Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   WMD threat deliberately misrepresented (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=6079)

downquark1 10-01-2004 21:55

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yesman
It looks like they have found something,




Here is the full story, maybe Blair and Bush will eventually get off the hook ?

At risk of sounding biased I highly doubt this counts as Mass destruction. And they certainly were not able to launch in 45 minutes. Although it's the best find so far, IMO this on it own would not have justified the war.

Ramrod 10-01-2004 22:00

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1
At risk of sounding biased I highly doubt this counts as Mass destruction. And they certainly were not able to launch in 45 minutes. Although it's the best find so far, IMO this on it own would not have justified the war.

Interesting though...

dr wadd 10-01-2004 22:22

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
I assume that one of the important questions is whether these are still viable weapons. Having been buried in the desert for 10 years there is the possibility that the active components will have broken down over time. I suspect that a lot of the flag waving, when it happens, will depend on that.

Xaccers 10-01-2004 22:41

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Of course there is the posibility that he managed to move them over to Syria.

Hick 11-01-2004 01:11

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Whether the WMD's were deliberately represented doesn't really bother me. The outcome, that is the removal of a brutal repressive dictator, is what concerns me. I believe that the outcome justifies the war even if we went in under false pretenses. According to most news sources the Iraqi people on the whole were happy with the removal of Saddam and the ruling party and I wish them good luck in the future and I'm sure we'll give them some of the help that they need to rebuild. Now lets move on :)

Graham 11-01-2004 13:33

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hick
The outcome, that is the removal of a brutal repressive dictator, is what concerns me. I believe that the outcome justifies the war even if we went in under false pretenses. [...]Now lets move on :)

Now let's move on and invade any and every other country that has "brutal and repressive dictators" (well, apart from ones like Saudi Arabia because they're our allies) and make the world safe for truth, justice and mom's apple pie...

(Here we go again... :rolleyes: )

Xaccers 11-01-2004 13:36

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Graham
Now let's move on and invade any and every other country that has "brutal and repressive dictators" (well, apart from ones like Saudi Arabia because they're our allies) and make the world safe for truth, justice and mom's apple pie...

(Here we go again... :rolleyes: )

Or we could try diplomatic pressure first hoping they'll change their ways and try and make things better for their country, whilst acknowledging that this isn't an overnight job and will take many years, just like what's going on with Saudi :D

Diplomatic channels must be tried first (like they were with iraq for the 12 years leading up to the ousting of saddam)

Graham 11-01-2004 18:17

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Xaccers
Diplomatic channels must be tried first (like they were with iraq for the 12 years leading up to the ousting of saddam)

Sorry, how long has the current situation in Saudi been going on? Or China? Or Myanmar? Or the Sudan? Or...

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/032800-01.htm

Ramrod 14-01-2004 16:46

Re: WMD threat deliberately misrepresented
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...20Word&wvx-300
What is wrong with these people? Saddam said he had no weapons, he let inspectors in they found nothing. Why can't they admit the mistake/lie?

Thats not exactly how I remember it. He was very obstructive as far as the weapons inspectors were concerned.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum