![]() |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
But the way these 3 guys are posting I think they offering little constructive to the forum, its more and more like company policy they posting than personal opinion. So for what its worth I think the site wouldnt lose too much, thy have lost themselves defending the superhub and gone too far, I am not the only one who thinks they getting very arrogant and think they should be treated better than the rest of us. What is the point of telling me to ask the CEO for commercial restricted information. I have no issue with staff correcting someone on something genuine to do with the service but the rubbish coming out now to simply hide problems that are occuring and to even prevent people from getting working alternative equipment is sad. We have told them numerous times using time the problems with VM and how this has been handled, instead of a thanks we will do better next time there is much denial of anything wrong, even when the evidence is out here in the open. Of course there was a point to my post in that it seems they were all posting from work in what is supposedbly an unofficial manner.[COLOR="Silver"] |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
---------- Post added at 17:40 ---------- Previous post was at 17:38 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
Do I want kind staff who offer constructive posts sure yes. Does the forum want me? no idea and probably not if they want to be seen as a VM promotion site. These guys have already ran other people off the forum, I know as I have pm's in my inbox from those people telling me why they left. What would this site be if the only people left were the VM staff talking to each other saying how perfect the service is. ---------- Post added at 17:46 ---------- Previous post was at 17:42 ---------- Quote:
Now you may still think whatever they have posted is fine, and my post for whatever reason you deem fit is uncalled for thats your right however that was a result of baiting me to email the CEO office himself, if I did masque's request by nature of the email I would have had to refer to this site anyway. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Sorry Ben, I meant "VM are not using bonded upstreams yet" as I can clearly see four bonded downstreams in the VMNG300 web GUI. My mistake, sorry!
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Enough of the arguing, insults and other off topic nonsense.
Any more and this thread will be closed, and further action taken. Grow up, all of you. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
(Just read the last few pages, skimmed anyway. Wow, all hell really broke lose here. Jesus. It's only broadband, isn't it? We should be using it to do things more constructive. Only a decade ago almost no-one had it...)
No mention of R27 being released over on the VM beta tester forum yet; maybe someone could post back here when it's out as I don't check the other forum more than twice a month. I'd like to give it a whirl but I have a feeling I won't be able to switch off the VMNG300. :D |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
Now back on topic please everyone |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
Im not in the habit of repeating myself. This thread has now seen three suspensions. Unless you wish to join the suspension list ... BEHAVE. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
R27 was actually rolled out yesterday, I read the message a day late so as such missed it and probably wont get it till monday now so about to plug my vmng300 back in until then. I realised was saturday so rechecked the date of the message :(
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Rolled out to beta-testers or anyone?
|
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
a VM staff member stated on here that calls relating to setup since the hub have decreased. I have it on good Authority by 2 members of staff one that works in the Swansea support office and also someone that works in the CEO office that since the hub calls for wireless support have increased and so have complaints about its poor wireless performance over the DLink and Netgear WNR2000 and also Complaints about the hub itself performing very poorly. Some of us experienced problems with the VMNG300 when released due to firmware issues but in my opinion a lot more are experiencing problems now since the VMNG300 was only on one tier of service where the Superhub is on 4 being 20mb, 30mb, 50mb and 100mb. |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
I've gave up with the superhub, I'm not prepared to put a 4th one in. So now i'm a VMNG300 with a d-link 615 and my internet is phenominal. Ive put up with it since november and i forgot how good gaming etc is with the old setup. Wife is no longer moaining that she has to go downstairs to rebbot the box.
I cant understand why virgin dont run both devices like they normally do (ambit, SA2100) (samsung 2110, pace 4000) (samsung v+, sa v+) |
Re: Superhub Firmware Beta Test
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum