![]() |
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
newshosting does look impressive I like how you can force a route using the port number and I imagine they better because they cost a bit more then the rest.
|
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
Quote:
|
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
Quote:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have just tried all the ports that newshosting allows and it's full speed on all of them. I can honestly state that we are not throttling the ports on newsgroups. Quote:
|
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
Beware, newshosts will bull**** and blame everyone else till the cows come home just to not dent their reputation, its always the ISP's problem with them.
|
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
Quote:
Looks as if there are a few potential causes on the table...but then at least they look like they're trying to get the bottom of it. Quote:
Not that I am suggesting that this is happening in this case...but there are always two sides to every story...and that thread linked above is quite interesting. Not that it really affects me, I don't even use ntl's newsgroups anymore let along a third parties (since I died of terminal impatience waiting for 2k of text to download several years ago).:) |
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
I've done some testing tonight:
NTL 10Mbit: newshosting.com - takes 3 connections to max 10mbit eu giganews.com - takes 1 connection to max 10mbit newscene.com - takes, I estimate, 5+ connections to max 10mbit easynews.com - cannot get it to go above 3mbit with any number of connections Bulldog with speed of ~6Mbit: easynews.com - takes 2 connections to max out the ~6mbit I didn't bother testing the other three Easynews and NTL are definitely having issues together. |
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
It is probably a peering issue possibly a saturated peering port from ntl.
If you test giganews during peak hours whatch the speed crumble that will be because the amsterdam congestion. |
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
weird thing just happened to me - alt.binaries.clonezone was there, I started grabbing a file and then the whole group disappeared (no such group error). Refresh of the group list showed it had disappeared completely. Using powerusenet which is a reseller of giganews. Weird.
|
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
ok to try and settle this easynews issue I did a trace on their site to me and got this
HOST LOSS RCVD SENT BEST AVG WORST ge1-8-1000m.sw1.easynews.com 0% 10 10 0.42 12.17 35.60 e-2-31-1000m.core-03.phx1.puregig.net 0% 10 10 0.30 2.64 22.10 ge3-3-0.jr1.phx1.llnw.net 0% 10 10 0.78 5.71 18.39 agg1-6-1.ar1.phx1.llnw.net 0% 10 10 1.41 5.57 31.84 so1-5-1.ar1.dal.llnw.net 0% 10 10 28.62 43.93 85.36 so1-5-2.ar1.ord.llnw.net 0% 10 10 52.81 56.69 83.51 so1-5-2.ar1.lga.llnw.net 0% 10 10 74.58 80.28 108.37 so1-5-1.ar1.lon.llnw.net 0% 10 10 148.15 152.16 174.35 ag1-21.fr1.lon.llnw.net 0% 10 10 147.44 151.44 175.00 195.66.224.25 60% 4 10 281.77 292.43 302.11 bre-bb-b-as0-0.inet.ntl.com 0% 10 10 142.88 163.85 208.13 ren-bb-a-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com 0% 10 10 153.07 158.69 199.07 lee-bb-b-so-600-0.inet.ntl.com 20% 8 10 152.68 160.44 193.24 lee-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com 20% 8 10 152.66 157.32 179.98 leic-t2core-a-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com 0% 10 10 154.80 155.82 161.02 leic-t2cam1-a-ge-wan32.inet.ntl.com 0% 10 10 154.83 165.49 206.07 leic-leic-ubr-8-ge01.inet.ntl.com 0% 10 10 152.56 153.25 156.30 ??? 100% 0 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 the hop 195.66.224.25 and leeds hops have packetloss but 195.66.224.25 does look suspicously high, dnsstuff reports the owner as LINX. Now look at the 1st hop you will see it has an average of 12ms and worst of 35ms, this hop is internal to easynews and that is very high latency for a LAN so I reckon easynews have some internal problems to sort out and the blame for this one doesnt seem to lie with ntl. |
Re: Are Ntl restricting Usenet access?
to bulldog.co.uk
ge1-8-1000m.sw1.easynews.com 0% 10 10 0.36 5.49 44.94 e-2-11-1000m.core-03.phx1.puregig.net 0% 10 10 0.31 0.42 0.59 ge3-3-0.jr1.phx1.llnw.net 0% 10 10 0.81 1.85 10.30 agg1-6-1.ar1.phx1.llnw.net 0% 10 10 1.37 5.54 21.72 so1-5-1.ar1.dal.llnw.net 0% 10 10 28.51 29.74 32.66 so1-5-2.ar1.ord.llnw.net 0% 10 10 53.01 54.22 60.05 so1-5-2.ar1.lga.llnw.net 0% 10 10 74.60 78.59 98.77 so1-5-1.ar1.ams.llnw.net 0% 10 10 151.42 152.06 154.27 ag1-21.fr1.ams.llnw.net 0% 10 10 150.64 153.61 165.66 de-cix1.schlund.net 0% 10 10 154.59 155.41 156.18 pos-50.gw-backbone-b.bad.schlund.net 0% 10 10 157.08 161.09 191.94 a0kac1.gw-dista-a.bs.ka.schlund.net 0% 10 10 157.07 162.39 181.33 gw-ps6.bs.ka.schlund.net 10% 9 10 158.13 167.84 198.68 212.227.127.109 10% 9 10 157.38 158.29 158.84 it doesnt go over that dodgy LINX hop but this isnt accurate for a bulldog dsl user since bulldog are hosting externally in germany O_o. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 19:17. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum