curry ...

It was a planned piss up and curry night.

I don’t think anyone has said here Boris isn’t still in political jeopardy, but surely even you can’t surmise that the amount of lying from Labour is just as bad as the Tory party lying here?

Damien 09-05-2022 22:31

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121793)
It was a planned piss up and curry night.

I don’t think anyone has said here Boris isn’t still in political jeopardy, but surely even you can’t surmise that the amount of lying from Labour is just as bad as the Tory party lying here?

The Tories lied about multiple parties and did so to Parliament on a couple of occasions. Not sure why it's different, there was just more of it.

Mick 09-05-2022 22:43

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121794)
The Tories lied about multiple parties and did so to Parliament on a couple of occasions. Not sure why it's different, there was just more of it.

Lying to parliament hasn’t been proven it’s being investigated by that committee they all voted for few weeks back.

It’s immaterial because rule breaking is rule breaking. Starmer stood on his moral soap box, used emotional stories about family members not being able to see dying loved ones when he himself had organised a curry and piss up night and claimed he was working, when he wasn’t.

Damien 09-05-2022 22:46

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121795)
Lying to parliament hasn’t been proven it’s being investigated by that committee they all voted for few weeks back.

It’s immaterial because rule breaking is rule breaking. Starmer stood on his moral soap box, used emotional stories about family members not being able to see dying loved ones when he himself had organised a curry and piss up night and claimed he was working, when he wasn’t.

Well this has not been proven either yet, it's being investigated by the police. Maybe Starmer has evidence they were working whilst eating? Who knows.

As I said he should resign if fined and now it turns out he will.

As you said rule-breaking is rule-breaking and if Starmer goes for one incident then so should Johnson. Especially so if Johnson gets fined multiple times for multiple parties.

1andrew1 09-05-2022 22:49

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36121768)
Your last point is wrong. Mixing in doors, sharing of food, at the time of Starmers curry & piss up event, wasn’t allowed.

I appreciate that this is a sincerely-held belief of yours, Mick.

However, whilst I am no Starmer fan, everything I’ve seen about that period indicates there was an exemption for working meals.

For example:
Quote:

Evening Standard On informal business meetings, or business lunches, the [No. 10] spokesperson said that work meetings that need to take place face-to-face are exempt from gathering restrictions. She again highlighted the fact that some people, such as the self-employed and freelancers, may not have a workplace to conduct such business meetings, and so could do so in a hospitality setting.
https://www.standard.co.uk/business/...us-b79350.html

Quote:

What were the rules during Beergate and when was it?
…Outdoor socialising was permitted, but only in groups of up to six people from two separate households. Pubs and restaurants were allowed to open, providing outdoor service only.
Outdoor socialising was permitted, but only in groups of up to six people from two separate households. Pubs and restaurants were allowed to open, providing outdoor service only.

However, indoor gatherings were allowed as long as they were for “work purposes”. This permitted colleagues to eat and drink together where this was “reasonably necessary for work”.
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news...rules-23909439

Damien 09-05-2022 22:52

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
TBH I don't care as much now he said he'll resign.

The worst-case scenario was Starmer is fined and then both Johnson and him pretend none of it happened and you have two lying leaders who broke laws they voted for debating each other every week. At least now there will only be one.

papa smurf 10-05-2022 08:27

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121797)
I appreciate that this is a sincerely-held belief of yours, Mick.

However, whilst I am no Starmer fan, everything I’ve seen about that period indicates there was an exemption for working meals.

For example:

https://www.standard.co.uk/business/...us-b79350.html


https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news...rules-23909439





No but your a bloody good comedian :rofl::rofl::rofl:

Sephiroth 10-05-2022 09:16

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36121771)
The only reason Sir Kier should resign is because he went on and on at the Prime Minister to do so just for being investigated by the police! Guilty before the evidence was even tested!

A fine for a breach of the lockdown rules is nothing. If it was an offence carrying a prison sentence, that would be different.

Yes, some people are indeed upset because they may have lost loved ones during the pandemic, and that's understandable, but associating the party allegations with their cicumstances is grossly over-egging the pot. The rules were on place to protect them and they would have been in place no matter what was going on at no 10.

People have become very picky in recent years and its time that we started debating the real problems we face in this country and the rest of the world. This self-righteous nonsense needs to cease. We nesd to get a collective grip.

I'm just having fun, OB. I'm more interested in "holier than thou" Starmer getting got than Boris, though I do want Boris out.

When/if Starmer goes, then the barrage on Boris will be even greater and the fun will be even better.

jonbxx 10-05-2022 10:02

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I notice that while Twitter goes in to meltdown with special mentions for Dan Wooton of GB News, Dan Hodges of the Mail on Sunday and Harry Cole of The Sun, senior conservatives are very quiet on all of this, even Nadine Dorries.

Either they have a pretty good idea of the outcome, are worried how this might affect Boris Johnson, or are letting their client journalists whip up the fury while keeping their hands clean. I suspect a little of each

Damien 10-05-2022 10:11

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
The Times has already reported that Senior Conservatives have been trying to die down talk of resignation and got a bit angry when some Tory came close to suggesting it the other day.

The ideal for the Tories is Starmer is fined and stays. Him resigning probably won't cause Johnson to resign but still looks bad and the next Labour Leader has a clean slate to attack especially if it happens before the Sue Grey report arrives.

Sephiroth 10-05-2022 10:15

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I've just returned from a weekend in Vienna.

The dozens of people with whom I interacted are all of the opinion that Boris is a total clown. When I mention Starmer, I get: "Wass ist Dass?"

More seriously, when Boris is gone, maybe our political reputation in Europe will rise - for a short while at least.

Mr K 10-05-2022 11:18

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36121825)
I've just returned from a weekend in Vienna.

The dozens of people with whom I interacted are all of the opinion that Boris is a total clown. When I mention Starmer, I get: "Wass ist Dass?"

More seriously, when Boris is gone, maybe our political reputation in Europe will rise - for a short while at least.

There isn't any chance of anyone in Europe taking the UK seriously again. We're an irrelevance.

1andrew1 10-05-2022 11:39

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
The Mail seems to be tying itself up in contradictions! Monday it crticises Starmer for not clearing the air, Tuesday it criticises him for clearing the air!

Of course, all this comes on top of its previous headline that criticised the opening of a police investigation into the No 10 parties!


No respect to their readers' intelligence.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1652179532

Sephiroth 10-05-2022 11:40

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36121830)
There isn't any chance of anyone in Europe taking the UK seriously again. We're an irrelevance.

Not what my interlocutors were saying. It was just Boris they were laughing at plus serious regret that the UK's departure from the EU enabled France (Macron) to get busy with their ludicrous plan to lead everything.

Damien 10-05-2022 11:52

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36121825)
I've just returned from a weekend in Vienna.

The dozens of people with whom I interacted are all of the opinion that Boris is a total clown. When I mention Starmer, I get: "Wass ist Dass?"

More seriously, when Boris is gone, maybe our political reputation in Europe will rise - for a short while at least.

I like Vienna.

And yeah it's typical people don't know who the opposition is in most countries I would say. I doubt many people in England could name the most senior member of the opposition in France, Germany, Italy e.t.c.

1andrew1 10-05-2022 13:01

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36121821)
I notice that while Twitter goes in to meltdown with special mentions for Dan Wooton of GB News, Dan Hodges of the Mail on Sunday and Harry Cole of The Sun, senior conservatives are very quiet on all of this, even Nadine Dorries.

Either they have a pretty good idea of the outcome, are worried how this might affect Boris Johnson, or are letting their client journalists whip up the fury while keeping their hands clean. I suspect a little of each

I think you're right.

---------- Post added at 13:01 ---------- Previous post was at 11:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36121830)
There isn't any chance of anyone in Europe taking the UK seriously again. We're an irrelevance.

In terms of Europe and Ukraine we're centre stage and not an irrelevance.

ianch99 10-05-2022 15:24

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Priceless ...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSUloBEX...jpg&name=small

papa smurf 10-05-2022 15:29

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36121869)
Priceless ...

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Did he have 30 pissed up law breakers with him? your post is a little short of info.

1andrew1 10-05-2022 15:51

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36121870)
Did he have 30 pissed up law breakers with him? your post is a little short of info.

That must be a reference to Johnson as there were only 15 people involved at curry gate.

Congratulations on stepping up and criticising Johnson, I thought your adoration of him knew no limits. My bad. :angel:

ianch99 10-05-2022 15:54

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36121870)
Did he have 30 pissed up law breakers with him? your post is a little short of info.

Ah, so you were there then? Tell all .. does the 30 include his wife *and* the official photographer? :p:

papa smurf 10-05-2022 16:00

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121871)
That must be a reference to Johnson as there were only 15 people involved at curry gate.

Congratulations on stepping up and criticising Johnson, I thought your adoration of him knew no limits. My bad. :angel:

Police are facing renewed pressure to investigate the so-called 'Beergate' event
Keir Starmer admitted sharing a lockdown curry with up to 30 Labour officials
Sadiq Khan suggested 'equivalence' with Boris Johnson's birthday gathering

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-birthday.html

1andrew1 10-05-2022 16:53

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36121873)
Police are facing renewed pressure to investigate the so-called 'Beergate' event
Keir Starmer admitted sharing a lockdown curry with up to 30 Labour officials
Sadiq Khan suggested 'equivalence' with Boris Johnson's birthday gathering

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-birthday.html

It was down to 15 people by yesterday.

Quote:

Alex Wickham [Politico Editor] 9 May

What happened at the Starmer curry? Here's a person familiar:
— 'working dinner' pre-arranged
— but takeaway arrived late, after work had finished
— 15 people stayed to eat & drink anyway
— it therefore "crossed the line"
— they'll speak to cops
— 2 "redthroats" talking to media
https://twitter.com/alexwickham/stat...60902552784896

OLD BOY 10-05-2022 17:35

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36121776)
Genuinely interested to know, where on the scale of law breaking do you feel being picky stops and real concern should begin? Are you suggesting that every law when broken that results in punishments below your bar should be repealed? Quite a strange stance from someone who seems staunchly behind the party that prides themselves as the party of law and order don't you think?

The punishment is a fine - not the loss of your livelihood. As I said, a sense of proportion is required.

---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36121790)
So the people who made the rules and told dying people their loved ones could not visit them at their death beds did this, while those people were dying. 15 parties in total. Some with Karaoke machines, swing breaking, official photographers and suitcases of booze:

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Yes, just as bad as a constituency office curry ...

Give us a break, please! If and when he’s found wanting you can criticise. Like for Sir Kier, we are awaiting a verdict.

---------- Post added at 17:27 ---------- Previous post was at 17:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36121794)
The Tories lied about multiple parties and did so to Parliament on a couple of occasions. Not sure why it's different, there was just more of it.

He didn’t lie if he thought it was true.

---------- Post added at 17:35 ---------- Previous post was at 17:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36121869)
Priceless ...

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

Yes, as I said many moons ago, pretty well everyone was breaking the rules in some way or other, but kidding themselves that they weren’t. This whole ridiculous debate is so trivial, it’s hard to take any of it seriously.

Hugh 10-05-2022 18:39

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36121888)
The punishment is a fine - not the loss of your livelihood. As I said, a sense of proportion is required.

---------- Post added at 17:26 ---------- Previous post was at 17:24 ----------



Give us a break, please! If and when he’s found wanting you can criticise. Like for Sir Kier, we are awaiting a verdict.

---------- Post added at 17:27 ---------- Previous post was at 17:26 ----------



He didn’t lie if he thought it was true.

---------- Post added at 17:35 ---------- Previous post was at 17:27 ----------



Yes, as I said many moons ago, pretty well everyone was breaking the rules in some way or other, but kidding themselves that they weren’t. This whole ridiculous debate is so trivial, it’s hard to take any of it seriously.

tbf, given his long history of telling porkies, he could have been lying about thinking what he said was true…

OLD BOY 10-05-2022 18:49

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36121904)
tbf, given his long history of telling porkies, he could have been lying about thinking what he said was true…

True, but you couldn’t prove it!

Hugh 10-05-2022 19:29

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
Dan Hodges has gone full "Wibble!"…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1652207477

Damien 10-05-2022 19:43

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Just how deep does this go!?

GrimUpNorth 10-05-2022 19:44

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36121888)
The punishment is a fine - not the loss of your livelihood. As I said, a sense of proportion is required.

To be fair, I think what's required are politicians that set an example and face the consequences of their actions. I'm disappointed Kier at the very least didn't step aside pending the outcome of the police investigation particularly as he was demanding Borris should resign. I'm not however disappointed with Borris as I think we all know he's no better than a snake oil salesman and a particularly bad one at that.

1andrew1 10-05-2022 20:09

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36121909)
Dan Hodges has gone full "Wibble!"…

He's always been a bit like that, I think.

There's a difference between changing jobs and dying in shady circumstances like a Russian oligarch.

Meanwhile, two interesting points have come to light over the video of Starmer:

1. The entrance to the Miner's hall is 100 yards past the front gates, so video taker Ivo Delingpole was not just passing by a window as claimed.
https://twitter.com/cirian75/status/1523740121895702528

2. It was taken by Ivo Delingpole, the son of Breitbart, Telegraph and Spectator writer James Delingpole. When the video of circulated last April, he tweeted about it without mentioning that his son had filmed it.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...o-sink-starmer

---------- Post added at 20:09 ---------- Previous post was at 20:00 ----------

Wonder why you didn't point this possibly out to to posters who said that Starmer lied? Do you think Starmer is more honest than Johnson?
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36121888)
He didn’t lie if he thought it was true.


papa smurf 10-05-2022 20:18

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121913)
He's always been a bit like that, I think.

There's a difference between changing jobs and dying in shady circumstances like a Russian oligarch.

Meanwhile, two interesting points have come to light over the video of Starmer:

1. The entrance to the Miner's hall is 100 yards past the front gates, so video taker Ivo Delingpole was not just passing by a window as claimed.
https://twitter.com/cirian75/status/1523740121895702528

2. It was taken by Ivo Delingpole, the son of Breitbart, Telegraph and Spectator writer James Delingpole. When the video of circulated last April, he tweeted about it without mentioning that his son had filmed it.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...o-sink-starmer

---------- Post added at 20:09 ---------- Previous post was at 20:00 ----------

Wonder why you didn't point this possibly out to to posters who said that Starmer lied? Do you think Starmer is more honest than Johnson?



we all owe him our thanks for uncovering this illegal booze up that sir beer tried to cover up.

Pierre 10-05-2022 21:12

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Please just make it stop now. Nobody cares anymore. I don’t care if Johnson stays or goes. I don’t care if Starmer stays or goes.

Can we please just concentrate on getting the economy back on track, tackling inflation and interest rates and looking after the vulnerable.

You know, like important stuff.

Damien 10-05-2022 21:46

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36121922)
Please just make it stop now. Nobody cares anymore. I don’t care if Johnson stays or goes. I don’t care if Starmer stays or goes.

Can we please just concentrate on getting the economy back on track, tackling inflation and interest rates and looking after the vulnerable.

You know, like important stuff.

These don't get much traction on forums like this because it's a longer-term problem with few developments a day. We can keep complaining about it but the story doesn't move on so weeks can go back with everyone discussing how bad inflation/cost of living is.

Mick 10-05-2022 22:17

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36121830)
There isn't any chance of anyone in Europe taking the UK seriously again. We're an irrelevance.

Tell that utter nonsense to Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, who rates the UK quite highly, how much is the corrupt EU still paying to Russia for its gas?

Go look it up. :zzz:

Mick 10-05-2022 22:48

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
BREAKING: Beergate sees Labour poll lead plummet to 1 point lead.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1652219231

Hugh 10-05-2022 23:13

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Worked, then…

OLD BOY 10-05-2022 23:38

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36121913)
He's always been a bit like that, I think.

There's a difference between changing jobs and dying in shady circumstances like a Russian oligarch.

Meanwhile, two interesting points have come to light over the video of Starmer:

1. The entrance to the Miner's hall is 100 yards past the front gates, so video taker Ivo Delingpole was not just passing by a window as claimed.
https://twitter.com/cirian75/status/1523740121895702528

2. It was taken by Ivo Delingpole, the son of Breitbart, Telegraph and Spectator writer James Delingpole. When the video of circulated last April, he tweeted about it without mentioning that his son had filmed it.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...o-sink-starmer

---------- Post added at 20:09 ---------- Previous post was at 20:00 ----------

Wonder why you didn't point this possibly out to to posters who said that Starmer lied? Do you think Starmer is more honest than Johnson?

I thought I had, actually! Both were most probably of the view that they were not breaking the rules. But Starmer lied about Legs Rayner not being present, he said it was a ‘spontaneous’ decision to have a curry when in fact it had been pre-planned and he told us that food was not available at his hotel.

There may be more to come out about Boris, of course, but for now we only know for certain that he has received a fine for receiving a cake between meetings.

Starmer was not between meetings - it was a party after work.

I know who I think is more guilty - at least so far.

Hugh 11-05-2022 00:16

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
"Legs Rayner"

Thank you, Benny Hill…

Note you never say "multiple adulterer serial liar Johnson*"

*difference being all those are true, rather than being made up by the Daily Mail…

tweetiepooh 11-05-2022 09:10

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
If Boris resigns or is pushed Labour will be clamouring for a general election (as opposition tends to when leader of ruling party changes) so, in one sense, they don't mind if Keir is fined and resigns and "forces" a change in PM.


I agree with Pierre that the whole things is media fodder, it generates lots of interest and comment but really is inconsequential compared to other matters that all our politicians should be focusing on.

Damien 11-05-2022 09:20

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36121944)
If Boris resigns or is pushed Labour will be clamouring for a general election (as opposition tends to when leader of ruling party changes) so, in one sense, they don't mind if Keir is fined and resigns and "forces" a change in PM.

I don't think Johnson would be forced into resigning, they'll just accept how it looks.

Labour won't mind because they get a clean slate for the new guy/gal. Starmer has done the hard work in terms of addressing 2019. Corbyn and his allies have been pushed out to the fringes of the party again, the rules have been changed to make it harder for a fringe candidate to win the leadership and a lot of the Momentum lot have left the party.

Starmer has earned enemies internally for this though and still has a bit of baggage from the Corbyn years. Plus although he isn't hated he is pretty bland so it's not a huge loss for them to put another face on the party.

Better that than having a fined Starmer stay in place after he called on Johnson to resign for getting a fine.

papa smurf 11-05-2022 09:38

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Once Starmer is binned will jezza get the labour whip back?

1andrew1 11-05-2022 09:43

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36121949)
Once Starmer is binned will jezza get the labour whip back?

No.

Hugh 11-05-2022 10:48

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
I wonder what Gove put on his cornflakes before his BBC Breakfast interview?


1andrew1 11-05-2022 11:04

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36121974)
I wonder what Gove put on his cornflakes before his BBC Breakfast interview?


That white stuff called sugar.

Hilarious but a distraction - the government did promise an announcement to help with the cost of living in the next few weeks, and seems to be back pedalling.

Damien 11-05-2022 12:43

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
Yes. 'Sugar'.

1andrew1 11-05-2022 13:07

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
:D:D:D

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1652270800

1andrew1 11-05-2022 13:37

Re: Partygate & Beergate discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36121909)
Dan Hodges has gone full "Wibble!"…

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1652207477

Consistently so. :D

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1652272549


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum